Pathology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 48
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Morphological predictors of BRCA1 germline mutations in young women with breast cancer
    Southey, MC ; Ramus, SJ ; Dowty, JG ; Smith, LD ; Tesoriero, AA ; Wong, EEM ; Dite, GS ; Jenkins, MA ; Byrnes, GB ; Winship, I ; Phillips, K-A ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL (NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2011-03-15)
    BACKGROUND: Knowing a young woman with newly diagnosed breast cancer has a germline BRCA1 mutation informs her clinical management and that of her relatives. We sought an optimal strategy for identifying carriers using family history, breast cancer morphology and hormone receptor status data. METHODS: We studied a population-based sample of 452 Australian women with invasive breast cancer diagnosed before age 40 years for whom we conducted extensive germline mutation testing (29 carried a BRCA1 mutation) and a systematic pathology review, and collected three-generational family history and tumour ER and PR status. Predictors of mutation status were identified using multiple logistic regression. Areas under receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were estimated using five-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: The probability of being a BRCA1 mutation carrier increased with number of selected histology features even after adjusting for family history and ER and PR status (P<0.0001). From the most parsimonious multivariate model, the odds ratio for being a carrier were: 9.7 (95% confidence interval: 2.6-47.0) for trabecular growth pattern (P=0.001); 7.8 (2.7-25.7) for mitotic index over 50 mitoses per 10 high-powered field (P=0.0003); and 2.7 (1.3-5.9) for each first-degree relative with breast cancer diagnosed before age 60 years (P=0.01).The area under the ROC curve was 0.87 (0.83-0.90). CONCLUSION: Pathology review, with attention to a few specific morphological features of invasive breast cancers, can identify almost all BRCA1 germline mutation carriers among women with early-onset breast cancer without taking into account family history.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    RAD51B in Familial Breast Cancer
    Pelttari, LM ; Khan, S ; Vuorela, M ; Kiiski, JI ; Vilske, S ; Nevanlinna, V ; Ranta, S ; Schleutker, J ; Winqvist, R ; Kallioniemi, A ; Doerk, T ; Bogdanova, NV ; Figueroa, J ; Pharoah, PDP ; Schmidt, MK ; Dunning, AM ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Bolla, MK ; Dennis, J ; Michailidou, K ; Wang, Q ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC ; Rosenberg, EH ; Fasching, PA ; Beckmann, MW ; Peto, J ; dos-Santos-Silva, I ; Sawyer, EJ ; Tomlinson, I ; Burwinkel, B ; Surowy, H ; Guenel, P ; Truong, T ; Bojesen, SE ; Nordestgaard, BG ; Benitez, J ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Neuhausen, SL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Brenner, H ; Arndt, V ; Meindl, A ; Schmutzler, RK ; Brauch, H ; Bruening, T ; Lindblom, A ; Margolin, S ; Mannermaa, A ; Hartikainen, JM ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Van Dyck, L ; Janssen, H ; Chang-Claude, J ; Rudolph, A ; Radice, P ; Peterlongo, P ; Hallberg, E ; Olson, JE ; Giles, GG ; Milne, RL ; Haiman, CA ; Schumacher, F ; Simard, J ; Dumont, M ; Kristensen, V ; Borresen-Dale, A-L ; Zheng, W ; Beeghly-Fadiel, A ; Grip, M ; Andrulis, IL ; Glendon, G ; Devilee, P ; Seynaeve, C ; Hooning, MJ ; Collee, M ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Shah, M ; Luben, RN ; Hamann, U ; Torres, D ; Jakubowska, A ; Lubinski, J ; Couch, FJ ; Yannoukakos, D ; Orr, N ; Swerdlow, A ; Darabi, H ; Li, J ; Czene, K ; Hall, P ; Easton, DF ; Mattson, J ; Blomqvist, C ; Aittomaki, K ; Nevanlinna, H ; Brusgaard, K (PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 2016-05-05)
    Common variation on 14q24.1, close to RAD51B, has been associated with breast cancer: rs999737 and rs2588809 with the risk of female breast cancer and rs1314913 with the risk of male breast cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of RAD51B variants in breast cancer predisposition, particularly in the context of familial breast cancer in Finland. We sequenced the coding region of RAD51B in 168 Finnish breast cancer patients from the Helsinki region for identification of possible recurrent founder mutations. In addition, we studied the known rs999737, rs2588809, and rs1314913 SNPs and RAD51B haplotypes in 44,791 breast cancer cases and 43,583 controls from 40 studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) that were genotyped on a custom chip (iCOGS). We identified one putatively pathogenic missense mutation c.541C>T among the Finnish cancer patients and subsequently genotyped the mutation in additional breast cancer cases (n = 5259) and population controls (n = 3586) from Finland and Belarus. No significant association with breast cancer