Melbourne Law School - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5
-
Item
-
ItemThe impact of Australia's refugee status determination system on its implementation of its refugee convention obligation on non-refoulement( 1994)Under article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugee Convention), Australia has a non-refoulement obligation in respect of `refugees'. This thesis examines whether Australia is violating article 33 of the Refugee Convention by failing to identify the `refugees' amongst its on-shore refugee status claimants. In the absence of a safe third country prepared to receive them, Australia has no choice but to allow persons identified as `refugees' to remain in its territory. The problem is that the Australian Government has goals for the nation it serves and the political party it represents which it believes will be jeopardised to the extent that it is unable to choose which aliens get to reside in Australia and which do not. In consequence, the Australian Government bas a negative attitude towards on-shore refugee status clat. Inimants. This negative attitude has transmitted itself to the officers of the Department of Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (DIEA) who are responsible for making refugee status determinations at the primary stage. DIEA decision makers tend to be overly restrictive in their interpretation and application of key elements of the Refugee Convention definition of `refugee'. On the other hand, the courts and the Refugee Review Tribunal (R.R.T.) - institutions which do not have the political agenda of the Australian Government - have come close to interpreting and applying the Refugee Convention definition of `refugee' in line with international standards. The problem is that not all refugee status claimants can afford to pursue R.R.T. and/or judicial review. This leaves open the possibility that Australia is risking breach of article 33 of the Refugee Convention by repatriating persons who are refugees but have not been identified as such. In order for Australia to avoid breaching article 33, its domestic legal and administrative regime considered as a whole must attain a standard of reasonable efficacy in the implementation of that article. In order for Australia to be assured of attaining a standard of reasonable efficacy, Australia's on-shore refugee status determination process must be designed to meet certain minimum procedural standards. These minimum procedural standards are: the use of an inquisitorial determination system; the maintenance of an independent documentation and research centre; the elimination of factors which could lead to incorrect adverse credibility assessments; the provision to claimants of all information available to the decision-maker; the use of independent, impartial, specialised, full-time, career decision-makers who are carefully selected and adequately trained; adequate access to legal assistance by claimants; the provision of an opportunity to be heard in person and by the decision-maker; the processing of claims without undue delay and adequate rights of review. Australia's refugee status determination system falls short of meeting these minimum procedural standards in some significant respects. It is conceivable that a State's other humanitarian protection measures may sufficiently compensate for an inadequate refugee status determination process by serving as a safety net for Refugee Convention refugees who are not identified by the refugee status determination process. Australia's humanitarian protection mechanisms, however, are not an adequate safety net for such persons.
-
ItemFusion development between law and equity( 1994)This thesis attempts to present a structured definition of the concept of fusion in a modern legal environment. It examines the forces and influences which have encouraged and shaped fusion developments and goes on to consider the manifestations of actual and potential fusions occurring in a variety of different legal and equitable doctrines. The recognition and acceptance of fusion does not necessarily signify the automatic destruction of all jurisdictional distinctions between law and equity and it is hoped that a systematic analysis of what fusion refers to and how it is evidenced within our legal infrastructure will allay this fear. Fusion is literally defined as a close union of things. The intimacy of this union is variable; it can range from a complete blending of two separate objects to a close interaction between those objects. When considering fusion in the context of the growing intimacy between the common law and equity jurisdiction, the same principles apply. There are different measures of fusion which are continually occurring between legal and equitable doctrines and not all fusion involves a complete meltdown of jurisdictional distinctions. Some fusion simply encourages a change in attitude or approach to a principle. This sort of fusion is an interactive rather than a merging fusion because it influences related doctrines instead of subsuming them. Some of the main jurisdictional difficulties encountered within a modern Judicature system are increasingly being addressed through fusion developments. Common concerns experienced by the courts include the perpetuation of doctrinal and discretionary inconsistencies between law and equity which are outdated and unnecessary and the artificial imposition of jurisdictional constraints in the application of remedy. Fusion can offer a rationalised, interactive alternative to strict jurisdictional segregation thereby providing a viable method for the resolution of these concerns. The difficulty in implementing fusion stems, however, from a lack of understanding about the nature of consequences of the concept. If fusion is constantly perceived to be an absolute merger rather than a discrete integrating process then inevitably any reference to fusion will be considered radical and unjustified. (From Introduction)
