Surgery (RMH) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 28
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The effect of surgical approach on early complications of total hip arthoplasty
    Tay, K ; Tang, A ; Fary, C ; Patten, S ; Steele, R ; de Steiger, R (BMC, 2019-09-03)
    BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is traditionally associated with a low complication rate, with complications such as infection, fracture and dislocation requiring readmission or reoperation. We seek to identify the complication rate among the anterior, direct lateral and posterior surgical approaches. METHODS: We reviewed all THAs performed at the Epworth Healthcare from 1 July 2014 to 30 June 2016. There were 2437 THAs performed by a variety of approaches. No hips were excluded from this study. We surveyed the hospital database and the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) to identify those patients who had been readmitted and/or reoperated on. Details collected included age, gender, laterality of the surgery (left/right/bilateral), surgical approach utilised, complications which occurred. RESULTS: There were 29 peri-prosthetic fractures detected (13 anterior, 9 lateral, 7 posterior) and 10 underwent revision of implant, 19 were fixed. The increased rate of revision in the anterior group was statistically significant. There were 14 dislocations (5 anterior, 1 lateral, 8 posterior) of which 8 prostheses were revised. Three cases operated via the anterior approach and 1 by the lateral had early subsidence without fracture, necessitating revision of the femoral prostheses. Operative site infection occurred in 12 cases (2 anterior, 4 lateral, 6 posterior) with 6 requiring revision of implants. CONCLUSION: The complication rates between the 3 main approaches are similar, but individual surgeons should be vigilant for complications unique to their surgical approaches, such as femoral fractures in the anterior approach and dislocations in the posterior approach.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Lifetime Risk of Primary Total Hip Replacement Surgery for Osteoarthritis From 2003 to 2013: A Multinational Analysis Using National Registry Data
    Ackerman, IN ; Bohensky, MA ; de Steiger, R ; Brand, CA ; Eskelinen, A ; Fenstad, AM ; Furnes, O ; Graves, SE ; Haapakoski, J ; Makela, K ; Mehnert, F ; Nemes, S ; Overgaard, S ; Pedersen, AB ; Garellick, G (WILEY, 2017-11)
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the lifetime risk of total hip replacement (THR) surgery for osteoarthritis (OA) between countries, and over time. METHODS: Data on primary THR procedures performed for OA in 2003 and 2013 were extracted from national arthroplasty registries in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Life tables and population data were also obtained for each country. Lifetime risk of THR was calculated for 2003 and 2013 using registry, life table, and population data. RESULTS: In 2003, lifetime risk of THR ranged from 8.7% (Denmark) to 15.9% (Norway) for females, and from 6.3% (Denmark) to 8.6% (Finland) for males. With the exception of females in Norway (where lifetime risk started and remained high), lifetime risk of THR increased significantly for both sexes in all countries from 2003 to 2013. In 2013, lifetime risk of THR was as high as 1 in 7 women in Norway, and 1 in 10 men in Finland. Females consistently demonstrated the highest lifetime risk of THR at both time points. Notably, lifetime risk for females in Norway was approximately double the risk for males in 2003 (females 15.9% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 15.6-16.1], males 6.9% [95% CI 6.7-7.1]), and 2013 (females 16.0% [95% CI 15.8-16.3], males 8.3% [95% CI 8.1-8.5]). CONCLUSION: Using representative, population-based data, this study found statistically significant increases in the lifetime risk of THR in 5 countries over a 10-year period, and substantial between-sex differences. These multinational risk estimates can inform resource planning for OA service delivery.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Do non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs impair fracture healing? A survey of Australian orthopaedic surgeons
    Ekegren, CL ; Hart, MJ ; Cameron, PA ; Edwards, ER ; Oppy, A ; De Steiger, R ; Page, R ; Liew, S ; Hau, R ; Bucknill, A ; Gabbe, BJ (Wiley, 2017-10-01)
    Abstract There is currently a lack of clear evidence on the impact of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on fracture healing post‐operatively. Australian orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed about their perceptions of the relationship between NSAIDs and fracture healing to determine whether equipoise exists within the profession. Results demonstrated divergence of opinion amongst Australian orthopaedic surgeons, lending support to the commencement of randomised controlled trials testing the influence of NSAIDs on fracture healing within Australia.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    In Vivo Six-Degree-of-Freedom Knee-Joint Kinematics in Overground and Treadmill Walking Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Guan, S ; Gray, HA ; Schache, AG ; Feller, J ; de Steiger, R ; Pandy, MG (WILEY, 2017-08)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Operation rate is more than double the revision rate for periprosthetic femur fractures
    Constantin, H ; Le, M ; de Steiger, R ; Harris, IA (WILEY, 2019-12)
    BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs) following hip arthroplasty can lead to significant morbidity due to their impact on mobility and the need for surgery. Its incidence often measured by the prosthesis revision rate reported in joint replacement registries. However, many PFFs are also treated with prosthesis retention and internal fixation. Minimally displaced and stable fractures may be treated without surgery. Knowledge of the difference between the number of femoral revisions for PFF (well reported in registries) and the number of surgeries for PFF overall would allow us to estimate the overall surgical burden. This study aims to determine the number of post-operative PFF in three hospitals and compare those treated with revision surgery to those PFF treated with internal fixation and femoral stem retention. By determining this difference, we can ascertain a more accurate estimate of the overall surgical burden of PFF. METHOD: Patients 50 years and older who sustained a post-operative PFF between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2017 at three public hospitals were extracted from hospital records. The number of revision procedures was compared to the number of re-operations of any type. RESULTS: There were 200 patients admitted for management of PFF. One hundred and forty-three (71.5%) required an operation of which 67 (47%) were revision arthroplasty. CONCLUSION: The overall surgical burden of PFF is approximately twice that represented by the revision rate.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Postmarket surveillance of arthroplasty device components using machine learning methods
