Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 35
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Streamlined genetic education is effective in preparing women newly diagnosed with breast cancer for decision making about treatment-focused genetic testing: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial
    Quinn, VF ; Meiser, B ; Kirk, J ; Tucker, KM ; Watts, KJ ; Rahman, B ; Peate, M ; Saunders, C ; Geelhoed, E ; Gleeson, M ; Barlow-Stewart, K ; Field, M ; Harris, M ; Antill, YC ; Cicciarelli, L ; Crowe, K ; Bowen, MT ; Mitchell, G (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2017-04)
    PURPOSE: Increasingly, women newly diagnosed with breast cancer are being offered treatment-focused genetic testing (TFGT). As the demand for TFGT increases, streamlined methods of genetic education are needed. METHODS: In this noninferiority trial, women aged <50 years with either a strong family history (FH+) or other features suggestive of a germ-line mutation (FH-) were randomized before definitive breast cancer surgery to receive TFGT education either as brief written materials (intervention group (IG)) or during a genetic counseling session at a familial cancer clinic (usual-care group (UCG)). Women completed self-report questionnaires at four time points over 12 months. RESULTS: A total of 135 women were included in the analysis, all of whom opted for TFGT. Decisional conflict about TFGT choice (primary outcome) was not inferior in the IG compared with the UCG (noninferiority margin of -10; mean difference = 2.45; 95% confidence interval -2.87-7.76; P = 0.36). Costs per woman counseled in the IG were significantly lower (AUD$89) compared with the UCG (AUD$173; t(115) = 6.02; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A streamlined model of educating women newly diagnosed with breast cancer about TFGT seems to be a cost-effective way of delivering education while ensuring that women feel informed and supported in their decision making, thus freeing resources for other women to access TFGT.Genet Med 19 4, 448-456.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Current mismatch repair deficiency tumor testing practices and capabilities: A survey of Australian pathology providers
    Mascarenhas, L ; Shanley, S ; Mitchell, G ; Spurdle, AB ; Macrae, F ; Pachter, N ; Buchanan, DD ; Ward, RL ; Fox, S ; Duxbury, E ; Driessen, R ; Boussioutas, A (WILEY, 2018-12)
    AIM & METHODS: An electronic survey of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia accredited pathology services was conducted to assess Lynch syndrome tumor screening practices and to identify barriers and capabilities to screen newly diagnosed colorectal and endometrial tumors in Australia. RESULTS: Australia lacks a national policy for universal mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) testing of incident colorectal and endometrial tumors cases. Routine Lynch syndrome tumor screening program for colorectal and/or endometrial tumors was applied by 95% (37/39) of laboratories. Tumor dMMR screening methods varied; MMR protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) alone was undertaken by 77% of 39 laboratories, 18% performed both IHC and microsatellite instability testing, 5% did not have the capacity to perform in-house testing. For colorectal tumors, 47% (17/36) reported following a universal approach without age limit, 30% (11/36) tested only "red flag" cases; 6% (3/36) on clinician request only. For endometrial tumors, 37% (12/33) reported clinician request generated testing, 27% (9/33) were screening only "red flag" cases, and 12% (4/33) carried out universal screening without an age criteria. BRAF V600E mutation testing of colorectal tumors demonstrating aberrant MLH1 protein expression by IHC was the most common secondary tumor test, with 53% of laboratories performing the test; 15% of laboratories also applied the BRAF V600E test to endometrial tumors with aberrant MLH1 expression despite no evidence for its utility. Tumor testing for MLH1 promoter methylation was performed by less than 15% laboratories. CONCLUSION: Although use of tumor screening for evidence of dMMR is widely available, protocols for its use in Australia vary widely. This national survey provides a snapshot of the current availability and practice of tumor dMMR screening and identifies the need for a uniform national testing policy.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Breast cancer risk prediction using a polygenic risk score in the familial setting: a prospective study from the Breast Cancer Family Registry and kConFab
