Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 18
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Benign breast disease increases breast cancer risk independent of underlying familial risk profile: Findings from a Prospective Family Study Cohort
    Zeinomar, N ; Phillips, K-A ; Daly, MB ; Milne, RL ; Dite, GS ; MacInnis, RJ ; Liao, Y ; Kehm, RD ; Knight, JA ; Southey, MC ; Chung, WK ; Giles, GG ; McLachlan, S-A ; Friedlander, ML ; Weideman, PC ; Glendon, G ; Nesci, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Buys, SS ; John, EM ; Hopper, JL ; Terry, MB (WILEY, 2019-07-15)
    Benign breast disease (BBD) is an established breast cancer (BC) risk factor, but it is unclear whether the magnitude of the association applies to women at familial or genetic risk. This information is needed to improve BC risk assessment in clinical settings. Using the Prospective Family Study Cohort, we used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of BBD with BC risk. We also examined whether the association with BBD differed by underlying familial risk profile (FRP), calculated using absolute risk estimates from the Breast Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA) model. During 176,756 person-years of follow-up (median: 10.9 years, maximum: 23.7) of 17,154 women unaffected with BC at baseline, we observed 968 incident cases of BC. A total of 4,704 (27%) women reported a history of BBD diagnosis at baseline. A history of BBD was associated with a greater risk of BC: HR = 1.31 (95% CI: 1.14-1.50), and did not differ by underlying FRP, with HRs of 1.35 (95% CI: 1.11-1.65), 1.26 (95% CI: 1.00-1.60), and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.01-1.93), for categories of full-lifetime BOADICEA score <20%, 20 to <35%, ≥35%, respectively. There was no difference in the association for women with BRCA1 mutations (HR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.04-2.58), women with BRCA2 mutations (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.78-2.3) or for women without a known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (HR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.13-1.53) (pinteraction  = 0.95). Women with a history of BBD have an increased risk of BC that is independent of, and multiplies, their underlying familial and genetic risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Mutational spectrum in a worldwide study of 29,700 families with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations
    Rebbeck, TR ; Friebel, TM ; Friedman, E ; Hamann, U ; Huo, D ; Kwong, A ; Olah, E ; Olopade, OI ; Solano, AR ; Teo, S-H ; Thomassen, M ; Weitzel, JN ; Chan, TL ; Couch, FJ ; Goldgar, DE ; Kruse, TA ; Palmero, EI ; Park, SK ; Torres, D ; van Rensburg, EJ ; McGuffog, L ; Parsons, MT ; Leslie, G ; Aalfs, CM ; Abugattas, J ; Adlard, J ; Agata, S ; Aittomaki, K ; Andrews, L ; Andrulis, IL ; Arason, A ; Arnold, N ; Arun, BK ; Asseryanis, E ; Auerbach, L ; Azzollini, J ; Balmana, J ; Barile, M ; Barkardottir, RB ; Barrowdale, D ; Benitez, J ; Berger, A ; Berger, R ; Blanco, AM ; Blazer, KR ; Blok, MJ ; Bonadona, V ; Bonanni, B ; Bradbury, AR ; Brewer, C ; Buecher, B ; Buys, SS ; Caldes, T ; Caliebe, A ; Caligo, MA ; Campbell, I ; Caputo, SM ; Chiquette, J ; Chung, WK ; Claes, KBM ; Collee, JM ; Cook, J ; Davidson, R ; de la Hoya, M ; De Leeneer, K ; de Pauw, A ; Delnatte, C ; Diez, O ; Ding, YC ; Ditsch, N ; Domchek, S ; Dorfling, CM ; Velazquez, C ; Dworniczak, B ; Eason, J ; Easton, DF ; Eeles, R ; Ehrencrona, H ; Ejlertsen, B ; Engel, C ; Engert, S ; Evans, DG ; Faivre, L ; Feliubadalo, L ; Ferrer, SF ; Foretova, L ; Fowler, J ; Frost, D ; Galvao, HCR ; Ganz, PA ; Garber, J ; Gauthier-Villars, M ; Gehrig, A ; Gerdes, A-M ; Gesta, P ; Giannini, G ; Giraud, S ; Glendon, G ; Godwin, AK ; Greene, MH ; Gronwald, J ; Gutierrez-Barrera, A ; Hahnen, E ; Hauke, J ; Henderson, A ; Hentschel, J ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Honisch, E ; Imyanitov, EN ; Isaacs, C ; Izatt, L ; Izquierdo, A ; Jakubowska, A ; James, P ; Janavicius, R ; Jensen, UB ; John, EM ; Vijai, J ; Kaczmarek, K ; Karlan, BY ; Kast, K ; Kim, S-W ; Konstantopoulou, I ; Korach, J ; Laitman, Y ; Lasa, A ; Lasset, C ; Lazaro, C ; Lee, A ; Lee, MH ; Lester, J ; Lesueur, F ; Liljegren, A ; Lindor, NM ; Longy, M ; Loud, JT ; Lu, KH ; Lubinski, J ; Machackova, E ; Manoukian, S ; Mari, V ; Martinez-Bouzas, C ; Matrai, Z ; Mebirouk, N ; Meijers-Heijboer, HEJ ; Meindl, A ; Mensenkamp, AR ; Mickys, U ; Miller, A ; Montagna, M ; Moysich, KB ; Mulligan, AM ; Musinsky, J ; Neuhausen, SL ; Nevanlinna, H ; Ngeow, J ; Nguyen, HP ; Niederacher, D ; Nielsen, HR ; Nielsen, FC ; Nussbaum, RL ; Offit, K ; Ofverholm, A ; Ong, K-R ; Osorio, A ; Papi, L ; Papp, J ; Pasini, B ; Pedersen, IS ; Peixoto, A ; Peruga, N ; Peterlongo, P ; Pohl, E ; Pradhan, N ; Prajzendanc, K ; Prieur, F ; Pujol, P ; Radice, P ; Ramus, SJ ; Rantala, J ; Rashid, MU ; Rhiem, K ; Robson, M ; Rodriguez, GC ; Rogers, MT ; Rudaitis, V ; Schmidt, AY ; Schmutzler, RK ; Senter, L ; Shah, PD ; Sharma, P ; Side, LE ; Simard, J ; Singer, CF ; Skytte, A-B ; Slavin, TP ; Snape, K ; Sobol, H ; Southey, M ; Steele, L ; Steinemann, D ; Sukiennicki, G ; Sutter, C ; Szabo, CI ; Tan, YY ; Teixeira, MR ; Terry, MB ; Teule, A ; Thomas, A ; Thull, DL ; Tischkowitz, M ; Tognazzo, S ; Toland, AE ; Topka, S ; Trainer, AH ; Tung, N ; van Asperen, CJ ; van der Hout, AH ; van der Kolk, LE ; van der Luijt, RB ; Van Heetvelde, M ; Varesco, L ; Varon-Mateeva, R ; Vega, A ; Villarreal-Garza, C ; von Wachenfeldt, A ; Walker, L ; Wang-Gohrke, S ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Weber, BHF ; Yannoukakos, D ; Yoon, S-Y ; Zanzottera, C ; Zidan, J ; Zorn, KK ; Selkirk, CGH ; Hulick, PJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Spurdle, AB ; Antoniou, AC ; Nathanson, KL (WILEY-HINDAWI, 2018-05)
    The prevalence and spectrum of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been reported in single populations, with the majority of reports focused on White in Europe and North America. The Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) has assembled data on 18,435 families with BRCA1 mutations and 11,351 families with BRCA2 mutations ascertained from 69 centers in 49 countries on six continents. This study comprehensively describes the characteristics of the 1,650 unique BRCA1 and 1,731 unique BRCA2 deleterious (disease-associated) mutations identified in the CIMBA database. We observed substantial variation in mutation type and frequency by geographical region and race/ethnicity. In addition to known founder mutations, mutations of relatively high frequency were identified in specific racial/ethnic or geographic groups that may reflect founder mutations and which could be used in targeted (panel) first pass genotyping for specific populations. Knowledge of the population-specific mutational spectrum in BRCA1 and BRCA2 could inform efficient strategies for genetic testing and may justify a more broad-based oncogenetic testing in some populations.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 Region and Risk of Ovarian Carcinoma of Mucinous Histology
    Kelemen, LE ; Earp, M ; Fridley, BL ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Fasching, PA ; Beckmann, MW ; Ekici, AB ; Hein, A ; Lambrechts, D ; Lambrechts, S ; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E ; Vergote, I ; Rossing, MA ; Doherty, JA ; Chang-Claude, J ; Behrens, S ; Moysich, KB ; Cannioto, R ; Lele, S ; Odunsi, K ; Goodman, MT ; Shvetsov, YB ; Thompson, PJ ; Wilkens, LR ; Doerk, T ; Antonenkova, N ; Bogdanova, N ; Hillemanns, P ; Runnebaum, IB ; du Bois, A ; Harter, P ; Heitz, F ; Schwaab, I ; Butzow, R ; Pelttari, LM ; Nevanlinna, H ; Modugno, F ; Edwards, RP ; Kelley, JL ; Ness, RB ; Karlan, BY ; Lester, J ; Orsulic, S ; Walsh, C ; Kjaer, SK ; Jensen, A ; Cunningham, JM ; Vierkant, RA ; Giles, GG ; Bruinsma, F ; Southey, MC ; Hildebrandt, MAT ; Liang, D ; Lu, K ; Wu, X ; Sellers, TA ; Levine, DA ; Schildkraut, JM ; Iversen, ES ; Terry, KL ; Cramer, DW ; Tworoger, SS ; Poole, EM ; Bandera, EV ; Olson, SH ; Orlow, I ; Thomsen, LCV ; Bjorge, L ; Krakstad, C ; Tangen, IL ; Kiemeney, LA ; Aben, KKH ; Massuger, LFAG ; van Altena, AM ; Pejovic, T ; Bean, Y ; Kellar, M ; Cook, LS ; Le, ND ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Gronwald, J ; Cybulski, C ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Wentzensen, N ; Brinton, LA ; Lissowska, J ; Hogdall, E ; Engelholm, SA ; Hogdall, C ; Lundvall, L ; Nedergaard, L ; Pharoah, PDP ; Dicks, E ; Song, H ; Tyrer, JP ; McNeish, I ; Siddiqui, N ; Carty, K ; Glasspool, R ; Paul, J ; Campbell, IG ; Eccles, D ; Whittemore, AS ; McGuire, V ; Rothstein, JH ; Sieh, W ; Narod, SA ; Phelan, CM ; McLaughlin, JR ; Risch, HA ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Menon, U ; Gayther, SA ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Ramus, SJ ; Wu, AH ; Pearce, CL ; Lee, AW ; Pike, MC ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Podgorska, A ; Plisiecka-Halasa, J ; Sawicki, W ; Goode, EL ; Berchuck, A (MDPI, 2018-09)
    Thymidylate synthase (TYMS) is a crucial enzyme for DNA synthesis. TYMS expression is regulated by its antisense mRNA, ENOSF1. Disrupted regulation may promote uncontrolled DNA synthesis and tumor growth. We sought to replicate our previously reported association between rs495139 in the TYMS-ENOSF1 3' gene region and increased risk of mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) in an independent sample. Genotypes from 24,351 controls to 15,000 women with invasive OC, including 665 MOC, were available. We estimated per-allele odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using unconditional logistic regression, and meta-analysis when combining these data with our previous report. The association between rs495139 and MOC was not significant in the independent sample (OR = 1.09; 95% CI = 0.97⁻1.22; p = 0.15; N = 665 cases). Meta-analysis suggested a weak association (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.03⁻1.24; p = 0.01; N = 1019 cases). No significant association with risk of other OC histologic types was observed (p = 0.05 for tumor heterogeneity). In expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analysis, the rs495139 allele was positively associated with ENOSF1 mRNA expression in normal tissues of the gastrointestinal system, particularly esophageal mucosa (r = 0.51, p = 1.7 × 10-28), and nonsignificantly in five MOC tumors. The association results, along with inconclusive tumor eQTL findings, suggest that a true effect of rs495139 might be small.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study
    Dixon-Suen, SC ; Nagle, CM ; Thrift, AP ; Pharoah, PDP ; Ewing, A ; Pearce, CL ; Zheng, W ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Fasching, PA ; Beckmann, MW ; Lambrechts, D ; Vergote, I ; Lambrechts, S ; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E ; Rossing, MA ; Doherty, JA ; Wicklund, KG ; Chang-Claude, J ; Jung, AY ; Moysich, KB ; Odunsi, K ; Goodman, MT ; Wilkens, LR ; Thompson, PJ ; Shvetsov, YB ; Doerk, T ; Park-Simon, T-W ; Hillemanns, P ; Bogdanova, N ; Butzow, R ; Nevanlinna, H ; Pelttari, LM ; Leminen, A ; Modugno, F ; Ness, RB ; Edwards, RP ; Kelley, JL ; Heitz, F ; du Bois, A ; Harter, P ; Schwaab, I ; Karlan, BY ; Lester, J ; Orsulic, S ; Rimel, BJ ; Kjaer, SK ; Hogdall, E ; Jensen, A ; Goode, EL ; Fridley, BL ; Cunningham, JM ; Winham, SJ ; Giles, GG ; Bruinsma, F ; Milne, RL ; Southey, MC ; Hildebrandt, MAT ; Wu, X ; Lu, KH ; Liang, D ; Levine, DA ; Bisogna, M ; Schildkraut, JM ; Berchuck, A ; Cramer, DW ; Terry, KL ; Bandera, EV ; Olson, SH ; Salvesen, HB ; Thomsen, LCV ; Kopperud, RK ; Bjorge, L ; Kiemeney, LA ; Massuger, LFAG ; Pejovic, T ; Bruegl, A ; Cook, LS ; Le, ND ; Swenerton, KD ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Kelemen, LE ; Lubinski, J ; Huzarski, T ; Gronwald, J ; Menkiszak, J ; Wentzensen, N ; Brinton, L ; Yang, H ; Lissowska, J ; Hogdall, CK ; Lundvall, L ; Song, H ; Tyrer, JP ; Campbell, I ; Eccles, D ; Paul, J ; Glasspool, R ; Siddiqui, N ; Whittemore, AS ; Sieh, W ; McGuire, V ; Rothstein, JH ; Narod, SA ; Phelan, C ; Risch, HA ; McLaughlin, JR ; Anton-Culver, H ; Ziogas, A ; Menon, U ; Gayther, SA ; Ramus, SJ ; Gentry-Maharaj, A ; Wu, AH ; Pike, MC ; Tseng, C-C ; Kupryjanczyk, J ; Dansonka-Mieszkowska, A ; Budzilowska, A ; Rzepecka, IK ; Webb, PM (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2018-04)
    BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias. METHODS: We pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Greater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Fine-mapping of prostate cancer susceptibility loci in a large meta-analysis identifies candidate causal variants
