Medicine (RMH) - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
ItemThe effect of epilepsy surgery on productivity: A systematic review and meta-analysis(WILEY, 2022-04)OBJECTIVES: An important but understudied benefit of resective epilepsy surgery is improvement in productivity; that is, people's ability to contribute to society through participation in the workforce and in unpaid roles such as carer duties. Here, we aimed to evaluate productivity in adults with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) pre- and post-resective epilepsy surgery, and to explore the factors that positively influence productivity outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using four electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), EBM Reviews - Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Cochrane Library. All studies over the past 30 years reporting on pre- and post-resective epilepsy surgical outcomes in adults with DRE were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the post-surgery change in employment outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1005 titles and abstracts were reviewed. Seventeen studies, comprising 2056 unique patients, were suitable for the final quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. Resective epilepsy surgery resulted in a 22% improvement in overall productivity (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.40). The factors associated with increased post-surgery employment risk ratios were lower pre-surgical employment in the workforce (relative risk ratio [RRR] =0.34; 95% CI: 0.15-0.74), shorter follow-up duration (RRR = 0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-0.99), and lower mean age at time of surgery (RRR= 0.97; 95% CI: 0.94-0.99). The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions and was low for most variables except "measurement of exposure." SIGNIFICANCE: There is clear evidence that resective surgery in eligible surgical DRE patients results in improved productivity. Future work may include implementing a standardized method for collecting and reporting productivity in epilepsy cohorts and focusing on ways to reprioritize health care resource allocation to allow suitable candidates to access surgery earlier. This will ultimately benefit individuals with DRE, their families, our communities, and the wider health care system.
-
ItemProspective multisite cohort study of patient-reported outcomes in adults with new-onset seizures(WILEY, 2022-03)OBJECTIVE: New-onset seizures affect up to 10% of people over their lifetime, however, their health economic impact has not been well-studied. This prospective multicenter study will collect patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) from adults with new-onset seizures seen in six Seizure Clinics across Melbourne, Australia and The University of Colorado, USA. METHODS: Approximately 450 eligible patients will be enrolled in the study at or following their initial attendance to Seizure Clinics at the study hospitals. Inclusion criteria for the study group are those with new-onset acute symptomatic seizures, new-onset unprovoked seizures, and new-onset epilepsy. Inclusion criteria for the three comparator groups are those with noncardiac syncope, those with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures, as well as published PROMs data from the Australian general population. Exclusion criteria are those aged less than 18 years, those with a preexisting epilepsy diagnosis, and those with intellectual disabilities or other impairments which would preclude them from comprehending and completing the questionnaires. Patients will complete eight online questionnaires regarding the effect that their seizures (or seizure mimics) have had on various aspects of their life. These questionnaires will be readministered at 6 and 12 months. Patients with new-diagnosis epilepsy will also be asked to share the reasons why they have accepted or declined antiseizure medications. ANALYSIS: Primary outcome measures will be quality of life, work productivity, informal care needs, and mood, at baseline compared to 6 and 12 months later for those with new-onset seizures and comparing these outcomes to those in the three comparator groups. Secondary outcomes include mapping of QoLIE-31 to the EQ-5D-5L in epilepsy, modelling indirect costs of new-onset seizures, and exploring why patients may or may not wish to take antiseizure medications. SIGNIFICANCE: These data will form an evidence-base for future studies that examine the effectiveness of various healthcare interventions for new-onset seizure patients. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Alfred Health Human Research Ethics Committee (SERP: 52 538, Alfred HREC: 307/19), the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/59148/Austin-2019), and the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board (COMIRB) (COMIRB #20-3028). ANZCTR TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000908831.