Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Going to extremes: determinants of extraordinary response and survival in patients with cancer
    Saner, FAM ; Herschtal, A ; Nelson, BH ; deFazio, A ; Goode, EL ; Ramus, SJ ; Pandey, A ; Beach, JA ; Fereday, S ; Berchuck, A ; Lheureux, S ; Pearce, CL ; Pharoah, PD ; Pike, MC ; Garsed, DW ; Bowtell, DDL (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2019-06)
    Research into factors affecting treatment response or survival in patients with cancer frequently involves cohorts that span the most common range of clinical outcomes, as such patients are most readily available for study. However, attention has turned to highly unusual patients who have exceptionally favourable or atypically poor responses to treatment and/or overall survival, with the expectation that patients at the extremes may provide insights that could ultimately improve the outcome of individuals with more typical disease trajectories. While clinicians can often recount surprising patients whose clinical journey was very unusual, given known clinical characteristics and prognostic indicators, there is a lack of consensus among researchers on how best to define exceptional patients, and little has been proposed for the optimal design of studies to identify factors that dictate unusual outcome. In this Opinion article, we review different approaches to identifying exceptional patients with cancer and possible study designs to investigate extraordinary clinical outcomes. We discuss pitfalls with finding these rare patients, including challenges associated with accrual of patients across different treatment centres and time periods. We describe recent molecular and immunological factors that have been identified as contributing to unusual patient outcome and make recommendations for future studies on these intriguing patients.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Association of p16 expression with prognosis varies across ovarian carcinoma histotypes: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study
    Rambau, PF ; Vierkant, RA ; Intermaggio, MP ; Kelemen, LE ; Goodman, MT ; Herpel, E ; Pharoah, PD ; Kommoss, S ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Karlan, BY ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Menon, U ; Polo, SH ; Candido dos Reis, FJ ; Doherty, JA ; Gayther, SA ; Sharma, R ; Larson, MC ; Harnett, PR ; Hatfield, E ; de Andrade, JM ; Nelson, GS ; Steed, H ; Schildkraut, JM ; Carney, ME ; Hogdall, E ; Whittemore, AS ; Widschwendter, M ; Kennedy, CJ ; Wang, F ; Wang, Q ; Wang, C ; Armasu, SM ; Daley, F ; Coulson, P ; Jones, ME ; Anglesio, MS ; Chow, C ; de Fazio, A ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Brucker, SY ; Cybulski, C ; Harris, HR ; Hartkopf, AD ; Huzarski, T ; Jensen, A ; Lubinski, J ; Oszurek, O ; Benitez, J ; Mina, F ; Staebler, A ; Taran, FA ; Pasternak, J ; Talhouk, A ; Rossing, MA ; Hendley, J ; Edwards, RP ; Fereday, S ; Modugno, F ; Ness, RB ; Sieh, W ; El-Bahrawy, MA ; Winham, SJ ; Lester, J ; Kjaer, SK ; Gronwald, J ; Sinn, P ; Fasching, PA ; Chang-Claude, J ; Moysich, KB ; Bowtell, DD ; Hernandez, BY ; Luk, H ; Behrens, S ; Shah, M ; Jung, A ; Ghatage, P ; Alsop, J ; Alsop, K ; Garcia-Donas, J ; Thompson, PJ ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Karpinskyj, C ; Cazorla-Jimenez, A ; Garcia, MJ ; Deen, S ; Wilkens, LR ; Palacios, J ; Berchuck, A ; Koziak, JM ; Brenton, JD ; Cook, LS ; Goode, EL ; Huntsman, DG ; Ramus, SJ ; Koebel, M (WILEY, 2018-10)
