Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 17
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Characterisation and validation of Mel38; A multi-tissue microRNA signature of cutaneous melanoma
    Van Laar, R ; Lincoln, M ; Fereday, S ; Ahmad, A (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2019-02-05)
    BACKGROUND: Histopathologic examination of melanocytic neoplasms can be challenging and subjective, with no specific circulating or tissue-based biomarkers currently available. Recently, a circulating 38-microRNA profile of melanoma (Mel38) was described. In this study, Mel38 expression and its impact on downstream mRNA regulation in solid tissue is examined. METHODS: Mel38 was applied to archival, clinically-annotated, solid-tissue genomic datasets representing benign naevi, primary and metastatic melanoma. Statistical analysis of the signature in relation to disease status, patient outcome and molecular pathways was performed. RESULTS: Mel38 is able to stratify genomic data from solid tissue biopsies on the basis of disease status and differences in melanoma-specific survival. Experimentally-verified messenger-RNA targets of Mel38 also exhibit prognostic expression patterns and represent key molecular pathways and events in melanoma development and progression. CONCLUSION: The Mel38 microRNA profile may have diagnostic and prognostic utility in solid tissue as well as being a robust circulating biomarker of melanoma.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Going to extremes: determinants of extraordinary response and survival in patients with cancer
    Saner, FAM ; Herschtal, A ; Nelson, BH ; deFazio, A ; Goode, EL ; Ramus, SJ ; Pandey, A ; Beach, JA ; Fereday, S ; Berchuck, A ; Lheureux, S ; Pearce, CL ; Pharoah, PD ; Pike, MC ; Garsed, DW ; Bowtell, DDL (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2019-06)
    Research into factors affecting treatment response or survival in patients with cancer frequently involves cohorts that span the most common range of clinical outcomes, as such patients are most readily available for study. However, attention has turned to highly unusual patients who have exceptionally favourable or atypically poor responses to treatment and/or overall survival, with the expectation that patients at the extremes may provide insights that could ultimately improve the outcome of individuals with more typical disease trajectories. While clinicians can often recount surprising patients whose clinical journey was very unusual, given known clinical characteristics and prognostic indicators, there is a lack of consensus among researchers on how best to define exceptional patients, and little has been proposed for the optimal design of studies to identify factors that dictate unusual outcome. In this Opinion article, we review different approaches to identifying exceptional patients with cancer and possible study designs to investigate extraordinary clinical outcomes. We discuss pitfalls with finding these rare patients, including challenges associated with accrual of patients across different treatment centres and time periods. We describe recent molecular and immunological factors that have been identified as contributing to unusual patient outcome and make recommendations for future studies on these intriguing patients.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study
    Rambau, PF ; Vierkant, RA ; Intermaggio, MP ; Kelemen, LE ; Goodman, MT ; Herpel, E ; Pharoah, PD ; Kommoss, S ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Karlan, BY ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Menon, U ; Polo, SH ; Candido dos Reis, FJ ; Doherty, JA ; Gayther, SA ; Sharma, R ; Larson, MC ; Harnett, PR ; Hatfield, E ; de Andrade, JM ; Nelson, GS ; Steed, H ; Schildkraut, JM ; Carney, ME ; Hogdall, E ; Whittemore, AS ; Widschwendter, M ; Kennedy, CJ ; Wang, F ; Wang, Q ; Wang, C ; Armasu, SM ; Daley, F ; Coulson, P ; Jones, ME ; Anglesio, MS ; Chow, C ; de Fazio, A ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Brucker, SY ; Cybulski, C ; Harris, HR ; Hartkopf, AD ; Huzarski, T ; Jensen, A ; Lubinski, J ; Oszurek, O ; Benitez, J ; Mina, F ; Staebler, A ; Taran, FA ; Pasternak, J ; Talhouk, A ; Rossing, MA ; Hendley, J ; Edwards, RP ; Fereday, S ; Modugno, F ; Ness, RB ; Sieh, W ; El-Bahrawy, MA ; Winham, SJ ; Lester, J ; Kjaer, SK ; Gronwald, J ; Sinn, P ; Fasching, PA ; Chang-Claude, J ; Moysich, KB ; Bowtell, DD ; Hernandez, BY ; Luk, H ; Behrens, S ; Shah, M ; Jung, A ; Ghatage, P ; Alsop, J ; Alsop, K ; Garcia-Donas, J ; Thompson, PJ ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Karpinskyj, C ; Cazorla-Jimenez, A ; Garcia, MJ ; Deen, S ; Wilkens, LR ; Palacios, J ; Berchuck, A ; Koziak, JM ; Brenton, JD ; Cook, LS ; Goode, EL ; Huntsman, DG ; Ramus, SJ ; Koebel, M (WILEY, 2018-10)
