Medicine (RMH) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 45
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Morphological predictors of BRCA1 germline mutations in young women with breast cancer
    Southey, MC ; Ramus, SJ ; Dowty, JG ; Smith, LD ; Tesoriero, AA ; Wong, EEM ; Dite, GS ; Jenkins, MA ; Byrnes, GB ; Winship, I ; Phillips, K-A ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2011-03-15)
    BACKGROUND: Knowing a young woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer has a germline BRCA1 mutation informs her clinical management and that of her relatives. We sought an optimal strategy for identifying carriers using family history, breast cancer morphology and hormone receptor status data. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 452 Australian women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed before age 40 years for whom we conducted extensive germline mutation testing (29 carried a BRCA1 mutation) and a systematic pathology review, and collected three-generational family history and tumour ER and PR status. Predictors of mutation status were identified using multiple logistic regression. Areas under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were estimated using five-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: The probability of being a BRCA1 mutation carrier increased with number of selected histology features even after adjusting for family history and ER and PR status (P<0.0001). From the most parsimonious multivariate model, the odds ratio for being a carrier were: 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.6-47.0) for trabecular growth pattern (P=0.001); 7.8 (2.7-25.7) for mitotic index over 50 mitoses per 10 high-powered field (P=0.0003); and 2.7 (1.3-5.9) for each first-degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed before age 60 years (P=0.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (0.83-0.90). CONCLUSION: Pathology review, with attention to a few specific morphological features of invasive breast cancers, can identify almost all BRCA1 germline mutation carriers among women with early-onset breast cancer without taking into account family history.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prevalence of PALB2 mutations in Australasian multiple-case breast cancer families
    Teo, ZL ; Park, DJ ; Provenzano, E ; Chatfield, CA ; Odefrey, FA ; Tu, N-D ; Dowty, JG ; Hopper, JL ; Winship, I ; Goldgar, DE ; Southey, MC (BMC, 2013)
    INTRODUCTION: Population-based studies of breast cancer have estimated that some PALB2 mutations confer a breast cancer risk (penetrance) comparable to the average pathogenic mutation in BRCA2. As this risk is of clinical relevance, we sought to identify mono-allelic PALB2 mutations and determine their frequencies in multiple-case breast cancer families attending Familial Cancer Clinics in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS: The youngest affected woman, not known to carry a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2, from 747 multiple-case breast cancer families participating in kConFab were selected for PALB2 mutation screening. The coding and flanking intronic regions of PALB2 in DNA extracted from blood were screened using high-resolution melt curve analysis with Sanger sequencing confirmation. Where possible, relatives of women found to carry PALB2 mutations were genotyped for the family-specific mutation, mutant transcripts were characterised and breast tumours arising in mutation carriers were recalled and reviewed. Missense mutations were assessed for potential to disrupt protein function via SIFT, Align GVGD and Polyphen-2. RESULTS: The mutation screen identified two nonsense mutations (PALB2 c.3113G>A in eight women and PALB2 c.196C>T in one woman), two frameshift mutations (PALB2 c.1947_1948insA and PALB2 c.2982_2983insT each in one woman), 10 missense variants, eight synonymous variants and four variants in intronic regions. Of the four PALB2 mutations identified that were predicted to produce truncated protein products, only PALB2 c.1947_1948insA had not previously been reported. PALB2 