Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/266

Filters

2010 2
1
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Type: Journal Article × Start date: 2010 × End date: 2010 × Author: Kammers, Marjolein ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The weight of representing the body: addressing the potentially indefinite number of body representations in healthy individuals
    Kammers, MPM ; Mulder, J ; de Vignemont, F ; Dijkerman, HC (SPRINGER, 2010-07)
    There is little consensus about the characteristics and number of body representations in the brain. In the present paper, we examine the main problems that are encountered when trying to dissociate multiple body representations in healthy individuals with the use of bodily illusions. Traditionally, task-dependent bodily illusion effects have been taken as evidence for dissociable underlying body representations. Although this reasoning holds well when the dissociation is made between different types of tasks that are closely linked to different body representations, it becomes problematic when found within the same response task (i.e., within the same type of representation). Hence, this experimental approach to investigating body representations runs the risk of identifying as many different body representations as there are significantly different experimental outputs. Here, we discuss and illustrate a different approach to this pluralism by shifting the focus towards investigating task-dependency of illusion outputs in combination with the type of multisensory input. Finally, we present two examples of behavioural bodily illusion experiments and apply Bayesian model selection to illustrate how this different approach of dissociating and classifying multiple body representations can be applied.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    How many motoric body representations can we grasp?
    Kammers, MPM ; Kootker, JA ; Hogendoorn, H ; Dijkerman, HC (SPRINGER, 2010-04)
    At present there is a debate on the number of body representations in the brain. The most commonly used dichotomy is based on the body image, thought to underlie perception and proven to be susceptible to bodily illusions, versus the body schema, hypothesized to guide actions and so far proven to be robust against bodily illusions. In this rubber hand illusion study we investigated the susceptibility of the body schema by manipulating the amount of stimulation on the rubber hand and the participant's hand, adjusting the postural configuration of the hand, and investigating a grasping rather than a pointing response. Observed results showed for the first time altered grasping responses as a consequence of the grip aperture of the rubber hand. This illusion-sensitive motor response challenges one of the foundations on which the dichotomy is based, and addresses the importance of illusion induction versus type of response when investigating body representations.