    We aimed to validate the prognostic association of p16 expression in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and to explore it in other ovarian carcinoma histotypes. p16 protein expression was assessed by clinical-grade immunohistochemistry in 6525 ovarian carcinomas including 4334 HGSC using tissue microarrays from 24 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. p16 expression patterns were interpreted as abnormal (either overexpression referred to as block expression or absence) or normal (heterogeneous). CDKN2A (which encodes p16) mRNA expression was also analyzed in a subset (n = 2280) mostly representing HGSC (n = 2010). Association of p16 expression with overall survival (OS) was determined within histotypes as was CDKN2A expression for HGSC only. p16 block expression was most frequent in HGSC (56%) but neither protein nor mRNA expression was associated with OS. However, relative to heterogeneous expression, block expression was associated with shorter OS in endometriosis-associated carcinomas, clear cell [hazard ratio (HR): 2.02, 95% confidence (CI) 1.47-2.77, p < 0.001] and endometrioid (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.75, p = 0.004), while absence was associated with shorter OS in low-grade serous carcinomas (HR: 2.95, 95% CI 1.61-5.38, p = 0.001). Absence was most frequent in mucinous carcinoma (50%), and was not associated with OS in this histotype. The prognostic value of p16 expression is histotype-specific and pattern dependent. We provide definitive evidence against an association of p16 expression with survival in ovarian HGSC as previously suggested. Block expression of p16 in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma should be further validated as a prognostic marker, and absence in low-grade serous carcinoma justifies CDK4 inhibition.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    The intronic G13964C variant in p53 is not a high-risk mutation in familial breast cancer in Australia
    Marsh, A ; Spurdle, AB ; Turner, BC ; Fereday, S ; Thorne, H ; Pupo, GM ; Mann, GJ ; Hopper, JL ; Sambrook, JF ; Chenevix-Trench, G (BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2001)
    BACKGROUND: Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for approximately 50% of breast cancer families with more than four affected cases, whereas exonic mutations in p53, PTEN, CHK2 and ATM may account for a very small proportion. It was recently reported that an intronic variant of p53--G13964C--occurred in three out of 42 (7.1%) 'hereditary' breast cancer patients, but not in any of 171 'sporadic' breast cancer control individuals (P = 0.0003). If this relatively frequent occurrence of G13964C in familial breast cancer and absence in control individuals were confirmed, then this would suggest that the G13964C variant plays a role in breast cancer susceptibility. METHOD: We genotyped 71 familial breast cancer patients and 143 control individuals for the G13964C variant using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. RESULTS: Three (4.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0-8.9%) G13964C heterozygotes were identified. The variant was also identified in 5 out of 143 (3.5%; 95% CI 0.6-6.4%) control individuals without breast cancer or a family history of breast cancer, however, which is no different to the proportion found in familial cases (P = 0.9). CONCLUSION: The present study would have had 80% power to detect an odds ratio of 4.4, and we therefore conclude that the G13946C polymorphism is not a 'high-risk' mutation for familial breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary
    Ahmed, AA ; Etemadmoghadam, D ; Temple, J ; Lynch, AG ; Riad, M ; Sharma, R ; Stewart, C ; Fereday, S ; Caldas, C ; DeFazio, A ; Bowtell, D ; Brenton, JD (WILEY, 2010-05)