    Dadaev, T ; Saunders, EJ ; Newcombe, PJ ; Anokian, E ; Leongamornlert, DA ; Brook, MN ; Cieza-Borrella, C ; Mijuskovic, M ; Wakerell, S ; Al Olama, AA ; Schumacher, FR ; Berndt, SI ; Benlloch, S ; Ahmed, M ; Goh, C ; Sheng, X ; Zhang, Z ; Muir, K ; Govindasami, K ; Lophatananon, A ; Stevens, VL ; Gapstur, SM ; Carter, BD ; Tangen, CM ; Goodman, P ; Thompson, IM ; Batra, J ; Chambers, S ; Moya, L ; Clements, J ; Horvath, L ; Tilley, W ; Risbridger, G ; Gronberg, H ; Aly, M ; Nordstrom, T ; Pharoah, P ; Pashayan, N ; Schleutker, J ; Tammela, TLJ ; Sipeky, C ; Auvinen, A ; Albanes, D ; Weinstein, S ; Wolk, A ; Hakansson, N ; West, C ; Dunning, AM ; Burnet, N ; Mucci, L ; Giovannucci, E ; Andriole, G ; Cussenot, O ; Cancel-Tassin, G ; Koutros, S ; Freeman, LEB ; Sorensen, KD ; Orntoft, TF ; Borre, M ; Maehle, L ; Grindedal, EM ; Neal, DE ; Donovan, JL ; Hamdy, FC ; Martin, RM ; Travis, RC ; Key, TJ ; Hamilton, RJ ; Fleshner, NE ; Finelli, A ; Ingles, SA ; Stern, MC ; Rosenstein, B ; Kerns, S ; Ostrer, H ; Lu, Y-J ; Zhang, H-W ; Feng, N ; Mao, X ; Guo, X ; Wang, G ; Sun, Z ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC ; MacInnis, RJ ; FitzGerald, LM ; Kibel, AS ; Drake, BF ; Vega, A ; Gomez-Caamano, A ; Fachal, L ; Szulkin, R ; Eklund, M ; Kogevinas, M ; Llorca, J ; Castano-Vinyals, G ; Penney, KL ; Stampfer, M ; Park, JY ; Sellers, TA ; Lin, H-Y ; Stanford, JL ; Cybulski, C ; Wokolorczyk, D ; Lubinski, J ; Ostrander, EA ; Geybels, MS ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Nielsen, SF ; Weisher, M ; Bisbjerg, R ; Roder, MA ; Iversen, P ; Brenner, H ; Cuk, K ; Holleczek, B ; Maier, C ; Luedeke, M ; Schnoeller, T ; Kim, J ; Logothetis, CJ ; John, EM ; Teixeira, MR ; Paulo, P ; Cardoso, M ; Neuhausen, SL ; Steele, L ; Ding, YC ; De Ruyck, K ; De Meerleer, G ; Ost, P ; Razack, A ; Lim, J ; Teo, S-H ; Lin, DW ; Newcomb, LF ; Lessel, D ; Gamulin, M ; Kulis, T ; Kaneva, R ; Usmani, N ; Slavov, C ; Mitev, V ; Parliament, M ; Singhal, S ; Claessens, F ; Joniau, S ; Van den Broeck, T ; Larkin, S ; Townsend, PA ; Aukim-Hastie, C ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Castelao, JE ; Martinez, ME ; Roobol, MJ ; Jenster, G ; van Schaik, RHN ; Menegaux, F ; Truong, T ; Koudou, YA ; Xu, J ; Khaw, K-T ; Cannon-Albright, L ; Pandha, H ; Michael, A ; Kierzek, A ; Thibodeau, SN ; McDonnell, SK ; Schaid, DJ ; Lindstrom, S ; Turman, C ; Ma, J ; Hunter, DJ ; Riboli, E ; Siddiq, A ; Canzian, F ; Kolonel, LN ; Le Marchand, L ; Hoover, RN ; Machiela, MJ ; Kraft, P ; Freedman, M ; Wiklund, F ; Chanock, S ; Henderson, BE ; Easton, DF ; Haiman, CA ; Eeles, RA ; Conti, DV ; Kote-Jarai, Z (NATURE PORTFOLIO, 2018-06-11)
    Prostate cancer is a polygenic disease with a large heritable component. A number of common, low-penetrance prostate cancer risk loci have been identified through GWAS. Here we apply the Bayesian multivariate variable selection algorithm JAM to fine-map 84 prostate cancer susceptibility loci, using summary data from a large European ancestry meta-analysis. We observe evidence for multiple independent signals at 12 regions and 99 risk signals overall. Only 15 original GWAS tag SNPs remain among the catalogue of candidate variants identified; the remainder are replaced by more likely candidates. Biological annotation of our credible set of variants indicates significant enrichment within promoter and enhancer elements, and transcription factor-binding sites, including AR, ERG and FOXA1. In 40 regions at least one variant is colocalised with an eQTL in prostate cancer tissue. The refined set of candidate variants substantially increase the proportion of familial relative risk explained by these known susceptibility regions, which highlights the importance of fine-mapping studies and has implications for clinical risk profiling.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Age-specific breast cancer risk by body mass index and familial risk: prospective family study cohort (ProF-SC)
