Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Moral Expansiveness Around the World: The Role of Societal Factors Across 36 Countries
    Kirkland, K ; Crimston, CR ; Jetten, J ; Rudnev, M ; Acevedo-Triana, C ; Amiot, CE ; Ausmees, L ; Baguma, P ; Barry, O ; Becker, M ; Bilewicz, M ; Boonyasiriwat, W ; Castelain, T ; Costantini, G ; Dimdins, G ; Espinosa, A ; Finchilescu, G ; Fischer, R ; Friese, M ; Gastardo-Conaco, MC ; Gomez, A ; Gonzalez, R ; Goto, N ; Halama, P ; Jiga-Boy, GM ; Kuppens, P ; Loughnan, S ; Markovik, M ; Mastor, KA ; McLatchie, N ; Novak, LM ; Onyekachi, BN ; Peker, M ; Rizwan, M ; Schaller, M ; Suh, EM ; Talaifar, S ; Tong, EMW ; Torres, A ; Turner, RN ; Van Lange, PAM ; Vauclair, C-M ; Vinogradov, A ; Wang, Z ; Yeung, VWL ; Bastian, B (SAGE Publications, 2022)
    What are the things that we think matter morally, and how do societal factors influence this? To date, research has explored several individual-level and historical factors that influence the size of our ‘moral circles.' There has, however, been less attention focused on which societal factors play a role. We present the first multi-national exploration of moral expansiveness—that is, the size of people’s moral circles across countries. We found low generalized trust, greater perceptions of a breakdown in the social fabric of society, and greater perceived economic inequality were associated with smaller moral circles. Generalized trust also helped explain the effects of perceived inequality on lower levels of moral inclusiveness. Other inequality indicators (i.e., Gini coefficients) were, however, unrelated to moral expansiveness. These findings suggest that societal factors, especially those associated with generalized trust, may influence the size of our moral circles.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Social mindfulness predicts concern for nature and immigrants across 36 nations.
    Kirkland, K ; Van Lange, PAM ; Van Doesum, NJ ; Acevedo-Triana, C ; Amiot, CE ; Ausmees, L ; Baguma, P ; Barry, O ; Becker, M ; Bilewicz, M ; Boonyasiriwat, W ; Castelain, T ; Costantini, G ; Dimdins, G ; Espinosa, A ; Finchilescu, G ; Fischer, R ; Friese, M ; Gómez, Á ; González, R ; Goto, N ; Halama, P ; Ilustrisimo, RD ; Jiga-Boy, GM ; Kuppens, P ; Loughnan, S ; Markovik, M ; Mastor, KA ; McLatchie, N ; Novak, LM ; Onyishi, IE ; Peker, M ; Rizwan, M ; Schaller, M ; Suh, EM ; Swann, WB ; Tong, EMW ; Torres, A ; Turner, RN ; Vauclair, C-M ; Vinogradov, A ; Wang, Z ; Yeung, VWL ; Bastian, B (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022-12-21)
    People cooperate every day in ways that range from largescale contributions that mitigate climate change to simple actions such as leaving another individual with choice - known as social mindfulness. It is not yet clear whether and how these complex and more simple forms of cooperation relate. Prior work has found that countries with individuals who made more socially mindful choices were linked to a higher country environmental performance - a proxy for complex cooperation. Here we replicated this initial finding in 41 samples around the world, demonstrating the robustness of the association between social mindfulness and environmental performance, and substantially built on it to show this relationship extended to a wide range of complex cooperative indices, tied closely to many current societal issues. We found that greater social mindfulness expressed by an individual was related to living in countries with more social capital, more community participation and reduced prejudice towards immigrants. Our findings speak to the symbiotic relationship between simple and more complex forms of cooperation in societies.