    We aimed to validate the prognostic association of p16 expression in ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and to explore it in other ovarian carcinoma histotypes. p16 protein expression was assessed by clinical-grade immunohistochemistry in 6525 ovarian carcinomas including 4334 HGSC using tissue microarrays from 24 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. p16 expression patterns were interpreted as abnormal (either overexpression referred to as block expression or absence) or normal (heterogeneous). CDKN2A (which encodes p16) mRNA expression was also analyzed in a subset (n = 2280) mostly representing HGSC (n = 2010). Association of p16 expression with overall survival (OS) was determined within histotypes as was CDKN2A expression for HGSC only. p16 block expression was most frequent in HGSC (56%) but neither protein nor mRNA expression was associated with OS. However, relative to heterogeneous expression, block expression was associated with shorter OS in endometriosis-associated carcinomas, clear cell [hazard ratio (HR): 2.02, 95% confidence (CI) 1.47-2.77, p < 0.001] and endometrioid (HR: 1.88, 95% CI 1.30-2.75, p = 0.004), while absence was associated with shorter OS in low-grade serous carcinomas (HR: 2.95, 95% CI 1.61-5.38, p = 0.001). Absence was most frequent in mucinous carcinoma (50%), and was not associated with OS in this histotype. The prognostic value of p16 expression is histotype-specific and pattern dependent. We provide definitive evidence against an association of p16 expression with survival in ovarian HGSC as previously suggested. Block expression of p16 in clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma should be further validated as a prognostic marker, and absence in low-grade serous carcinoma justifies CDK4 inhibition.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Evidence for a time-dependent association between FOLR1 expression and survival from ovarian carcinoma: implications for clinical testing. An Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis consortium study
    Koebel, M ; Madore, J ; Ramus, SJ ; Clarke, BA ; Pharoah, PDP ; Deen, S ; Bowtell, DD ; Odunsi, K ; Menon, U ; Morrison, C ; Lele, S ; Bshara, W ; Sucheston, L ; Beckmann, MW ; Hein, A ; Thiel, FC ; Hartmann, A ; Wachter, DL ; Anglesio, MS ; Hogdall, E ; Jensen, A ; Hogdall, C ; Kalli, KR ; Fridley, BL ; Keeney, GL ; Fogarty, ZC ; Vierkant, RA ; Liu, S ; Cho, S ; Nelson, G ; Ghatage, P ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Gayther, SA ; Benjamin, E ; Widschwendter, M ; Intermaggio, MP ; Rosen, B ; Bernardini, MQ ; Mackay, H ; Oza, A ; Shaw, P ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Driver, KE ; Alsop, J ; Mack, M ; Koziak, JM ; Steed, H ; Ewanowich, C ; DeFazio, A ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Fereday, S ; Gao, B ; Johnatty, SE ; George, J ; Galletta, L ; Goode, EL ; Kjaer, SK ; Huntsman, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Moysich, KB ; Brenton, JD ; Kelemen, LE (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2014-12-09)
    BACKGROUND: Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) is expressed in the majority of ovarian carcinomas (OvCa), making it an attractive target for therapy. However, clinical trials testing anti-FOLR1 therapies in OvCa show mixed results and require better understanding of the prognostic relevance of FOLR1 expression. We conducted a large study evaluating FOLR1 expression with survival in different histological types of OvCa. METHODS: Tissue microarrays composed of tumour samples from 2801 patients in the Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium were assessed for FOLR1 expression by centralised immunohistochemistry. We estimated associations for overall (OS) and progression-free (PFS) survival using adjusted Cox regression models. High-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSC) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were