Management and Marketing - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14
-
ItemMetaphor, Myth, and Theory Building: Communication Studies Meets the Linguistic Turn in Sociology, Anthropology, and Philosophy(SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2010-08-01)
-
ItemThe fox and the hedgehog go to work - A natural history of workplace collusion(SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2008-02-01)The author argues that an ironic approach to collusion can help shift the focus of resistance away from the relatively rare events surrounding implacable opposition or total unanimity to the quotidian aspects of workplace politics. Collusion is characterized as an outcome of organizational politics conducted between the traditionally opposed parties of radical industrial sociology (i.e., managers and workers) under the guidance of an ironic mode of cognition. Irony is depicted as a foxlike way of gaining “a perspective on perspectives,” which provides a means of understanding stalemate, accommodation, and collusion by showing how opposing ideological positions are indebted. It also illuminates the moments when collusion breaks down and resisting parties become implacably opposed hedgehogs (one position prevails over the other), leading to overt conflict and resistance.
-
Item
-
ItemDoing what comes naturally? Why we need a practical ethics of teamwork(ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2005-02-01)
-
ItemNeither Good nor Bad but Dangerous: Surveillance as an Ethical Paradox(Open University Press, 2007)
-
ItemThe labour process, surveillance, and the person in the sight of the organization(SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009-01-01)
-
Item
-
ItemNice work? Rethinking managerial control in an era of knowledge work(SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2005-09-01)This article assesses the ability of labour process theory (LPT) to account for the persistence of managerial control under the apparent conditions of greater autonomy and discretion we have come to associate with ‘knowledge Work’. LPT has traditionally problematized control around the need to resolve ‘the indeterminacy of labour’—that is, how do managers ensure that workers’ actual labouring efforts approach their potential labour power? In contrast, I propose that it is more useful to problematize control around the ‘indeterminacy of knowledge’—that is, how do managers ensure that workers’ cognitive efforts approach their full cognitive potential? A common response to the problem of the indeterminacy of knowledge has been to cede discretion to workers so that they can exercise their mental capabilities in order to provide their organizations with solutions to workplace problems. I will show, however, that this still requires the operation of disciplinary mechanisms that perpetuate managerial control under conditions that ostensibly reverse the separation of the conception and the execution of work tasks inherent in the logic of Taylorism.
-
ItemCoercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance(ACAD MANAGEMENT, 2006-10-01)
-
Item