Medicine (RMH) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 16
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Breast and bowel cancers diagnosed in people 'too young to have cancer': A blueprint for research using family and twin studies
    Hopper, JL ; Li, S ; MacInnis, RJ ; Dowty, JG ; Nguyen, TL ; Bui, M ; Dite, GS ; Esser, VFC ; Ye, Z ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Goudey, B ; Alpen, K ; Kapuscinski, M ; Win, AK ; Dugue, P-A ; Milne, RL ; Jayasekara, H ; Brooks, JD ; Malta, S ; Calais-Ferreira, L ; Campbell, AC ; Young, JT ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Sung, J ; Giles, GG ; Buchanan, D ; Winship, I ; Terry, MB ; Southey, MC ; Jenkins, MA (WILEY, 2024-03-19)
    Young breast and bowel cancers (e.g., those diagnosed before age 40 or 50 years) have far greater morbidity and mortality in terms of years of life lost, and are increasing in incidence, but have been less studied. For breast and bowel cancers, the familial relative risks, and therefore the familial variances in age-specific log(incidence), are much greater at younger ages, but little of these familial variances has been explained. Studies of families and twins can address questions not easily answered by studies of unrelated individuals alone. We describe existing and emerging family and twin data that can provide special opportunities for discovery. We present designs and statistical analyses, including novel ideas such as the VALID (Variance in Age-specific Log Incidence Decomposition) model for causes of variation in risk, the DEPTH (DEPendency of association on the number of Top Hits) and other approaches to analyse genome-wide association study data, and the within-pair, ICE FALCON (Inference about Causation from Examining FAmiliaL CONfounding) and ICE CRISTAL (Inference about Causation from Examining Changes in Regression coefficients and Innovative STatistical AnaLysis) approaches to causation and familial confounding. Example applications to breast and colorectal cancer are presented. Motivated by the availability of the resources of the Breast and Colon Cancer Family Registries, we also present some ideas for future studies that could be applied to, and compared with, cancers diagnosed at older ages and address the challenges posed by young breast and bowel cancers.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    The Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) trial: a randomised controlled trial of a decision support tool for risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening
    Emery, JD ; Jenkins, MA ; Saya, S ; Chondros, P ; Oberoi, J ; Milton, S ; Novy, K ; Habgood, E ; Karnchanachari, N ; Pirotta, M ; Trevena, L ; Bickerstaffe, A ; Lourenco, RDA ; Crothers, A ; Ouakrim, DA ; Flander, L ; Dowty, JG ; Walter, FM ; Clark, M ; Doncovio, S ; Etemadmoghadam, D ; Fishman, G ; Macrae, F ; Winship, I ; McIntosh, JG (ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS, 2023-08)
    BACKGROUND: A risk-stratified approach to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening could result in a more acceptable balance of benefits and harms, and be more cost-effective. AIM: To determine the effect of a consultation in general practice using a computerised risk assessment and decision support tool (Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction, CRISP) on risk-appropriate CRC screening. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomised controlled trial in 10 general practices in Melbourne, Australia, from May 2017 to May 2018. METHOD: Participants were recruited from a consecutive sample of patients aged 50-74 years attending their GP. Intervention consultations included CRC risk assessment using the CRISP tool and discussion of CRC screening recommendations. Control group consultations focused on lifestyle CRC risk factors. The primary outcome was risk-appropriate CRC screening at 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 734 participants (65.1% of eligible patients) were randomised (369 intervention, 365 control); the primary outcome was determined for 722 (362 intervention, 360 control). There was a 6.5% absolute increase (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.28 to 13.2) in risk-appropriate screening in the intervention compared with the control group (71.5% versus 65.0%; odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95% CI = 0.99 to 1.86, P = 0.057). In those due CRC screening during follow-up, there was a 20.3% (95% CI = 10.3 to 30.4) increase (intervention 59.8% versus control 38.9%; OR 2.31, 95% CI = 1.51 to 3.53, P<0.001) principally by increasing faecal occult blood testing in those at average risk. CONCLUSION: A risk assessment and decision support tool increases risk-appropriate CRC screening in those due screening. The CRISP intervention could commence in people in their fifth decade to ensure people start CRC screening at the optimal age with the most cost-effective test.