    Hopper, JL ; Dite, GS ; MacInnis, RJ ; Liao, Y ; Zeinomar, N ; Knight, JA ; Southey, MC ; Milne, RL ; Chung, WK ; Giles, GG ; Genkinger, JM ; McLachlan, S-A ; Friedlander, ML ; Antoniou, AC ; Weideman, PC ; Glendon, G ; Nesci, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Buys, SS ; Daly, MB ; John, EM ; Phillips, KA ; Terry, MB (BMC, 2018-11-03)
    BACKGROUND: The association between body mass index (BMI) and risk of breast cancer depends on time of life, but it is unknown whether this association depends on a woman's familial risk. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of a cohort enriched for familial risk consisting of 16,035 women from 6701 families in the Breast Cancer Family Registry and the Kathleen Cunningham Foundation Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer followed for up to 20 years (mean 10.5 years). There were 896 incident breast cancers (mean age at diagnosis 55.7 years). We used Cox regression to model BMI risk associations as a function of menopausal status, age, and underlying familial risk based on pedigree data using the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA), all measured at baseline. RESULTS: The strength and direction of the BMI risk association depended on baseline menopausal status (P < 0.001); after adjusting for menopausal status, the association did not depend on age at baseline (P = 0.6). In terms of absolute risk, the negative association with BMI for premenopausal women has a much smaller influence than the positive association with BMI for postmenopausal women. Women at higher familial risk have a much larger difference in absolute risk depending on their BMI than women at lower familial risk. CONCLUSIONS: The greater a woman's familial risk, the greater the influence of BMI on her absolute postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Given that age-adjusted BMI is correlated across adulthood, maintaining a healthy weight throughout adult life is particularly important for women with a family history of breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Polygenic Risk Scores for Prediction of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Subtypes
    Mavaddat, N ; Michailidou, K ; Dennis, J ; Lush, M ; Fachal, L ; Lee, A ; Tyrer, JP ; Chen, T-H ; Wang, Q ; Bolla, MK ; Yang, X ; Adank, MA ; Ahearn, T ; Aittomaki, K ; Allen, J ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, NN ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Auer, PL ; Auvinen, P ; Barrdahl, M ; Freeman, LEB ; Beckmann, MW ; Behrens, S ; Benitez, J ; Bermisheva, M ; Bernstein, L ; Blomqvist, C ; Bogdanova, N ; Bojesen, SE ; Bonanni, B ; Borresen-Dale, A-L ; Brauch, H ; Bremer, M ; Brenner, H ; Brentnall, A ; Brock, IW ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Brucker, SY ; Bruening, T ; Burwinkel, B ; Campa, D ; Carter, BD ; Castelao, JE ; Chanock, SJ ; Chlebowski, R ; Christiansen, H ; Clarke, CL ; Collee, JM ; Cordina-Duverger, E ; Cornelissen, S ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; Devilee, P ; Doerk, T ; dos-Santos-Silva, I ; Dumont, M ; Durcan, L ; Dwek, M ; Eccles, DM ; Ekici, AB ; Eliassen, AH ; Ellberg, C ; Engel, C ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Figueroa, J ; Fletcher, O ; Flyger, H ; Foersti, A ; Fritschi, L ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Gapstur, SM ; Garcia-Saenz, JA ; Gaudet, MM ; Georgoulias, V ; Giles, GG ; Gilyazova, IR ; Glendon, G ; Goldberg, MS ; Goldgar, DE ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Alnaes, GIG ; Grip, M ; Gronwald, J ; Grundy, A ; Guenel, P ; Haeberle, L ; Hahnen, E ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hamann, U ; Hankinson, SE ; Harkness, EF ; Hart, SN ; He, W ; Hein, A ; Heyworth, J ; Hillemanns, P ; Hollestelle, A ; Hooning, MJ ; Hoover, RN ; Hopper, JL ; Howell, A ; Huang, G ; Humphreys, K ; Hunter, DJ ; Jakimovska, M ; Jakubowska, A ; Janni, W ; John, EM ; Johnson, N ; Jones, ME ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Jung, A ; Kaaks, R ; Kaczmarek, K ; Kataja, V ; Keeman, R ; Kerin, MJ ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Kiiski, J ; Knight, JA ; Ko, Y-D ; Kosma, V-M ; Koutros, S ; Kristensen, VN ; Kruger, U ; Kuehl, T ; Lambrechts, D ; Le Marchand, L ; Lee, E ; Lejbkowicz, F ; Lilyquist, J ; Lindblom, A ; Lindstrom, S ; Lissowska, J ; Lo, W-Y ; Loibl, S ; Long, J ; Lubinski, J ; Lux, MP ; MacInnis, RJ ; Maishman, T ; Makalic, E ; Kostovska, IM ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoukian, S ; Margolin, S ; Martens, JWM ; Martinez, ME ; Mavroudis, D ; McLean, C ; Meindl, A ; Menon, U ; Middha, P ; Miller, N ; Moreno, F ; Mulligan, AM ; Mulot, C ; Munoz-Garzon, VM ; Neuhausen, SL ; Nevanlinna, H ; Neven, P ; Newman, WG ; Nielsen, SF ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Norman, A ; Offit, K ; Olson, JE ; Olsson, H ; Orr, N ; Pankratz, VS ; Park-Simon, T-W ; Perez, JIA ; Perez-Barrios, C ; Peterlongo, P ; Peto, J ; Pinchev, M ; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D ; Polley, EC ; Prentice, R ; Presneau, N ; Prokofyeva, D ; Purrington, K ; Pylkas, K ; Rack, B ; Radice, P ; Rau-Murthy, R ; Rennert, G ; Rennert, HS ; Rhenius, V ; Robson, M ; Romero, A ; Ruddy, KJ ; Ruebner, M ; Saloustros, E ; Sandler, DP ; Sawyer, EJ ; Schmidt, DF ; Schmutzler, RK ; Schneeweiss, A ; Schoemaker, MJ ; Schumacher, F ; Schuermann, P ; Schwentner, L ; Scott, C ; Scott, RJ ; Seynaeve, C ; Shah, M ; Sherman, ME ; Shrubsole, MJ ; Shu, X-O ; Slager, S ; Smeets, A ; Sohn, C ; Soucy, P ; Southey, MC ; Spinelli, JJ ; Stegmaier, C ; Stone, J ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Tamimi, RM ; Tapper, WJ ; Taylor, JA ; Terry, MB ; Thoene, K ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Tomlinson, I ; Truong, T ; Tzardi, M ; Ulmer, H-U ; Untch, M ; Vachon, CM ; van Veen, EM ; Vijai, J ; Weinberg, CR ; Wendt, C ; Whittemore, AS ; Wildiers, H ; Willett, W ; Winqvist, R ; Wolk, A ; Yang, XR ; Yannoukakos, D ; Zhang, Y ; Zheng, W ; Ziogas, A ; Clarke, C ; Balleine, R ; Baxter, R ; Braye, S ; Carpenter, J ; Dahlstrom, J ; Forbes, J ; Lee, CS ; Marsh, D ; Morey, A ; Pathmanathan, N ; Scott, R ; Simpson, P ; Spigelman, A ; Wilcken, N ; Yip, D ; Zeps, N ; Sexton, A ; Dobrovic, A ; Christian, A ; Trainer, A ; Fellows, A ; Shelling, A ; De Fazio, A ; Blackburn, A ; Crook, A ; Meiser, B ; Patterson, B ; Clarke, C ; Saunders, C ; Hunt, C ; Scott, C ; Amor, D ; Ortega, DG ; Marsh, D ; Edkins, E ; Salisbury, E ; Haan, E ; Macrea, F ; Farshid, G ; Lindeman, G ; Trench, G ; Mann, G ; Giles, G ; Gill, G ; Thorne, H ; Campbell, I ; Hickie, I ; Caldon, L ; Winship, I ; Cui, J ; Flanagan, J ; Kollias, J ; Visvader, J ; Taylor, J ; Burke, J ; Saunus, J ; Forbs, J ; Hopper, J ; Beesley, J ; Kirk, J ; French, J ; Tucker, K ; Wu, K ; Phillips, K ; Forrest, L ; Lipton, L ; Andrews, L ; Lobb, L ; Walker, L ; Kentwell, M ; Spurdle, M ; Cummings, M ; Gleeson, M ; Harris, M ; Jenkins, M ; Young, MA ; Delatycki, M ; Wallis, M ; Burgess, M ; Brown, M ; Southey, M ; Bogwitz, M ; Field, M ; Friedlander, M ; Gattas, M ; Saleh, M ; Aghmesheh, M ; Hayward, N ; Pachter, N ; Cohen, P ; Duijf, P ; James, P ; Simpson, P ; Fong, P ; Butow, P ; Williams, R ; Kefford, R ; Simard, J ; Balleine, R-M ; Dawson, S-J ; Lok, S ; O'connell, S ; Greening, S ; Nightingale, S ; Edwards, S ; Fox, S ; McLachlan, S-A ; Lakhani, S ; Dudding, T ; Antill, Y ; Sahlberg, KK ; Ottestad, L ; Karesen, R ; Schlichting, E ; Holmen, MM ; Sauer, T ; Haakensen, V ; Engebraten, O ; Naume, B ; Fossa, A ; Kiserud, CE ; Reinertsen, K ; Helland, A ; Riis, M ; Geisler, J ; Dunning, AM ; Thompson, DJ ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Chang-Claude, J ; Schmidt, MK ; Hall, P ; Milne, RL ; Pharoah, PDP ; Antoniou, AC ; Chatterjee, N ; Kraft, P ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Easton, DF (CELL PRESS, 2019-01-03)
    Stratification of women according to their risk of breast cancer based on polygenic risk scores (PRSs) could improve screening and prevention strategies. Our aim was to develop PRSs, optimized for prediction of estrogen receptor (ER)-specific disease, from the largest available genome-wide association dataset and to empirically validate the PRSs in prospective studies. The development dataset comprised 94,075 case subjects and 75,017 control subjects of European ancestry from 69 studies, divided into training and validation sets. Samples were genotyped using genome-wide arrays, and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected by stepwise regression or lasso penalized regression. The best performing PRSs were validated in an