School of Historical and Philosophical Studies - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The orphic liar: the quarrel between poetry and philosophy
    Lawrence, Desmonda ( 2017)
    Though Plato claimed the quarrel between poetry and philosophy was already ancient, his exile of poets in from the republic marks an important foundational gesture for philosophy. This thesis suggests the quarrel is foundational in at least some of philosophy's prevailing modes of practice; and seeks to characterise the nature of the quarrel, and to consider what is at stake in philosophical practice where the exclusionary gesture is maintained. Chapters on Plato's Republic, Aristotle's Poetics and Kant's Critique of Judgement consider three sites in the history of philosophy where its relationship with poetry has been constitutive. The later chapters, on the work of Cora Diamond and Raimond Gaita, consider some implications of philosophy’s exile of poetry for its current modes of practice and suggest possibilities for reflective spaces philosophy might inhabit that are not dictated to it by the terms of the quarrel.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Philosophical reflections on the pedagogy of the art museum: toward an experiential practice
    Gray, Pamela Clelland ( 2017)
    This thesis investigates discourse and practice that has informed the pedagogy of the public art museum. The broad context for the thesis is recent museological research and institutional strategies that emphasise the subjective and collective agency of audience. Contemporary scholarly reflection on museums gives attention to the active agency of audiences in the process of knowledge production, thus reflecting concern for a social relationship between things and people. Focussing on education programming for adult audiences this thesis brings into question the efficacy of traditional pedagogical practice in the contemporary art museum. It argues that programming underpinned by ideas of expert art historical knowledge no longer hold authority over how contemporary museum audiences view or interpret works of art. Examination of the epistemological foundation of museum pedagogy is critical to redistribute knowledge and practice in order to augment the potentialities of the art museum’s educational impact and import. Education can no longer be thought of on the model of a straightforward transfer of information from one who knows to many who do not, but conceived in a more emancipatory and transformative way. The confluence of art and education in the museum cannot be about art alone. Beyond knowledge about art lies the possibility of knowing oneself, in solitude, and in community with others, through art. Museum pedagogy requires a broader disciplinary base in order to trace the relations between viewing works of art in the museum and the life-world of visitors. The thesis is premised on an understanding of art as a unique form of knowledge that exceeds its historical framing. Art asks or wants something of us as beholders, it insists in the performative and sensual dynamics involved in making and engaging with the world. It therefore implicates the agency of the viewer; potentially prompting prolonged engagement and speculation. Combining historical analysis with philosophical investigation the thesis establishes germane theoretical ground for an emergent pedagogic praxis that recognises human agency in learning and the importance of aesthetics. It is not within the scope of the thesis to present a method or pedagogic model; a single model does not serve the cause of museum education. The thesis is an interdisciplinary study weighted toward philosophical reflections that orient toward an experientially nuanced pedagogy. The research method draws on the philosophical thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer, John Dewey, Jacques Rancière and Immanuel Kant whose work in different, but significant ways provide orienting ideals and principles toward the articulation of an emancipatory hermeneutic pedagogy.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The morality of rhetoric in Pico della Mirandola's Oration
    Smith, Jenny ( 2004-10)
    Rhetoric and philosophy enjoyed a somewhat awkward relationship in late fifteenth century Italy. Pico’s work shows both the skill and love of eloquence, and the scorn for rhetoric as mere artifice and deceit, which were common in his milieu. Historians have puzzled over this ambivalent view of rhetoric, especially as it appears in Pico’s correspondence with Ermolao Barbaro in 1485, eighteen months before the Oration. Quirinus Breen argues that in the letters Pico was railing not against rhetoric per se but against its abuse. While I concur with Breen’s analysis, the link between Pico’s attitude in the letters and in the Oration has not yet been satisfactorily examined. This thesis attempts to clarify the link between the letters’ use of rhetoric and that of the Oration. I will argue that the ‘paradoxical’ attitude to rhetoric and philosophy in the letters led Pico to construct a theory in the Oration that allowed rhetoric to serve moral ends. This approach continues to be fruitful to debates on the value of rhetoric in modern society. As the title of this thesis suggests, my primary focus is not to analyse ‘the rhetoric of morality’ but the ‘morality of rhetoric’ in the Oration, that is, how Pico negotiated his ambivalence toward rhetoric. This thesis has three parts. First I intend to trace the development of the ambivalence toward rhetoric as art and as artifice in the Quattrocento, and outline the direction in which Pico was beginning to negotiate it in the letter to Barbaro. Second, I want to analyse how Pico addressed philosophy and rhetoric in the Oration. Third, I suggest how Pico’s rhetoric in the Oration relates to the development of humanist rhetorical debates, Renaissance historiography, and to contemporary debates around language in the public sphere.