Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 31
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Pheo-Type: A Diagnostic Gene-expression Assay for the Classification of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma
    Flynn, A ; Dwight, T ; Harris, J ; Benn, D ; Zhou, L ; Hogg, A ; Catchpoole, D ; James, P ; Duncan, EL ; Trainer, A ; Gill, AJ ; Clifton-Bligh, R ; Hicks, RJ ; Tothill, RW (ENDOCRINE SOC, 2016-03)
    CONTEXT: Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are heritable neoplasms that can be classified into gene-expression subtypes corresponding to their underlying specific genetic drivers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a diagnostic and research tool (Pheo-type) capable of classifying PPGL tumors into gene-expression subtypes that could be used to guide and interpret genetic testing, determine surveillance programs, and aid in elucidation of PPGL biology. DESIGN: A compendium of published microarray data representing 205 PPGL tumors was used for the selection of subtype-specific genes that were then translated to the Nanostring gene-expression platform. A support vector machine was trained on the microarray dataset and then tested on an independent Nanostring dataset representing 38 familial and sporadic cases of PPGL of known genotype (RET, NF1, TMEM127, MAX, HRAS, VHL, and SDHx). Different classifier models involving between three and six subtypes were compared for their discrimination potential. RESULTS: A gene set of 46 genes and six endogenous controls was selected representing six known PPGL subtypes; RTK1-3 (RET, NF1, TMEM127, and HRAS), MAX-like, VHL, and SDHx. Of 38 test cases, 34 (90%) were correctly predicted to six subtypes based on the known genotype to gene-expression subtype association. Removal of the RTK2 subtype from training, characterized by an admixture of tumor and normal adrenal cortex, improved the classification accuracy (35/38). Consolidation of RTK and pseudohypoxic PPGL subtypes to four- and then three-class architectures improved the classification accuracy for clinical application. CONCLUSIONS: The Pheo-type gene-expression assay is a reliable method for predicting PPGL genotype using routine diagnostic tumor samples.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Cousins not twins: intratumoural and intertumoural heterogeneity in syndromic neuroendocrine tumours
    Flynn, A ; Dwight, T ; Benn, D ; Deb, S ; Colebatch, AJ ; Fox, S ; Harris, J ; Duncan, EL ; Robinson, B ; Hogg, A ; Ellul, J ; To, H ; Cuong, D ; Miller, JA ; Yates, C ; James, P ; Trainer, A ; Gill, AJ ; Clifton-Bligh, R ; Hicks, RJ ; Tothill, RW (WILEY, 2017-07)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    A quantitative model to predict pathogenicity of missense variants in the TP53 gene
    Fortuno, C ; Cipponi, A ; Ballinger, ML ; Tavtigian, S ; Olivier, M ; Ruparel, V ; Haupt, Y ; Haupt, S ; Tucker, K ; Spurdle, AB ; Thomas, DM ; James, PA (WILEY, 2019-06)
    Germline pathogenic variants in the TP53 gene cause Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a condition that predisposes individuals to a wide range of cancer types. Identification of individuals carrying a TP53 pathogenic variant is linked to clinical management decisions, such as the avoidance of radiotherapy and use of high-intensity screening programs. The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based quantitative model that integrates independent in silico data (Align-GVGD and BayesDel) and somatic to germline ratio (SGR), to assign pathogenicity to every possible missense variant in the TP53 gene. To do this, a likelihood ratio for pathogenicity (LR) was derived from each component calibrated using reference sets of assumed pathogenic and benign missense variants. A posterior probability of pathogenicity was generated by combining LRs, and algorithm outputs were validated using different approaches. A total of 730 TP53 missense variants could be assigned to a clinically interpretable class. The outputs of the model correlated well with existing clinical information, functional data, and ClinVar classifications. In conclusion, these quantitative outputs provide the basis for individualized assessment of cancer risk useful for clinical interpretation. In addition, we propose the value of the novel SGR approach for use within the ACMG/AMP guidelines for variant classification.