School of Historical and Philosophical Studies - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The private face of patronage: the Howitts, artistic and intellectual philanthropists in early Melbourne Society
    Clemente, Caroline ( 2005)
    This thesis investigates a case of upper-middle class, private patronage in Melbourne, focusing on three decades between 1840 and 1870. Evidence points to the existence of a lively circle of intellectual and artistic activity around the Quaker family of Dr Godfrey Howitt and his wife, Phebe, from the Midlands who arrived at the Port Phillip District in 1840. The presentation of a group of fine, rare colonial water-colours and drawings to the National Gallery of Victoria by a direct Howitt descendant, Mrs James Evans in 1989, was the point of inspiration for this subject. Godfrey Howitt, one of the first experienced medical practitioners in the colony, had much in common with the Superintendent of Port Phillip. Their friendship gave the Howitts entrée into the uppermost social circles of the colony. Financially, the family prospered due to Howitt's professional practice which insulated them against economic downturns and provided a steady accumulation of wealth. While as a Quaker, Phebe Howitt had little background in the fine arts, she began to exercise patronage in support of her artist friends, most of who arrived with the gold rush in 1852. With it came Godfrey Howitt's elder brother, William, a famous English author. In London in 1850, William and Mary Howitt's daughter, the feminist painter and writer, Anna Mary, had become engaged to Edward La Trobe Bateman. A brilliant designer and cousin of Superintendent La Trobe, Bateman introduced the young, still struggling Pre-Raphaelite artists with whom he was closely associated, to the English Howitts. Arriving in Melbourne in 1852, William was followed shortly afterwards by Bateman and two artists, including the Pre-Raphaelite sculptor, Thomas Woolner. The gold rush also attracted Eugene von Guérard, and Nicholas Chevalier in due course. In 1856, as a guest of the Howitts' on her first Victorian visit, Louisa Anne Meredith, writer, botanical artist and social commentator, was introduced to their artistic and literary circle. The Howitts' friendship with these artists thus took on a very different hue from the normal patterns of patronage. Beyond commissioning works of art from artists returning empty handed from the gold fields, Phebe Howitt supported them in other ways until suffering a catastrophic stroke towards the end of 1856. During that period, the founding of the new Victorian colony's cultural institutions became a source of official artistic commissions for the first time. Through friends in influential positions like Justice Redmond Barry and Godfrey Howitt, Bateman was employed in various design projects for new public buildings and gardens. With the purchase of Barragunda at Cape Schanck in 1860, Godfrey Howitt assumed a central role as patron. In making the house available to Bateman and his artist friends, he and his daughter, Edith Mary, repeated the unusual degree of patronage formerly exercised by Phebe Howitt before her illness. By 1869, Woolner, Bateman and Chevalier had departed the colony and from 1870, von Guérard was taken up with the National Gallery of Victoria. Although succeeding generations of the family maintained contact with all the artists in their circle, by Godfrey Howitt's death in 1873, the prime years of Howitt patronage had passed.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Exhibiting visual culture: narrative, perception and the new museum
    Message, Kylie Rachel ( 2002)
    This thesis maps a recent emergence or shift in museological discourse. It focuses on the moment where the discourses of narrative, cinema, and museums come together visibly and publically in relation to the built environment which hosts them, and the experience they offer. In Australia, this moment may be identified as emerging in 1995 with the Museum of Sydney, reaching a critical mass in 1998 with the developmental plans for the Melbourne Museum, Federation Square, and National Museum of Australia, and reaching its most satisfactory and effective manifestation in 2001, with the opening of the National Museum of Australia. This thesis considers these (and other) museum projects to look at how and why this emergence or shift came about. It is interested more in the processes of development than with the respective outcomes, which it may as yet be too early to evaluate fully. As such, this thesis evaluates the production and reception of recently developed museums that embody this shift. It is concerned with the ways that these developments present themselves rhetorically, architecturally and through their exhibitions, and with the type of experience that they aim to offer visitors. They tend to represent this experience as unique, immersive, and postmodern, and the thesis argues that these museums share a similarity based on their cross-disciplinary approach to self-representation, and other key factors. Because of this, the thesis presents a close exploration of these signifiers of ‘newness’, asking why these are privileged by the contemporary museum, and looking to see whether this trope of newness itself has a historical chronology, or a predecessor in earlier museums. It also looks at how the effect of newness is conceptualized, designed, and produced. The thesis contends that the ‘new’ museum presents itself as being a primarily interdisciplinary institution that is concerned with replicating and developing connections across disciplinary fields, rather than according to an historical chronology. However, despite this denial of historical relationships, the ‘new’ museum’s attention to a conceptual and thematic acuity can itself be historicized. Although the museum is not produced according to concerns for historical or traditional accuracy, the cross-disciplinary focus that it champions as an innovative signifier of its ‘newness’ itself has roots in earlier examples of museums and other cultural experiences (that include reading and cinema-going). As such, the primary historical allegiance that is shared by the cross-disciplinary impulse, and by the museums which champion this, is with early modernity. Characteristics associated with the new technologies and experiences of modernity (from cinema and other technologies, to the Crystal Palace, to new modes of writing and narrative form) are all valued by ‘new’ twenty first century museum projects, and many of the technologies and approaches to textuality that they also present. Locating the origins of cross-disciplinarity at the moment of an emergent modernity, the thesis deconstructs the concepts, specifically privileged by the ‘new’ museums, in order to look at the ways that these concepts also engage with each other, and to consider how and why they have been incorporated into these museum projects at all. In order to do this, the thesis is divided into three sections, ‘Narrative’, ‘Cinema’, and ‘Museums’, with each Part providing a discussion of each discipline in isolation. Part Three, ‘Museums’, looks at ways in which recent museum projects have attempted to combine these discrete areas, and it also contends that the appropriation efforts have varying degrees of success in this activity. (Part abstract)