School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    ACCESS datasets for CMIP6: methodology and idealised experiments
    Mackallah, C ; Chamberlain, MA ; Law, RM ; Dix, M ; Ziehn, T ; Bi, D ; Bodman, R ; Brown, JR ; Dobrohotoff, P ; Druken, K ; Evans, B ; Harman, IN ; Hayashida, H ; Holmes, R ; Kiss, AE ; Lenton, A ; Liu, Y ; Marsland, S ; Meissner, K ; Menviel, L ; O'Farrell, S ; Rashid, HA ; Ridzwan, S ; Savita, A ; Srbinovsky, J ; Sullivan, A ; Trenham, C ; Vohralik, PF ; Wang, Y-P ; Williams, G ; Woodhouse, MT ; Yeung, N (CSIRO PUBLISHING, 2022)
    The Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) has contributed to the World Climate Research Programme’s Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) using two fully coupled model versions (ACCESS-CM2 and ACCESS-ESM1.5) and two ocean–sea-ice model versions (1° and 0.25° resolution versions of ACCESS-OM2). The fully coupled models differ primarily in the configuration and version of their atmosphere components (including the aerosol scheme), with smaller differences in their sea-ice and land model versions. Additionally, ACCESS-ESM1.5 includes biogeochemistry in the land and ocean components and can be run with an interactive carbon cycle. CMIP6 comprises core experiments and associated thematic Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs). This paper provides an overview of the CMIP6 submission, including the methods used for the preparation of input forcing datasets and the post-processing of model output, along with a comprehensive list of experiments performed, detailing their initialisation, duration, ensemble number and computational cost. A small selection of model output is presented, focusing on idealised experiments and their variants at global scale. Differences in the climate simulation of the two coupled models are highlighted. ACCESS-CM2 produces a larger equilibrium climate sensitivity (4.7°C) than ACCESS-ESM1.5 (3.9°C), likely a result of updated atmospheric parameterisation in recent versions of the atmospheric component of ACCESS-CM2. The idealised experiments run with ACCESS-ESM1.5 show that land and ocean carbon fluxes respond to both changing atmospheric CO2 and to changing temperature. ACCESS data submitted to CMIP6 are available from the Earth System Grid Federation (https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2281 and https://doi.org/10.22033/ESGF/CMIP6.2288). The information provided in this paper should facilitate easier use of these significant datasets by the broader climate community.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The contribution of coral-reef-derived dimethyl sulfide to aerosol burden over the Great Barrier Reef: a modelling study
    Fiddes, SL ; Woodhouse, MT ; Utembe, S ; Schofield, R ; Alexander, SP ; Alroe, J ; Chambers, SD ; Chen, Z ; Cravigan, L ; Dunne, E ; Humphries, RS ; Johnson, G ; Keywood, MD ; Lane, TP ; Miljevic, B ; Omori, Y ; Protat, A ; Ristovski, Z ; Selleck, P ; Swan, HB ; Tanimoto, H ; Ward, JP ; Williams, AG (COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH, 2022-02-22)
    Abstract. Coral reefs have been found to produce the sulfur compound dimethyl sulfide (DMS), a climatically relevant aerosol precursor predominantly associated with phytoplankton. Until recently, the role of coral-reef-derived DMS within the climate system had not been quantified. A study preceding the present work found that DMS produced by corals had negligible long-term climatic forcing at the global–regional scale. However, at sub-daily timescales more typically associated with aerosol and cloud formation, the influence of coral-reef-derived DMS on local aerosol radiative effects remains unquantified. The Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) has been used in this work to study the role of coral-reef-derived DMS at sub-daily timescales for the first time. WRF-Chem was run to coincide with an October 2016 field campaign over the Great Barrier Reef, Queensland, Australia, against which the model was evaluated. After updating and scaling the DMS surface water climatology, the model reproduced DMS and sulfur concentrations well. The inclusion of coral-reef-derived DMS resulted in no significant change in sulfate aerosol mass or total aerosol number. Subsequently, no direct or indirect aerosol effects were detected. The results suggest that the co-location of the Great Barrier Reef with significant anthropogenic aerosol sources along the Queensland coast prevents coral-reef-derived aerosol from having a modulating influence on local aerosol burdens in the current climate.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Coral reef-derived dimethyl sulfide and the climatic impact of the loss of coral reefs
    Fiddes, SL ; Woodhouse, MT ; Lane, TP ; Schofield, R ( 2020-10-27)
    Abstract. Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a naturally occurring aerosol precursor gas which plays an important role in the global sulfur budget, aerosol formation and climate. While DMS is produced predominantly by phytoplankton, recent observational literature has suggested that corals and their symbionts produce a comparable amount of DMS, which is unaccounted for in models. It has further been hypothesised that the coral reef source of DMS may modulate regional climate. This hypothesis presents a particular concern given the current threat to coral reefs under anthropogenic climate change. In this paper, a global climate model with online chemistry and aerosol is used to explore the influence of coral reef-derived DMS on atmospheric composition and climate. A simple representation of coral reef-derived DMS is developed and added to a common DMS surface water climatology, resulting in an additional DMS flux of 0.3 Tg year−1 S, or 1.7 % of the global flux. By comparing the differences between both nudged and free running ensemble simulations with and without coral reef-derived DMS, the influence of coral reef-derived DMS on regional climate is quantified. In the Maritime Continent-Australian region, where the highest density of coral reefs exist, a small decrease in nucleation and Aitken mode aerosol number concentration and mass is found when coral reef DMS emissions are removed from the system. However, these small responses are found to have no robust effect on regional climate via direct and indirect aerosol effects. This work emphasises the complexities of the aerosol-climate system and the limitations of current modelling capabilities are highlighted, in particular surrounding convective responses to changes in aerosol. In conclusion we find no robust evidence that coral reef-derived DMS influences global and regional climate.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Cloud, precipitation and radiation responses to large perturbations in global dimethyl sulfide
    Fiddes, SL ; Woodhouse, MT ; Nicholls, Z ; Lane, TP ; Schofield, R ( 2017-12-22)
    Abstract. Natural aerosol emission represents one of the largest uncertainties in our understanding of the climate system. Sulfur emitted by marine organisms, as dimethyl sulfide (DMS), constitutes one fifth of the global sulfur budget and yet the distribution, fluxes and fate of DMS remain poorly constrained. In this study we quantify the role of DMS in the chemistry-climate system and determine the climate's response to large DMS perturbations. By removing all marine DMS in the Australian Community Climate and Earth System Simulator (ACCESS) – United Kingdom Chemistry and Aerosol (UKCA), we find a top of atmosphere radiative effect of 1.7 W m−2. The largest responses to removing marine DMS are in stratiform cloud decks in the Southern Hemisphere's eastern ocean basins. These regions show significant differences in low-cloud (−9 %), radiation (+7 W m−2 in short wave incoming surface radiation) and large-scale rainfall (+15 %) when all DMS is removed. We demonstrate a precipitation suppression effect of DMS-derived aerosol in stratiform cloud deck regions, coupled with an increase in low cloud fraction. The increase in low cloud fraction is an example of the aerosol lifetime effect. Other areas of low cloud formation, such as the Southern Ocean and stratiform cloud decks in the Northern Hemisphere, have a relatively weak response to DMS perturbations. Our study highlights the need for further modelling and field studies of natural aerosols and their impact on cloud and precipitation, in particular in Southern Hemisphere stratiform cloud regions.