Infrastructure Engineering - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 11
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The Reform of Statutory Regulations Relating to The Surveying Profession
    Ristevski, JA ; Williamson, IP (Informa UK Limited, 2001-06)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The role of land administration in the accession of Central European countries to the European Union
    Bogaerts, T ; Williamson, IP ; Fendel, EM (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2002-01)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Stochastic modelling of GPS phase observations for improved quality estimation
    Brown, N ; Kealy, A ; Williamson, I (Informa UK Limited, 2002-01-01)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The role of institutional mechanisms in spatial data infrastructure development that supports decision-making
    Feeney, MEF ; Williamson, IP ; Bishop, ID (Australian Institute of Cartographers, 2002-01-01)
    Improved economic, social and environmental decision-making are principal objectives for investing in the development of Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) at all political and administrative levels. Indeed, Resolution 7 of the recent 5th Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI) conference in Cartagena, Colombia (GSDI, 2001) argued that the purpose of the GSDI is to improve the availability, accessibility, and applicability of spatial information for decision-making. While accepting the development of institutional mechanisms to support decision-making by promoting the availability and accessibility of spatial information as part of SDI institutional frameworks, many institutional mechanisms fall short of addressing the application of spatial data to decision-making. From an institutional perspective, the motivation for SDI implementation is the impracticality of a single organisation producing and maintaining the wide variety of data and models needed to inform many decisions, resulting in a need for sharing of data and a range of analytical and display tools. This is being seen particularly in the natural resource, environment and government sectors in Australia. These sectors are utilising institutional mechanisms to support spatial decision-making processes in a number of different ways including the development of community resource centres, departmental development of decision support tools, as well as the development of atlases, spatial data directories and on-line land information services. In Australia these institutional mechanisms are playing a crucial role in providing the building blocks for the institutional framework of SDIs and address different levels of the decision-making process. This paper looks at how availability and accessibility of spatial data are being achieved by reviewing examples from each of the institutional mechanisms mentioned. The variety of decision-making levels supported by these different initiatives is reviewed in terms of decision process theory. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the approaches to developing institutional support for decision-making as part of SDI development, as well as a consideration of directions for SDI development in the future to support spatial decision-making processes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The cultural aspects of sharing and dynamic partnerships within an SDI hierarchy
    Rajabifard, A ; Feeney, ME ; Williamson, IP (Informa UK Limited, 2002-01-01)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The need to provide for boundary adjustments in a registered title land system
    Park*, MM ; Williamson, IP (Informa UK Limited, 2003-06)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The Development of a Cadastral Template
    STEUDLER, DM ; WILLIAMSON, IP ; RAJABIFARD, A ( 2003)
  • Item
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Regional SDI Development
    RAJABIFARD, A ; WILLIAMSON, I ( 2004)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Opportunities for surveyors in modern land markets
    WILLIAMSON, IP (Office of the Association of British Columbia Land Surveyors, 2005)
    A large component of the activities of the land surveyor, land registries and land information systems is concerned with building and maintaining a land administration infrastructure where one of its primary tasks is to support the operation of an efficient and effective land market. This includes cadastral surveys to identify and subdivide land, land registry systems to support simple land trading (buying, selling, mortgaging and leasing land) and land information systems to facilitate access to the relevant related information. It is assumed that all these land administration activities will support the operation of a land market. But what is a land market? Are our current land administration systems designed to support a modern land market which includes complex commodities such as mortgage backed certificates, water rights, land information, time shares, unit and property trusts, financial instruments, insurance products, options, corporate development instruments and vertical villages? A land market is a complex and dynamic range of activities, processes and opportunities. It is a concept that is continually evolving, primarily in response to sustainable development objectives (economic, environmental and social dimensions), although it is also being facilitated by information and communications technologies. This paper argues that modern land markets offer many business opportunities for land surveyors. It is important that cadastral survey practices, land registries and land information systems keep pace with, and preferably lead, these land market developments. This paper discusses the evolution of land administration systems and the land markets they support. It introduces the vision for a modern land administration system that supports not only simple land trading but also the trading in complex commodities. It describes the challenges facing surveyors if they are to capitalise on their spatial, measurement and land management skills and apply them to the opportunities presented by the growth of complex land markets.