    Li, H ; Feng, B ; Miron, A ; Chen, X ; Beesley, J ; Bimeh, E ; Barrowdale, D ; John, EM ; Daly, MB ; Andrulis, IL ; Buys, SS ; Kraft, P ; Thorne, H ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Southey, MC ; Antoniou, AC ; James, PA ; Terry, MB ; Phillips, K-A ; Hopper, JL ; Mitchell, G ; Goldgar, DE (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2017-01)
    PURPOSE: This study examined the utility of sets of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in familial but non-BRCA-associated breast cancer (BC). METHODS: We derived a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 24 known BC risk SNPs for 4,365 women from the Breast Cancer Family Registry and Kathleen Cuningham Consortium Foundation for Research into Familial Breast Cancer familial BC cohorts. We compared scores for women based on cancer status at baseline; 2,599 women unaffected at enrollment were followed-up for an average of 7.4 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the association of PRS with BC risk. The BOADICEA risk prediction algorithm was used to measure risk based on family history alone. RESULTS: The mean PRS at baseline was 2.25 (SD, 0.35) for affected women and was 2.17 (SD, 0.35) for unaffected women from combined cohorts (P < 10-6). During follow-up, 205 BC cases occurred. The hazard ratios for continuous PRS (per SD) and upper versus lower quintiles were 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 1.22-1.56) and 3.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.84-5.23) respectively. Based on their PRS-based predicted risk, management for up to 23% of women could be altered. CONCLUSION: Including BC-associated SNPs in risk assessment can provide more accurate risk prediction than family history alone and can influence recommendations for cancer screening and prevention modalities for high-risk women.Genet Med 19 1, 30-35.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Exome Sequencing Identifies Rare Deleterious Mutations in DNA Repair Genes FANCC and BLM as Potential Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles
    Thompson, ER ; Doyle, MA ; Ryland, GL ; Rowley, SM ; Choong, DYH ; Tothill, RW ; Thorne, H ; Barnes, DR ; Li, J ; Ellul, J ; Philip, GK ; Antill, YC ; James, PA ; Trainer, AH ; Mitchell, G ; Campbell, IG ; Horwitz, MS (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2012-09)
    Despite intensive efforts using linkage and candidate gene approaches, the genetic etiology for the majority of families with a multi-generational breast cancer predisposition is unknown. In this study, we used whole-exome sequencing of thirty-three individuals from 15 breast cancer families to identify potential predisposing genes. Our analysis identified families with heterozygous, deleterious mutations in the DNA repair genes FANCC and BLM, which are responsible for the autosomal recessive disorders Fanconi Anemia and Bloom syndrome. In total, screening of all exons in these genes in 438 breast cancer families identified three with truncating mutations in FANCC and two with truncating mutations in BLM. Additional screening of FANCC mutation hotspot exons identified one pathogenic mutation among an additional 957 breast cancer families. Importantly, none of the deleterious mutations were identified among 464 healthy controls and are not reported in the 1,000 Genomes data. Given the rarity of Fanconi Anemia and Bloom syndrome disorders among Caucasian populations, the finding of multiple deleterious mutations in these critical DNA repair genes among high-risk breast cancer families is intriguing and suggestive of a predisposing role. Our data demonstrate the utility of intra-family exome-sequencing approaches to uncover cancer predisposition genes, but highlight the major challenge of definitively validating candidates where the incidence of sporadic disease is high, germline mutations are not fully penetrant, and individual predisposition genes may only account for a tiny proportion of breast cancer families.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A high-throughput protocol for mutation scanning of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes
    Hondow, HL ; Fox, SB ; Mitchell, G ; Scott, RJ ; Beshay, V ; Wong, SQ ; Dobrovic, A (BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2011-06-24)
