Melbourne Law School - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 4 of 4
-
ItemThe interrelationship of private international law principles and international corporate insolvency( 2002)The search for the appropriate manner to conduct cross border insolvency administrations has continued for many years and taken many forms. Clearly these administrations involve assets, rights and creditors dispersed among jurisdictions with nations having no unilateral authority to administer aspects of the insolvency not located in their jurisdiction. My thesis initially outlines and reviews this search for the manner in which these administrations should be conducted explaining the theoretical approaches proposed as to the manner in which these administrations should be conducted and isolates the theory reflected in these current proposals. The conclusion drawn from this review is that generally a universalist approach is preferred, being a stance of co-operation with foreign administrations. This thesis tests this 'co-operative approach' by way of the international instruments proposed, the characterisation process presently utilised in determining the law governing rights/assets involved in these administrations and the trends evident in the most recent developments in this area i.e. the writings of the theorists, recent domestic legislative enactments and international solutions proposed. The Australian approach is accorded particular focus in this examination to both ascertain the approach it adopts and the solution it would be disposed to in any international solution. This examination reveals that despite all the work undertaken in this search for the appropriate manner in which to conduct these administrations, in reality despite an ostensibly universalist stance predominance is accorded to the protection of domestic and other commercial interests over any real co-operation being achieved. This thesis argues once insolvency intervenes it is appropriate for all rights to be determined in an insolvency context and details the factors making such characterisation appropriate. The final chapter of this thesis discusses how the present situation can move on to a more international solution. Building on the commonalities evident in the international instruments proposed, this thesis proposes the appropriate manner to conduct these administrations. This thesis then determines the manner in which this international solution should be implemented and discusses why in Australia's case the CA is not the appropriate vehicle to utilise for same.
-
ItemLiability of the university in negligence( 2001)The liability of a university for the negligent instruction of students has traditionally been limited by the reluctance of the courts to intervene in internal matters, and particularly in purely academic matters, and the availability of other mechanisms for dispute resolution, notably the jurisdiction of the visitor. This thesis considers these traditional constraints and argues that the changing environment in which the university functions requires a change in approach to the analysis of the liability of universities for negligent instruction. It considers the university systems in Australia and the United Kingdom and, to a lesser extent, the United States, and argues that increasing governmental involvement in the university system could give the university the status of a quasi-governmental organisation. The level of governmental control invites a negligence analysis appropriate to a public body, but that analysis is not likely to lead to significant differences in the outcome. This thesis details the approaches in Australia and the United Kingdom in the analysis of liability of governmental organisations. It then undertakes an analysis of potential liability in negligence. Considerations peculiar to the university context arise at each stage of a negligence analysis, and this thesis analyses the effect of these matters. However, the number of alternative dispute resolution procedures available to the student are likely to divert actions in negligence to other types of proceeding. There is a significant impact on the negligence analysis through administrative remedies, the jurisdiction of the visitor, and statutory protections afforded to the consumer.
-
ItemEmployment protection of casual employees( 2003)Summary of Argument: This paper aims to make a contribution to the literature by examining the employment protection of workers characterised by the Australian Bureau of Statistics as casual employees (' ABS casual employees'). In undertaking this examination, this paper seeks to compare the employment protection of ABS casual employees with that available to other employees. The examination commences by discussing the key approaches that courts and industrial tribunals have taken in determining whether a worker is a casual employee under a particular industrial instrument. It then analyses the employment protection of ABS casual employees in the following areas: • protection against unfair dismissal; • entitlement to notice at common law and statute; and • protection in the event of redundancies. It concludes that the employment protection of ABS casual employees is generally inferior to that available to other employees with a sub-group of such employees, namely, those engaged pursuant to a series of distinct contracts enjoying even more slender employment protection.
-
ItemTowards a binding international human rights regime for transnational corporations( 2003)Since its elaboration in the aftermath of the Second World War, international human rights law has remained primarily concerned with the relationship between the State and the individual; in particular, the obligations that the State owes to individuals (and peoples) and the legal rights that each individual may claim ‘by virtue of being a human being’. Under international human rights law, the State is primarily responsible for upholding and implementing the full diversity of human rights. At the national level, the State is required, as part of its international duties, to ensure that private entities within its jurisdiction do not violate the rights that the State is obligated to protect. Where private entities do violate those human rights, the State has a duty to make available means of redress for victims who have had their rights transgressed. Individuals are therefore entitled to make claims at the national level against those private entities that violate their rights. Where the State fails to protect human rights, including by failing to provide means of redress for private entity violation, it is said to be in breach of its international duties. The rights and duties just outlined constitute the ‘classical approach’ to international human rights law, whereby only the State is obligated to respect, ensure and protect the human rights of individuals. This approach to international human rights law contemplates that the State has international duties that require it to impose obligations on private entities not to violate human rights. Thus the obligations of private entities are derived from international law, but are not imposed directly by international law. (From Introduction)