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Cheasley, D ; Li, N ; Rowley, SM ; Elder, K ; Mann, GB ; Loi, S ; Savas, P ; Goode, DL ; Kader, T ; Zethoven, M ; Semple, T ; Fox, SB ; Pang, J-M ; Byrne, D ; Devereux, L ; Nickson, C ; Procopio, P ; Lee, G ; Hughes, S ; Saunders, H ; Fujihara, KM ; Kuykhoven, K ; Connaughton, J ; James, PA ; Gorringe, KL ; Campbell, IG (WILEY, 2019-06)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
    Rebbeck, TR ; Friebel, TM ; Friedman, E ; Hamann, U ; Huo, D ; Kwong, A ; Olah, E ; Olopade, OI ; Solano, AR ; Teo, S-H ; Thomassen, M ; Weitzel, JN ; Chan, TL ; Couch, FJ ; Goldgar, DE ; Kruse, TA ; Palmero, EI ; Park, SK ; Torres, D ; van Rensburg, EJ ; McGuffog, L ; Parsons, MT ; Leslie, G ; Aalfs, CM ; Abugattas, J ; Adlard, J ; Agata, S ; Aittomaki, K ; Andrews, L ; Andrulis, IL ; Arason, A ; Arnold, N ; Arun, BK ; Asseryanis, E ; Auerbach, L ; Azzollini, J ; Balmana, J ; Barile, M ; Barkardottir, RB ; Barrowdale, D ; Benitez, J ; Berger, A ; Berger, R ; Blanco, AM ; Blazer, KR ; Blok, MJ ; Bonadona, V ; Bonanni, B ; Bradbury, AR ; Brewer, C ; Buecher, B ; Buys, SS ; Caldes, T ; Caliebe, A ; Caligo, MA ; Campbell, I ; Caputo, SM ; Chiquette, J ; Chung, WK ; Claes, KBM ; Collee, JM ; Cook, J ; Davidson, R ; de la Hoya, M ; De Leeneer, K ; de Pauw, A ; Delnatte, C ; Diez, O ; Ding, YC ; Ditsch, N ; Domchek, S ; Dorfling, CM ; Velazquez, C ; Dworniczak, B ; Eason, J ; Easton, DF ; Eeles, R ; Ehrencrona, H ; Ejlertsen, B ; Engel, C ; Engert, S ; Evans, DG ; Faivre, L ; Feliubadalo, L ; Ferrer, SF ; Foretova, L ; Fowler, J ; Frost, D ; Galvao, HCR ; Ganz, PA ; Garber, J ; Gauthier-Villars, M ; Gehrig, A ; Gerdes, A-M ; Gesta, P ; Giannini, G ; Giraud, S ; Glendon, G ; Godwin, AK ; Greene, MH ; Gronwald, J ; Gutierrez-Barrera, A ; Hahnen, E ; Hauke, J ; Henderson, A ; Hentschel, J ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Honisch, E ; Imyanitov, EN ; Isaacs, C ; Izatt, L ; Izquierdo, A ; Jakubowska, A ; James, P ; Janavicius, R ; Jensen, UB ; John, EM ; Vijai, J ; Kaczmarek, K ; Karlan, BY ; Kast, K ; Kim, S-W ; Konstantopoulou, I ; Korach, J ; Laitman, Y ; Lasa, A ; Lasset, C ; Lazaro, C ; Lee, A ; Lee, MH ; Lester, J ; Lesueur, F ; Liljegren, A ; Lindor, NM ; Longy, M ; Loud, JT ; Lu, KH ; Lubinski, J ; Machackova, E ; Manoukian, S ; Mari, V ; Martinez-Bouzas, C ; Matrai, Z ; Mebirouk, N ; Meijers-Heijboer, HEJ ; Meindl, A ; Mensenkamp, AR ; Mickys, U ; Miller, A ; Montagna, M ; Moysich, KB ; Mulligan, AM ; Musinsky, J ; Neuhausen, SL ; Nevanlinna, H ; Ngeow, J ; Nguyen, HP ; Niederacher, D ; Nielsen, HR ; Nielsen, FC ; Nussbaum, RL ; Offit, K ; Ofverholm, A ; Ong, K-R ; Osorio, A ; Papi, L ; Papp, J ; Pasini, B ; Pedersen, IS ; Peixoto, A ; Peruga, N ; Peterlongo, P ; Pohl, E ; Pradhan, N ; Prajzendanc, K ; Prieur, F ; Pujol, P ; Radice, P ; Ramus, SJ ; Rantala, J ; Rashid, MU ; Rhiem, K ; Robson, M ; Rodriguez, GC ; Rogers, MT ; Rudaitis, V ; Schmidt, AY ; Schmutzler, RK ; Senter, L ; Shah, PD ; Sharma, P ; Side, LE ; Simard, J ; Singer, CF ; Skytte, A-B ; Slavin, TP ; Snape, K ; Sobol, H ; Southey, M ; Steele, L ; Steinemann, D ; Sukiennicki, G ; Sutter, C ; Szabo, CI ; Tan, YY ; Teixeira, MR ; Terry, MB ; Teule, A ; Thomas, A ; Thull, DL ; Tischkowitz, M ; Tognazzo, S ; Toland, AE ; Topka, S ; Trainer, AH ; Tung, N ; van Asperen, CJ ; van der Hout, AH ; van der Kolk, LE ; van der Luijt, RB ; Van Heetvelde, M ; Varesco, L ; Varon-Mateeva, R ; Vega, A ; Villarreal-Garza, C ; von Wachenfeldt, A ; Walker, L ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Weber, BHF ; Yannoukakos, D ; Yoon, S-Y ; Zanzottera, C ; Zidan, J ; Zorn, KK ; Selkirk, CGH ; Hulick, PJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Spurdle, AB ; Antoniou, AC ; Nathanson, KL (WILEY-HINDAWI, 2018-05)