risk was seen in the meta-analysis of the Finnish datasets or in the large BCAC dataset. The association with previously identified risk variants rs999737, rs2588809, and rs1314913 was replicated among all breast cancer cases and also among familial cases in the BCAC dataset. The most significant association was observed for the haplotype carrying the risk-alleles of all the three SNPs both among all cases (odds ratio (OR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.19, P = 8.88 x 10-16) and among familial cases (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.16-1.32, P = 6.19 x 10-11), compared to the haplotype with the respective protective alleles. Our results suggest that loss-of-function mutations in RAD51B are rare, but common variation at the RAD51B region is significantly associated with familial breast cancer risk.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Somatic mutations of the coding microsatellites within the beta-2-microglobulin gene in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancers and adenomas
    Clendenning, M ; Huang, A ; Jayasekara, H ; Lorans, M ; Preston, S ; O'Callaghan, N ; Pope, BJ ; Macrae, FA ; Winship, IM ; Milne, RL ; Giles, GG ; English, DR ; Hopper, JL ; Win, AK ; Jenkins, MA ; Southey, MC ; Rosty, C ; Buchanan, DD (SPRINGER, 2018-01)
    In colorectal cancers (CRCs) with tumour mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency, genes involved in the host immune response that contain microsatellites in their coding regions, including beta-2-microglobulin (B2M), can acquire mutations that may alter the immune response, tumour progression and prognosis. We screened the coding microsatellites within B2M for somatic mutations in MMR-deficient CRCs and adenomas to determine associations with tumour subtypes, clinicopathological features and survival. Incident MMR-deficient CRCs from Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR) and the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study participants (n = 144) and 63 adenomas from 41 MMR gene mutation carriers from the ACCFR were screened for somatic mutations within five coding microsatellites of B2M. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival by B2M mutation status were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for age at CRC diagnosis, sex, AJCC stage and grade. B2M mutations occurred in 30 (20.8%) of the 144 MMR-deficient CRCs (29% of the MLH1-methylated, 17% of the Lynch syndrome and 9% of the suspected Lynch CRCs). No B2M mutations were identified in the 63 adenomas tested. B2M mutations differed by site, stage, grade and lymphocytic infiltration although none reached statistical significance (p > 0.05). The HR for overall survival for B2M mutated CRC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.29-1.48) compared with B2M wild-type. We observed differences in B2M mutation status in MMR-deficient CRC by tumour subtypes, site, stage, grade, immune infiltrate and for overall survival that warrant further investigation in larger studies before B2M mutation status can be considered to have clinical utility.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Alcohol Consumption and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer for Mismatch Repair Gene Mutation Carriers
    Dashti, SG ; Buchanan, DD ; Jayasekara, H ; Ouakrim, DA ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Winship, IM ; Macrae, FA ; Giles, GG ; Parry, S ; Casey, G ; Haile, RW ; Gallinger, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Thibodeau, SN ; Lindor, NM ; Newcomb, PA ; Potter, JD ; Baron, JA ; Hopper, JL ; Jenkins, MA ; Win, AK (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2017-03)
    © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.Background: People with germline mutation in one of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes have increased colorectal cancer risk. For these high-risk people, study findings of the relationship between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer risk have been inconclusive. Methods: 1,925 MMR gene mutations carriers recruited into the Colon Cancer Family Registry who had completed a questionnaire on lifestyle factors were included. Weighted Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between alcohol consumption and colorectal cancer. Results: Colorectal cancer was diagnosed in 769 carriers (40%) at a mean (SD) age of 42.6 (10.3) years. Compared with abstention, ethanol consumption from any alcoholic beverage up to 14 g/day and >28 g/day was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.09-2.07 and 1.69; 95% CI, 1.07-2.65, respectively; Ptrend = 0.05), and colon cancer risk (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.27-2.49 and 1.94; 95% CI, 1.19-3.18, respectively; Ptrend = 0.02). However, there was no clear evidence for an association with rectal cancer risk. Also, there was no evidence for associations between consumption of individual alcoholic beverage types (beer, wine, spirits) and colorectal, colon, or rectal cancer risk. Conclusions: Our data suggest that alcohol consumption, particularly more than 28 g/day of ethanol (∼2 standard drinks of alcohol in the United States), is associated with increased colorectal cancer risk for MMR gene mutation carriers. Impact: Although these data suggested that alcohol consumption in MMR carriers was associated with increased colorectal cancer risk, there was no evidence of a dose-response, and not all types of alcohol consumption were associated with increased risk.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Prevalence and Penetrance of Major Genes and Polygenes for Colorectal Cancer
