University General - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 16
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Australian health policy on access to medical care for refugees and asylum seekers.
    Correa-Velez, I ; Gifford, SM ; Bice, SJ (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2005-10-09)
    Since the tightening of Australian policy for protection visa applicants began in the 1990s, access to health care has been increasingly restricted to asylum seekers on a range of different visa types. This paper summarises those legislative changes and discusses their implications for health policy relating to refugees and asylum seekers in Australia. Of particular concern are asylum seekers on Bridging Visas with no work rights and no access to Medicare. The paper examines several key questions: What is the current state of play, in terms of health screening and medical care policies, for asylum seekers and refugees? Relatedly, how has current policy changed from that of the past? How does Australia compare with other countries in relation to health policy for asylum seekers and refugees? These questions are addressed with the aim of providing a clear description of the current situation concerning Australian health policy on access to medical care for asylum seekers and refugees. Issues concerning lack of access to appropriate health care and related services are raised, ethical and practical issues are explored, and current policy gaps are investigated.
  • Item
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment
    Ovseiko, PV ; Greenhalgh, T ; Adam, P ; Grant, J ; Hinrichs-Krapels, S ; Graham, KE ; Valentine, PA ; Sued, O ; Boukhris, OF ; Al Olaqi, NM ; Al Rahbi, IS ; Dowd, A-M ; Bice, S ; Heiden, TL ; Fischer, MD ; Dopson, S ; Norton, R ; Pollitt, A ; Wooding, S ; Balling, GV ; Jakobsen, U ; Kuhlmann, E ; Klinge, I ; Pololi, LH ; Jagsi, R ; Smith, HL ; Etzkowitz, H ; Nielsen, MW ; Carrion, C ; Solans-Domesnech, M ; Vizcaino, E ; Naing, L ; Cheok, QHN ; Eckelmann, B ; Simuyemba, MC ; Msiska, T ; Declich, G ; Edmunds, LD ; Kiparoglou, V ; Buchan, AMJ ; Williamson, C ; Lord, GM ; Channon, KM ; Surender, R ; Buchan, AM (BMC, 2016-07-19)
    Global investment in biomedical research has grown significantly over the last decades, reaching approximately a quarter of a trillion US dollars in 2010. However, not all of this investment is distributed evenly by gender. It follows, arguably, that scarce research resources may not be optimally invested (by either not supporting the best science or by failing to investigate topics that benefit women and men equitably). Women across the world tend to be significantly underrepresented in research both as researchers and research participants, receive less research funding, and appear less frequently than men as authors on research publications. There is also some evidence that women are relatively disadvantaged as the beneficiaries of research, in terms of its health, societal and economic impacts. Historical gender biases may have created a path dependency that means that the research system and the impacts of research are biased towards male researchers and male beneficiaries, making it inherently difficult (though not impossible) to eliminate gender bias. In this commentary, we - a group of scholars and practitioners from Africa, America, Asia and Europe - argue that gender-sensitive research impact assessment could become a force for good in moving science policy and practice towards gender equity. Research impact assessment is the multidisciplinary field of scientific inquiry that examines the research process to maximise scientific, societal and economic returns on investment in research. It encompasses many theoretical and methodological approaches that can be used to investigate gender bias and recommend actions for change to maximise research impact. We offer a set of recommendations to research funders, research institutions and research evaluators who conduct impact assessment on how to include and strengthen analysis of gender equity in research impact assessment and issue a global call for action.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Defining Asia Capabilities for Australia's Public Service
    Bice, S ; Merriam, A (WILEY, 2016-09)
    Twenty‐three years ago, questions posed in this journal asked whether and how the Australian public service was prepared to engage effectively in Asia. More recent meta‐analyses of public policy scholarship suggest that Western policy scholars and administrators continue to pay limited attention to Asian policymaking, despite the rise of Asia in the 21st century. This article contributes a research‐derived Asia capabilities framework for Australia's public service, distilled from a qualitative study with public administration leaders at Commonwealth, state, and local government levels. It taps scholarly literature in ‘cultural intelligence’, global leadership competencies, and training to provide a robust conceptual underpinning for the framework. The framework defines the knowledge, skills, capabilities, and experiences vital for Australia's public service to engage effectively with the region in a rapidly changing policy environment.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Responsible Mining Key principles for industry integrity Prologue
    Bice, S (ROUTLEDGE, 2016)
    This book shows how the concept of responsible mining is based on five key principles or pillars: holistic assessment; ethical relationships; community-based agreements; appropriate boundaries and good governance.
  • Item
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Resourcing the Asian Century: Mining and Developing Asian Nations
    BICE, SJ ; Hameiri, S (Murdoch University, 2013)
  • Item
  • Item
  • Item