evaluated independently for association between FOLR1 mRNA upregulation and survival. RESULTS: FOLR1 expression ranged from 76% in HGSC to 11% in mucinous carcinomas in OTTA. For HGSC, the association between FOLR1 expression and OS changed significantly during the years following diagnosis in OTTA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=1422) and TCGA (Pinteraction=0.01, N=485). In OTTA, particularly for FIGO stage I/II tumours, patients with FOLR1-positive HGSC showed increased OS during the first 2 years only (hazard ratio=0.44, 95% confidence interval=0.20-0.96) and patients with FOLR1-positive clear cell carcinomas (CCC) showed decreased PFS independent of follow-up time (HR=1.89, 95% CI=1.10-3.25, N=259). In TCGA, FOLR1 mRNA upregulation in HGSC was also associated with increased OS during the first 2 years following diagnosis irrespective of tumour stage (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: FOLR1-positive HGSC tumours were associated with an increased OS in the first 2 years following diagnosis. Patients with FOLR1-negative, poor prognosis HGSC would be unlikely to benefit from anti-FOLR1 therapies. In contrast, a decreased PFS interval was observed for FOLR1-positive CCC. The clinical efficacy of FOLR1-targeted interventions should therefore be evaluated according to histology, stage and time following diagnosis.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Cis-eQTL analysis and functional validation of candidate susceptibility genes for high-grade serous ovarian cancer
    Lawrenson, K ; Li, Q ; Kar, S ; Seo, J-H ; Tyrer, J ; Spindler, TJ ; Lee, J ; Chen, Y ; Karst, A ; Drapkin, R ; Aben, KKH ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, N ; Baker, H ; Bandera, EV ; Bean, Y ; Beckmann, MW ; Berchuck, A ; Bisogna, M ; Bjorge, L ; Bogdanova, N ; Brinton, LA ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Bruinsma, F ; Butzow, R ; Campbell, IG ; Carty, K ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Chen, A ; Chen, Z ; Cook, LS ; Cramer, DW ; Cunningham, JM ; Cybulski, C ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Dennis, J ; Dicks, E ; Doherty, JA ; Doerk, T ; Du Bois, A ; Duerst, M ; Eccles, D ; Easton, DT ; Edwards, RP ; Eilber, U ; Ekici, AB ; Fasching, PA ; Fridley, BL ; Gao, Y-T ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Giles, GG ; Glasspool, R ; Goode, EL ; Goodman, MT ; Grownwald, J ; Harrington, P ; Harter, P ; Hasmad, HN ; Hein, A ; Heitz, F ; Hildebrandt, MAT ; Hillemanns, P ; Hogdall, E ; Hogdall, C ; Hosono, S ; Iversen, ES ; Jakubowska, A ; James, P ; Jensen, A ; Ji, B-T ; Karlan, BY ; Kjaer, SK ; Kelemen, LE ; Kellar, M ; Kelley, JL ; Kiemeney, LA ; Krakstad, C ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Lambrechts, D ; Lambrechts, S ; Le, ND ; Lee, AW ; Lele, S ; Leminen, A ; Lester, J ; Levine, DA ; Liang, D ; Lissowska, J ; Lu, K ; Lubinski, J ; Lundvall, L ; Massuger, LFAG ; Matsuo, K ; McGuire, V ; McLaughlin, JR ; Nevanlinna, H ; McNeish, I ; Menon, U ; Modugno, F ; Moysich, KB ; Narod, SA ; Nedergaard, L ; Ness, RB ; Azmi, MAN ; Odunsi, K ; Olson, SH ; Orlow, I ; Orsulic, S ; Weber, RP ; Pearce, CL ; Pejovic, T ; Pelttari, LM ; Permuth-Wey, J ; Phelan, CM ; Pike, MC ; Poole, EM ; Ramus, SJ ; Risch, HA ; Rosen, B ; Rossing, MA ; Rothstein, JH ; Rudolph, A ; Runnebaum, IB ; Rzepecka, IK ; Salvesen, HB ; Schildkraut, JM ; Schwaab, I ; Sellers, TA ; Shu, X-O ; Shvetsov, YB ; Siddiqui, N ; Sieh, W ; Song, H ; Southey, MC ; Sucheston, L ; Tangen, IL ; Teo, S-H ; Terry, KL ; Thompson, PJ ; Timorek, A ; Tsai, Y-Y ; Tworoger, SS ; Van Altena, AM ; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E ; Vergote, I ; Vierkant, RA ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Walsh, C ; Wentzensen, N ; Whittemore, AS ; Wicklund, KG ; Wilkens, LR ; Woo, Y-L ; Wu, X ; Wu, AH ; Yang, H ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Monteiro, A ; Pharoah, PD ; Gayther, SA ; Freedman, ML ; Grp, AOCS ; Bowtell, D ; Webb, PM ; Defazio, A (NATURE RESEARCH, 2015-09)
