Melbourne Law School - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemOccupation, resistance & the law: Was armed resistance to the occupation of Iraq justified under international Law?( 2009)The 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq triggered a plethora of legal questions. This study focuses upon two: Was Iraqi resistance to the invasion and occupation justified under the laws of war? If so, by whom and for how long? ('The research questions') These are questions that the UN Security Council deliberately avoided when it responded to the intervention. Given that most States and commentators regarded the intervention as a violation of the UN Charter, the legality of armed resistance to the invasion and occupation warrants analysis. The present study examines, inter alia, whether Iraq was justified in using force against Coalition forces in the exercise of rights under the jus ad hellum. It considers whether self-defence and self determination provided a juridical foundation for armed resistance to the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. Attention is also paid to the jus in hello. Issues addressed include: the nature of the conflict(s) during the occupation; whether members of various resistance forces qualified as combatants; and the issue of compliance with the jus in hello during resistance operations. In order to address these matters with precision, the occupation of Iraq is considered in several stages: 1. The immediate aftermath of the ouster of the Ba'ath regime (April-May 2003); 2. Post-UNSCR 1483; 3. Post-UNSCR 1511; and 4. Post-UNSCR 1546 (and pre-28 June 2004). The fourth stage highlights a matter of fundamental importance to this study the end point of the occupation. The position adopted here is that the occupation was terminated, with UNSC approval, upon the transfer of power to an Iraqi government on 28 June 2004. Thereafter, armed resistance could not have been justified under the right of national self-defence, as this right is exercisable by governments, not insurgent forces. While it may be argued that military occupation continued, as a matter of fact, beyond the transfer of power, this writer's view is that, as a matter of law, the occupation was terminated on 28 June 2004, in accordance with UNSCR 1546. Discussion of 'the legality of resistance to occupation' is thus confined to the period between the collapse of the Ba'ath regime in April 2003 and the transfer of power on 28 June 2004. In addressing the research questions, a range of contemporary legal issues are highlighted. They include: 1. Unresolved tensions within the laws of war over the precise parameters of 'lawful resistance' to foreign occupation; 2. Overlap and convergence of the jus in hello and the }us ad hellum in the context of armed resistance to occupation. (The clearest example is the right of peoples to fight for self determination against alien occupation which falls within both branches of the laws of war); 3. Whether the right of self-defence may be overridden by the UNSC; 4. Whether UNSC resolutions depend for their validity upon their conformity with jus cogens norms; and 5. Whether armed resistance to UN-authorized forces is, by its nature, a breach of the UN Charter and therefore an unlawful use of force.
-
ItemReforming Australia's anti-discrimination legislation: individual complaints, the equality commission and tackling discrimination( 2009)Australian courts hear very few discrimination complaints each year. Most complaints are resolved prior to hearing, in the privacy of conciliation. The hypothesis of this thesis is that the law is not operating as intended and there is a shortage of decisions because complainants are disinclined to use the formal legal system to resolve their complaint. Commentators have identified problems with both the substantive law and its interpretation, the problems related to proving discrimination and the lack of support available to complainants. This thesis considers the extent to which these problems are a factor in the high rate of settlement of complaints based on interviews of staff at the Victorian Equal 0pPoliunity and Human Rights Commission, lawyers and non-legal advocates practicing in discrimination law in Victoria, and a survey of complainants and respondents who have participated in conciliation. This is supported by an analysis of court decisions and complaint statistics. This research revealed that most complainants settle to avoid the time and energy required to pursue the complaint, the cost of litigating or the risk that if they are successful and awarded compensation, it may not cover their legal fees. It also identified problems with the resolution process, particularly the facilitative nature of conciliation and that there is little publicly available information about settlement outcomes. Furthermore, the research revealed that although complainants may initially seek wider remedies, most complaints are resolved with compensation and an analysis of substantive decisions showed that the tribunal most often orders compensation in Victoria. Drawing on mechanisms used overseas, this thesis proposes a strengthened model of individual enforcement. Under this model, complainants have direct access to a specialist 'equality' tribunal and can choose 'rights-based' conciliation or adjudication using less formal and less adversarial hearing procedures. In addition to remedying the complainant's experience, the tribunal is required to make an order targeting discrimination more broadly. The second part of this proposal is to introduce a statutory 'questionnaire procedure' to assist complainants with obtaining information relevant to their complaint and, for those who proceed to litigation, shifting the burden of proof to the respondent once the complainant has established prima facie discrimination. As a result of the proposed changes to the individual enforcement process, the equality commission would not be responsible for resolving complaints. The thesis proposes to add another enforcement 'tier' - enabling the equality commission to assist complainants with resolving the complaint. The thesis argues that the equality commission should use its assistance function strategically to develop the law and to obtain outcomes which benefit a group. Finally, the thesis argues that addressing discrimination with an individual complaints based process is limited because it is reactive and passive. The thesis concludes by presenting an overview of positive duties in the United Kingdom and shows how they attempt to overcome the limits of the individual complaints based approach in tackling discrimination.