    Win, AK ; Jenkins, MA ; Dowty, JG ; Antoniou, AC ; Lee, A ; Giles, GG ; Buchanan, DD ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Ahnen, DJ ; Thibodeau, SN ; Casey, G ; Gallinger, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Haile, RW ; Potter, JD ; Zheng, Y ; Lindor, NM ; Newcomb, PA ; Hopper, JL ; Maclnnis, RJ (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2017-03)
    © 2016 American Association for Cancer Research.Background: Although high-risk mutations in identified major susceptibility genes (DNA mismatch repair genes and MUTYH) account for some familial aggregation of colorectal cancer, their population prevalence and the causes of the remaining familial aggregation are not known. Methods: We studied the families of 5,744 colorectal cancer cases (probands) recruited from population cancer registries in the United States, Canada, and Australia and screened probands for mutations in mismatch repair genes and MUTYH. We conducted modified segregation analyses using the cancer history of first-degree relatives, conditional on the proband's age at diagnosis. We estimated the prevalence of mutations in the identified genes, the prevalence of HR for unidentified major gene mutations, and the variance of the residual polygenic component. Results: We estimated that 1 in 279 of the population carry mutationsin mismatchrepair genes(MLH1 = 1 in 1,946, MSH2 = 1 in 2,841, MSH6 = 1 in 758, PMS2 = 1 in 714), 1 in 45 carry mutations in MUTYH, and 1 in 504 carry mutations associated with an average 31-fold increased risk of colorectal cancer in unidentified major genes. The estimated polygenic variance was reduced by 30% to 50% after allowing for unidentified major genes and decreased from 3.3 for age >40 years to 0.5 for age 70 years(equivalenttosiblingrelativerisksof5.1to1.3,respectively). Conclusions: Unidentified major genes might explain one third to one half of the missing heritability of colorectal cancer. Impact: Our findings could aid gene discovery and development of better colorectal cancer risk prediction models.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Tumor testing to identify lynch syndrome in two Australian colorectal cancer cohorts
    Buchanan, DD ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Eriksen, SV ; Walsh, MD ; Walters, RJ ; Thibodeau, SN ; Stewart, J ; Preston, S ; Win, AK ; Flander, L ; Ouakrim, DA ; Macrae, FA ; Boussioutas, A ; Winship, IM ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC ; English, D ; Jenkins, MA (WILEY, 2017-02)
    BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tumor testing of colorectal cancers (CRC) for mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is an effective approach to identify carriers of germline MMR gene mutation (Lynch syndrome). The aim of this study was to identify MMR gene mutation carriers in two cohorts of population-based CRC utilizing a combination of tumor and germline testing approaches. METHODS: Colorectal cancers from 813 patients diagnosed with CRC < 60 years of age from the Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR) and from 826 patients from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study (MCCS) were tested for MMR protein expression using immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability (MSI), BRAFV600E somatic mutation, and for MLH1 methylation. MMR gene mutation testing (Sanger sequencing and Multiplex Ligation Dependent Probe Amplification) was performed on germline DNA of patients with MMR-deficient tumors and a subset of MMR-proficient CRCs. RESULTS: Of the 813 ACCFR probands, 90 probands demonstrated tumor MMR deficiency (11.1%), and 42 had a MMR gene germline mutation (5.2%). For the MCCS, MMR deficiency was identified in the tumors of 103 probands (12.5%) and seven had a germline mutation (0.8%). All the mutation carriers were diagnosed prior to 70 years of age. Probands with a MMR-deficient CRC without MLH1 methylation and a gene mutation were considered Lynch-like and comprised 41.1% and 25.2% of the MMR-deficient CRCs for the ACCFR and MCCS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of MMR gene mutation carriers in Australian CRC-affected patients is optimized by immunohistochemistry screening of CRC diagnosed before 70 years of age. A significant proportion of MMR-deficient CRCs will have unknown etiology (Lynch-like) proving problematic for clinical management.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Risk of extracolonic cancers for people with biallelic and monoallelic mutations in MUTYH