    Genome-wide association studies have reported 11 regions conferring risk of high-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses can identify candidate susceptibility genes at risk loci. Here we evaluate cis-eQTL associations at 47 regions associated with HGSOC risk (P≤10(-5)). For three cis-eQTL associations (P<1.4 × 10(-3), FDR<0.05) at 1p36 (CDC42), 1p34 (CDCA8) and 2q31 (HOXD9), we evaluate the functional role of each candidate by perturbing expression of each gene in HGSOC precursor cells. Overexpression of HOXD9 increases anchorage-independent growth, shortens population-doubling time and reduces contact inhibition. Chromosome conformation capture identifies an interaction between rs2857532 and the HOXD9 promoter, suggesting this SNP is a leading causal variant. Transcriptomic profiling after HOXD9 overexpression reveals enrichment of HGSOC risk variants within HOXD9 target genes (P=6 × 10(-10) for risk variants (P<10(-4)) within 10 kb of a HOXD9 target gene in ovarian cells), suggesting a broader role for this network in genetic susceptibility to HGSOC.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    MyD88 and TLR4 Expression in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Block, MS ; Vierkant, RA ; Rambau, PF ; Winham, SJ ; Wagner, P ; Traficante, N ; Toloczko, A ; Tiezzi, DG ; Taran, FA ; Sinn, P ; Sieh, W ; Sharma, R ; Rothstein, JH ; Ramon y Cajal, T ; Paz-Ares, L ; Oszurek, O ; Orsulic, S ; Ness, RB ; Nelson, G ; Modugno, F ; Menkiszak, J ; McGuire, V ; McCauley, BM ; Mack, M ; Lubinski, J ; Longacre, TA ; Li, Z ; Lester, J ; Kennedy, CJ ; Kalli, KR ; Jung, AY ; Johnatty, SE ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Jensen, A ; Intermaggio, MP ; Hung, J ; Herpel, E ; Hernandez, BY ; Hartkopf, AD ; Harnett, PR ; Ghatage, P ; Garcia-Bueno, JM ; Gao, B ; Fereday, S ; Eilber, U ; Edwards, RP ; de Sousa, CB ; de Andrade, JM ; Chudecka-Glaz, A ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Cazorla, A ; Brucker, SY ; Alsop, J ; Whittemore, AS ; Steed, H ; Staebler, A ; Moysich, KB ; Menon, U ; Koziak, JM ; Kommoss, S ; Kjaer, SK ; Kelemen, LE ; Karlan, BY ; Huntsman, DG ; Hogdall, E ; Gronwald, J ; Goodman, MT ; Gilks, B ; Jose Garcia, M ; Fasching, PA ; de Fazio, A ; Deen, S ; Chang-Claude, J ; dos Reis, FJC ; Campbell, IG ; Brenton, JD ; Bowtell, DD ; Benitez, J ; Pharoah, PDP ; Kobel, M ; Ramus, SJ ; Goode, EL (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2018-03)
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expression in relation to clinical features of epithelial ovarian cancer, histologic subtypes, and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted centralized immunohistochemical staining, semi-quantitative scoring, and survival analysis in 5263 patients participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. Patients were diagnosed between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 2014, including 2865 high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOCs), with more than 12,000 person-years of follow-up time. Tissue microarrays were stained for MyD88 and TLR4, and staining intensity was classified using a 2-tiered system for each marker (weak vs strong). RESULTS: Expression of MyD88 and TLR4 was similar in all histotypes except clear cell ovarian cancer, which showed reduced expression compared with other histotypes (P<.001 for both). In HGSOC, strong MyD88 expression was modestly associated with shortened overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.13; 95% CI, 1.01-1.26; P=.04) but was also associated with advanced stage (P<.001). The expression of TLR4 was not associated with survival. In low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC), strong expression of both MyD88 and TLR4 was associated with favorable survival (HR [95% CI], 0.49 [0.29-0.84] and 0.44 [0.21-0.89], respectively; P=.009 and P=.