Melbourne Law School - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6
-
ItemOccupation, resistance & the law: Was armed resistance to the occupation of Iraq justified under international Law?( 2009)The 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq triggered a plethora of legal questions. This study focuses upon two: Was Iraqi resistance to the invasion and occupation justified under the laws of war? If so, by whom and for how long? ('The research questions') These are questions that the UN Security Council deliberately avoided when it responded to the intervention. Given that most States and commentators regarded the intervention as a violation of the UN Charter, the legality of armed resistance to the invasion and occupation warrants analysis. The present study examines, inter alia, whether Iraq was justified in using force against Coalition forces in the exercise of rights under the jus ad hellum. It considers whether self-defence and self determination provided a juridical foundation for armed resistance to the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq. Attention is also paid to the jus in hello. Issues addressed include: the nature of the conflict(s) during the occupation; whether members of various resistance forces qualified as combatants; and the issue of compliance with the jus in hello during resistance operations. In order to address these matters with precision, the occupation of Iraq is considered in several stages: 1. The immediate aftermath of the ouster of the Ba'ath regime (April-May 2003); 2. Post-UNSCR 1483; 3. Post-UNSCR 1511; and 4. Post-UNSCR 1546 (and pre-28 June 2004). The fourth stage highlights a matter of fundamental importance to this study the end point of the occupation. The position adopted here is that the occupation was terminated, with UNSC approval, upon the transfer of power to an Iraqi government on 28 June 2004. Thereafter, armed resistance could not have been justified under the right of national self-defence, as this right is exercisable by governments, not insurgent forces. While it may be argued that military occupation continued, as a matter of fact, beyond the transfer of power, this writer's view is that, as a matter of law, the occupation was terminated on 28 June 2004, in accordance with UNSCR 1546. Discussion of 'the legality of resistance to occupation' is thus confined to the period between the collapse of the Ba'ath regime in April 2003 and the transfer of power on 28 June 2004. In addressing the research questions, a range of contemporary legal issues are highlighted. They include: 1. Unresolved tensions within the laws of war over the precise parameters of 'lawful resistance' to foreign occupation; 2. Overlap and convergence of the jus in hello and the }us ad hellum in the context of armed resistance to occupation. (The clearest example is the right of peoples to fight for self determination against alien occupation which falls within both branches of the laws of war); 3. Whether the right of self-defence may be overridden by the UNSC; 4. Whether UNSC resolutions depend for their validity upon their conformity with jus cogens norms; and 5. Whether armed resistance to UN-authorized forces is, by its nature, a breach of the UN Charter and therefore an unlawful use of force.
-
ItemThe interrelationship of private international law principles and international corporate insolvency( 2002)The search for the appropriate manner to conduct cross border insolvency administrations has continued for many years and taken many forms. Clearly these administrations involve assets, rights and creditors dispersed among jurisdictions with nations having no unilateral authority to administer aspects of the insolvency not located in their jurisdiction. My thesis initially outlines and reviews this search for the manner in which these administrations should be conducted explaining the theoretical approaches proposed as to the manner in which these administrations should be conducted and isolates the theory reflected in these current proposals. The conclusion drawn from this review is that generally a universalist approach is preferred, being a stance of co-operation with foreign administrations. This thesis tests this 'co-operative approach' by way of the international instruments proposed, the characterisation process presently utilised in determining the law governing rights/assets involved in these administrations and the trends evident in the most recent developments in this area i.e. the writings of the theorists, recent domestic legislative enactments and international solutions proposed. The Australian approach is accorded particular focus in this examination to both ascertain the approach it adopts and the solution it would be disposed to in any international solution. This examination reveals that despite all the work undertaken in this search for the appropriate manner in which to conduct these administrations, in reality despite an ostensibly universalist stance predominance is accorded to the protection of domestic and other commercial interests over any real co-operation being achieved. This thesis argues once insolvency intervenes it is appropriate for all rights to be determined in an insolvency context and details the factors making such characterisation appropriate. The final chapter of this thesis discusses how the present situation can move on to a more international solution. Building on the commonalities evident in the international instruments proposed, this thesis proposes the appropriate manner to conduct these administrations. This thesis then determines the manner in which this international solution should be implemented and discusses why in Australia's case the CA is not the appropriate vehicle to utilise for same.