    The prevalence and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported in single populations, with the majority of reports focused on White in Europe and North America. The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) has assembled data on 18,435 families with BRCA1 mutations and 11,351 families with BRCA2 mutations ascertained from 69 centers in 49 countries on six continents. This study comprehensively describes the characteristics of the 1,650 unique BRCA1 and 1,731 unique BRCA2 deleterious (disease-associated) mutations identified in the CIMBA database. We observed substantial variation in mutation type and frequency by geographical region and race/ethnicity. In addition to known founder mutations, mutations of relatively high frequency were identified in specific racial/ethnic or geographic groups that may reflect founder mutations and which could be used in targeted (panel) first pass genotyping for specific populations. Knowledge of the population-specific mutational spectrum in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could inform efficient strategies for genetic testing and may justify a more broad-based oncogenetic testing in some populations.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Molecular analysis of PALB2-associated breast cancers
    Lee, JEA ; Li, N ; Rowley, SM ; Cheasley, D ; Zethoven, M ; McInerny, S ; Gorringe, KL ; James, PA ; Campbell, IG (WILEY, 2018-05)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Breast cancer risk prediction using a polygenic risk score in the familial setting: a prospective study from the Breast Cancer Family Registry and kConFab
    Li, H ; Feng, B ; Miron, A ; Chen, X ; Beesley, J ; Bimeh, E ; Barrowdale, D ; John, EM ; Daly, MB ; Andrulis, IL ; Buys, SS ; Kraft, P ; Thorne, H ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Southey, MC ; Antoniou, AC ; James, PA ; Terry, MB ; Phillips, K-A ; Hopper, JL ; Mitchell, G ; Goldgar, DE (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2017-01)
    PURPOSE: This study examined the utility of sets of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in familial but non-BRCA-associated breast cancer (BC). METHODS: We derived a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 24 known BC risk SNPs for 4,365 women from the Breast Cancer Family Registry and Kathleen Cuningham Consortium Foundation for Research into Familial Breast Cancer familial BC cohorts. We compared scores for women based on cancer status at baseline; 2,599 women unaffected at enrollment were followed-up for an average of 7.4 years. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the association of PRS with BC risk. The BOADICEA risk prediction algorithm was used to measure risk based on family history alone. RESULTS: The mean PRS at baseline was 2.25 (SD, 0.35) for affected women and was 2.17 (SD, 0.35) for unaffected women from combined cohorts (P < 10-6). During follow-up, 205 BC cases occurred. The hazard ratios for continuous PRS (per SD) and upper versus lower quintiles were 1.38 (95% confidence interval: 1.22-1.56) and 3.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.84-5.23) respectively. Based on their PRS-based predicted risk, management for up to 23% of women could be altered. CONCLUSION: Including BC-associated SNPs in risk assessment can provide more accurate risk prediction than family history alone and can influence recommendations for cancer screening and prevention modalities for high-risk women.Genet Med 19 1, 30-35.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Exome Sequencing Identifies Rare Deleterious Mutations in DNA Repair Genes FANCC and BLM as Potential Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles
    Thompson, ER ; Doyle, MA ; Ryland, GL ; Rowley, SM ; Choong, DYH ; Tothill, RW ; Thorne, H ; Barnes, DR ; Li, J ; Ellul, J ; Philip, GK ; Antill, YC ; James, PA ; Trainer, AH ; Mitchell, G ; Campbell, IG ; Horwitz, MS (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2012-09)