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Results are consistent with an association between strong MyD88 staining and advanced stage and poorer survival in HGSOC and demonstrate correlation between strong MyD88 and TLR4 staining and improved survival in LGSOC, highlighting the biological differences between the 2 serous histotypes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Functional mechanisms underlying pleiotropic risk alleles at the 19p13.1 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility locus
    Lawrenson, K ; Kar, S ; McCue, K ; Kuchenbaeker, K ; Michailidou, K ; Tyrer, J ; Beesley, J ; Ramus, SJ ; Li, Q ; Delgado, MK ; Lee, JM ; Aittomaki, K ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Arndt, V ; Arun, BK ; Arver, B ; Bandera, EV ; Barile, M ; Barkardottir, RB ; Barrowdale, D ; Beckmann, MW ; Benitez, J ; Berchuck, A ; Bisogna, M ; Bjorge, L ; Blomqvist, C ; Blot, W ; Bogdanova, N ; Bojesen, A ; Bojesen, SE ; Bolla, MK ; Bonanni, B ; Borresen-Dale, A-L ; Brauch, H ; Brennan, P ; Brenner, H ; Bruinsma, F ; Brunet, J ; Buhari, SA ; Burwinkel, B ; Butzow, R ; Buys, SS ; Cai, Q ; Caldes, T ; Campbell, I ; Canniotto, R ; Chang-Claude, J ; Chiquette, J ; Choi, J-Y ; Claes, KBM ; Cook, LS ; Cox, A ; Cramer, DW ; Cross, SS ; Cybulski, C ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; Damiola, F ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Darabi, H ; Dennis, J ; Devilee, P ; Diez, O ; Doherty, JA ; Domchek, SM ; Dorfling, CM ; Doerk, T ; Dumont, M ; Ehrencrona, H ; Ejlertsen, B ; Ellis, S ; Engel, C ; Lee, E ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Feliubadalo, L ; Figueroa, J ; Flesch-Janys, D ; Fletcher, O ; Flyger, H ; Foretova, L ; Fostira, F ; Foulkes, WD ; Fridley, BL ; Friedman, E ; Frost, D ; Gambino, G ; Ganz, PA ; Garber, J ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Ghoussaini, M ; Giles, GG ; Glasspool, R ; Godwin, AK ; Goldberg, MS ; Goldgar, DE ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Goode, EL ; Goodman, MT ; Greene, MH ; Gronwald, J ; Guenel, P ; Haiman, CA ; Hall, P ; Hallberg, E ; Hamann, U ; Hansen, TVO ; Harrington, PA ; Hartman, M ; Hassan, N ; Healey, S ; Heitz, F ; Herzog, J ; Hogdall, E ; Hogdall, CK ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Hollestelle, A ; Hopper, JL ; Hulick, PJ ; Huzarski, T ; Imyanitov, EN ; Isaacs, C ; Ito, H ; Jakubowska, A ; Janavicius, R ; Jensen, A ; John, EM ; Johnson, N ; Kabisch, M ; Kang, D ; Kapuscinski, M ; Karlan, BY ; Khan, S ; Kiemeney, LA ; Kjaer, SK ; Knight, JA ; Konstantopoulou, I ; Kosma, V-M ; Kristensen, V ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Kwong, A ; de la Hoya, M ; Laitman, Y ; Lambrechts, D ; Le, N ; De Leeneer, K ; Lester, J ; Levine, DA ; Li, J ; Lindblom, A ; Long, J ; Lophatananon, A ; Loud, JT ; Lu, K ; Lubinski, J ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoukian, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Margolin, S ; Marme, F ; Massuger, LFAG ; Matsuo, K ; Mazoyer, S ; McGuffog, L ; McLean, C ; McNeish, I ; Meindl, A ; Menon, U ; Mensenkamp, AR ; Milne, RL ; Montagna, M ; Moysich, KB ; Muir, K ; Mulligan, AM ; Nathanson, KL ; Ness, RB ; Neuhausen, SL ; Nevanlinna, H ; Nord, S ; Nussbaum, RL ; Odunsi, K ; Offit, K ; Olah, E ; Olopade, OI ; Olson, JE ; Olswold, C ; O'Malley, D ; Orlow, I ; Orr, N ; Osorio, A ; Park, SK ; Pearce, CL ; Pejovic, T ; Peterlongo, P ; Pfeiler, G ; Phelan, CM ; Poole, EM ; Pylkas, K ; Radice, P ; Rantala, J ; Rashid, MU ; Rennert, G ; Rhenius, V ; Rhiem, K ; Risch, HA ; Rodriguez, G ; Rossing, MA ; Rudolph, A ; Salvesen, HB ; Sangrajrang, S ; Sawyer, EJ ; Schildkraut, JM ; Schmidt, MK ; Schmutzler, RK ; Sellers, TA ; Seynaeve, C ; Shah, M ; Shen, C-Y ; Shu, X-O ; Sieh, W ; Singer, CF ; Sinilnikova, OM ; Slager, S ; Song, H ; Soucy, P ; Southey, MC ; Stenmark-Askmalm, M ; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ; Sutter, C ; Swerdlow, A ; Tchatchou, S ; Teixeira, MR ; Teo, SH ; Terry, KL ; Terry, MB ; Thomassen, M ; Tibiletti, MG ; Tihomirova, L ; Tognazzo, S ; Toland, AE ; Tomlinson, I ; Torres, D ; Truong, T ; Tseng, C-C ; Tung, N ; Tworoger, SS ; Vachon, C ; van den Ouweland, AMW ; van Doorn, HC ; van Rensburg, EJ ; Van't Veer, LJ ; Vanderstichele, A ; Vergote, I ; Vijai, J ; Wang, Q ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Weitzel, JN ; Wentzensen, N ; Whittemore, AS ; Wildiers, H ; Winqvist, R ; Wu, AH ; Yannoukakos, D ; Yoon, S-Y ; Yu, J-C ; Zheng, W ; Zheng, Y ; Khanna, KK ; Simard, J ; Monteiro, AN ; French, JD ; Couch, FJ ; Freedman, ML ; Easton, DF ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PD ; Edwards, SL ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Antoniou, AC ; Gayther, SA (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2016-09)
    A locus at 19p13 is associated with breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) risk. Here we analyse 438 SNPs in this region in 46,451 BC and 15,438 OC cases, 15,252 BRCA1 mutation carriers and 73,444 controls and identify 13 candidate causal SNPs associated with serous OC (P=9.2 × 10(-20)), ER-negative BC (P=1.1 × 10(-13)), BRCA1-associated BC (P=7.7 × 10(-16)) and triple negative BC (P-diff=2 × 10(-5)). Genotype-gene expression associations are identified for candidate target genes ANKLE1 (P=2 × 10(-3)) and ABHD8 (P<2 × 10(-3)). Chromosome conformation capture identifies interactions between four candidate SNPs and ABHD8, and luciferase assays indicate six risk alleles increased transactivation of the ADHD8 promoter. Targeted deletion of a region containing risk SNP rs56069439 in a putative enhancer induces ANKLE1 downregulation; and mRNA stability assays indicate functional effects for an ANKLE1 3'-UTR SNP. Altogether, these data suggest that multiple SNPs at 19p13 regulate ABHD8 and perhaps ANKLE1 expression, and indicate common mechanisms underlying breast and ovarian cancer risk.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Enhanced GAB2 Expression Is Associated with Improved Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Sensitivity to PI3K Inhibition
    Davis, SJ ; Sheppard, KE ; Anglesio, MS ; George, J ; Traficante, N ; Fereday, S ; Intermaggio, MP ; Menon, U ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Lubinski, J ; Gronwald, J ; Pearce, CL ; Pike, MC ; Wu, A ; Kommoss, S ; Pfisterer, J ; du Bois, A ; Hilpert, F ; Ramus, SJ ; Bowtell, DDL ; Huntsman, DG ; Pearson, RB ; Simpson, KJ ; Campbell, IG ; Gorringe, KL (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2015-06)
