Surgery (RMH) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 35
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Identification and isolation of slow-cycling glioma stem cells
    Furst, L ; Atkins, RJ ; Dinevska, M ; Stylli, SS ; Corcoran, NM ; Hovens, CM ; Mantamadiotis, T ; Vitale, I ; Manic, G ; Galluzzi, L (ELSEVIER ACADEMIC PRESS INC, 2022)
    Cancer stem cells are defined as low-abundance, quiescent cells and are considered a major cellular source of tumor recurrence following therapy, which identifies these cells as important therapeutic targets for difficult-to-treat cancers, including high-grade gliomas. By contrast to the highly proliferative bulk tumor cells, glioma stem cells (GSC) are slow-cycling, and therefore less sensitive to DNA damaging cytotoxic drugs. GSC are also less reliant on aerobic glycolytic metabolism, leading to inadequate clearing of GSC by chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The definition of GSC is based on the expression of specific stem cell protein markers. This method of GSC isolation is successful in isolating cell populations that can reliably recapitulate the tumor. However, cell populations that lack stem marker expression may also be capable of tumor recapitulation. Therefore, robust, reproducible methods for isolating GSC are required to identify and isolate cells with stem cell characteristics. Here, we provide a comprehensive and reproducible protocol for the isolation of slow-cycling GSC. Using this method, GSC isolated retain key characteristics of the cells in situ, including expression of genes associated with cell quiescence and invasive potential, compared to non-quiescent cell populations. Thus, isolation of GSC gated on cell proliferation offers a reliable alternative method for in vitro GSC identification, that adequately mirrors the physiological properties of GSC seen in vivo.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Molecular Mechanisms Driving the Formation of Brain Metastases
    Campbell, BK ; Gao, Z ; Corcoran, NM ; Stylli, SS ; Hovens, CM (MDPI, 2022-10)
    Targeted therapies for cancers have improved primary tumor response rates, but concomitantly, brain metastases (BM) have become the most common brain tumors in adults and are associated with a dismal prognosis of generally less than 6 months, irrespective of the primary cancer type. They most commonly occur in patients with primary breast, lung, or melanoma histologies; however, they also appear in patients with other primary cancers including, but not limited to, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Historically, molecular biomarkers have normally been identified from primary tumor resections. However, clinically informative genomic alterations can occur during BM development and these potentially actionable alterations are not always detected in the primary tumor leading to missed opportunities for effective targeted therapy. The molecular mechanisms that facilitate and drive metastasis to the brain are poorly understood. Identifying the differences between the brain and other extracranial sties of metastasis, and between primary tumors and BM, is essential to improving our understanding of BM development and ultimately patient management and survival. In this review, we present the current data on the genomic landscape of BM from various primary cancers which metastasize to the brain and outline potential mechanisms which may play a role in promoting the formation of the distant metastases in the brain.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Perish and publish: Dynamics of biomedical publications by deceased authors
    Jung, C-HJ ; Boutros, PCM ; Park, DJM ; Corcoran, NMM ; Pope, BJM ; Hovens, CMM ; Wicherts, JM (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2022-09-14)
    The question of whether it is appropriate to attribute authorship to deceased individuals of original studies in the biomedical literature is contentious. Authorship guidelines utilized by journals do not provide a clear consensus framework that is binding on those in the field. To guide and inform the implementation of authorship frameworks it would be useful to understand the extent of the practice in the scientific literature, but studies that have systematically quantified the prevalence of this phenomenon in the biomedical literature have not been performed to date. To address this issue, we quantified the prevalence of publications by deceased authors in the biomedical literature from the period 1990-2020. We screened 2,601,457 peer-reviewed papers from the full text Europe PubMed Central database. We applied natural language processing, stringent filtering and manual curation to identify a final set of 1,439 deceased authors. We then determined these authors published a total of 38,907 papers over their careers with 5,477 published after death. The number of deceased publications has been growing rapidly, a 146-fold increase since the year 2000. This rate of increase was still significant when accounting for the growing total number of publications and pool of authors. We found that more than 50% of deceased author papers were first submitted after the death of the author and that over 60% of these papers failed to acknowledge the deceased authors status. Most deceased authors published less than 10 papers after death but a small pool of 30 authors published significantly more. A pool of 266 authors published more than 90% of their total publications after death. Our analysis indicates that the attribution of deceased authorship in the literature is not an occasional occurrence but a burgeoning trend. A consensus framework to address authorship by deceased scientists is warranted.