    Despite intensive efforts using linkage and candidate gene approaches, the genetic etiology for the majority of families with a multi-generational breast cancer predisposition is unknown. In this study, we used whole-exome sequencing of thirty-three individuals from 15 breast cancer families to identify potential predisposing genes. Our analysis identified families with heterozygous, deleterious mutations in the DNA repair genes FANCC and BLM, which are responsible for the autosomal recessive disorders Fanconi Anemia and Bloom syndrome. In total, screening of all exons in these genes in 438 breast cancer families identified three with truncating mutations in FANCC and two with truncating mutations in BLM. Additional screening of FANCC mutation hotspot exons identified one pathogenic mutation among an additional 957 breast cancer families. Importantly, none of the deleterious mutations were identified among 464 healthy controls and are not reported in the 1,000 Genomes data. Given the rarity of Fanconi Anemia and Bloom syndrome disorders among Caucasian populations, the finding of multiple deleterious mutations in these critical DNA repair genes among high-risk breast cancer families is intriguing and suggestive of a predisposing role. Our data demonstrate the utility of intra-family exome-sequencing approaches to uncover cancer predisposition genes, but highlight the major challenge of definitively validating candidates where the incidence of sporadic disease is high, germline mutations are not fully penetrant, and individual predisposition genes may only account for a tiny proportion of breast cancer families.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prevalence of PALB2 mutations in Australian familial breast cancer cases and controls
    Thompson, ER ; Gorringe, KL ; Rowley, SM ; Wong-Brown, MW ; McInerny, S ; Li, N ; Trainer, AH ; Devereux, L ; Doyle, MA ; Li, J ; Lupat, R ; Delatycki, MB ; Mitchell, G ; James, PA ; Scott, RJ ; Campbell, IG (BMC, 2015-08-19)
    INTRODUCTION: PALB2 is emerging as a high-penetrance breast cancer predisposition gene in the order of BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, large studies that have evaluated the full gene rather than just the most common variants in both cases and controls are required before all truncating variants can be included in familial breast cancer variant testing. METHODS: In this study we analyse almost 2000 breast cancer cases sourced from individuals referred to familial cancer clinics, thus representing typical cases presenting in clinical practice. These cases were compared to a similar number of population-based cancer-free controls. RESULTS: We identified a significant excess of truncating variants in cases (1.3 %) versus controls (0.2 %), including six novel variants (p = 0.0001; odds ratio (OR) 6.58, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.3-18.9). Three of the four control individuals carrying truncating variants had at least one relative with breast cancer. There was no excess of missense variants in cases overall, but the common c.1676A > G variant (rs152451) was significantly enriched in cases and may represent a low-penetrance polymorphism (p = 0.002; OR 1.24 (95 % CI 1.09-1.47). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support truncating variants in PALB2 as high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles, and suggest that a common missense variant may also lead to a low level of increased breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Prediction of Breast and Prostate Cancer Risks in Male BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers Using Polygenic Risk Scores