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Colorectal cancer incidences in Lynch syndrome: a comparison of results from the prospective lynch syndrome database and the international mismatch repair consortium
    Moller, P ; Seppala, T ; Dowty, JG ; Haupt, S ; Dominguez-Valentin, M ; Sunde, L ; Bernstein, I ; Engel, C ; Aretz, S ; Nielsen, M ; Capella, G ; Evans, DG ; Burn, J ; Holinski-Feder, E ; Bertario, L ; Bonanni, B ; Lindblom, A ; Levi, Z ; Macrae, F ; Winship, I ; Plazzer, J-P ; Sijmons, R ; Laghi, L ; Della Valle, A ; Heinimann, K ; Half, E ; Lopez-Koestner, F ; Alvarez-Valenzuela, K ; Scott, RJ ; Katz, L ; Laish, I ; Vainer, E ; Vaccaro, CA ; Carraro, DM ; Gluck, N ; Abu-Freha, N ; Stakelum, A ; Kennelly, R ; Winter, D ; Rossi, BM ; Greenblatt, M ; Bohorquez, M ; Sheth, H ; Tibiletti, MG ; Lino-Silva, LS ; Horisberger, K ; Portenkirchner, C ; Nascimento, I ; Rossi, NT ; da Silva, LA ; Thomas, H ; Zarand, A ; Mecklin, J-P ; Pylvanainen, K ; Renkonen-Sinisalo, L ; Lepisto, A ; Peltomaki, P ; Therkildsen, C ; Lindberg, LJ ; Thorlacius-Ussing, O ; von Knebel Doeberitz, M ; Loeffler, M ; Rahner, N ; Steinke-Lange, V ; Schmiegel, W ; Vangala, D ; Perne, C ; Hueneburg, R ; de Vargas, AF ; Latchford, A ; Gerdes, A-M ; Backman, A-S ; Guillen-Ponce, C ; Snyder, C ; Lautrup, CK ; Amor, D ; Palmero, E ; Stoffel, E ; Duijkers, F ; Hall, MJ ; Hampel, H ; Williams, H ; Okkels, H ; Lubinski, J ; Reece, J ; Ngeow, J ; Guillem, JG ; Arnold, J ; Wadt, K ; Monahan, K ; Senter, L ; Rasmussen, LJ ; van Hest, LP ; Ricciardiello, L ; Kohonen-Corish, MRJ ; Ligtenberg, MJL ; Southey, M ; Aronson, M ; Zahary, MN ; Samadder, NJ ; Poplawski, N ; Hoogerbrugge, N ; Morrison, PJ ; James, P ; Lee, G ; Chen-Shtoyerman, R ; Ankathil, R ; Pai, R ; Ward, R ; Parry, S ; Debniak, T ; John, T ; van Overeem Hansen, T ; Caldes, T ; Yamaguchi, T ; Barca-Tierno, V ; Garre, P ; Cavestro, GM ; Weitz, J ; Redler, S ; Buettner, R ; Heuveline, V ; Hopper, JL ; Win, AK ; Lindor, N ; Gallinger, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Newcomb, PA ; Figueiredo, J ; Buchanan, DD ; Thibodeau, SN ; ten Broeke, SW ; Hovig, E ; Nakken, S ; Pineda, M ; Duenas, N ; Brunet, J ; Green, K ; Lalloo, F ; Newton, K ; Crosbie, EJ ; Mints, M ; Tjandra, D ; Neffa, F ; Esperon, P ; Kariv, R ; Rosner, G ; Pavicic, WH ; Kalfayan, P ; Torrezan, GT ; Bassaneze, T ; Martin, C ; Moslein, G ; Ahadova, A ; Kloor, M ; Sampson, JR ; Jenkins, MA (BMC, 2022-10-01)
    OBJECTIVE: To compare colorectal cancer (CRC) incidences in carriers of pathogenic variants of the MMR genes in the PLSD and IMRC cohorts, of which only the former included mandatory colonoscopy surveillance for all participants. METHODS: CRC incidences were calculated in an intervention group comprising a cohort of confirmed carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (path_MMR) followed prospectively by the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD). All had colonoscopy surveillance, with polypectomy when polyps were identified. Comparison was made with a retrospective cohort reported by the International Mismatch Repair Consortium (IMRC). This comprised confirmed and inferred path_MMR carriers who were first- or second-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. RESULTS: In the PLSD, 8,153 subjects had follow-up colonoscopy surveillance for a total of 67,604 years and 578 carriers had CRC diagnosed. Average cumulative incidences of CRC in path_MLH1 carriers at 70 years of age were 52% in males and 41% in females; for path_MSH2 50% and 39%; for path_MSH6 13% and 17% and for path_PMS2 11% and 8%. In contrast, in the IMRC cohort, corresponding cumulative incidences were 40% and 27%; 34% and 23%; 16% and 8% and 7% and 6%. Comparing just the European carriers in the two series gave similar findings. Numbers in the PLSD series did not allow comparisons of carriers from other continents separately. Cumulative incidences at 25 years were < 1% in all retrospective groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively observed CRC incidences (PLSD) in path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers undergoing colonoscopy surveillance and polypectomy were higher than in the retrospective (IMRC) series, and were not reduced in path_MSH6 carriers. These findings were the opposite to those expected. CRC point incidence before 50 years of age was reduced in path_PMS2 carriers subjected to colonoscopy, but not significantly so.