independent test set comprising 11,428 case subjects and 18,323 control subjects from 10 prospective studies and 190,040 women from UK Biobank (3,215 incident breast cancers). For the best PRSs (313 SNPs), the odds ratio for overall disease per 1 standard deviation in ten prospective studies was 1.61 (95%CI: 1.57-1.65) with area under receiver-operator curve (AUC) = 0.630 (95%CI: 0.628-0.651). The lifetime risk of overall breast cancer in the top centile of the PRSs was 32.6%. Compared with women in the middle quintile, those in the highest 1% of risk had 4.37- and 2.78-fold risks, and those in the lowest 1% of risk had 0.16- and 0.27-fold risks, of developing ER-positive and ER-negative disease, respectively. Goodness-of-fit tests indicated that this PRS was well calibrated and predicts disease risk accurately in the tails of the distribution. This PRS is a powerful and reliable predictor of breast cancer risk that may improve breast cancer prevention programs.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Regular use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and breast cancer risk for women at familial or genetic risk: a cohort study
    Kehm, RD ; Hopper, JL ; John, EM ; Phillips, K-A ; MacInnis, RJ ; Dite, GS ; Milne, RL ; Liao, Y ; Zeinomar, N ; Knight, JA ; Southey, MC ; Vahdat, L ; Kornhauser, N ; Cigler, T ; Chung, WK ; Giles, GG ; McLachlan, S-A ; Friedlander, ML ; Weideman, PC ; Glendon, G ; Nesci, S ; Andrulis, IL ; Buys, SS ; Daly, MB ; Terry, MB (BMC, 2019-04-18)
    BACKGROUND: The use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been associated with reduced breast cancer risk, but it is not known if this association extends to women at familial or genetic risk. We examined the association between regular NSAID use and breast cancer risk using a large cohort of women selected for breast cancer family history, including 1054 BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. METHODS: We analyzed a prospective cohort (N = 5606) and a larger combined, retrospective and prospective, cohort (N = 8233) of women who were aged 18 to 79 years, enrolled before June 30, 2011, with follow-up questionnaire data on medication history. The prospective cohort was further restricted to women without breast cancer when medication history was asked by questionnaire. Women were recruited from seven study centers in the United States, Canada, and Australia. Associations were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for demographics, lifestyle factors, family history, and other medication use. Women were classified as regular or non-regular users of aspirin, COX-2 inhibitors, ibuprofen and other NSAIDs, and acetaminophen (control) based on self-report at follow-up of ever using the medication for at least twice a week for ≥1 month prior to breast cancer diagnosis. The main outcome was incident invasive breast cancer, based on self- or relative-report (81% confirmed pathologically). RESULTS: From fully adjusted analyses, regular aspirin use was associated with a 39% and 37% reduced risk of breast cancer in the prospective (HR = 0.61; 95% CI = 0.33-1.14) and combined cohorts (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.57-0.71), respectively. Regular use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with a 61% and 71% reduced risk of breast cancer (prospective HR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.15-0.97; combined HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.23-0.38). Other NSAIDs and acetaminophen were not associated with breast cancer risk in either cohort. Associations were not modified by familial risk, and consistent patterns were found by BRCA1 and BRCA2 carrier status, estrogen receptor status, and attained age. CONCLUSION: Regular use of aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors might reduce breast cancer risk for women at familial or genetic risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Accuracy of Risk Estimates from the iPrevent Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Management Tool