    Lecarpentier, J ; Silvestri, V ; Kuchenbaecker, KB ; Barrowdale, D ; Dennis, J ; McGuffog, L ; Soucy, P ; Leslie, G ; Rizzolo, P ; Navazio, AS ; Valentini, V ; Zelli, V ; Lee, A ; Al Olama, AA ; Tyrer, JP ; Southey, M ; John, EM ; Conner, TA ; Goldgar, DE ; Buys, SS ; Janavicius, R ; Steele, L ; Ding, YC ; Neuhausen, SL ; Hansen, TVO ; Osorio, A ; Weitzel, JN ; Toss, A ; Medici, V ; Cortesi, L ; Zanna, I ; Palli, D ; Radice, P ; Manoukian, S ; Peissel, B ; Azzollini, J ; Viel, A ; Cini, G ; Damante, G ; Tommasi, S ; Peterlongo, P ; Fostira, F ; Hamann, U ; Evans, DG ; Henderson, A ; Brewer, C ; Eccles, D ; Cook, J ; Ong, K-R ; Walker, L ; Side, LE ; Porteous, ME ; Davidson, R ; Hodgson, S ; Frost, D ; Adlard, J ; Izatt, L ; Eeles, R ; Ellis, S ; Tischkowitz, M ; Godwin, AK ; Meindl, A ; Gehrig, A ; Dworniczak, B ; Sutter, C ; Engel, C ; Niederacher, D ; Steinemann, D ; Hahnen, E ; Hauke, J ; Rhiem, K ; Kast, K ; Arnold, N ; Ditsch, N ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Wand, D ; Lasset, C ; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ; Belotti, M ; Damiola, F ; Barjhoux, L ; Mazoyer, S ; Van Heetvelde, M ; Poppe, B ; De Leeneer, K ; Claes, KBM ; de la Hoya, M ; Garcia-Barberan, V ; Caldes, T ; Perez Segura, P ; Kiiski, JI ; Aittomaeki, K ; Khan, S ; Nevanlinna, H ; van Asperen, CJ ; Vaszko, T ; Kasler, M ; Olah, E ; Balmana, J ; Gutierrez-Enriquez, S ; Diez, O ; Teule, A ; Izquierdo, A ; Darder, E ; Brunet, J ; Del Valle, J ; Feliubadalo, L ; Pujana, MA ; Lazaro, C ; Arason, A ; Agnarsson, BA ; Johannsson, OT ; Barkardottir, RB ; Alducci, E ; Tognazzo, S ; Montagna, M ; Teixeira, MR ; Pinto, P ; Spurdle, AB ; Holland, H ; Lee, JW ; Lee, MH ; Lee, J ; Kim, S-W ; Kang, E ; Kim, Z ; Sharma, P ; Rebbeck, TR ; Vijai, J ; Robson, M ; Lincoln, A ; Musinsky, J ; Gaddam, P ; Tan, YY ; Berger, A ; Singer, CF ; Loud, JT ; Greene, MH ; Mulligan, AM ; Glendon, G ; Andrulis, IL ; Toland, AE ; Senter, L ; Bojesen, A ; Nielsen, HR ; Skytte, A-B ; Sunde, L ; Jensen, UB ; Pedersen, IS ; Krogh, L ; Kruse, TA ; Caligo, MA ; Yoon, S-Y ; Teo, S-H ; von Wachenfeldt, A ; Huo, D ; Nielsen, SM ; Olopade, OI ; Nathanson, KL ; Domchek, SM ; Lorenchick, C ; Jankowitz, RC ; Campbell, I ; James, P ; Mitchell, G ; Orr, N ; Park, SK ; Thomassen, M ; Offit, K ; Couch, FJ ; Simard, J ; Easton, DF ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Schmutzler, RK ; Antoniou, AC ; Ottini, L (AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017-07-10)
    Purpose BRCA1/2 mutations increase the risk of breast and prostate cancer in men. Common genetic variants modify cancer risks for female carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. We investigated-for the first time to our knowledge-associations of common genetic variants with breast and prostate cancer risks for male carriers of BRCA1/ 2 mutations and implications for cancer risk prediction. Materials and Methods We genotyped 1,802 male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 by using the custom Illumina OncoArray. We investigated the combined effects of established breast and prostate cancer susceptibility variants on cancer risks for male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations by constructing weighted polygenic risk scores (PRSs) using published effect estimates as weights. Results In male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations, PRS that was based on 88 female breast cancer susceptibility variants was associated with breast cancer risk (odds ratio per standard deviation of PRS, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.56; P = 8.6 × 10-6). Similarly, PRS that was based on 103 prostate cancer susceptibility variants was associated with prostate cancer risk (odds ratio per SD of PRS, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.35 to 1.81; P = 3.2 × 10-9). Large differences in absolute cancer risks were observed at the extremes of the PRS distribution. For example, prostate cancer risk by age 80 years at the 5th and 95th percentiles of the PRS varies from 7% to 26% for carriers of BRCA1 mutations and from 19% to 61% for carriers of BRCA2 mutations, respectively. Conclusion PRSs may provide informative cancer risk stratification for male carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations that might enable these men and their physicians to make informed decisions on the type and timing of breast and prostate cancer risk management.