    Cafri, G ; Graves, SE ; Sedrakyan, A ; Fan, J ; Calhoun, P ; de Steiger, RN ; Cuthbert, A ; Lorimer, M ; Paxton, EW (WILEY, 2019-11)
    PURPOSE: While joint arthroplasty is generally a safe and effective procedure, there are concerns that some devices are at increased risk of failure. Early identification of total hip arthroplasty devices with increased risk of failure can be challenging because devices consist of multiple components, hundreds of distinct components are currently used in surgery, and any estimated effect needs to address confounding due to device and patient factors. The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of machine learning approaches at identifying recalled components listed by the US Food and Drug Administration using data from a US total joint arthroplasty registry. METHODS: An open cohort study was conducted using data (January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2015) from 74 520 implantations and 348 unique components in the Kaiser Permanente Total Joint Replacement Registry. Exposures of interest were device components used in elective primary total hip arthroplasty. The outcome was time to first revision surgery, defined as exchange, removal, or addition of any component. Machine learning methods included regularized/unregularized Cox models and random survival forest. RESULTS: Among the recalled components detected were ASR acetabular shell/large femoral head, Durom acetabular shell/Metasul large femoral head, and Rejuvenate modular neck stem. The three components not identified were characterized by small numbers of devices recorded in the registry. CONCLUSIONS: The novel approaches to signal detection may improve postmarket surveillance of frequently used arthroplasty devices, which in turn will improve public health.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Outcomes of hip and knee replacement surgery in private and public hospitals in Australia
    Harris, I ; Cuthbert, A ; Lorimer, M ; de Steiger, R ; Lewis, P ; Graves, SE (WILEY, 2019-11)
    BACKGROUND: This study determined the contributing factors of hospital sector (private versus public) variation in revision rates after elective total hip replacement (THR) for hip fracture, and elective total knee replacement (TKR). METHODS: Using data from a large national arthroplasty registry, funnel plots for hospitals were generated, displaying the proportion of revised primary procedures. The proportion of outliers for each distribution was defined as the proportion outside the upper 99.7% confidence limit. Survival analyses determined differences between hospital sector revision rates separately for implants with the lowest revision rate, and for all other implants. Multivariate Cox regression determined the role of hospital sector in revision, adjusting for possible confounders. RESULTS: For THR performed for osteoarthritis, 17.4% of private and 4.4% of public hospitals were outliers. For TKR performed for osteoarthritis, 19.6% of private and 10.0% of public hospitals were outliers. For THR for fractured neck of femur, 8.1% of private and 0.0% of public hospitals were outliers. Adjusted and unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analyses showed higher THR revision rates in private hospitals for osteoarthritis and fractured neck of femur, but no difference when restricted to the 10 prostheses with the lowest revision rate. The Kaplan-Meier analysis of TKR showed higher revision rates for private hospitals, with the association reversing when restricted to prostheses with the lowest revision rate. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation was seen in the revision rate after THR and TKR between hospital sectors in Australia. The variation was largely due to differences in prosthesis selection.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Three-dimensional motion of the knee-joint complex during normal walking revealed by mobile biplane x-ray imaging
    Gray, HA ; Guan, S ; Thomeer, LT ; Schache, AG ; de Steiger, R ; Pandy, MG (WILEY, 2019-03)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Progression to total hip arthroplasty following hip arthroscopy
    McCarthy, B ; Ackerman, IN ; de Steiger, R (WILEY, 2018-05-24)
    BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy is a minimally invasive surgical technique increasingly being used to treat hip pathology. There is evidence that a proportion of patients require total hip arthroplasty in the years immediately following arthroscopy, suggesting that these patients have derived only a limited benefit from the procedure. Identification of risk factors for early progression to hip arthroplasty may enable refinement of hip arthroscopy indications and more informed decision making. The aim of this study is to identify the proportion of patients in a hip arthroscopy cohort who progress to total hip arthroplasty within 2 years of arthroscopy, and to analyse risk factors for this early progression. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on all patients who underwent hip arthroscopy at one tertiary institution from 2004 to 2013. Hospital data were linked to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry in 2016 to identify subsequent hip arthroplasty. RESULTS: There were 989 arthroscopies performed on 947 patients; 447 were female (48.1%), the mean age was 41.1 years (SD: 14.23) and osteoarthritis was present at arthroscopy in 31.5%. Total hip arthroplasty occurred in 129 patients (13%) within 2 years. Multivariable logistic regression revealed osteoarthritis, age >50 years and previous arthroscopy were significant risk factors for arthroplasty within 2 years (adjusted odds ratios (confidence intervals): 4.6 (2.91-7.16), 3.8 (2.44-5.87), 2.5 (1.16-5.81)). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoarthritis, older age and history of arthroscopy were independent risk factors for early progression to arthroplasty; these factors should be considered within clinical decision-making, and when discussing potential arthroscopy outcomes with patients.
  • Item