c.3113G>A and PALB2 c.196C>T were previously identified in the Australian population whereas PALB2 c.2982_2983insT was previously reported in the UK population. Transcripts derived from three of these mutant PALB2 alleles were vulnerable to nonsense-mediated decay. One missense mutation (PALB2 c.2993G>A) was predicted to disrupt protein function via the three in silico assessment methods applied. The majority of breast cancers arising in carriers that were available for review were high-grade invasive ductal carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS: About 1.5% (95% CI 0.6to 2.4) of Australasian multiple-case breast cancer families attending clinics are segregating protein-truncating mutations in PALB2, most being PALB2 c.3113G>A, p.Trp1038*. Given the prevalence, breast cancer risk, and tumour grade associated with this mutation, consideration of clinical PALB2 testing is warranted.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A PALB2 mutation associated with high risk of breast cancer
    Southey, MC ; Teo, ZL ; Dowty, JG ; Odefrey, FA ; Park, DJ ; Tischkowitz, M ; Sabbaghian, N ; Apicella, C ; Byrnes, GB ; Winship, I ; Baglietto, L ; Giles, GG ; Goldgar, DE ; Foulkes, WD ; Hopper, JL (BMC, 2010)
    NTRODUCTION: As a group, women who carry germline mutations in partner and localizer of breast cancer 2 susceptibility protein (PALB2) are at increased risk of breast cancer. Little is known about by how much or whether risk differs by mutation or family history, owing to the paucity of studies of cases unselected for family history. METHODS: We screened 1,403 case probands for PALB2 mutations in a population-based study of Australian women with invasive breast cancer stratified by age at onset. The age-specific risk of breast cancer was estimated from the cancer histories of first- and second-degree relatives of mutation-carrying probands using a modified segregation analysis that included a polygenic modifier and was conditioned on the carrier case proband. Further screening for PALB2 c.3113G > A (W1038X) was conducted for 779 families with multiple cases of breast cancer ascertained through family cancer clinics in Australia and New Zealand and 764 population-based controls. RESULTS: We found five independent case probands in the population-based sample with the protein-truncating mutation PALB2 c.3113G > A (W1038X); 2 of 695 were diagnosed before age 40 years and 3 of 708 were diagnosed when between ages 40 and 59 years. Both of the two early-onset carrier case probands had very strong family histories of breast cancer. Further testing found that the mutation segregated with breast cancer in these families. No c.3113G > A (W1038X) carriers were found in 764 population-based unaffected controls. The hazard ratio was estimated to be 30.1 (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.5 to 120; P < 0.0001), and the corresponding cumulative risk estimates were 49% (95% CI, 15 to 93) to age 50 and 91% (95% CI, 44 to 100) to age 70. We found another eight families carrying this mutation in 779 families with multiple cases of breast cancer ascertained through family cancer clinics. CONCLUSIONS: The PALB2 c.3113G > A mutation appears to be associated with substantial risks of breast cancer that are of clinical relevance.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM rare variants and cancer risk: data from COGS
    Southey, MC ; Goldgar, DE ; Winqvist, R ; Pylkas, K ; Couch, F ; Tischkowitz, M ; Foulkes, WD ; Dennis, J ; Michailidou, K ; van Rensburg, EJ ; Heikkinen, T ; Nevanlinna, H ; Hopper, JL ; Doerk, T ; Claes, KBM ; Reis-Filho, J ; Teo, ZL ; Radice, P ; Catucci, I ; Peterlongo, P ; Tsimiklis, H ; Odefrey, FA ; Dowty, JG ; Schmidt, MK ; Broeks, A ; Hogervorst, FB ; Verhoef, S ; Carpenter, J ; Clarke, C ; Scott, RJ ; Fasching, PA ; Haeberle, L ; Ekici, AB ; Beckmann, MW ; Peto, J ; dos-Santos-Silva, I ; Fletcher, O ; Johnson, N ; Bolla, MK ; Sawyer, EJ ; Tomlinson, I ; Kerin, MJ ; Miller, N ; Marme, F ; Burwinkel, B ; Yang, R ; Guenel, P ; Therese, T ; Menegaux, F ; Sanchez, M ; Bojesen, S ; Nielsen, SF ; Flyger, H ; Benitez, J ; Pilar Zamora, M ; Arias