Architecture, Building and Planning - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3
-
ItemForgotten game(University of Melbourne, 1999)
-
ItemArchitectural hermeneutics: architecture, meaning and art in everyday life( 1995)This work shows how comprehension of the situation if an individual work of architecture, and of what is expected of the collective mode of architecture in everyday life, could allow us to say (1) what is valuable in architecture, and (2) 'how architecture can have meaning. Moreover, the work demonstrates how a range of dramaturgical, symbol?c and typological approaches can guide architects who want to produce meaningful architectural form. Architecture such as this should enrich the lives of architects and non-architects alike
-
ItemRelating and designing : modelling the human-environment nexus( 1983)Nothing less than a paradigm shift will do. If architecture is to enrich human dwelling, if it is to be consistently practised as both art and science, then it must be profoundly grounded on a knowledge and understanding of the ways in which humans relate to their environments. Architects have rediscovered and reinterpreted this belief over many centuries. For some two decades now many have sought knowledge of their fellow humans from the Behavioural Sciences. There has been considerable inter-disciplinary co-operation, but it has been undertaken without attention to the prevailing disciplinary paradigms. And, while there have been modest successes, an increasing concern has been receiving expression at conferences and in journals: the nature of research disciplines and design disciplines is such that their relationship is dominantly 'producer-user' and the information produced is often of a different character to, or in a form different from, that which the users require. The solution to this dilemma cannot be effected through superficial surface change. A revision and restructuring of the way both discipline-areas conceive of their domains is necessary. Their joint areas of concern provide the most fertile starting point for this endeavour. Nothing less than a paradigm shift will do. This thesis proposes models that could form the core of a revised paradigm. There is no claim made that they are the only models possible or necessary to generate paradigmatic revolution. They are held to be sufficient to the task, however. There are four levels at which the argument is presented within this work. First the title: it names the two major models presented - relating and designing, claims that there is a nexus between humans and environments and that it can be modelled. As a second level of elaboration the following brief summary of the chapters is given to outline the structure of the whole: Chapter 1 considers models and prescribes a model-concept appropriate to the field of human-environment relations and designing. The next three chapters examine humans, environments and relations and, loosely, propose models of each. These can then be employed subsequently. Chapter 5 develops a model of relating, a model of an agent intentionally acting to ensure that his relations to his environment are, he would judge, appropriate. A descriptive model of architectural designing is presented next. In the final chapter these two models are shown to have the same domain and to satisfy the model-concept prescriptions established in Chapter 1. Speculations about the nature and character of researching and designing in the alternative paradigm conclude the thesis. The third level of elaboration is provided by the seven chapter abstracts. Collectively they form the outline below. Each is repeated prior to the relevant chapter to form an argumentative skeleton. The discussions within the chapters form the fourth level of argument. They put flesh on the skeleton.