    Numerous studies have tested the association between TP53 mutations in ovarian cancer and prognosis but these have been consistently confounded by limitations in study design, methodology, and/or heterogeneity in the sample cohort. High-grade serous (HGS) carcinoma is the most clinically important histological subtype of ovarian cancer. As these tumours may arise from the ovary, Fallopian tube or peritoneum, they are collectively referred to as high-grade pelvic serous carcinoma (HGPSC). To identify the true prevalence of TP53 mutations in HGPSC, we sequenced exons 2-11 and intron-exon boundaries in tumour DNA from 145 patients. HGPSC cases were defined as having histological grade 2 or 3 and FIGO stage III or IV. Surprisingly, pathogenic TP53 mutations were identified in 96.7% (n = 119/123) of HGPSC cases. Molecular and pathological review of mutation-negative cases showed evidence of p53 dysfunction associated with copy number gain of MDM2 or MDM4, or indicated the exclusion of samples as being low-grade serous tumours or carcinoma of uncertain primary site. Overall, p53 dysfunction rate approached 100% of confirmed HGPSCs. No association between TP53 mutation and progression-free or overall survival was found. From this first comprehensive mapping of TP53 mutation rate in a homogeneous group of HGPSC patients, we conclude that mutant TP53 is a driver mutation in the pathogenesis of HGPSC cancers. Because TP53 mutation is almost invariably present in HGPSC, it is not of substantial prognostic or predictive significance.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study
    Koebel, M ; Madore, J ; Ramus, SJ ; Clarke, BA ; Pharoah, PDP ; Deen, S ; Bowtell, DD ; Odunsi, K ; Menon, U ; Morrison, C ; Lele, S ; Bshara, W ; Sucheston, L ; Beckmann, MW ; Hein, A ; Thiel, FC ; Hartmann, A ; Wachter, DL ; Anglesio, MS ; Hogdall, E ; Jensen, A ; Hogdall, C ; Kalli, KR ; Fridley, BL ; Keeney, GL ; Fogarty, ZC ; Vierkant, RA ; Liu, S ; Cho, S ; Nelson, G ; Ghatage, P ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Gayther, SA ; Benjamin, E ; Widschwendter, M ; Intermaggio, MP ; Rosen, B ; Bernardini, MQ ; Mackay, H ; Oza, A ; Shaw, P ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Driver, KE ; Alsop, J ; Mack, M ; Koziak, JM ; Steed, H ; Ewanowich, C ; DeFazio, A ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Fereday, S ; Gao, B ; Johnatty, SE ; George, J ; Galletta, L ; Goode, EL ; Kjaer, SK ; Huntsman, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Moysich, KB ; Brenton, JD ; Kelemen, LE (SPRINGERNATURE, 2014-12-09)
    BACKGROUND: Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS: Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS: FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    MyD88 and TLR4 Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Block, MS ; Vierkant, RA ; Rambau, PF ; Winham, SJ ; Wagner, P ; Traficante, N ; Toloczko, A ; Tiezzi, DG ; Taran, FA ; Sinn, P ; Sieh, W ; Sharma, R ; Rothstein, JH ; Ramon y Cajal, T ; Paz-Ares, L ; Oszurek, O ; Orsulic, S ; Ness, RB ; Nelson, G ; Modugno, F ; Menkiszak, J ; McGuire, V ; McCauley, BM ; Mack, M ; Lubinski, J ; Longacre, TA ; Li, Z ; Lester, J ; Kennedy, CJ ; Kalli, KR ; Jung, AY ; Johnatty, SE ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Jensen, A ; Intermaggio, MP ; Hung, J ; Herpel, E ; Hernandez, BY ; Hartkopf, AD ; Harnett, PR ; Ghatage, P ; Garcia-Bueno, JM ; Gao, B ; Fereday, S ; Eilber, U ; Edwards, RP ; de Sousa, CB ; de Andrade, JM ; Chudecka-Glaz, A ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Cazorla, A ; Brucker, SY ; Alsop, J ; Whittemore, AS ; Steed, H ; Staebler, A ; Moysich, KB ; Menon, U ; Koziak, JM ; Kommoss, S ; Kjaer, SK ; Kelemen, LE ; Karlan, BY ; Huntsman, DG ; Hogdall, E ; Gronwald, J ; Goodman, MT ; Gilks, B ; Jose Garcia, M ; Fasching, PA ; de Fazio, A ; Deen, S ; Chang-Claude, J ; dos Reis, FJC ; Campbell, IG ; Brenton, JD ; Bowtell, DD ; Benitez, J ; Pharoah, PDP ; Kobel, M ; Ramus, SJ ; Goode, EL (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018-03)
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression in relation to clinical features of epithelial ovarian cancer, histologic subtypes, and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted centralized immunohistochemical staining, semi-quantitative scoring, and survival analysis in 5263 patients participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 2014, including 2865 high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), with more than 12,000 person-years of follow-up time. Tissue microarrays were stained for MyD88 and TLR4, and staining intensity was classified using a 2-tiered system for each marker (weak vs strong). RESULTS: Expression of MyD88 and TLR4 was similar in all histotypes except clear cell ovarian cancer, which showed reduced expression compared with other histotypes (P<.001 for both). In HGSOC, strong MyD88 expression was modestly associated with shortened overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26; P=.04) but was also associated with advanced stage (P<.001). The expression of TLR4 was not associated with survival. In low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), strong expression of both MyD88 and TLR4 was associated with favorable survival (HR [95% CI], 0.49 [0.29-0.84] and 0.44 [0.21-0.89], respectively; P=.009 and P=.