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    The Prostate Cancer Immune Microenvironment, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Intervention
    Zhang, Y ; Campbell, BK ; Stylli, SS ; Corcoran, NM ; Hovens, CM (MDPI AG, 2022-04-10)
    Advanced prostate cancers have a poor survival rate and a lack of effective treatment options. In order to broaden the available treatments, immunotherapies have been investigated. These include cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cells and bispecific antibodies. In addition, combinations of different immunotherapies and with standard therapy have been explored. Despite the success of the Sipuleucel-T vaccine in the metastatic, castrate-resistant prostate cancer setting, other immunotherapies have not shown the same efficacy in this population at large. Some individual patients, however, have shown remarkable responsiveness to these therapies. Therefore, work is underway to identify which populations will respond positively to therapy via the identification of predictive biomarkers. These include biomarkers of the immunologically active tumour microenvironment and biomarkers indicative of high neoantigen expression in the tumour. This review examines the constitution of the prostate tumour immune microenvironment, explores the effectiveness of immunotherapies, and finally investigates how therapy selection can be optimised by the use of biomarkers.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Androgen Deprivation in Localised Prostate Cancer
    Pechlivanis, M ; Campbell, BK ; Hovens, CM ; Corcoran, NM (MDPI, 2022-01)
    Prostate cancer (PCa) is a hormone driven cancer, characterised by defects in androgen receptor signalling which drive the disease process. As such, androgen targeted therapies have been the mainstay for PCa treatment for over 70 years. High-risk PCa presents unique therapeutic challenges, namely in minimising the primary tumour, and eliminating any undetected micro metastases. Trials of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy aim to address these challenges. Patients typically respond well to neoadjuvant treatment, showing regression of the primary tumour and negative surgical margins at the time of resection, however the majority of patients relapse and progress to metastatic disease. The mechanisms affording this resistance are largely unknown. This commentary attempts to explore theories of resistance more broadly, namely, clonal evolution, cancer stem cells, cell persistence, and drug tolerance. Moreover, it aims to explore the application of these theories in the PCa setting. This commentary also highlights the distinction between castration resistant PCa, and neoadjuvant resistant disease, and identifies the markers and characteristics of neoadjuvant resistant disease presented by current literature.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Transcriptome sequencing and multi-plex imaging of prostate cancer microenvironment reveals a dominant role for monocytic cells in progression
    Mangiola, S ; McCoy, P ; Modrak, M ; Souza-Fonseca-Guimaraes, F ; Blashki, D ; Stuchbery, R ; Keam, SP ; Kerger, M ; Chow, K ; Nasa, C ; Le Page, M ; Lister, N ; Monard, S ; Peters, J ; Dundee, P ; Williams, SG ; Costello, AJ ; Neeson, PJ ; Pal, B ; Huntington, ND ; Corcoran, NM ; Papenfuss, AT ; Hovens, CM (BMC, 2021-07-22)
    BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is caused by genomic aberrations in normal epithelial cells, however clinical translation of findings from analyses of cancer cells alone has been very limited. A deeper understanding of the tumour microenvironment is needed to identify the key drivers of disease progression and reveal novel therapeutic opportunities. RESULTS: In this study, the experimental enrichment of selected cell-types, the development of a Bayesian inference model for continuous differential transcript abundance, and multiplex immunohistochemistry permitted us to define the transcriptional landscape of the prostate cancer microenvironment along the disease progression axis. An important role of monocytes and macrophages in prostate cancer progression and disease recurrence was uncovered, supported by both transcriptional landscape findings and by differential tissue composition analyses. These findings were corroborated and validated by spatial analyses at the single-cell level using multiplex immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: This study advances our knowledge concerning the role of monocyte-derived recruitment in primary prostate cancer, and supports their key role in disease progression, patient survival and prostate microenvironment immune modulation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Loss of SNAI2 in Prostate Cancer Correlates With Clinical Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