Perez, JI ; Menendez, P ; Anton-Culver, H ; Neuhausen, S ; Ziogas, A ; Clarke, CA ; Brenner, H ; Arndt, V ; Stegmaier, C ; Brauch, H ; Bruening, T ; Ko, Y-D ; Muranen, TA ; Aittomaki, K ; Blomqvist, C ; Bogdanova, NV ; Antonenkova, NN ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Kataja, V ; Kosma, V-M ; Hartikainen, JM ; Spurdle, AB ; Wauters, E ; Smeets, D ; Beuselinck, B ; Floris, G ; Chang-Claude, J ; Rudolph, A ; Seibold, P ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Olson, JE ; Vachon, C ; Pankratz, VS ; McLean, C ; Haiman, CA ; Henderson, BE ; Schumacher, F ; Le Marchand, L ; Kristensen, V ; Alnaes, GG ; Zheng, W ; Hunter, DJ ; Lindstrom, S ; Hankinson, SE ; Kraft, P ; Andrulis, I ; Knight, JA ; Glendon, G ; Mulligan, AM ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Grip, M ; Kauppila, S ; Devilee, P ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Seynaeve, C ; Hollestelle, A ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Figueroa, J ; Chanock, SJ ; Lissowska, J ; Czene, K ; Darabi, H ; Eriksson, M ; Eccles, DM ; Rafiq, S ; Tapper, WJ ; Gerty, SM ; Hooning, MJ ; Martens, JWM ; Collee, JM ; Tilanus-Linthorst, M ; Hall, P ; Li, J ; Brand, JS ; Humphreys, K ; Cox, A ; Reed, MWR ; Luccarini, C ; Baynes, C ; Dunning, AM ; Hamann, U ; Torres, D ; Ulmer, HU ; Ruediger, T ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Jaworska, K ; Durda, K ; Slager, S ; Toland, AE ; Ambrosone, CB ; Yannoukakos, D ; Swerdlow, A ; Ashworth, A ; Orr, N ; Jones, M ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Pita, G ; Rosario Alonso, M ; Alvarez, N ; Herrero, D ; Tessier, DC ; Vincent, D ; Bacot, F ; Simard, J ; Dumont, M ; Soucy, P ; Eeles, R ; Muir, K ; Wiklund, F ; Gronberg, H ; Schleutker, J ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Weischer, M ; Travis, RC ; Neal, D ; Donovan, JL ; Hamdy, FC ; Khaw, K-T ; Stanford, JL ; Blot, WJ ; Thibodeau, S ; Schaid, DJ ; Kelley, JL ; Maier, C ; Kibel, AS ; Cybulski, C ; Cannon-Albright, L ; Butterbach, K ; Park, J ; Kaneva, R ; Batra, J ; Teixeira, MR ; Kote-Jarai, Z ; Al Olama, AA ; Benlloch, S ; Renner, SP ; Hartmann, A ; Hein, A ; Ruebner, M ; Lambrechts, D ; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E ; Vergote, I ; Lambretchs, S ; Doherty, JA ; Rossing, MA ; Nickels, S ; Eilber, U ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Odunsi, K ; Sucheston-Campbell, LE ; Friel, G ; Lurie, G ; Killeen, JL ; Wilkens, LR ; Goodman, MT ; Runnebaum, I ; Hillemanns, PA ; Pelttari, LM ; Butzow, R ; Modugno, F ; Edwards, RP ; Ness, RB ; Moysich, KB ; du Bois, A ; Heitz, F ; Harter, P ; Kommoss, S ; Karlan, BY ; Walsh, C ; Lester, J ; Jensen, A ; Kjaer, SK ; Hogdall, E ; Peissel, B ; Bonanni, B ; Bernard, L ; Goode, EL ; Fridley, BL ; Vierkant, RA ; Cunningham, JM ; Larson, MC ; Fogarty, ZC ; Kalli, KR ; Liang, D ; Lu, KH ; Hildebrandt, MAT ; Wu, X ; Levine, DA ; Dao, F ; Bisogna, M ; Berchuck, A ; Iversen, ES ; Marks, JR ; Akushevich, L ; Cramer, DW ; Schildkraut, J ; Terry, KL ; Poole, EM ; Stampfer, M ; Tworoger, SS ; Bandera, EV ; Orlow, I ; Olson, SH ; Bjorge, L ; Salvesen, HB ; van Altena, AM ; Aben, KKH ; Kiemeney, LA ; Massuger, LFAG ; Pejovic, T ; Bean, Y ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Kelemen, LE ; Cook, LS ; Le, ND ; Grski, B ; Gronwald, J ; Menkiszak, J ; Hogdall, CK ; Lundvall, L ; Nedergaard, L ; Engelholm, SA ; Dicks, E ; Tyrer, J ; Campbell, I ; McNeish, I ; Paul, J ; Siddiqui, N ; Glasspool, R ; Whittemore, AS ; Rothstein, JH ; McGuire, V ; Sieh, W ; Cai, H ; Shu, X-O ; Teten, RT ; Sutphen, R ; McLaughlin, JR ; Narod, SA ; Phelan, CM ; Monteiro, AN ; Fenstermacher, D ; Lin, H-Y ; Permuth, JB ; Sellers, TA ; Chen, YA ; Tsai, Y-Y ; Chen, Z ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Gayther, SA ; Ramus, SJ ; Menon, U ; Wu, AH ; Pearce, CL ; Van den Berg, D ; Pike, MC ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Plisiecka-Halasa, J ; Moes-Sosnowska, J ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Pharoah, PDP ; Song, H ; Winship, I ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Giles, GG ; Tavtigian, SV ; Easton, DF ; Milne, RL (BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2016-12)
