Melbourne Law School - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/383

Filters

2008 1
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Type: Coursework thesis × Start date: 2000 × End date: 2008 × Author: Irving, James N ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Security and liberty : Australia's counter-terrorism laws and freedom of expression
    Irving, James N ( 2008)
    The legal subject areas covered by this thesis are international human rights law, Australian constitutional law and Australian federal criminal law. The thesis examines four selected provisions of the Commonwealth Criminal Code against the standards set by art 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (`ICCPR') to determine whether they breach Australia's international obligations to protect the right to freedom of expression. The four provisions are selected on the basis that they are identified as counter-terrorism laws that clearly affect the right to freedom of expression as defined in international law, and were controversial when they were enacted. The provisions are analysed carefully to identify their impact on freedom of expression. Article 19 is selected as the standard for the measurement of the effects on freedom of expression by the provisions because the ICCPR is the most prominent human rights covenant that Australia is a party to. The ICCPR has not, however, been fully implemented at federal level in Australia as yet. In particular, art 19 has not been expressly implemented at all. The result is that that Australia's compliance with art 19 is haphazard and dependent upon Australia's domestic laws (the Constitution and statutory mechanisms)confining the restriction of the right to freedom of expression within the boundary permitted by art 19(3), which sets out a limited basis for the governmental restriction of the freedom. Accordingly, the protection's for human rights established by Australian domestic law, particularly the implied constitutional freedom of expression on political and governmental matters, are examined to see whether they restrain the provisions from infringing article 19. The thesis concludes that all of the four provisions do breach article 19, notwithstanding the operation of these domestic legal protections, for identified reasons. The thesis suggests amendments to the provisions to avoid this effect, as well as general law reform measures that would strengthen the protection of all human rights in Australia, including freedom of expression.