Radiology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    TROG 15.03 phase II clinical trial of Focal Ablative STereotactic Radiosurgery for Cancers of the Kidney - FASTRACK II
    Siva, S ; Chesson, B ; Bressel, M ; Pryor, D ; Higgs, B ; Reynolds, HM ; Hardcastle, N ; Montgomery, R ; Vanneste, B ; Khoo, V ; Ruben, J ; Lau, E ; Hofman, MS ; Lourenco, RDA ; Sridharan, S ; Brook, NR ; Martin, J ; Lawrentschuk, N ; Kron, T ; Foroudi, F (BMC, 2018-10-23)
    BACKGROUND: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a non-invasive alternative to surgery to control primary renal cell cancer (RCC) in patients that are medically inoperable or at high-risk of post-surgical dialysis. The objective of the FASTRACK II clinical trial is to investigate the efficacy of SABR for primary RCC. METHODS: FASTRACK II is a single arm, multi-institutional phase II study. Seventy patients will be recruited over 3 years and followed for a total of 5 years. Eligible patients must have a biopsy confirmed diagnosis of primary RCC with a single lesion within a kidney, have ECOG performance ≤2 and be medically inoperable, high risk or decline surgery. Radiotherapy treatment planning is undertaken using four dimensional CT scanning to incorporate the impact of respiratory motion. Treatment must be delivered using a conformal or intensity modulated technique including IMRT, VMAT, Cyberknife or Tomotherapy. The trial includes two alternate fractionation schedules based on tumour size: for tumours ≤4 cm in maximum diameter a single fraction of 26Gy is delivered; and for tumours > 4 cm in maximum diameter 42Gy in three fractions is delivered. The primary outcome of the study is to estimate the efficacy of SABR for primary RCC. Secondary objectives include estimating tolerability, characterising overall survival and cancer specific survival, estimating the distant failure rate, describing toxicity and renal function changes after SABR, and assessment of cost-effectiveness of SABR compared with current therapies. DISCUSSION: The present study design allows for multicentre prospective validation of the efficacy of SABR for primary RCC that has been observed from prior single institutional and retrospective series. The study also allows assessment of treatment related toxicity, overall survival, cancer specific survival, freedom from distant failure and renal function post therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02613819 , registered Nov 25th 2015.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    High FDG activity in focal fat necrosis: a pitfall in interpretation of posttreatment PET/CT in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma
    Kashyap, R ; Lau, E ; George, A ; Seymour, JF ; Lade, S ; Hicks, RJ ; Hofman, MS (SPRINGER, 2013-09)
    PURPOSE: PET/CT has a major role in lymphoma imaging, but glycolytic activity in inflammatory processes can reduce specificity. In this study we evaluated restaging PET/CT findings in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and fat necrosis. METHODS: We identified 16 patients from 8,819 restaging FDG PET/CT scans with suspicion of or biopsy-proven fat necrosis on PET/CT. RESULTS: All patients had NHL and demonstrated focal FDG-avid nodular change on CT with density higher than that of fat but lower than that of soft tissue. Histological confirmation was obtained in eight patients, with high GLUT-1 staining between necrotic tissue and organizing fat necrosis evident. Uptake resolved in four patients, and surveillance was continuing in four without relapse. CONCLUSION: Although rare, identification of fat necrosis in patients with a solitary FDG-avid nodule after therapy is important and may lead to the avoidance of unnecessary interventions or treatment. Specific features on CT aid identification, whilst follow-up imaging can be helpful as the metabolic abnormality regresses with time.