    BACKGROUND: The rarity of mutations in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM make it difficult to estimate precisely associated cancer risks. Population-based family studies have provided evidence that at least some of these mutations are associated with breast cancer risk as high as those associated with rare BRCA2 mutations. We aimed to estimate the relative risks associated with specific rare variants in PALB2, CHEK2 and ATM via a multicentre case-control study. METHODS: We genotyped 10 rare mutations using the custom iCOGS array: PALB2 c.1592delT, c.2816T>G and c.3113G>A, CHEK2 c.349A>G, c.538C>T, c.715G>A, c.1036C>T, c.1312G>T, and c.1343T>G and ATM c.7271T>G. We assessed associations with breast cancer risk (42 671 cases and 42 164 controls), as well as prostate (22 301 cases and 22 320 controls) and ovarian (14 542 cases and 23 491 controls) cancer risk, for each variant. RESULTS: For European women, strong evidence of association with breast cancer risk was observed for PALB2 c.1592delT OR 3.44 (95% CI 1.39 to 8.52, p=7.1×10-5), PALB2 c.3113G>A OR 4.21 (95% CI 1.84 to 9.60, p=6.9×10-8) and ATM c.7271T>G OR 11.0 (95% CI 1.42 to 85.7, p=0.0012). We also found evidence of association with breast cancer risk for three variants in CHEK2, c.349A>G OR 2.26 (95% CI 1.29 to 3.95), c.1036C>T OR 5.06 (95% CI 1.09 to 23.5) and c.538C>T OR 1.33 (95% CI 1.05 to 1.67) (p≤0.017). Evidence for prostate cancer risk was observed for CHEK2 c.1343T>G OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.53 to 6.03, p=0.0006) for African men and CHEK2 c.1312G>T OR 2.21 (95% CI 1.06 to 4.63, p=0.030) for European men. No evidence of association with ovarian cancer was found for any of these variants. CONCLUSIONS: This report adds to accumulating evidence that at least some variants in these genes are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer that is clinically important.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Genomic Characterization of Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients With Lynch Syndrome
    Donahue, TE ; Bagrodia, A ; Audenet, F ; Donoghue, MTA ; Cha, EK ; Sfakianos, JP ; Sperling, D ; Al-Ahmadie, H ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Buchanan, DD ; Jenkins, M ; Hopper, J ; Winship, I ; Templeton, AS ; Walsh, MF ; Stadler, ZK ; Iyer, G ; Taylor, B ; Coleman, J ; Lindor, NM ; Solit, DB ; Bochner, BH (AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018-01-23)
    PURPOSE: Patients with Lynch syndrome (LS) have a significantly increased risk of developing upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Here, we sought to identify differences in the patterns of mutational changes in LS-associated versus sporadic UTUCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed targeted sequencing of 17 UTUCs from patients with documented LS-associated germline mutations (LS-UTUCs) using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Integrated Molecular Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets targeted exon capture assay and compared the results with those from a recently characterized cohort of 82 patients with sporadic UTUC. RESULTS: Patients with LS-UTUC were significantly younger, had had less exposure to tobacco, and more often presented with a ureteral primary site compared with patients with sporadic UTUC. The median number of mutations per tumor was significantly greater in LS-UTUC tumors than in tumors from the sporadic cohort (58; interquartile range [IQR], 47-101 v 6; IQR, 4-10; P < .001), as was the MSIsensor score (median, 25.1; IQR, 17.9-31.2 v 0.03; IQR, 0-0.44; P < .001). Differences in the genetic landscape were observed between sporadic and LS-associated tumors. Alterations in KMT2D, CREBBP, or ARID1A or in DNA damage response and repair genes were present at a significantly higher frequency in LS-UTUC. CIC, NOTCH1, NOTCH3, RB1, and CDKN1B alterations were almost exclusive to LS-UTUC. Although FGFR3 mutations were identified in both cohorts, the R248C hotspot mutation was highly enriched in LS-UTUC. CONCLUSION: LSand sporadic UTUCs have overlapping but distinct genetic signatures. LS-UTUC is associated with hypermutation and a significantly higher prevalence of FGFR3 R248C mutation. Prospective molecular characterization of patients to identify those with LS-UTUC may help guide treatment.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes
    Mavaddat, N ; Michailidou, K ; Dennis, J ; Lush, M ; Fachal, L ; Lee, A ; Tyrer, JP ; Chen, T-H ; Wang, Q ; Bolla, MK ; Yang, X ; Adank, MA ; Ahearn, T ; Aittomaki, K ; Allen, J ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, NN ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Auer, PL ; Auvinen, P ; Barrdahl, M ; Freeman, LEB ; Beckmann, MW ; Behrens, S ; Benitez, J ; Bermisheva, M ; Bernstein, L ; Blomqvist, C ; Bogdanova, N ; Bojesen, SE ; Bonanni, B ; Borresen-Dale, A-L ; Brauch, H ; Bremer, M ; Brenner, H ; Brentnall, A ; Brock, IW ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Brucker, SY ; Bruening, T ; Burwinkel, B ; Campa, D ; Carter, BD ; Castelao, JE ; Chanock, SJ ; Chlebowski, R ; Christiansen, H ; Clarke, CL ; Collee, JM ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Cornelissen, S ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; Devilee, P ; Doerk, T ; dos-Santos-Silva, I ; Dumont, M ; Durcan, L ; Dwek, M ; Eccles, DM ; Ekici, AB ; Eliassen, AH ; Ellberg, C ; Engel, C ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Figueroa, J ; Fletcher, O ; Flyger, H ; Foersti, A ; Fritschi, L ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Gapstur, SM ; Garcia-Saenz, JA ; Gaudet, MM ; Georgoulias, V ; Giles, GG ; Gilyazova, IR ; Glendon, G ; Goldberg, MS ; Goldgar, DE ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Alnaes, GIG ; Grip, M ; Gronwald, J ; Grundy, A ; Guenel, P ; Haeberle, L ; Hahnen, E ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hamann, U ; Hankinson, SE ; Harkness, EF ; Hart, SN ; He, W ; Hein, A ; Heyworth, J ; Hillemanns, P ; Hollestelle, A ; Hooning, MJ ; Hoover, RN ; Hopper, JL ; Howell, A ; Huang, G ; Humphreys, K ; Hunter, DJ ; Jakimovska, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Janni, W ; John, EM ; Johnson, N ; Jones, ME ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Jung, A ; Kaaks, R ; Kaczmarek, K ; Kataja, V ; Keeman, R ; Kerin, MJ ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Kiiski, J ; Knight, JA ; Ko, Y-D ; Kosma, V-M ; Koutros, S ; Kristensen, VN ; Kruger, U ; Kuehl, T ; Lambrechts, D ; Le Marchand, L ; Lee, E ; Lejbkowicz, F ; Lilyquist, J ; Lindblom, A ; Lindstrom, S ; Lissowska, J ; Lo, W-Y ; Loibl, S ; Long, J ; Lubinski, J ; Lux, MP ; MacInnis, RJ ; Maishman, T ; Makalic, E ; Kostovska, IM ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoukian, S ; Margolin, S ; Martens, JWM ; Martinez, ME ; Mavroudis, D ; McLean, C ; Meindl, A ; Menon, U ; Middha, P ; Miller, N ; Moreno, F ; Mulligan, AM ; Mulot, C ; Munoz-Garzon, VM ; Neuhausen, SL ; Nevanlinna, H ; Neven, P ; Newman, WG ; Nielsen, SF ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Norman, A ; Offit, K ; Olson, JE ; Olsson, H ; Orr, N ; Pankratz, VS ; Park-Simon, T-W ; Perez, JIA ; Perez-Barrios, C ; Peterlongo, P ; Peto, J ; Pinchev, M ; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D ; Polley, EC ; Prentice, R ; Presneau, N ; Prokofyeva, D ; Purrington, K ; Pylkas, K ; Rack, B ; Radice, P ; Rau-Murthy, R ; Rennert, G ; Rennert, HS ; Rhenius, V ; Robson, M ; Romero, A ; Ruddy, KJ ; Ruebner, M ; Saloustros, E ; Sandler, DP ; Sawyer, EJ ; Schmidt, DF ; Schmutzler, RK ; Schneeweiss, A ; Schoemaker, MJ ; Schumacher, F ; Schuermann, P ; Schwentner, L ; Scott, C ; Scott, RJ ; Seynaeve, C ; Shah, M ; Sherman, ME ; Shrubsole, MJ ; Shu, X-O ; Slager, S ; Smeets, A ; Sohn, C ; Soucy, P ; Southey, MC ; Spinelli, JJ ; Stegmaier, C ; Stone, J ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Tamimi, RM ; Tapper, WJ ; Taylor, JA ; Terry, MB ; Thoene, K ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Tomlinson, I ; Truong, T ; Tzardi, M ; Ulmer, H-U ; Untch, M ; Vachon, CM ; van Veen, EM ; Vijai, J ; Weinberg, CR ; Wendt, C ; Whittemore, AS ; Wildiers, H ; Willett, W ; Winqvist, R ; Wolk, A ; Yang, XR ; Yannoukakos, D ; Zhang, Y ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Clarke, C ; Balleine, R ; Baxter, R ; Braye, S ; Carpenter, J ; Dahlstrom, J ; Forbes, J ; Lee, CS ; Marsh, D ; Morey, A ; Pathmanathan, N ; Scott, R ; Simpson, P ; Spigelman, A ; Wilcken, N ; Yip, D ; Zeps, N ; Sexton, A ; Dobrovic, A ; Christian, A ; Trainer, A ; Fellows, A ; Shelling, A ; De Fazio, A ; Blackburn, A ; Crook, A ; Meiser, B ; Patterson, B ; Clarke, C ; Saunders, C ; Hunt, C ; Scott, C ; Amor, D ; Ortega, DG ; Marsh, D ; Edkins, E ; Salisbury, E ; Haan, E ; Macrea, F ; Farshid, G ; Lindeman, G ; Trench, G ; Mann, G ; Giles, G ; Gill, G ; Thorne, H ; Campbell, I ; Hickie, I ; Caldon, L ; Winship, I ; Cui, J ; Flanagan, J ; Kollias, J ; Visvader, J ; Taylor, J ; Burke, J ; Saunus, J ; Forbs, J ; Hopper, J ; Beesley, J ; Kirk, J ; French, J ; Tucker, K ; Wu, K ; Phillips, K ; Forrest, L ; Lipton, L ; Andrews, L ; Lobb, L ; Walker, L ; Kentwell, M ; Spurdle, M ; Cummings, M ; Gleeson, M ; Harris, M ; Jenkins, M ; Young, MA ; Delatycki, M ; Wallis, M ; Burgess, M ; Brown, M ; Southey, M ; Bogwitz, M ; Field, M ; Friedlander, M ; Gattas, M ; Saleh, M ; Aghmesheh, M ; Hayward, N ; Pachter, N ; Cohen, P ; Duijf, P ; James, P ; Simpson, P ; Fong, P ; Butow, P ; Williams, R ; Kefford, R ; Simard, J ; Balleine, R-M ; Dawson, S-J ; Lok, S ; O'connell, S ; Greening, S ; Nightingale, S ; Edwards, S ; Fox, S ; McLachlan, S-A ; Lakhani, S ; Dudding, T ; Antill, Y ; Sahlberg, KK ; Ottestad, L ; Karesen, R ; Schlichting, E ; Holmen, MM ; Sauer, T ; Haakensen, V ; Engebraten, O ; Naume, B ; Fossa, A ; Kiserud, CE ; Reinertsen, K ; Helland, A ; Riis, M ; Geisler, J ; Dunning, AM ; Thompson, DJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Chang-Claude, J ; Schmidt, MK ; Hall, P ; Milne, RL ; Pharoah, PDP ; Antoniou, AC ; Chatterjee, N ; Kraft, P ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Easton, DF (CELL PRESS, 2019-01-03)
    Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Homologous recombination DNA repair defects in PALB2-associated breast cancers
    Li, A ; Geyer, FC ; Blecua, P ; Lee, JY ; Selenica, P ; Brown, DN ; Pareja, F ; Lee, SSK ; Kumar, R ; Rivera, B ; Bi, R ; Piscuoglio, S ; Wen, HY ; Lozada, JR ; Gularte-Merida, R ; Cavallone, L ; Rezoug, Z ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Peterlongo, P ; Tondini, C ; Terkelsen, T ; Ronlund, K ; Boonen, SE ; Mannerma, A ; Winqvist, R ; Janatova, M ; Rajadurai, P ; Xia, B ; Norton, L ; Robson, ME ; Ng, P-S ; Looi, L-M ; Southey, MC ; Weigelt, B ; Soo-Hwang, T ; Tischkowitz, M ; Foulkes, WD ; Reis-Filho, JS ; Aghmesheh, M ; Amor, D ; Andrews, L ; Antill, Y ; Balleine, R ; Beesley, J ; Blackburn, A ; Bogwitz, M ; Brown, M ; Burgess, M ; Burke, J ; Butow, P ; Caldon, L ; Campbell, I ; Christian, A ; Clarke, C ; Cohen, P ; Crook, A ; Cui, J ; Cummings, M ; Dawson, S-J ; De Fazio, A ; Delatycki, M ; Dobrovic, A ; Dudding, T ; Duijf, P ; Edkins, E ; Edwards, S ; Farshid, G ; Fellows, A ; Field, M ; Flanagan, J ; Fong, P ; Forbes, J ; Forrest, L ; Fox, S ; French, J ; Friedlander, M ; Ortega, DG ; Gattas, M ; Giles, G ; Gill, G ; Gleeson, M ; Greening, S ; Haan, E ; Harris, M ; Hayward, N ; Hickie, I ; Hopper, J ; Hunt, C ; James, P ; Jenkins, M ; Kefford, R ; Kentwell, M ; Kirk, J ; Kollias, J ; Lakhani, S ; Lindeman, G ; Lipton, L ; Lobb, L ; Lok, S ; Macrea, F ; Mane, G ; Marsh, D ; Mclachlan, S-A ; Meiser, B ; Milne, R ; Nightingale, S ; O'Connell, S ; Pachter, N ; Patterson, B ; Phillips, K ; Saleh, M ; Salisbury, E ; Saunders, C ; Saunus, J ; Scott, C ; Scott, R ; Sexton, A ; Shelling, A ; Simpson, P ; Spigelman, A ; Spurdle, M ; Stone, J ; Taylor, J ; Thorne, H ; Trainer, A ; Trench, G ; Tucker, K ; Visvader, J ; Walker, L ; Wallis, M ; Williams, R ; Winship, I ; Wu, K ; Young, MA (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2019-08-08)
