Architecture, Building and Planning - Theses
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemOccupants’ mood responses to daylight in buildings: a pilot study( 2015)Many studies have been carried out on the effects of daylight on the occupants of a building in order to determine the benefits of exposure to daylight. However, there have been only a few studies conducted on the effects of daylight in Australian conditions. The Australian Glass and Glazing Association (AGGA) has noticed a trend of reduction in glazing area to meet energy efficiency code requirements. The Association is concerned that, apart from commercial reasons, this is done in the absence of a full understanding of the potential impacts, positive or negative, of the occupants’ access to daylight. This project came about as result of the association’s interest. This research firstly investigated the beneficial effects of daylight on building occupants by reviewing existing literature on the subject and then initiated a pilot study on means to effectively measure the occupants’ psychological response to various levels of daylight. The breadth of this pilot study’s methodological approach was intentionally kept wide to aid the exploration of using different ways of conducting or of using a combination of established methods to conduct research of this kind and measuring the test subjects’ responses. This strategy has yielded a number of experimental design refinements which would benefit future studies. This research occurred over only three consecutive Friday afternoons and was conducted in the Sidney Myer Asia Centre and the new Melbourne School of Design building in Parkville campus, Melbourne. Undergraduate students were the test subjects. They self-reported their responses through a survey that was based on Thayer’s Activation and Deactiviation Adjective Checklist (ADACL). The illuminance was logged during the course of the experiment rather than on a ‘snap shot’ record basis, used by most researchers. The advantage of continuous data logging in capturing the dynamic nature of daylight, which could affect the occupants’ psychological responses, was illustrated in this research where an increase of 11,000 lux of outdoor light reading and an accompanying indoor illuminance increase of 670 lux within a short span of 20 minutes was detected. A ‘snap shot’ lux recording approach would have missed this sizable fluctuation and the mood response data would have been cross referenced with a much lower lux value taken at a different time, thus giving an incorrect correlation between light level and mood response. The original sample size of 80 had to be reduced to approximately 65 due to a limited number of lux meters/loggers available. Further subdivision of the group of 65 into 4 cohorts rendered the sub sample size to be statistically insignificant. Although, no conclusive result as to the effects of daylight on the students under different lighting levels could be drawn from this research project. However, valuable ‘lessons learnt’ were gained. It was also observed in the last experiment sessions on 24 October 2014 that students sitting closest to the windows reported a slight improvement in their moods. A different approach was adopted for this last set of experiments after lessons learnt from the previous weeks. Whilst this could not compensate for the inadequate sample size, the refinement has provided insights into how this experiment could be improved. In order to obtain higher quality data from future experiments, a better control of independent variables and maximisation of sample size need to be put in place. Test subject selection (the ‘Convenient Sample’ approach did not work for this experiment), characteristics of test location such as colour, colour temperature, reflectance, acoustic properties, ambient noise, air temperature, humidity should be as consistent as practicable for all experiments. If at all possible a means to control the daylight level so that it could remain reasonably constant would be ideal.
-
ItemPlace attachment: recognizing feelings for places( 1993)Places are part of our everyday lives as the setting for ordinary activities and as the location for significant life experiences. We feel passionate about places which playa special role in our lives because they are evidence of who we are, they can trigger emotional responses and memories of past experiences. They are an important part of our heritage. We are attached to places and fear their loss. Place attachment is a basic phenomenon common to all human beings and experienced every day as an automatic emotional response to the environment. However, current heritage conservation practice does little to account for this emotional connection to place, preferring to address tangible, measurable, countable aspects of heritage which are easier to identify and easier to protect with legislation and regulation. The discrepancy between the value of place as it is experienced in the phenomenon of place attachment and the official value of place recognised in current heritage conservation practice needs to be addressed by more creative methods of place assessment.