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The Impact of a Comprehensive Risk Prediction Model for Colorectal Cancer on a Population Screening Program
    Saya, S ; Emery, JD ; Dowty, JG ; McIntosh, JG ; Winship, IM ; Jenkins, MA (OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2020-10-01)
    Background In many countries, population colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is based on age and family history, though more precise risk prediction could better target screening. We examined the impact of a CRC risk prediction model (incorporating age, sex, lifestyle, genomic, and family history factors) to target screening under several feasible screening scenarios. Methods We estimated the model’s predicted CRC risk distribution in the Australian population. Predicted CRC risks were categorized into screening recommendations under 3 proposed scenarios to compare with current recommendations: 1) highly tailored, 2) 3 risk categories, and 3) 4 sex-specific risk categories. Under each scenario, for 35- to 74-year-olds, we calculated the number of CRC screens by immunochemical fecal occult blood testing (iFOBT) and colonoscopy and the proportion of predicted CRCs over 10 years in each screening group. Results Currently, 1.1% of 35- to 74-year-olds are recommended screening colonoscopy and 56.2% iFOBT, and 5.7% and 83.2% of CRCs over 10 years were predicted to occur in these groups, respectively. For the scenarios, 1) colonoscopy was recommended to 8.1% and iFOBT to 37.5%, with 36.1% and 50.1% of CRCs in each group; 2) colonoscopy was recommended to 2.4% and iFOBT to 56.0%, with 13.2% and 76.9% of cancers in each group; and 3) colonoscopy was recommended to 5.0% and iFOBT to 54.2%, with 24.5% and 66.5% of cancers in each group. Conclusions A highly tailored CRC screening scenario results in many fewer screens but more cancers in those unscreened. Category-based scenarios may provide a good balance between number of screens and cancers detected and are simpler to implement.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Morphological predictors of BRCA1 germline mutations in young women with breast cancer
    Southey, MC ; Ramus, SJ ; Dowty, JG ; Smith, LD ; Tesoriero, AA ; Wong, EEM ; Dite, GS ; Jenkins, MA ; Byrnes, GB ; Winship, I ; Phillips, K-A ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2011-03-15)
    BACKGROUND: Knowing a young woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer has a germline BRCA1 mutation informs her clinical management and that of her relatives. We sought an optimal strategy for identifying carriers using family history, breast cancer morphology and hormone receptor status data. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 452 Australian women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed before age 40 years for whom we conducted extensive germline mutation testing (29 carried a BRCA1 mutation) and a systematic pathology review, and collected three-generational family history and tumour ER and PR status. Predictors of mutation status were identified using multiple logistic regression. Areas under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were estimated using five-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: The probability of being a BRCA1 mutation carrier increased with number of selected histology features even after adjusting for family history and ER and PR status (P<0.0001). From the most parsimonious multivariate model, the odds ratio for being a carrier were: 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.6-47.0) for trabecular growth pattern (P=0.001); 7.8 (2.7-25.7) for mitotic index over 50 mitoses per 10 high-powered field (P=0.0003); and 2.7 (1.3-5.9) for each first-degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed before age 60 years (P=0.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (0.83-0.90). CONCLUSION: Pathology review, with attention to a few specific morphological features of invasive breast cancers, can identify almost all BRCA1 germline mutation carriers among women with early-onset breast cancer without taking into account family history.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Ability of known susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk for persons with and without a family history