    Mono-allelic germline pathogenic variants in the Partner And Localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) gene predispose to a high-risk of breast cancer development, consistent with the role of PALB2 in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair. Here, we sought to define the repertoire of somatic genetic alterations in PALB2-associated breast cancers (BCs), and whether PALB2-associated BCs display bi-allelic inactivation of PALB2 and/or genomic features of HR-deficiency (HRD). Twenty-four breast cancer patients with pathogenic PALB2 germline mutations were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing (WES, n = 16) or targeted capture massively parallel sequencing (410 cancer genes, n = 8). Somatic genetic alterations, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the PALB2 wild-type allele, large-scale state transitions (LSTs) and mutational signatures were defined. PALB2-associated BCs were found to be heterogeneous at the genetic level, with PIK3CA (29%), PALB2 (21%), TP53 (21%), and NOTCH3 (17%) being the genes most frequently affected by somatic mutations. Bi-allelic PALB2 inactivation was found in 16 of the 24 cases (67%), either through LOH (n = 11) or second somatic mutations (n = 5) of the wild-type allele. High LST scores were found in all 12 PALB2-associated BCs with bi-allelic PALB2 inactivation sequenced by WES, of which eight displayed the HRD-related mutational signature 3. In addition, bi-allelic inactivation of PALB2 was significantly associated with high LST scores. Our findings suggest that the identification of bi-allelic PALB2 inactivation in PALB2-associated BCs is required for the personalization of HR-directed therapies, such as platinum salts and/or PARP inhibitors, as the vast majority of PALB2-associated BCs without PALB2 bi-allelic inactivation lack genomic features of HRD.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Development and validation of a targeted gene sequencing panel for application to disparate cancers
    McCabe, MJ ; Gauthier, M-EA ; Chan, C-L ; Thompson, TJ ; De Sousa, SMC ; Puttick, C ; Grady, JP ; Gayevskiy, V ; Tao, J ; Ying, K ; Cipponi, A ; Deng, N ; Swarbrick, A ; Thomas, ML ; kConFab, ; Lord, RV ; Johns, AL ; Kohonen-Corish, M ; O'Toole, SA ; Clark, J ; Mueller, SA ; Gupta, R ; McCormack, AI ; Dinger, ME ; Cowley, MJ (Nature Publishing Group, 2019-11-19)
    Next generation sequencing has revolutionised genomic studies of cancer, having facilitated the development of precision oncology treatments based on a tumour's molecular profile. We aimed to develop a targeted gene sequencing panel for application to disparate cancer types with particular focus on tumours of the head and neck, plus test for utility in liquid biopsy. The final panel designed through Roche/Nimblegen combined 451 cancer-associated genes (2.01 Mb target region). 136 patient DNA samples were collected for performance and application testing. Panel sensitivity and precision were measured using well-characterised DNA controls (n = 47), and specificity by Sanger sequencing of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein (AIP) gene in 89 patients. Assessment of liquid biopsy application employed a pool of synthetic circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Library preparation and sequencing were conducted on Illumina-based platforms prior to analysis with our accredited (ISO15189) bioinformatics pipeline. We achieved a mean coverage of 395x, with sensitivity and specificity of >99% and precision of >97%. Liquid biopsy revealed detection to 1.25% variant allele frequency. Application to head and neck tumours/cancers resulted in detection of mutations aligned to published databases. In conclusion, we have developed an analytically-validated panel for application to cancers of disparate types with utility in liquid biopsy.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Type 2 diabetes mellitus, blood cholesterol, triglyceride and colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome
    Dashti, SG ; Li, WY ; Buchanan, DD ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Winship, IM ; Macrae, FA ; Giles, GG ; Hardikar, S ; Hua, X ; Thibodeau, SN ; Figueiredo, JC ; Casey, G ; Haile, RW ; Gallinger, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Newcomb, PA ; Potter, JD ; Lindor, NM ; Hopper, JL ; Jenkins, MA ; Win, AK (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2019-11-12)
    BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and high total cholesterol and triglycerides are known to be associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for the general population. These associations are unknown for people with a germline DNA mismatch repair gene mutation (Lynch syndrome), who are at high risk of colorectal cancer. METHODS: This study included 2023 (56.4% female) carriers with a mismatch repair gene mutation (737 in MLH1, 928 in MSH2, 230 in MSH6, 106 in PMS2, 22 in EPCAM) recruited by the Colon Cancer Family Registry between 1998 and 2012. Weighted Cox regression was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between self-reported type 2 diabetes, high cholesterol, triglyceride and colorectal cancer risk. RESULTS: Overall, 802 carriers were diagnosed with colorectal cancer at a median age of 42 years. A higher risk of colorectal cancer was observed in those with self-reported type-2 diabetes (HR 1.92; 95% CI, 1.03-3.58) and high cholesterol (HR 1.76; CI 1.23-2.52) compared with those without these conditions. There was no evidence of high triglyceride being associated with colorectal cancer risk. CONCLUSION: For people with Lynch syndrome, self-reported type-2 diabetes mellitus and high cholesterol were associated with increased colorectal cancer risk.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Cancer Risks for PMS2-Associated Lynch Syndrome
    ten Broeke, SW ; van der Klift, HM ; Tops, CMJ ; Aretz, S ; Bernstein, I ; Buchanan, DD ; de la Chapelle, A ; Capella, G ; Clendenning, M ; Engel, C ; Gallinger, S ; Gomez Garcia, E ; Figueiredo, JC ; Haile, R ; Hampel, HL ; Hopper, JL ; Hoogerbrugge, N ; Doeberitz, MVK ; Le Marchand, L ; Letteboer, TGW ; Jenkins, MA ; Lindblom, A ; Lindor, NM ; Mensenkamp, AR ; Moller, P ; Newcomb, PA ; van Os, TAM ; Pearlman, R ; Pineda, M ; Rahner, N ; Redeker, EJW ; Olderode-Berends, MJW ; Rosty, C ; Schackert, HK ; Scott, R ; Senter, L ; Spruijt, L ; Steinke-Lange, V ; Suerink, M ; Thibodeau, S ; Vos, YJ ; Wagner, A ; Winship, I ; Hes, FJ ; Vasen, HFA ; Wijnen, JT ; Nielsen, M ; Win, AK (AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018-10-10)
    PURPOSE: Lynch syndrome due to pathogenic variants in the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 is predominantly associated with colorectal and endometrial cancer, although extracolonic cancers have been described within the Lynch tumor spectrum. However, the age-specific cumulative risk (penetrance) of these cancers is still poorly defined for PMS2-associated Lynch syndrome. Using a large data set from a worldwide collaboration, our aim was to determine accurate penetrance measures of cancers for carriers of heterozygous pathogenic PMS2 variants. METHODS: A modified segregation analysis was conducted that incorporated both genotyped and nongenotyped relatives, with conditioning for ascertainment to estimates corrected for bias. Hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% CIs were estimated for each cancer site for mutation carriers compared with the general population, followed by estimation of penetrance. RESULTS: In total, 284 families consisting of 4,878 first- and second-degree family members were included in the analysis. PMS2 mutation carriers were at increased risk for colorectal cancer (cumulative risk to age 80 years of 13% [95% CI, 7.9% to 22%] for males and 12% [95% CI, 6.7% to 21%] for females) and endometrial cancer (13% [95% CI, 7.0%-24%]), compared with the general population (6.6%, 4.7%, and 2.4%, respectively). There was no clear evidence of an increased risk of ovarian, gastric, hepatobiliary, bladder, renal, brain, breast, prostate, or small bowel cancer. CONCLUSION: Heterozygous PMS2 mutation carriers were at small increased risk for colorectal and endometrial cancer but not for any other Lynch syndrome-associated cancer. This finding justifies that PMS2-specific screening protocols could be restricted to colonoscopies. The role of risk-reducing hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for PMS2 mutation carriers needs further discussion.