Melbourne Law School - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemOvercoming legal impediments to a comprehensive legislative basis for war crimes trials in Australia(University of Melbourne, 2010)There are persistent allegations of war criminals from various conflicts that have occurred since the end of the Second World War residing in Australia. This raises difficult moral, legal and political questions for Australian authorities about how to deal with such allegations. War crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide are deemed to be the most serious crimes of concern to the international community and are now reflected in established international criminal law designed to bring individual perpetrators of such crimes to justice. However, Australia's record of domestically enforcing crimes found under international law is mostly non-existent. The practice of successive Australian Governments in dealing with war crimes reflects a piecemeal approach, whereby legislation has been enacted to give effect to various international treaties dealing with different types of war crimes. But, this legislation has either proven inadequate or has remained unused. Where war crimes trials have been initiated, they have ultimately proved to be ineffective. The thesis will challenge the existing state of affairs in Australia by firstly presenting a philosophical basis justifying the prosecution of individuals accused of committing international crimes in domestic Australian criminal courts and secondly, establishing that it is possible to overcome potential legal impediments to a comprehensive legislative basis for war crimes trials in Australia. The thesis proceeds on the basis that there is no justification for excusing war criminals from prosecution. The strong moral impact on society that the perpetration of war crimes has should ultimately be reflected in domestic legislation that provides for the prosecution and punishment of those committing such crimes in Australian courts. Indeed, there is a moral imperative that justice is done on behalf of victims and Australian society; and that the perpetrators are held accountable for their actions. The thesis employs an empirical analysis of existing Australian war crimes legislation and jurisprudence and then extends and relates that discussion to the possible conduct of future war crimes trials. A comparative analysis of domestic and international law is undertaken throughout the thesis that will demonstrate the legal capacity for establishing a systematic framework to facilitate prosecutions in Australia. This includes adopting a proper jurisdictional basis for war crimes trials; the enactment and operation of retrospective war crimes legislation; and challenges to the conduct of war crimes trials in Australian domestic criminal courts, such as appropriate judicial methodology in hearing and deciding such cases and whether a fair war crimes trial is possible. In demonstrating how the various perceived legal impediments and challenges can be overcome, the thesis also provides a broad blueprint for designing future Australian war crimes legislation. Ultimately, the contribution of the thesis will be to provide a validation for a comprehensive legislative basis for war crimes trials in Australia, particularly for the period between the end of the Second World War and the beginning of legislation giving effect to the provisions of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. At the same time, the thesis will recognise that political reality in Australia suggests that enacting such legislation is far from inevitable. The political unwillingness and reluctance by successive Australian Governments to investigate and prosecute alleged war criminals living in Australia is instructive. But as the thesis will argue, there is strong moral and legal justification for enacting new war crimes legislation in order to conduct war crimes trials and in doing so, it will announce that there is no safe haven for war criminals in Australia.
-
ItemInternational extradition between Indonesia and Australia( 2018)Indonesia and Australia have not found extradition easy, despite the bilateral extradition treaty in force between them since 1992. This thesis is concerned with international crime cooperation in the extradition of fugitive offenders between Indonesia and Australia, but it also intended to augment the body of research on international cooperation in the enforcement and suppression of transnational and domestic crimes. It aims to find the answer to why there are still problems in extradition cooperation between Indonesia and Australia despite the presence of a legal framework for cooperation, and to identify ways in which these problems might be resolved. I argue that the problems in legal cooperation in extradition between Indonesia and Australia are the result of a complex mixture of factors that include social, political and legal aspects. The solution cannot be simply instrumental. Focusing solely on legislative change will not suffice unless it is also supported by other non-regulatory schemes, including, among other: developing a bilateral consultation framework between Indonesia and Australia with a view to creating a platform to address the differences peculiar to each legal system; and assigning a Liaison Officer for International Crime Cooperation at the Embassy of each country.
-
ItemRegulation of executive remuneration: an empirical study of the first three years of a 'disclosure and voting' regime in Australia and the UK( 2010)Legislation by the UK government in 2002 and the Australian government in 2004 sought to improve board accountability for executive remuneration practices in listed companies. The thesis examines whether the remuneration report plus an advisory vote were effective in achieving this and other government policy aims (such as reducing excessive remuneration and aligning pay with performance). The thesis focuses upon the initial three years of this regime in the UK (2003-2005) and Australia (2005/06-2007/08). Part I of the thesis reviews three theories of motivation from the human resource management literature, together with two derivatives of agency theory (optimal contract and the managerial power thesis) to justify executive remuneration practices and the need for it to be regulated. Drawing upon the concept of ‘regulatory space’ and Julia Black's writings on rule dimension and regulatory conversation, the thesis presents a conceptual model of the regulatory framework for executive remuneration: the regulated remuneration cycle consisting of four activities (remuneration practice, disclosure, engagement and voting). Close analysis of the rule types, regulators and regulatees within this regulated remuneration cycle demonstrates that most of the rules found in the cycle take the form of statements of best practice, or other kinds of ‘soft law’, rather than legislation. Thus enforcement of good remuneration practices does not rely upon legal sanctions. The enforcement pyramid for remuneration practice confirms that most of the enforcement strategies for remuneration practice belong to shareholders. However, the regulated remuneration cycle exposes the three roles that shareholders play within this regulatory space: a rule-maker for executive remuneration practice, an active engager of remuneration committees and a routine voter on remuneration-related resolutions. Part II presents qualitative and quantitative empirical evidence of the operation of the remuneration report and advisory vote in both jurisdictions. It analyses remuneration reports and voting results for a sample of companies from the FTSE 100 and the S&P/ASX 200 for the first three years. It supplements this publicly available information with interview evidence from remuneration committees and their consultants, institutional investors and institutional representative organisations. By analysing the rules for each of the four activities in light of the evidence of how they work in practice, it demonstrates the challenges facing remuneration committees and institutional investors in working within the regulated remuneration cycle. Using the advisory vote as a proxy for shareholder outrage, it demonstrates the effect that the vote had on remuneration practice over the first three years of its operation was not identical in the UK and Australia. Part III concludes the thesis by presenting six findings on the operation of the regulatory initiatives of the remuneration report and advisory vote. These reforms were only partially successful in improving board accountability and unsuccessful in reducing excessive remuneration over the first three years of its operation. The implications of these findings for the regulatory reforms enacted in response to the global financial crisis are noted.