    Identification of genomic alterations defining ovarian carcinoma subtypes may aid the stratification of patients to receive targeted therapies. We characterized high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC) for the association of amplified and overexpressed genes with clinical outcome using gene expression data from 499 HGSC patients in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis cohort for 11 copy number amplified genes: ATP13A4, BMP8B, CACNA1C, CCNE1, DYRK1B, GAB2, PAK4, RAD21, TPX2, ZFP36, and URI. The Australian Ovarian Cancer Study and The Cancer Genome Atlas datasets were also used to assess the correlation between gene expression, patient survival, and tumor classification. In a multivariate analysis, high GAB2 expression was associated with improved overall and progression-free survival (P = 0.03 and 0.02), whereas high BMP8B and ATP13A4 were associated with improved progression-free survival (P = 0.004 and P = 0.02). GAB2 overexpression and copy number gain were enriched in the AOCS C4 subgroup. High GAB2 expression correlated with enhanced sensitivity in vitro to the dual PI3K/mTOR inhibitor PF-04691502 and could be used as a genomic marker for identifying patients who will respond to treatments inhibiting PI3K signaling.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Germline Mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and Ten-Year Survival for Women Diagnosed with Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Candido-dos-Reis, FJ ; Song, H ; Goode, EL ; Cunningham, JM ; Fridley, BL ; Larson, MC ; Alsop, K ; Dicks, E ; Harrington, P ; Ramus, SJ ; de Fazio, A ; Mitchell, G ; Fereday, S ; Bolton, KL ; Gourley, C ; Michie, C ; Karlan, B ; Lester, J ; Walsh, C ; Cass, I ; Olsson, H ; Gore, M ; Benitez, JJ ; Garcia, MJ ; Andrulis, I ; Mulligan, AM ; Glendon, G ; Blanco, I ; Lazaro, C ; Whittemore, AS ; McGuire, V ; Sieh, W ; Montagna, M ; Alducci, E ; Sadetzki, S ; Chetrit, A ; Kwong, A ; Kjaer, SK ; Jensen, A ; Hogdall, E ; Neuhausen, S ; Nussbaum, R ; Daly, M ; Greene, MH ; Mai, PL ; Loud, JT ; Moysich, K ; Toland, AE ; Lambrechts, D ; Ellis, S ; Frost, D ; Brenton, JD ; Tischkowitz, M ; Easton, DF ; Antoniou, A ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Gayther, SA ; Bowtell, D ; Pharoah, PDP (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2015-02-01)
    PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 on mortality in patients with ovarian cancer up to 10 years after diagnosis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used unpublished survival time data for 2,242 patients from two case-control studies and extended survival time data for 4,314 patients from previously reported studies. All participants had been screened for deleterious germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Survival time was analyzed for the combined data using Cox proportional hazard models with BRCA1 and BRCA2 as time-varying covariates. Competing risks were analyzed using Fine and Gray model. RESULTS: The combined 10-year overall survival rate was 30% [95% confidence interval (CI), 28%-31%] for non-carriers, 25% (95% CI, 22%-28%) for BRCA1 carriers, and 35% (95% CI, 30%-41%) for BRCA2 carriers. The HR for BRCA1 was 0.53 at time zero and increased over time becoming greater than one at 4.8 years. For BRCA2, the HR was 0.42 at time zero and increased over time (predicted to become greater than 1 at 10.5 years). The results were similar when restricted to 3,202 patients with high-grade serous tumors and to ovarian cancer-specific mortality. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1/2 mutations are associated with better short-term survival, but this advantage decreases over time and in BRCA1 carriers is eventually reversed. This may have important implications for therapy of both primary and relapsed disease and for analysis of long-term survival in clinical trials of new agents, particularly those that are effective in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Hormone-receptor expression and ovarian cancer survival: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study
