Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

http://hdl.handle.net/11343/274

Filters

2019 1
Reset filters

Settings
Statistics
Citations
Author: Akhurst, Timothy × Author: Hicks, Rodney × Author: Hofman, Michael × Author: Lawrentschuk, Nathan × End date: 2019 × Start date: 2010 × Type: Journal Article ×

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating retroperitoneal masses -Keeping your eye on the ball!
    Hung, T-J ; McLean, L ; Mitchell, C ; Pascoe, C ; Lawrentschuk, N ; Murphy, DG ; Iravani, A ; Singh, D ; Hofman, MS ; Zidan, L ; Akhurst, T ; Lewin, J ; Hicks, RJ (BMC, 2019-05-29)
    BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumour is the commonest malignancy affecting males aged between 15 and 35, with an increased relative risk amongst those with a history of cryptorchidism. In patients presenting with locoregional metastatic disease, retroperitoneal and pelvic soft tissue masses are common findings on ultrasound and computed tomography, which has several differential diagnoses within this demographic cohort. On staging 18F-FDG-PET/CT, understanding the typical testicular lymphatic drainage pathway facilitates prompt recognition of the pathognomonic constellation of unilateral absence of testicular scrotal activity, and FDG-avid nodal masses along the drainage pathway. We describe the cases of three young males presenting with abdominopelvic masses, in whom FDG-PET/CT was helpful in formulating a unifying diagnosis of metastatic seminoma, retrospectively corroborated by a history of testicular maldescent. CASE PRESENTATIONS: In all three cases, the patients were males aged in their 30s and 40s who were brought to medical attention for back and lower abdominal pain of varying duration. Initial imaging evaluation with computed tomography and/or ultrasound revealed large abdominopelvic soft tissue masses, with lymphoproliferative disorders or soft tissue sarcomas being high on the list of differential diagnoses. As such, they were referred for staging FDG-PET/CT, all of whom demonstrated the pathognomonic constellation of, 1) unilateral absence of scrotal testicular activity, and 2) FDG-avid nodal masses along the typical testicular lymphatic drainage pathway. These characteristic patterns were corroborated by a targeted clinical history and examination which revealed a history of cryptorchidism, and elevated β-hCG in two of three patients. All were subsequently confirmed as metastatic seminoma on biopsy and open resection. CONCLUSION: These cases highlight the importance of clinical history and examination for the clinician, as well as a sound knowledge of the typical testicular lymphatic drainage pathway for the PET physician, which would assist with prompt recognition of the characteristic imaging patterns on FDG-PET/CT. It further anecdotally supports the utility of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating undiagnosed abdominopelvic masses, as well as a potential role in the initial staging of germ cell tumours in appropriately selected patients.