Mechanical Engineering - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The Effect of Wall Normal Actuation on a Turbulent Boundary Layer
    Schlanderer, SC ; Hutchins, N ; Sandberg, RD (SPRINGER, 2017-12)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Machine-Learnt Turbulence Closures for Low-Pressure Turbines With Unsteady Inflow Conditions
    Akolekar, HD ; Sandberg, RD ; Hutchins, N ; Michelassi, V ; Laskowski, G (ASME, 2019-10)
    Abstract The design of low-pressure turbines (LPTs) must account for the losses generated by the unsteady interaction with the upstream blade row. The estimation of such unsteady wake-induced losses requires the accurate prediction of the incoming wake dynamics and decay. Existing linear turbulence closures (stress–strain relationships), however, do not offer an accurate prediction of the wake mixing. Therefore, machine-learnt, nonlinear turbulence closures (models) have been developed for LPT flows with unsteady inflow conditions using a zonal-based model development approach, with an aim to enhance the wake mixing prediction for unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes calculations. High-fidelity time-averaged and phase-lock averaged data at a realistic isentropic Reynolds number and two reduced frequencies, i.e., with discrete incoming wakes and with wake “fogging,” have been used as reference data for a machine learning algorithm based on gene expression programing to develop models. Models developed via phase-lock averaged data were able to capture the effect of certain prominent physical phenomena in LPTs such as wake–wake interactions, whereas models based on the time-averaged data could not. Correlations with the flow physics lead to a set of models that can effectively enhance the wake mixing prediction across the entire LPT domain for both cases. Based on a newly developed error metric, the developed models have reduced the a priori error over the Boussinesq approximation on average by 45%. This study thus aids blade designers in selecting the appropriate nonlinear closures capable of mimicking the physical mechanisms responsible for loss generation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Development and Use of Machine-Learnt Algebraic Reynolds Stress Models for Enhanced Prediction of Wake Mixing in Low-Pressure Turbines
    Akolekar, HD ; Weatheritt, J ; Hutchins, N ; Sandberg, RD ; Laskowski, G ; Michelassi, V (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2019-04-01)
    Nonlinear turbulence closures were developed that improve the prediction accuracy of wake mixing in low-pressure turbine (LPT) flows. First, Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) calculations using five linear turbulence closures were performed for the T106A LPT profile at isentropic exit Reynolds numbers 60,000 and 100,000. None of these RANS models were able to accurately reproduce wake loss profiles, a crucial parameter in LPT design, from direct numerical simulation (DNS) reference data. However, the recently proposed kv2¯ω transition model was found to produce the best agreement with DNS data in terms of blade loading and boundary layer behavior and thus was selected as baseline model for turbulence closure development. Analysis of the DNS data revealed that the linear stress–strain coupling constitutes one of the main model form errors. Hence, a gene-expression programming (GEP) based machine-learning technique was applied to the high-fidelity DNS data to train nonlinear explicit algebraic Reynolds stress models (EARSM), using different training regions. The trained models were first assessed in an a priori sense (without running any RANS calculations) and showed much improved alignment of the trained models in the region of training. Additional RANS calculations were then performed using the trained models. Importantly, to assess their robustness, the trained models were tested both on the cases they were trained for and on testing, i.e., previously not seen, cases with different flow features. The developed models improved prediction of the Reynolds stress, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) production, wake-loss profiles, and wake maturity, across all cases.