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Results are consistent with an association between strong MyD88 staining and advanced stage and poorer survival in HGSOC and demonstrate correlation between strong MyD88 and TLR4 staining and improved survival in LGSOC, highlighting the biological differences between the 2 serous histotypes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Multiple ABCB1 transcriptional fusions in drug resistant high-grade serous ovarian and breast cancer
    Christie, EL ; Pattnaik, S ; Beach, J ; Copeland, A ; Rashoo, N ; Fereday, S ; Hendley, J ; Alsop, K ; Brady, SL ; Lamb, G ; Pandey, A ; deFazio, A ; Thorne, H ; Bild, A ; Bowtell, DDL (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2019-03-20)
    ABCB1 encodes Multidrug Resistance protein (MDR1), an ATP-binding cassette member involved in the cellular efflux of chemotherapeutic drugs. Here we report that ovarian and breast samples from chemotherapy treated patients are positive for multiple transcriptional fusions involving ABCB1, placing it under the control of a strong promoter while leaving its open reading frame intact. We identified 15 different transcriptional fusion partners involving ABCB1, as well as patients with multiple distinct fusion events. The partner gene selected depended on its structure, promoter strength, and chromosomal proximity to ABCB1. Fusion positivity was strongly associated with the number of lines of MDR1-substrate chemotherapy given. MDR1 inhibition in a fusion positive ovarian cancer cell line increased sensitivity to paclitaxel more than 50-fold. Convergent evolution of ABCB1 fusion is therefore frequent in chemotherapy resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. As most currently approved PARP inhibitors (PARPi) are MDR1 substrates, prior chemotherapy may precondition resistance to PARPi.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Methylation of all BRCA1 copies predicts response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in ovarian carcinoma
    Kondrashova, O ; Topp, M ; Nesic, K ; Lieschke, E ; Ho, G-Y ; Harrell, M ; Zapparoli, G ; Hadley, A ; Holian, R ; Boehm, E ; Heong, V ; Sanij, E ; Pearson, RB ; Krais, JJ ; Johnson, N ; McNally, O ; Ananda, S ; Alsop, K ; Hutt, KJ ; Kaufmann, SH ; Lin, KK ; Harding, TC ; Traficante, N ; deFazio, A ; McNeish, LA ; Bowtell, DD ; Swisher, EM ; Dobrovic, A ; Wakefield, MJ ; Scott, CL ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Green, A ; Webb, P ; Gertig, D ; Fereday, S ; Moore, S ; Hung, J ; Harrap, K ; Sadkowsky, T ; Pandeya, N ; Malt, M ; Mellon, A ; Robertson, R ; Vanden Bergh, T ; Jones, M ; Mackenzie, P ; Maidens, J ; Nattress, K ; Chiew, YE ; Stenlake, A ; Sullivan, H ; Alexander, B ; Ashover, P ; Brown, S ; Corrish, T ; Green, L ; Jackman, L ; Ferguson, K ; Martin, K ; Martyn, A ; Ranieri, B ; White, J ; Jayde, V ; Mamers, P ; Bowes, L ; Galletta, L ; Giles, D ; Hendley, J ; Schmidt, T ; Shirley, H ; Ball, C ; Young, C ; Viduka, S ; Tran, H ; Bilic, S ; Glavinas, L ; Brooks, J ; Stuart-Harris, R ; Kirsten, F ; Rutovitz, J ; Clingan, P ; Glasgow, A ; Proietto, A ; Braye, S ; Otton, G ; Shannon, J ; Bonaventura, T ; Stewart, J ; Begbie, S ; Friedlander, M ; Bell, D ; Baron-Hay, S ; Ferrier, A ; Gard, G ; Nevell, D ; Pavlakis, N ; Valmadre, S ; Young, B ; Camaris, C ; Crouch, R ; Edwards, L ; Hacker, N ; Marsden, D ; Robertson, G ; Beale, P ; Beith, J ; Carter, J ; Dalrymple, C ; Houghton, R ; Russell, P ; Links, M ; Grygiel, J ; Hill, J ; Brand, A ; Byth, K ; Jaworski, R ; Harnett, P ; Sharma, R ; Wain, G ; Ward, B ; Papadimos, D ; Crandon, A ; Cummings, M ; Horwood, K ; Obermair, A ; Perrin, L ; Wyld, D ; Nicklin, J ; Davy, M ; Oehler, MK ; Hall, C ; Dodd, T ; Healy, T ; Pittman, K ; Henderson, D ; Miller, J ; Pierdes, J ; Blomfield, P ; Challis, D ; Mclntosh, R ; Parker, A ; Brown, B ; Rome, R ; Allen, D ; Grant, P ; Hyde, S ; Laurie, R ; Robbie, M ; Healy, D ; Jobling, T ; Manolitsas, T ; McNealage, J ; Rogers, P ; Susil, B ; Sumithran, E ; Simpson, I ; Phillips, K ; Rischin, D ; Fox, S ; Johnson, D ; Lade, S ; Loughrey, M ; O'Callaghan, N ; Murray, W ; Waring, P ; Billson, V ; Pyman, J ; Neesham, D ; Quinn, M ; Underhill, C ; Bell, R ; Ng, LF ; Blum, R ; Ganju, V ; Hammond, I ; Leung, Y ; McCartney, A ; Buck, M ; Haviv, I ; Purdie, D ; Whiteman, D ; Zeps, N (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2018-09-28)