    Cmero, M ; Kurganovs, NJ ; Stuchbery, R ; McCoy, P ; Grima, C ; Ngyuen, A ; Chow, K ; Mangiola, S ; Macintyre, G ; Howard, N ; Kerger, M ; Dundee, P ; Ruljancich, P ; Clarke, D ; Grummet, J ; Peters, JS ; Costello, AJ ; Norden, S ; Ryan, A ; Parente, P ; Hovens, CM ; Corcoran, NM (LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS, 2021-06)
    PURPOSE: Androgen receptor (AR) signaling is important in prostate cancer progression, and therapies that target this pathway have been the mainstay of treatment for advanced disease for over 70 years. Tumors eventually progress despite castration through a number of well-characterized mechanisms; however, little is known about what determines the magnitude of response to short-term pathway inhibition. METHODS: We evaluated a novel combination of AR-targeting therapies (degarelix, abiraterone, and bicalutamide) and noted that the objective patient response to therapy was highly variable. To investigate what was driving treatment resistance in poorly responding patients, as a secondary outcome we comprehensively characterized pre- and post-treatment samples using both whole-genome and RNA sequencing. RESULTS: We find that resistance following short-term treatment differs molecularly from typical progressive castration-resistant disease, associated with transcriptional reprogramming, to a transitional epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype rather than an upregulation of AR signaling. Unexpectedly, tolerance to therapy appears to be the default state, with treatment response correlating with the prevalence of tumor cells deficient for SNAI2, a key regulator of EMT reprogramming. CONCLUSION: We show that EMT characterizes acutely resistant prostate tumors and that deletion of SNAI2, a key transcriptional regulator of EMT, correlates with clinical response.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Late biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy is associated with a slower rate of progression
    Chow, K ; Herrera, P ; Stuchbery, R ; Peters, JS ; Costello, AJ ; Hovens, CM ; Corcoran, NM (WILEY, 2019-06)
    OBJECTIVE: To characterise the pattern of late biochemical recurrence (BCR) in the largest contemporary cohort of patients with localised prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) in the active surveillance era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent RP for localised prostate cancer between 2003 and 2017 were identified from a prospectively recorded, dedicated prostate cancer database. Patients who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy were excluded. These patients were categorised into the following groups: no BCR, BCR at <12 months (early), BCR at 12-60 months (intermediate), and BCR at >60 months (late), after RP. Clinicopathological characteristics were analysed using the Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, or chi-squared test where appropriate. Multivariable binomial logistic regression models were used to assess predictors of BCR at various time-points. RESULTS: In all, 2312 patients were included in the final analysis with up to 12 years of follow-up data. The average patient had clinically localised prostate cancer, an elevated PSA level, and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group 2 on biopsy. In all, 88.7% of patients had ISUP Grade Group ≥2 at RP. A subgroup of 446 patients had undetectable PSA levels at 5 years after RP; 11.7% of them progressed to experience BCR. In this subgroup, late recurrers had significantly higher-grade tumours on ISUP and Gleason sum (P <0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively), higher rates of extraprostatic extension (P = 0.022), and larger tumour volumes (P = 0.032). Logistic regression showed that RP ISUP Grade Group was a significant predictor of BCR (odds ratio 2.14, 95% confidence interval 1.43-3.20; P <0.001). CONCLUSION: This study characterises the pattern of late BCR in the largest contemporary active surveillance era cohort. We have identified that RP ISUP Grade Group is a strong predictive indicator for late BCR. We also propose that timing of BCR resides on a continuum of risk and that the potential concept of dormant micrometastatic involvement requires further research and evaluation.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Ductal adenocarcinoma of the prostate: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence, presentation, prognosis, and management
