Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2
-
Item68Ga-DOTATATE and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Paraganglioma and Pheochromocytoma: utility, patterns and heterogeneity(E-MED, 2016-08-17)BACKGROUND: Pheochromocytomas (PCC) and paragangliomas (PGL) are neuroendocrine tumours arising from pluripotent neural crest stem cells and are associated with neurons of the autonomic nervous system. PCCs/PGLs are often hereditary and multifocal, and their biologic behaviour and metabolic activity vary making imaging of these tumours challenging. The imaging gold standard has been I-123 MIBG complemented by CT or MRI. PGLs being neuroendocrine tumours express somatostatin receptors enabling imaging with Ga-68 DOTA-coupled peptides such as DOTATATE. Imaging with F-18 FDG also provides additional information regarding metabolic activity and biologic aggressiveness of these tumours, or, in some situations, reflecting metabolic reprogramming of these tumours. We report our experience using both Ga-68 DOTATATE and F-18 FDG PET/CT imaging in patients with PGLs and PCCs. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 23 patients with proven PGL/PCC who underwent both DOTATATE and FDG PET/CT. Seven patients also had I-123 MIBG SPECT/CT and 1 patient had I-124 MIBG PET/CT. Lesional intensity and patterns of uptake were analysed. RESULTS: DOTATATE and FDG were positive at most sites of disease (96.2 % vs 91.4 %), although uptake intensity was significantly higher on DOTATATE with a median SUV of 21 compared to 12.5 for FDG (p < 0.001). SUVmax on F-18 FDG was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in clinically aggressive cases. I-123/I-124 MIBG detected fewer lesions (30.4 %). CONCLUSION: Overall, Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT detected similar number but has significantly greater lesion-to-background contrast compared to F-18 FDG PET/CT. Combined with high specificity, patient convenience and relatively low cost, DOTATATE PET/CT should be considered the ideal first line investigation for imaging PGL/PCC. Depending on DOTATATE findings and the clinical question, FDG and MIBG remain useful and, in selected cases, may provide more accurate staging, disease characterisation and guide treatment choices.
-
ItemThe role of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in evaluating retroperitoneal masses -Keeping your eye on the ball!(BMC, 2019-05-29)BACKGROUND: Testicular germ cell tumour is the commonest malignancy affecting males aged between 15 and 35, with an increased relative risk amongst those with a history of cryptorchidism. In patients presenting with locoregional metastatic disease, retroperitoneal and pelvic soft tissue masses are common findings on ultrasound and computed tomography, which has several differential diagnoses within this demographic cohort. On staging 18F-FDG-PET/CT, understanding the typical testicular lymphatic drainage pathway facilitates prompt recognition of the pathognomonic constellation of unilateral absence of testicular scrotal activity, and FDG-avid nodal masses along the drainage pathway. We describe the cases of three young males presenting with abdominopelvic masses, in whom FDG-PET/CT was helpful in formulating a unifying diagnosis of metastatic seminoma, retrospectively corroborated by a history of testicular maldescent. CASE PRESENTATIONS: In all three cases, the patients were males aged in their 30s and 40s who were brought to medical attention for back and lower abdominal pain of varying duration. Initial imaging evaluation with computed tomography and/or ultrasound revealed large abdominopelvic soft tissue masses, with lymphoproliferative disorders or soft tissue sarcomas being high on the list of differential diagnoses. As such, they were referred for staging FDG-PET/CT, all of whom demonstrated the pathognomonic constellation of, 1) unilateral absence of scrotal testicular activity, and 2) FDG-avid nodal masses along the typical testicular lymphatic drainage pathway. These characteristic patterns were corroborated by a targeted clinical history and examination which revealed a history of cryptorchidism, and elevated β-hCG in two of three patients. All were subsequently confirmed as metastatic seminoma on biopsy and open resection. CONCLUSION: These cases highlight the importance of clinical history and examination for the clinician, as well as a sound knowledge of the typical testicular lymphatic drainage pathway for the PET physician, which would assist with prompt recognition of the characteristic imaging patterns on FDG-PET/CT. It further anecdotally supports the utility of FDG-PET/CT in evaluating undiagnosed abdominopelvic masses, as well as a potential role in the initial staging of germ cell tumours in appropriately selected patients.