-
ItemThe new Philippine mineral regime: an opportunity for investment?( 1994)A ring of fire encircles the Pacific Basin, an unstable region of earthquakes, faulting and intense volcanic activity. It stretches from the tip of South America, up through the Andes, across the Aleutians, down through Japan and the Philippines to the tip of New Zealand. To the countries in the region, this geological volatility is both a misfortune and a blessing. It was a misfortune, indeed, to the local people who lived around the slopes of the Mt. Pinatubo volcano in the Philippines when it erupted in 1991. Their homes and farms were buried under metres of volcanic ash and it will be many years before they can return to the area to live. Yet when viewed from a broader perspective this geological instability has been a real boon to the Philippines, not merely because of the substantial export industry it has generated in souvenirs made out of volcanic ash, but because it is this same instability which has made the region fertile and resource rich. Over millions of years the tremendous pressures from within the earth have forced hot, mineral rich fluids up through faults created by earthquakes and faulting in the sub-surface rock. In that rock the minerals have cooled and concentrated to become mineral deposits, lying hidden underground until erosion reveals their presence to the human eye. Many of the world's major mineral deposits have been discovered in this region, such as the spectacular Hishikari deposit in Southern Japan, Erstberg in Indonesia and Bougainville in Papua New Guinea. The impact that this mineral endowment has had on the economic development of some of the countries in the region has been enormous. In PNG, for example, minerals make up more than 80% of the country's export income and generate revenue of over Aus$350 Million per annum. In Australia, they make up around 40% of export income, generating revenue of around Aus$30 Billion per annum. The significance of such revenue flows, particularly to developing countries, can not be underestimated. However a country's high geological potential will remain just that, unrealised potential, unless the country has access to sufficient funds to explore for new mineral deposits and to develop them when they are found. Few developing countries have sufficient domestic capital available to fund mineral development and for this reason many countries have in recent years been competing to attract foreign investment to assist in the development of their mineral industries. Vietnam, Laos, India, Peru, Argentina, Chile and others have all been taking steps to promote foreign investment by removing impediments to foreign investment, reducing government take and offering investment incentives. At the same time, Australian mining companies have been increasingly looking overseas for investment opportunities. Australian mining companies, in particular, have been seeking to place a greater percentage of their exploration/development budgets offshore in order to minimise their exposure to Australian sovereign risk, engendered by Australian Government decisions such as Coronation Hill, world heritage listings and more recently the Mabo legislation.
-
ItemThe court and the factory the legal construction of occupational health and safety offences in Victoria( 1994)This thesis reports on an empirically based study of the manner in which Victorian Magistrates Courts constructed occupational health and safety (OHS) issues when hearing prosecutions for offences under the Industrial Safety, Health and Welfare Act 1981 (the ISHWA) and the Occupational Health and Safety Act 1985 (OHSA) from 1983 to 1991. These statutes established OHS standards for employers and other relevant parties. The State government enforced these standards through an OHS inspectorate which had a range of enforcement powers, including prosecution. After outlining the historical development of Victoria’s OHS legislation, the magistracy’s historical role in its enforcement, and the development of an enforcement culture in which inspectors viewed prosecution as a last resort, the study shows how the key provisions of the ISHWA and OHSA required occupiers of workplaces and employers to provide and maintain safe systems of work, including the guarding of dangerous machinery. Using a wide range of empirical research methods and legal materials, it shows how the enforcement policies, procedures and practices of the inspectorate heavily slanted inspectors workplace investigations and hence prosecutions towards a restricted and often superficial, analysis of incidents (or “events”) most of which involved injuries on machinery. There was evidence, however, that after the establishment of the Central Investigation Unit in 1989 cases were more thoroughly investigated and prosecuted. From 1990 the majority of prosecutions were taken under the employer’s general duty provisions, and by 1991 there was evidence that prosecutions were focusing on matters other than machinery guarding.