    Accurately identifying patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) who respond to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy is of great clinical importance. Here we show that quantitative BRCA1 methylation analysis provides new insight into PARPi response in preclinical models and ovarian cancer patients. The response of 12 HGSOC patient-derived xenografts (PDX) to the PARPi rucaparib was assessed, with variable dose-dependent responses observed in chemo-naive BRCA1/2-mutated PDX, and no responses in PDX lacking DNA repair pathway defects. Among BRCA1-methylated PDX, silencing of all BRCA1 copies predicts rucaparib response, whilst heterozygous methylation is associated with resistance. Analysis of 21 BRCA1-methylated platinum-sensitive recurrent HGSOC (ARIEL2 Part 1 trial) confirmed that homozygous or hemizygous BRCA1 methylation predicts rucaparib clinical response, and that methylation loss can occur after exposure to chemotherapy. Accordingly, quantitative BRCA1 methylation analysis in a pre-treatment biopsy could allow identification of patients most likely to benefit, and facilitate tailoring of PARPi therapy.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Analysis of cancer risk and BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation prevalence in the kConFab familial breast cancer resource
    Mann, GJ ; Thorne, H ; Balleine, RL ; Butow, PN ; Clarke, CL ; Edkins, E ; Evans, GM ; Fereday, S ; Haan, E ; Gattas, M ; Giles, GG ; Goldblatt, J ; Hopper, JL ; Kirk, J ; Leary, JA ; Lindeman, G ; Niedermayr, E ; Phillips, KA ; Picken, S ; Pupo, GM ; Saunders, C ; Scott, CL ; Spurdle, AB ; Suthers, G ; Tucker, K ; Chenevix-Trench, G (BMC, 2006)
    INTRODUCTION: The Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab) is a multidisciplinary, collaborative framework for the investigation of familial breast cancer. Based in Australia, the primary aim of kConFab is to facilitate high-quality research by amassing a large and comprehensive resource of epidemiological and clinical data with biospecimens from individuals at high risk of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and from their close relatives. METHODS: Epidemiological, family history and lifestyle data, as well as biospecimens, are collected from multiple-case breast cancer families ascertained through family cancer clinics in Australia and New Zealand. We used the Tyrer-Cuzick algorithms to assess the prospective risk of breast cancer in women in the kConFab cohort who were unaffected with breast cancer at the time of enrolment in the study. RESULTS: Of kConFab's first 822 families, 518 families had multiple cases of female breast cancer alone, 239 had cases of female breast and ovarian cancer, 37 had cases of female and male breast cancer, and 14 had both ovarian cancer as well as male and female breast cancer. Data are currently held for 11,422 people and germline DNAs for 7,389. Among the 812 families with at least one germline sample collected, the mean number of germline DNA samples collected per family is nine. Of the 747 families that have undergone some form of mutation screening, 229 (31%) carry a pathogenic or splice-site mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Germline DNAs and data are stored from 773 proven carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA1 mutations. kConFab's fresh tissue bank includes 253 specimens of breast or ovarian tissue--both normal and malignant--including 126 from carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. CONCLUSION: These kConFab resources are available to researchers anywhere in the world, who may apply to kConFab for biospecimens and data for use in ethically approved, peer-reviewed projects. A high calculated risk from the Tyrer-Cuzick algorithms correlated closely with the subsequent occurrence of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation positive families, but this was less evident in families in which no pathogenic BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has been detected.