Melbourne Law School - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemThe interrelationship of private international law principles and international corporate insolvency( 2002)The search for the appropriate manner to conduct cross border insolvency administrations has continued for many years and taken many forms. Clearly these administrations involve assets, rights and creditors dispersed among jurisdictions with nations having no unilateral authority to administer aspects of the insolvency not located in their jurisdiction. My thesis initially outlines and reviews this search for the manner in which these administrations should be conducted explaining the theoretical approaches proposed as to the manner in which these administrations should be conducted and isolates the theory reflected in these current proposals. The conclusion drawn from this review is that generally a universalist approach is preferred, being a stance of co-operation with foreign administrations. This thesis tests this 'co-operative approach' by way of the international instruments proposed, the characterisation process presently utilised in determining the law governing rights/assets involved in these administrations and the trends evident in the most recent developments in this area i.e. the writings of the theorists, recent domestic legislative enactments and international solutions proposed. The Australian approach is accorded particular focus in this examination to both ascertain the approach it adopts and the solution it would be disposed to in any international solution. This examination reveals that despite all the work undertaken in this search for the appropriate manner in which to conduct these administrations, in reality despite an ostensibly universalist stance predominance is accorded to the protection of domestic and other commercial interests over any real co-operation being achieved. This thesis argues once insolvency intervenes it is appropriate for all rights to be determined in an insolvency context and details the factors making such characterisation appropriate. The final chapter of this thesis discusses how the present situation can move on to a more international solution. Building on the commonalities evident in the international instruments proposed, this thesis proposes the appropriate manner to conduct these administrations. This thesis then determines the manner in which this international solution should be implemented and discusses why in Australia's case the CA is not the appropriate vehicle to utilise for same.
-
ItemAustralian water law: an historical and analytical background( 1971)The thesis traces the history of governmental intervention in Australian water management. At the State level, it examines traditional common law doctrines, their inadequacies to meet Australian demands, and the tensions between private rights and public control inherent in the Australian system of administrative rights to water. It argues for clearer recognition of the role of private law actions in such a system. At the national level it documents the history of the conflicts which have shaped the administration of inter-State rivers as a background to the integrated enquiries of other research students.
-
ItemDefamation and the internet( 1999)The Internet is a unique and revolutionary medium of communication. The objective of this dissertation is to identify whether there are areas in which reform of the rules of Australian civil defamation law needs to be undertaken to meet the challenges posed by this new medium and, if so, to advocate desirable reforms. The methodology by which the dissertation sets out to achieve its objective is a systematic analysis of how the defamation cause of action, defences and remedies, as well as relevant jurisdiction and choice of law rules, apply, or are likely to apply, to material published via the Internet. It is possible to distil five features of communication via the Internet which are of relevance to the operation of the rules of civil defamation law: - Internet communications do not respect geographical boundaries: they involve the transfer of signals from computers in indeterminate locations, to other computers in indeterminate locations, via routes which are indeterminate; - intermediaries, in the form of Internet service providers and network operators, play a central role in all Internet communications; - material published via the Internet can be republished to a wide and geographically diverse audience more easily than material published via other means; - material on the Internet is organised through the use of hyperlinks which blur the distinction between where one publication ends and the next begins; - the Internet can be used in a wide variety of ways, to resemble almost any other medium, including the telephone, the postal service, radio, television, newspapers or libraries. Once the way in which the Internet works and is used is understood, it is possible to predict how most of the rules of defamation law would apply to material published via the Internet. The outcome of the research undertaken in this dissertation is that most of those rules are capable of being applied without the need for reform. In other areas, however, the existing rules give rise to uncertainty, or undesirable outcomes, when applied to Internet publications. In those areas, reform is desirable. Ultimately, four areas of reform of the existing rules of defamation law are identified, and desirable reforms suggested: 1 Reform to clarify whether different types of Internet publication are libel or slander. 2 Reform to ensure that intermediaries of Internet publications are only liable for civil defamation where their conduct is sufficiently culpable to warrant the attribution of liability. 3 Expansion of the remedies available in civil defamation law to provide successful plaintiffs with more effective means of vindicating their reputations where they have been damaged by defamatory Internet publications. 4 Reform of the choice of law rules applicable to intra-Australian publications, by adoption of a rule that substantive rights and liabilities are determined by applying solely the law of the place (or places) of publication, regardless of the place in which proceedings are brought and determined.