Melbourne Law School - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/383

Filters

2006 1
1
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Start date: 1984 × Subject: Victoria × Subject: Australia × Author: Murphy, Ann Elaine ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Effective public participation in major projects
    Murphy, Ann Elaine ( 2006)
    The thesis explores ways to make public participation processes for major projects more effective. Reviews and analysis of public participation theories and practices are provided, with particular attention to legislative requirements and judicial findings in Victoria, Australia. The questionnaire and interview findings from participants in the two Victorian case studies - the Advisory Committee for the Melbourne 2006 Commonwealth Games Village and Coode Island Community Consultative Committee -- provide first hand accounts of participants' experiences with these processes. Their responses are studied in composite to further understand `the public' as well as the participant groups making up the public to understand their views. The analysis suggests that public participation processes in Victoria need to be improved. While some guidance on conducting public participation is provided by the Victorian government and other levels of government, much of this does not directly address issues of power imbalances, politics and other practical considerations. The research findings reveal a groundswell of dissatisfaction with public participation in major projects. While case study participants strongly supported the principles of public participation they were disappointed with its reality. Significant differences between participant groups related to their evaluations of the effectiveness of these processes, their awareness of public participation legal requirements, their preference for strengthening these requirements and the appropriate levels and methods for engaging the public. Participant groups with higher levels of influence provided more positive evaluations of these processes and were less interested in strengthening their legislative requirements and appeal rights than those with the least influence. This dissertation makes several valuable contributions to town planning and legal research. The research provides valuable information on how laws work in their social and economic contexts. It provides a rich and comprehensive understanding of where public participation in major projects is failing and how it can be improved in a manner that meets the needs and abilities of a diverse public. This dissertation springs from empirical research which, though widely used in social science research, is not widely utilised in legal research. Such cross-evaluation can be especially useful for international legal research given that differences in legal systems limit the extent to which findings can he compared. This study's research methods and data can be used by subsequent researchers to test their validity and reliability. The research critically examines the applicability of an international convention to public participation in major projects. It is suggested that the three pillars of the Aarhus Convention should be viewed as progressive layers creating a pyramid of participation. The Effective Major Project Public Participation Model advocates providing basic legal requirements that focus on providing good information, followed by appropriate participation and access to independent review, while recognising the need for participant goodwill and voluntary guidelines. This model is supported by a framework, detailing key participation steps and considerations along with a matrix of preferable participation options for major projects.