    BACKGROUND: Detection of mutations by DNA sequencing can be facilitated by scanning methods to identify amplicons which may have mutations. Current scanning methods used for the detection of germline sequence variants are laborious as they require post-PCR manipulation. High resolution melting (HRM) is a cost-effective rapid screening strategy, which readily detects heterozygous variants by melting curve analysis of PCR products. It is well suited to screening genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 as germline pathogenic mutations in these genes are always heterozygous. METHODS: Assays for the analysis of all coding regions and intron-exon boundaries of BRCA1 and BRCA2 were designed, and optimised. A final set of 94 assays which ran under identical amplification conditions were chosen for BRCA1 (36) and BRCA2 (58). Significant attention was placed on primer design to enable reproducible detection of mutations within the amplicon while minimising unnecessary detection of polymorphisms. Deoxyinosine residues were incorporated into primers that overlay intronic polymorphisms. Multiple 384 well plates were used to facilitate high throughput. RESULTS: 169 BRCA1 and 239 BRCA2 known sequence variants were used to test the amplicons. We also performed an extensive blinded validation of the protocol with 384 separate patient DNAs. All heterozygous variants were detected with the optimised assays. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first HRM approach to screen the entire coding region of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes using one set of reaction conditions in a multi plate 384 well format using specifically designed primers. The parallel screening of a relatively large number of samples enables better detection of sequence variants. HRM has the advantages of decreasing the necessary sequencing by more than 90%. This markedly reduced cost of sequencing will result in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation testing becoming accessible to individuals who currently do not undergo mutation testing because of the significant costs involved.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The attitudes of people with sarcoma and their family towards genomics and incidental information arising from genetic research
    Young, M-A ; Herlihy, A ; Mitchell, G ; Thomas, DM ; Ballinger, M ; Tucker, K ; Lewis, CR ; Neuhaus, S ; Halliday, J (BIOMED CENTRAL LTD, 2013)
    PURPOSE: The study aimed to examine attitudes of individuals diagnosed with sarcoma and their family members towards genetics, genomic research and incidental information arising as a result of participating in genetic research. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 1200 individuals from the International Sarcoma Kindred Study (ISKS). Respondents were divided into three groups: individuals affected with sarcoma (probands), their spouses and family members. RESULTS: Approximately half of all research participants felt positively towards new discoveries in human genetics. Overall, more were positive in their attitudes towards genetic testing for inherited conditions (60%) but family members were less so. Older participants reported more highly positive attitudes more often than younger participants. Males were less likely to feel positive about new genetic discoveries and more likely to believe they could modify genetic risk by altering lifestyle factors. Almost all ISKS participants believed participants would like to be given ancillary information arising as a result of participating in genetic research. CONCLUSIONS: The only difference between the study groups was the decreased likelihood of family members being highly positive about genetic testing. This may be important if predictive testing for sarcoma becomes available. Generally ISKS research participants supported the notion of returning incidental genetic information to research participants.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prevalence of PALB2 mutations in Australian familial breast cancer cases and controls
    Thompson, ER ; Gorringe, KL ; Rowley, SM ; Wong-Brown, MW ; McInerny, S ; Li, N ; Trainer, AH ; Devereux, L ; Doyle, MA ; Li, J ; Lupat, R ; Delatycki, MB ; Mitchell, G ; James, PA ; Scott, RJ ; Campbell, IG (BMC, 2015-08-19)