    Phillips, K-A ; Liao, Y ; Milne, RL ; MacInnis, RJ ; Collins, IM ; Buchsbaum, R ; Weideman, PC ; Bickerstaffe, A ; Nesci, S ; Chung, WK ; Southey, MC ; Knight, JA ; Whittemore, AS ; Dite, GS ; Goldgar, D ; Giles, GG ; Glendon, G ; Cuzick, J ; Antoniou, AC ; Andrulis, IL ; John, EM ; Daly, MB ; Buys, SS ; Hopper, JL ; Terry, MB ; kConFab Investigators, (Oxford University Press, 2019-12)

    Background

    iPrevent is an online breast cancer (BC) risk management decision support tool. It uses an internal switching algorithm, based on a woman's risk factor data, to estimate her absolute BC risk using either the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) version 7.02, or Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm version 3 models, and then provides tailored risk management information. This study assessed the accuracy of the 10-year risk estimates using prospective data.

    Methods

    iPrevent-assigned 10-year invasive BC risk was calculated for 15 732 women aged 20-70 years and without BC at recruitment to the Prospective Family Study Cohort. Calibration, the ratio of the expected (E) number of BCs to the observed (O) number and discriminatory accuracy were assessed.

    Results

    During the 10 years of follow-up, 619 women (3.9%) developed BC compared with 702 expected (E/O = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.05 to 1.23). For women younger than 50 years, 50 years and older, and BRCA1/2-mutation carriers and noncarriers, E/O was 1.04 (95% CI = 0.93 to 1.16), 1.24 (95% CI = 1.11 to 1.39), 1.13 (95% CI = 0.96 to 1.34), and 1.13 (95% CI = 1.04 to 1.24), respectively. The C-statistic was 0.70 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.73) overall and 0.74 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.77), 0.63 (95% CI = 0.59 to 0.66), 0.59 (95% CI = 0.53 to 0.64), and 0.65 (95% CI = 0.63 to 0.68), respectively, for the subgroups above. Applying the newer IBIS version 8.0b in the iPrevent switching algorithm improved calibration overall (E/O = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.15) and in all subgroups, without changing discriminatory accuracy.

    Conclusions

    For 10-year BC risk, iPrevent had good discriminatory accuracy overall and was well calibrated for women aged younger than 50 years. Calibration may be improved in the future by incorporating IBIS version 8.0b.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Development and validation of a targeted gene sequencing panel for application to disparate cancers
    McCabe, MJ ; Gauthier, M-EA ; Chan, C-L ; Thompson, TJ ; De Sousa, SMC ; Puttick, C ; Grady, JP ; Gayevskiy, V ; Tao, J ; Ying, K ; Cipponi, A ; Deng, N ; Swarbrick, A ; Thomas, ML ; kConFab, ; Lord, RV ; Johns, AL ; Kohonen-Corish, M ; O'Toole, SA ; Clark, J ; Mueller, SA ; Gupta, R ; McCormack, AI ; Dinger, ME ; Cowley, MJ (Nature Publishing Group, 2019-11-19)
    Next generation sequencing has revolutionised genomic studies of cancer, having facilitated the development of precision oncology treatments based on a tumour's molecular profile. We aimed to develop a targeted gene sequencing panel for application to disparate cancer types with particular focus on tumours of the head and neck, plus test for utility in liquid biopsy. The final panel designed through Roche/Nimblegen combined 451 cancer-associated genes (2.01 Mb target region). 136 patient DNA samples were collected for performance and application testing. Panel sensitivity and precision were measured using well-characterised DNA controls (n = 47), and specificity by Sanger sequencing of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Interacting Protein (AIP) gene in 89 patients. Assessment of liquid biopsy application employed a pool of synthetic circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Library preparation and sequencing were conducted on Illumina-based platforms prior to analysis with our accredited (ISO15189) bioinformatics pipeline. We achieved a mean coverage of 395x, with sensitivity and specificity of >99% and precision of >97%. Liquid biopsy revealed detection to 1.25% variant allele frequency. Application to head and neck tumours/cancers resulted in detection of mutations aligned to published databases. In conclusion, we have developed an analytically-validated panel for application to cancers of disparate types with utility in liquid biopsy.