School of Social and Political Sciences - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemThe new politics of old ideas: A comparative study of welfare state reform in Sweden and the United States( 2017)This study seeks to explain why governments engage in welfare state reform, despite apparent risks, and why they sometimes do so contrary to policy regime type. In so doing, it advances our understanding of the role played by ideas in welfare reform. The study argues that persistent policy problems, described as functional pressure, provide opportunities for ideationally motivated leaders to engage in reform. This pressure allows for the return of previously dormant, non- viable or unsuccessful ideas as alternatives to the status quo. Drawing upon literature on institutions, policy change and decision theory, a distinctive account of reform is developed and then tested through the close analysis of four case studies, from two distinctive welfare systems: Sweden and the United States. In health care, it compares the development of the US Affordable Care Act (popularly known as “Obamacare”), with Sweden’s 2009 vårdval (patient choice) reform in primary care. For pensions, the cases are Sweden’s replacement of its national pension scheme, completed in 1998 and the similar, but failed effort to partly privatise Social Security, led by President Bush in 2005. Ideas are found to play important roles in delegitimising the status quo and providing persuasive links between problem and solution, especially under conditions of uncertainty. However, the causal effects of ideas are mediated by material and perceived institutional and policy constraints. These constraints necessitate bricolage, the piecing together and reframing of existing solutions to fit the political and policy circumstances, as well as learning from previous failures. The analysis of the case studies suggests that in the long-term, innovation through bricolage may spur unexpected bouts of reform. The study therefore challenges the dominant view of the welfare state as highly change resistant. It appears that policy problems will continue to provide opportunities for reform-minded actors to implement long-held ideas, especially if they are able to engage successfully in strategic learning. Although developed welfare states are unlikely to move radically away from established regime types in one fell swoop, this study makes clear that there is significant room for continued evolution and hybridisation, even in “exceptional” welfare states.
-
ItemExamining the link between democracy and inclusive economic growth in Southeast Asia( 2017)Embedded in all our assumptions and hopes for democracy is the belief that a democratic system will make life better, economically and socially, for its citizens. Given this almost universal assumption it is surprising how little we really know about the impact of democratisation upon the welfare of citizens and the variables linking the two. This thesis investigates the impact of democracy on Inclusive Economic Growth, and mainly questioning: “Does democracy matter in the delivery of larger and more effective social policies that improve inclusive economic growth? ”The four cases selected to empirically analyse the relationship among the three variables (democracy, social policy, and inclusive economic growth) are Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. The finding is social policy is one of the potential variables linking the two; especially when the development of democratic institution run stably and the vast majority of the people support it. In other words, social policy becomes an important variable to test the link between democracy and inclusive economic growth.