    Jenkins, MA ; Win, AK ; Dowty, JG ; MacInnis, RJ ; Makalic, E ; Schmidt, DF ; Dite, GS ; Kapuscinski, M ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Winship, IM ; Emery, JD ; Saya, S ; Macrae, FA ; Ahnen, DJ ; Duggan, D ; Figueiredo, JC ; Lindor, NM ; Haile, RW ; Potter, JD ; Cotterchio, M ; Gallinger, S ; Newcomb, PA ; Buchanan, DD ; Casey, G ; Hopper, JL (SPRINGER, 2019-10)
    Before SNP-based risk can be incorporated in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, the ability of these SNPs to estimate CRC risk for persons with and without a family history of CRC, and the screening implications need to be determined. We estimated the association with CRC of a 45 SNP-based risk using 1181 cases and 999 controls, and its correlation with CRC risk predicted from detailed family history. We estimated the predicted change in the distribution across predefined risk categories, and implications for recommended screening commencement age, from adding SNP-based risk to family history. The inter-quintile risk ratio for colorectal cancer risk of the SNP-based risk was 3.28 (95% CI 2.54-4.22). SNP-based and family history-based risks were not correlated (r = 0.02). For persons with no first-degree relatives with CRC, screening could commence 4 years earlier for women (5 years for men) in the highest quintile of SNP-based risk. For persons with two first-degree relatives with CRC, screening could commence 16 years earlier for men and women in the highest quintile, and 7 years earlier for the lowest quintile. This 45 SNP panel in conjunction with family history, can identify people who could benefit from earlier screening. Risk reclassification by 45 SNPs could inform targeted screening for CRC prevention, particularly in clinical genetics settings when mutations in high-risk genes cannot be identified. Yet to be determined is cost-effectiveness, resources requirements, community, patient and clinician acceptance, and feasibility with potentially ethical, legal and insurance implications.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Heritable DNA methylation marks associated with susceptibility to breast cancer
    Joo, JE ; Dowty, JG ; Milne, RL ; Wong, EM ; Dugue, P-A ; English, D ; Hopper, JL ; Goldgar, DE ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2018-02-28)
    Mendelian-like inheritance of germline DNA methylation in cancer susceptibility genes has been previously reported. We aimed to scan the genome for heritable methylation marks associated with breast cancer susceptibility by studying 25 Australian multiple-case breast cancer families. Here we report genome-wide DNA methylation measured in 210 peripheral blood DNA samples provided by family members using the Infinium HumanMethylation450. We develop and apply a new statistical method to identify heritable methylation marks based on complex segregation analysis. We estimate carrier probabilities for the 1000 most heritable methylation marks based on family structure, and we use Cox proportional hazards survival analysis to identify 24 methylation marks with corresponding carrier probabilities significantly associated with breast cancer. We replicate an association with breast cancer risk for four of the 24 marks using an independent nested case-control study. Here, we report a novel approach for identifying heritable DNA methylation marks associated with breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The use of a risk assessment and decision support tool (CRISP) compared with usual care in general practice to increase risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Walker, JG ; Macrae, F ; Winship, I ; Oberoi, J ; Saya, S ; Milton, S ; Bickerstaffe, A ; Dowty, JG ; Lourenco, RDA ; Clark, M ; Galloway, L ; Fishman, G ; Walter, FM ; Flander, L ; Chondros, P ; Ouakrim, DA ; Pirotta, M ; Trevena, L ; Jenkins, MA ; Emery, JD (BMC, 2018-07-25)