-
ItemReforming Australia's anti-discrimination legislation: individual complaints, the equality commission and tackling discrimination( 2009)Australian courts hear very few discrimination complaints each year. Most complaints are resolved prior to hearing, in the privacy of conciliation. The hypothesis of this thesis is that the law is not operating as intended and there is a shortage of decisions because complainants are disinclined to use the formal legal system to resolve their complaint. Commentators have identified problems with both the substantive law and its interpretation, the problems related to proving discrimination and the lack of support available to complainants. This thesis considers the extent to which these problems are a factor in the high rate of settlement of complaints based on interviews of staff at the Victorian Equal 0pPoliunity and Human Rights Commission, lawyers and non-legal advocates practicing in discrimination law in Victoria, and a survey of complainants and respondents who have participated in conciliation. This is supported by an analysis of court decisions and complaint statistics. This research revealed that most complainants settle to avoid the time and energy required to pursue the complaint, the cost of litigating or the risk that if they are successful and awarded compensation, it may not cover their legal fees. It also identified problems with the resolution process, particularly the facilitative nature of conciliation and that there is little publicly available information about settlement outcomes. Furthermore, the research revealed that although complainants may initially seek wider remedies, most complaints are resolved with compensation and an analysis of substantive decisions showed that the tribunal most often orders compensation in Victoria. Drawing on mechanisms used overseas, this thesis proposes a strengthened model of individual enforcement. Under this model, complainants have direct access to a specialist 'equality' tribunal and can choose 'rights-based' conciliation or adjudication using less formal and less adversarial hearing procedures. In addition to remedying the complainant's experience, the tribunal is required to make an order targeting discrimination more broadly. The second part of this proposal is to introduce a statutory 'questionnaire procedure' to assist complainants with obtaining information relevant to their complaint and, for those who proceed to litigation, shifting the burden of proof to the respondent once the complainant has established prima facie discrimination. As a result of the proposed changes to the individual enforcement process, the equality commission would not be responsible for resolving complaints. The thesis proposes to add another enforcement 'tier' - enabling the equality commission to assist complainants with resolving the complaint. The thesis argues that the equality commission should use its assistance function strategically to develop the law and to obtain outcomes which benefit a group. Finally, the thesis argues that addressing discrimination with an individual complaints based process is limited because it is reactive and passive. The thesis concludes by presenting an overview of positive duties in the United Kingdom and shows how they attempt to overcome the limits of the individual complaints based approach in tackling discrimination.
-
ItemLiability of the university in negligence( 2001)The liability of a university for the negligent instruction of students has traditionally been limited by the reluctance of the courts to intervene in internal matters, and particularly in purely academic matters, and the availability of other mechanisms for dispute resolution, notably the jurisdiction of the visitor. This thesis considers these traditional constraints and argues that the changing environment in which the university functions requires a change in approach to the analysis of the liability of universities for negligent instruction. It considers the university systems in Australia and the United Kingdom and, to a lesser extent, the United States, and argues that increasing governmental involvement in the university system could give the university the status of a quasi-governmental organisation. The level of governmental control invites a negligence analysis appropriate to a public body, but that analysis is not likely to lead to significant differences in the outcome. This thesis details the approaches in Australia and the United Kingdom in the analysis of liability of governmental organisations. It then undertakes an analysis of potential liability in negligence. Considerations peculiar to the university context arise at each stage of a negligence analysis, and this thesis analyses the effect of these matters. However, the number of alternative dispute resolution procedures available to the student are likely to divert actions in negligence to other types of proceeding. There is a significant impact on the negligence analysis through administrative remedies, the jurisdiction of the visitor, and statutory protections afforded to the consumer.
-
ItemEmployment protection of casual employees( 2003)Summary of Argument: This paper aims to make a contribution to the literature by examining the employment protection of workers characterised by the Australian Bureau of Statistics as casual employees (' ABS casual employees'). In undertaking this examination, this paper seeks to compare the employment protection of ABS casual employees with that available to other employees. The examination commences by discussing the key approaches that courts and industrial tribunals have taken in determining whether a worker is a casual employee under a particular industrial instrument. It then analyses the employment protection of ABS casual employees in the following areas: • protection against unfair dismissal; • entitlement to notice at common law and statute; and • protection in the event of redundancies. It concludes that the employment protection of ABS casual employees is generally inferior to that available to other employees with a sub-group of such employees, namely, those engaged pursuant to a series of distinct contracts enjoying even more slender employment protection.
-
ItemTowards a binding international human rights regime for transnational corporations( 2003)Since its elaboration in the aftermath of the Second World War, international human rights law has remained primarily concerned with the relationship between the State and the individual; in particular, the obligations that the State owes to individuals (and peoples) and the legal rights that each individual may claim ‘by virtue of being a human being’. Under international human rights law, the State is primarily responsible for upholding and implementing the full diversity of human rights. At the national level, the State is required, as part of its international duties, to ensure that private entities within its jurisdiction do not violate the rights that the State is obligated to protect. Where private entities do violate those human rights, the State has a duty to make available means of redress for victims who have had their rights transgressed. Individuals are therefore entitled to make claims at the national level against those private entities that violate their rights. Where the State fails to protect human rights, including by failing to provide means of redress for private entity violation, it is said to be in breach of its international duties. The rights and duties just outlined constitute the ‘classical approach’ to international human rights law, whereby only the State is obligated to respect, ensure and protect the human rights of individuals. This approach to international human rights law contemplates that the State has international duties that require it to impose obligations on private entities not to violate human rights. Thus the obligations of private entities are derived from international law, but are not imposed directly by international law. (From Introduction)