- Finance - Research Publications
Finance - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 10 of 19
-
ItemEvaluation and management of patients with noncardiac chest pain.Shekhar, C ; Whorwell, PJ (Hindawi Limited, 2008)Up to a third of patients undergoing coronary angiography for angina-like chest pain are found to have normal coronary arteries and a substantial proportion of these individuals continue to consult and even attend emergency departments. Initially, these patients are usually seen by cardiologists but with accumulating evidence that the pain might have a gastrointestinal origin, it may be more appropriate for them to be cared for by the gastroenterologist once a cardiological cause has been excluded. This review covers the assessment and management of this challenging condition, which includes a combination of education, reassurance, and pharmacotherapy. For the more refractory cases, behavioral treatments, such as cognitive behavioral therapy or hypnotherapy, may have to be considered.
-
ItemExplicit neural signals reflecting reward uncertaintySchultz, W ; Preuschoff, K ; Camerer, C ; Hsu, M ; Fiorillo, CD ; Tobler, PN ; Bossaerts, P (ROYAL SOC, 2008-12-12)The acknowledged importance of uncertainty in economic decision making has stimulated the search for neural signals that could influence learning and inform decision mechanisms. Current views distinguish two forms of uncertainty, namely risk and ambiguity, depending on whether the probability distributions of outcomes are known or unknown. Behavioural neurophysiological studies on dopamine neurons revealed a risk signal, which covaried with the standard deviation or variance of the magnitude of juice rewards and occurred separately from reward value coding. Human imaging studies identified similarly distinct risk signals for monetary rewards in the striatum and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), thus fulfilling a requirement for the mean variance approach of economic decision theory. The orbitofrontal risk signal covaried with individual risk attitudes, possibly explaining individual differences in risk perception and risky decision making. Ambiguous gambles with incomplete probabilistic information induced stronger brain signals than risky gambles in OFC and amygdala, suggesting that the brain's reward system signals the partial lack of information. The brain can use the uncertainty signals to assess the uncertainty of rewards, influence learning, modulate the value of uncertain rewards and make appropriate behavioural choices between only partly known options.
-
ItemMarkowitz in the brain?Preuschoff, K ; Quartz, S ; Bossaerts, P (Editions Dalloz, 2008)Brain-scanning (fMRI) evidence is presented that activity in certain sub-cortical structures of the human brain correlate with changes in expected reward, and with risk. Risk is measured by variance of payoff, as in Markowitz’ theory. These brain structures form part of the dopaminergic system (which consists of the neurons that emit a crucial chemical, namely, dopamine, and the areas to which the dopamine neurons project). The dopaminergic system has been known to regulate reward expectation. We show that it is involved in risk perception as well. As such, our findings support for the human brain what recently had been discovered in the primate brain (using single-neuron analysis instead of fMRI).
-
ItemTHE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE, REPUTATION AND MANAGEMENT EARNINGS FORECASTSChan, H ; Faff, R ; Mather, P ; Ramsay, A (Virtus Interpress, 2008)
-
ItemAn empirical investigation of whether Australian capital gains tax reforms influence individual investor behaviourHanlon, D ; Pinder, S (Elsevier BV, 2007-11-01)
-
ItemThe sub-prime crisis down underBROWN, C. ; DAVIS, K. ( 2008)
-
ItemGovernance structures of initial public offerings in AustraliaShekhar, C ; Stapledon, G (WILEY, 2007-11)We study the relationship between venture capital financing, CEO ownership, compensation structure, and board structures for a group of Australian IPO firms. Results suggest that board structures are influenced by the industry the firm is in, and presence of venture capitalists results in a larger board with a higher number of outside directors. CEOs in non VC‐backed firms own a significantly higher fraction of firm shares, and CEO ownership is negatively related to both board size and outside blockholders. VC‐backed firms are significantly more likely to disclose information about CEO compensation packages, but the relationship between actual board size and structure and disclosure is insignificant. Finally, we also find that venture capital backing significantly decreases the time to change‐in‐status for firms, whereby firms cease to exist as independent entities.
-
ItemMeasurement of insider trading in wagering marketsColeman, L (Informa UK Limited, 2007-03-01)
-
ItemThe relation between R&D intensity and future market returns: Does expensing versus capitalization matter?Chan, HWH ; Faff, RW ; Gharghori, P ; Ho, YK (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2007-07-01)
-
ItemRe-examination of the historical equity risk premium in AustraliaBrailsford, T ; Handley, JC ; Maheswaran, K (BLACKWELL PUBLISHING, 2008-03)Abstract In light of the ongoing debate over the value of the equity risk premium, its increasing use in the regulatory setting, and the impact of dividend imputation on the premium, this paper presents a timely new look at the historical equity risk premium in Australia, and provides an improved understanding of the historical record. We document concerns about data quality that become increasingly important the further back in time one looks. In particular, there are sufficient question marks over the quality of data prior to 1958 to warrant any estimates based thereon to be treated with caution. Accordingly, we present a new set of estimates of the historical equity risk premium corresponding to periods of increasing data quality but of decreasing sample size. Relative to bonds (bills), the equity premium has averaged 6.3 per cent (6.8 per cent) per annum over 1958–2005, which is a period of relatively good data quality. Together with other results in the paper, the findings reveal a historical estimate that is substantially less than widely cited historical studies would otherwise indicate. We reconcile prior evidence through documenting a dividend adjustment that has typically been overlooked. We also provide estimates that incorporate an adjustment for imputation credits.