    BACKGROUND: Australia and New Zealand have the highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer worldwide. In Australia there is significant unwarranted variation in colorectal cancer screening due to low uptake of the immunochemical faecal occult blood test, poor identification of individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer, and over-referral of individuals at average risk for colonoscopy. Our pre-trial research has developed a novel Colorectal cancer RISk Prediction (CRISP) tool, which could be used to implement precision screening in primary care. This paper describes the protocol for a phase II multi-site individually randomised controlled trial of the CRISP tool in primary care. METHODS: This trial aims to test whether a standardised consultation using the CRISP tool in general practice (the CRISP intervention) increases risk-appropriate colorectal cancer screening compared to control participants who receive standardised information on cancer prevention. Patients between 50 and 74 years old, attending an appointment with their general practitioner for any reason, will be invited into the trial. A total of 732 participants will be randomised to intervention or control arms using a computer-generated allocation sequence stratified by general practice. The primary outcome (risk-appropriate screening at 12 months) will be measured using baseline data for colorectal cancer risk and objective health service data to measure screening behaviour. Secondary outcomes will include participant cancer risk perception, anxiety, cancer worry, screening intentions and health service utilisation measured at 1, 6 and 12 months post randomisation. DISCUSSION: This trial tests a systematic approach to implementing risk-stratified colorectal cancer screening in primary care, based on an individual's absolute risk, using a state-of-the-art risk assessment tool. Trial results will be reported in 2020. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12616001573448p . Registered on 14 November 2016.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Are the common genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer risk for DNA mismatch repair gene mutation carriers?
    Win, AK ; Hopper, JL ; Buchanan, DD ; Young, JP ; Tenesa, A ; Dowty, JG ; Giles, GG ; Goldblatt, J ; Winship, I ; Boussioutas, A ; Young, GP ; Parry, S ; Baron, JA ; Duggan, D ; Gallinger, S ; Newcomb, PA ; Haile, RW ; Le Marchand, L ; Lindor, NM ; Jenkins, MA (ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2013-05)
    BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified at least 15 independent common genetic variants associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The aim of this study was to investigate whether 11 of these variants are associated with CRC risk for carriers of germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. METHODS: A total of 927 MMR gene mutation carriers (360 MLH1, 442 MSH2, 85 MSH6 and 40 PMS2) from 315 families enrolled in the Colon Cancer Family Registry, were genotyped for the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs): rs16892766 (8q23.3), rs6983267 (8q24.21), rs719725 (9p24), rs10795668 (10p14), rs3802842 (11q23.1), rs4444235 (14q22.2), rs4779584 (15q13.3), rs9929218 (16q22.1), rs4939827 (18q21.1), rs10411210 (19q13.1) and rs961253 (20p12.3). We used a weighted Cox regression to estimate CRC risk for homozygous and heterozygous carriers of the risk allele compared with homozygous non-carriers as well as for an additive per allele model (on the log scale). RESULTS: Over a total of 40,978 person-years observation, 426 (46%) carriers were diagnosed with CRC at a mean age of 44.3 years. For all carriers combined, we found no evidence of an association between CRC risk and the total number of risk alleles (hazard ratio [HR] per risk allele=0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.88-1.07, p=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that the SNPs associated with CRC in the general population are modifiers of the risk for MMR gene mutation carriers overall, and therefore any evidence of proven clinical utility in Lynch syndrome.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH
    Win, AK ; Reece, JC ; Dowty, JG ; Buchanan, DD ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Southey, MC ; Young, JP ; Cleary, SP ; Kim, H ; Cotterchio, M ; Macrae, FA ; Tucker, KM ; Baron, JA ; Burnett, T ; Le Marchand, L ; Casey, G ; Haile, RW ; Newcomb, PA ; Thibodeau, SN ; Hopper, JL ; Gallinger, S ; Winship, IM ; Lindor, NM ; Jenkins, MA (WILEY, 2016-10-01)