    Ranasinha, N ; Omer, A ; Philippou, Y ; Harriss, E ; Davies, L ; Chow, K ; Chetta, PM ; Erickson, A ; Rajakumar, T ; Mills, IG ; Bryant, RJ ; Hamdy, FC ; Murphy, DG ; Loda, M ; Hovens, CM ; Corcoran, NM ; Verrill, C ; Lamb, AD (WILEY, 2021-01)
    CONTEXT: Ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC) is relatively rare, but is nonetheless the second most common subtype of prostate cancer. First described in 1967, opinion is still divided regarding its biology, prognosis, and outcome. OBJECTIVES: To systematically interrogate the literature to clarify the epidemiology, diagnosis, management, progression, and survival statistics of DAC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a literature search of five medical databases from inception to May 04 2020 according to PRISMA criteria using search terms "prostate ductal adenocarcinoma" OR "endometriod adenocarcinoma of prostate" and variations of each. RESULTS: Some 114 studies were eligible for inclusion, presenting 2 907 170 prostate cancer cases, of which 5911 were DAC. [Correction added on 16 January 2021 after the first online publication: the preceding statement has been corrected in this current version.] DAC accounts for 0.17% of prostate cancer on meta-analysis (range 0.0837%-13.4%). The majority of DAC cases were admixed with predominant acinar adenocarcinoma (AAC). Median Prostate Specific Antigen at diagnosis ranged from 4.2 to 9.6 ng/mL in the case series.DAC was more likely to present as T3 (RR1.71; 95%CI 1.53-1.91) and T4 (RR7.56; 95%CI 5.19-11.01) stages, with far higher likelihood of metastatic disease (RR4.62; 95%CI 3.84-5.56; all P-values < .0001), compared to AAC. Common first treatments included surgery (radical prostatectomy (RP) or cystoprostatectomy for select cases) or radiotherapy (RT) for localized disease, and hormonal or chemo-therapy for metastatic disease. Few studies compared RP and RT modalities, and those that did present mixed findings, although cancer-specific survival rates seem worse after RP.Biochemical recurrence rates were increased with DAC compared to AAC. Additionally, DAC metastasized to unusual sites, including penile and peritoneal metastases. Where compared, all studies reported worse survival for DAC compared to AAC. CONCLUSION: When drawing conclusions about DAC it is important to note the heterogenous nature of the data. DAC is often diagnosed incidentally post-treatment, perhaps due to lack of a single, universally applied histopathological definition. As such, DAC is likely underreported in clinical practice and the literature. Poorer prognosis and outcomes for DAC compared to AAC merit further research into genetic composition, evolution, diagnosis, and treatment of this surprisingly common prostate cancer sub-type. PATIENT SUMMARY: Ductal prostate cancer is a rare but important form of prostate cancer. This review demonstrates that it tends to be more serious at detection and more likely to spread to unusual parts of the body. Overall survival is worse with this type of prostate cancer and urologists need to be aware of the presence of ductal prostate cancer to alter management decisions and follow-up.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Open-label, phase I dose-escalation study of sodium selenate, a novel activator of PP2A, in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer
    Corcoran, NM ; Hovens, CM ; Michael, M ; Rosenthal, MA ; Costello, AJ (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2010-08-10)
    BACKGROUND: Angiogenesis is fundamental to the progression of many solid tumours including prostate cancer. Sodium selenate is a small, water-soluble, orally bioavailable activator of PP2A phosphatase with anti-angiogenic properties. METHODS: This was a dose-escalation phase I study in men with asymptomatic, chemotherapy-naïve, castration-resistant prostate cancer. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included establishing the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile. RESULTS: A total of 19 patients were enrolled. The MTD was 60 mg per day. Dose-limiting toxicity (fatigue and diarrhoea) was observed at 90 mg per day. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events across all treatment cohorts were nausea, diarrhoea, fatigue, muscle spasms, alopecia and nail disorders. No grade 4 toxicities were observed and there were no deaths on study. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed. One patient had a PSA response >50%. Median time to PSA progression (for non-responders) was 14.2 weeks. Mean PSA doubling time increased during the main treatment phase from 2.18 months before trial to 3.85 months. CONCLUSION: Sodium selenate is well tolerated at a dose of 60 mg per day with modest single-agent efficacy similar to other anti-angiogenic agents. Further trials in combination with conventional cytotoxic regimens are warranted.