    INTRODUCTION: PALB2 is emerging as a high-penetrance breast cancer predisposition gene in the order of BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, large studies that have evaluated the full gene rather than just the most common variants in both cases and controls are required before all truncating variants can be included in familial breast cancer variant testing. METHODS: In this study we analyse almost 2000 breast cancer cases sourced from individuals referred to familial cancer clinics, thus representing typical cases presenting in clinical practice. These cases were compared to a similar number of population-based cancer-free controls. RESULTS: We identified a significant excess of truncating variants in cases (1.3 %) versus controls (0.2 %), including six novel variants (p = 0.0001; odds ratio (OR) 6.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.3-18.9). Three of the four control individuals carrying truncating variants had at least one relative with breast cancer. There was no excess of missense variants in cases overall, but the common c.1676A > G variant (rs152451) was significantly enriched in cases and may represent a low-penetrance polymorphism (p = 0.002; OR 1.24 (95 % CI 1.09-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support truncating variants in PALB2 as high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles, and suggest that a common missense variant may also lead to a low level of increased breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Breast Tissue Composition and Immunophenotype and Its Relationship with Mammographic Density in Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer
    Pang, J-MB ; Byrne, DJ ; Takano, EA ; Jene, N ; Petelin, L ; McKinley, J ; Poliness, C ; Saunders, C ; Taylor, D ; Mitchell, G ; Fox, SB ; De, A (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2015-06-25)
    AIM: To investigate the cellular and immunophenotypic basis of mammographic density in women at high risk of breast cancer. METHODS: Mammograms and targeted breast biopsies were accrued from 24 women at high risk of breast cancer. Mammographic density was classified into Wolfe categories and ranked by increasing density. The histological composition and immunophenotypic profile were quantified from digitized haematoxylin and eosin-stained and immunohistochemically-stained (ERα, ERβ, PgR, HER2, Ki-67, and CD31) slides and correlated to mammographic density. RESULTS: Increasing mammographic density was significantly correlated with increased fibrous stroma proportion (rs (22) = 0.5226, p = 0.0088) and significantly inversely associated with adipose tissue proportion (rs (22) = -0.5409, p = 0.0064). Contrary to previous reports, stromal expression of ERα was common (19/20 cases, 95%). There was significantly higher stromal PgR expression in mammographically-dense breasts (p=0.026). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of stroma and fat underlies mammographic density in women at high risk of breast cancer. Increased expression of PgR in the stroma of mammographically dense breasts and frequent and unexpected presence of stromal ERα expression raises the possibility that hormone receptor expression in breast stroma may have a role in mediating the effects of exogenous hormonal therapy on mammographic density.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prediction of Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks in Male BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
    Lecarpentier, J ; Silvestri, V ; Kuchenbaecker, KB ; Barrowdale, D ; Dennis, J ; McGuffog, L ; Soucy, P ; Leslie, G ; Rizzolo, P ; Navazio, AS ; Valentini, V ; Zelli, V ; Lee, A ; Al Olama, AA ; Tyrer, JP ; Southey, M ; John, EM ; Conner, TA ; Goldgar, DE ; Buys, SS ; Janavicius, R ; Steele, L ; Ding, YC ; Neuhausen, SL ; Hansen, TVO ; Osorio, A ; Weitzel, JN ; Toss, A ; Medici, V ; Cortesi, L ; Zanna, I ; Palli, D ; Radice, P ; Manoukian, S ; Peissel, B ; Azzollini, J ; Viel, A ; Cini, G ; Damante, G ; Tommasi, S ; Peterlongo, P ; Fostira, F ; Hamann, U ; Evans, DG ; Henderson, A ; Brewer, C ; Eccles, D ; Cook, J ; Ong, K-R ; Walker, L ; Side, LE ; Porteous, ME ; Davidson, R ; Hodgson, S ; Frost, D ; Adlard, J ; Izatt, L ; Eeles, R ; Ellis, S ; Tischkowitz, M ; Godwin, AK ; Meindl, A ; Gehrig, A ; Dworniczak, B ; Sutter, C ; Engel, C ; Niederacher, D ; Steinemann, D ; Hahnen, E ; Hauke, J ; Rhiem, K ; Kast, K ; Arnold, N ; Ditsch, N ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Wand, D ; Lasset, C ; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ; Belotti, M ; Damiola, F ; Barjhoux, L ; Mazoyer, S ; Van Heetvelde, M ; Poppe, B ; De Leeneer, K ; Claes, KBM ; de la Hoya, M ; Garcia-Barberan, V ; Caldes, T ; Perez Segura, P ; Kiiski, JI ; Aittomaeki, K ; Khan, S ; Nevanlinna, H ; van Asperen, CJ ; Vaszko, T ; Kasler, M ; Olah, E ; Balmana, J ; Gutierrez-Enriquez, S ; Diez, O ; Teule, A ; Izquierdo, A ; Darder, E ; Brunet, J ; Del Valle, J ; Feliubadalo, L ; Pujana, MA ; Lazaro, C ; Arason, A ; Agnarsson, BA ; Johannsson, OT ; Barkardottir, RB ; Alducci, E ; Tognazzo, S ; Montagna, M ; Teixeira, MR ; Pinto, P ; Spurdle, AB ; Holland, H ; Lee, JW ; Lee, MH ; Lee, J ; Kim, S-W ; Kang, E ; Kim, Z ; Sharma, P ; Rebbeck, TR ; Vijai, J ; Robson, M ; Lincoln, A ; Musinsky, J ; Gaddam, P ; Tan, YY ; Berger, A ; Singer, CF ; Loud, JT ; Greene, MH ; Mulligan, AM ; Glendon, G ; Andrulis, IL ; Toland, AE ; Senter, L ; Bojesen, A ; Nielsen, HR ; Skytte, A-B ; Sunde, L ; Jensen, UB ; Pedersen, IS ; Krogh, L ; Kruse, TA ; Caligo, MA ; Yoon, S-Y ; Teo, S-H ; von Wachenfeldt, A ; Huo, D ; Nielsen, SM ; Olopade, OI ; Nathanson, KL ; Domchek, SM ; Lorenchick, C ; Jankowitz, RC ; Campbell, I ; James, P ; Mitchell, G ; Orr, N ; Park, SK ; Thomassen, M ; Offit, K ; Couch, FJ ; Simard, J ; Easton, DF ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Schmutzler, RK ; Antoniou, AC ; Ottini, L (AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017-07-10)
    Purpose BRCA1/2 mutations increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer in men. Common genetic variants modify cancer risks for female carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. We investigated-for the first time to our knowledge-associations of common genetic variants with breast and prostate cancer risks for male carriers of BRCA1/ 2 mutations and implications for cancer risk prediction. Materials and Methods We genotyped 1,802 male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 by using the custom Illumina OncoArray. We investigated the combined effects of established breast and prostate cancer susceptibility variants on cancer risks for male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations by constructing weighted polygenic risk scores (PRSs) using published effect estimates as weights. Results In male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, PRS that was based on 88 female breast cancer susceptibility variants was associated with breast cancer risk (odds ratio per standard deviation of PRS, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.56; P = 8.6 × 10-6). Similarly, PRS that was based on 103 prostate cancer susceptibility variants was associated with prostate cancer risk (odds ratio per SD of PRS, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.81; P = 3.2 × 10-9). Large differences in absolute cancer risks were observed at the extremes of the PRS distribution. For example, prostate cancer risk by age 80 years at the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS varies from 7% to 26% for carriers of BRCA1 mutations and from 19% to 61% for carriers of BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Conclusion PRSs may provide informative cancer risk stratification for male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations that might enable these men and their physicians to make informed decisions on the type and timing of breast and prostate cancer risk management.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Reevaluation of the BRCA2 truncating allele c.9976A > T (p.Lys3326Ter) in a familial breast cancer context
    Thompson, ER ; Gorringe, KL ; Rowley, SM ; Li, N ; McInerny, S ; Wong-Brown, MW ; Devereux, L ; Li, J ; Trainer, AH ; Mitchell, G ; Scott, RJ ; James, PA ; Campbell, IG (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2015-10-12)
    The breast cancer predisposition gene, BRCA2, has a large number of genetic variants of unknown effect. The variant rs11571833, an A > T transversion in the final exon of the gene that leads to the creation of a stop codon 93 amino acids early (K3326*), is reported as a neutral polymorphism but there is some evidence to suggest an association with an increased risk of breast cancer. We assessed whether this variant was enriched in a cohort of breast cancer cases ascertained through familial cancer clinics compared to population-based non-cancer controls using a targeted sequencing approach. We identified the variant in 66/2634 (2.5%) cases and 33/1996 (1.65%) controls, indicating an enrichment in the breast cancer cases (p = 0.047, OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.00-2.34). This data is consistent with recent iCOGs data suggesting that this variant is not neutral with respect to breast cancer risk. rs11571833 may need to be included in SNP panels for evaluating breast cancer risk.