    Sieh, W ; Koebel, M ; Longacre, TA ; Bowtell, DD ; defazio, A ; Goodman, MT ; Hogdall, E ; Deen, S ; Wentzensen, N ; Moysich, KB ; Brenton, JD ; Clarke, BA ; Menon, U ; Gilks, CB ; Kim, A ; Madore, J ; Fereday, S ; George, J ; Galletta, L ; Lurie, G ; Wilkens, LR ; Carney, ME ; Thompson, PJ ; Matsuno, RK ; Kjaer, SK ; Jensen, A ; Hogdall, C ; Kalli, KR ; Fridley, BL ; Keeney, GL ; Vierkant, RA ; Cunningham, JM ; Brinton, LA ; Yang, HP ; Sherman, ME ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Lissowska, J ; Odunsi, K ; Morrison, C ; Lele, S ; Bshara, W ; Sucheston, L ; Jimenez-Linan, M ; Driver, K ; Alsop, J ; Mack, M ; McGuire, V ; Rothstein, JH ; Rosen, BP ; Bernardini, MQ ; Mackay, H ; Oza, A ; Wozniak, EL ; Benjamin, E ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Gayther, SA ; Tinker, AV ; Prentice, LM ; Chow, C ; Anglesio, MS ; Johnatty, SE ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Whittemore, AS ; Pharoah, PDP ; Goode, EL ; Huntsman, DG ; Ramus, SJ (ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 2013-08)
    BACKGROUND: Few biomarkers of ovarian cancer prognosis have been established, partly because subtype-specific associations might be obscured in studies combining all histopathological subtypes. We examined whether tumour expression of the progesterone receptor (PR) and oestrogen receptor (ER) was associated with subtype-specific survival. METHODS: 12 studies participating in the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium contributed tissue microarray sections and clinical data to our study. Participants included in our analysis had been diagnosed with invasive serous, mucinous, endometrioid, or clear-cell carcinomas of the ovary. For a patient to be eligible, tissue microarrays, clinical follow-up data, age at diagnosis, and tumour grade and stage had to be available. Clinical data were obtained from medical records, cancer registries, death certificates, pathology reports, and review of histological slides. PR and ER statuses were assessed by central immunohistochemistry analysis done by masked pathologists. PR and ER staining was defined as negative (<1% tumour cell nuclei), weak (1 to <50%), or strong (≥50%). Associations with disease-specific survival were assessed. FINDINGS: 2933 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer were included: 1742 with high-grade serous carcinoma, 110 with low-grade serous carcinoma, 207 with mucinous carcinoma, 484 with endometrioid carcinoma, and 390 with clear-cell carcinoma. PR expression was associated with improved disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma (log-rank p<0·0001) and high-grade serous carcinoma (log-rank p=0·0006), and ER expression was associated with improved disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma (log-rank p<0·0001). We recorded no significant associations for mucinous, clear-cell, or low-grade serous carcinoma. Positive hormone-receptor expression (weak or strong staining for PR or ER, or both) was associated with significantly improved disease-specific survival in endometrioid carcinoma compared with negative hormone-receptor expression, independent of study site, age, stage, and grade (hazard ratio 0·33, 95% CI 0·21-0·51; p<0·0001). Strong PR expression was independently associated with improved disease-specific survival in high-grade serous carcinoma (0·71, 0·55-0·91; p=0·0080), but weak PR expression was not (1·02, 0·89-1·18; p=0·74). INTERPRETATION: PR and ER are prognostic biomarkers for endometrioid and high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Clinical trials, stratified by subtype and biomarker status, are needed to establish whether hormone-receptor status predicts response to endocrine treatment, and whether it could guide personalised treatment for ovarian cancer. FUNDING: Carraresi Foundation and others.