    Win, AK ; Reece, JC ; Dowty, JG ; Buchanan, DD ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Southey, MC ; Young, JP ; Cleary, SP ; Kim, H ; Cotterchio, M ; Macrae, FA ; Tucker, KM ; Baron, JA ; Burnett, T ; Le Marchand, L ; Casey, G ; Haile, RW ; Newcomb, PA ; Thibodeau, SN ; Hopper, JL ; Gallinger, S ; Winship, IM ; Lindor, NM ; Jenkins, MA (WILEY, 2016-10-01)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Risk factors for metachronous colorectal cancer following a primary colorectal cancer: A prospective cohort study
    Jayasekara, H ; Reece, JC ; Buchanan, DD ; Rosty, C ; Dashti, SG ; Ouakrim, DA ; Winship, IM ; Macrae, FA ; Boussioutas, A ; Giles, GG ; Ahnen, DJ ; Lowery, J ; Casey, G ; Haile, RW ; Gallinger, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Newcomb, PA ; Lindor, NM ; Hopper, JL ; Parry, S ; Jenkins, MA ; Win, AK (WILEY-BLACKWELL, 2016-09-01)
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    SNP rs16906252C>T Is an Expression and Methylation Quantitative Trait Locus Associated with an Increased Risk of Developing MGMT-Methylated Colorectal Cancer
    Kuroiwa-Trzmielina, J ; Wang, F ; Rapkins, RW ; Ward, RL ; Buchanan, DD ; Win, AK ; Clendenning, M ; Rosty, C ; Southey, MC ; Winship, IM ; Hopper, JL ; Jenkins, MA ; Olivier, J ; Hawkins, NJ ; Hitchins, MP (AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH, 2016-12-15)
    PURPOSE: Methylation of the MGMT promoter is the major cause of O6-methylguanine methyltransferase deficiency in cancer and has been associated with the T variant of the promoter enhancer SNP rs16906252C>T. We sought evidence for an association between the rs16906252C>T genotype and increased risk of developing a subtype of colorectal cancer featuring MGMT methylation, mediated by genotype-dependent epigenetic silencing within normal tissues. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: By applying a molecular pathologic epidemiology case-control study design, associations between rs16906252C>T and risk for colorectal cancer overall, and colorectal cancer stratified by MGMT methylation status, were estimated using multinomial logistic regression in two independent retrospective series of colorectal cancer cases and controls. The test sample comprised 1,054 colorectal cancer cases and 451 controls from Sydney, Australia. The validation sample comprised 612 colorectal cancer cases and 245 controls from the Australasian Colon Cancer Family Registry (ACCFR). To determine whether rs16906252C>T was linked to a constitutively altered epigenetic state, quantitative allelic expression and methylation analyses were performed in normal tissues. RESULTS: An association between rs16906252C>T and increased risk of developing MGMT-methylated colorectal cancer in the Sydney sample was observed [OR, 3.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.0-5.3; P < 0.0001], which was replicated in the ACCFR sample (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4-6.8; P < 0.0001). The T allele demonstrated about 2.5-fold reduced transcription in normal colorectal mucosa from cases and controls and was selectively methylated in a minority of normal cells, indicating that rs16906252C>T represents an expression and methylation quantitative trait locus. CONCLUSIONS: We provide evidence that rs16906252C>T is associated with elevated risk for MGMT-methylated colorectal cancer, likely mediated by constitutive epigenetic repression of the T allele. Clin Cancer Res; 22(24); 6266-77. ©2016 AACR.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Female Hormonal Factors and the Risk of Endometrial Cancer in Lynch Syndrome
    Dashti, SG ; Chau, R ; Ouakrim, DA ; Buchanan, DD ; Clendenning, M ; Young, JP ; Winship, IM ; Arnold, J ; Ahnen, DJ ; Haile, RW ; Casey, G ; Gallinger, S ; Thibodeau, SN ; Lindor, NM ; Le Marchand, L ; Newcomb, PA ; Potter, JD ; Baron, JA ; Hopper, JL ; Jenkins, MA ; Win, AK (AMER MEDICAL ASSOC, 2015-07-07)
    IMPORTANCE: Apart from hysterectomy, there is no consensus recommendation for reducing endometrial cancer risk for women with a mismatch repair gene mutation (Lynch syndrome). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between hormonal factors and endometrial cancer risk in Lynch syndrome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study included 1128 women with a mismatch repair gene mutation identified from the Colon Cancer Family Registry. Data were analyzed with a weighted cohort approach. Participants were recruited between 1997 and 2012 from centers across the United States, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. EXPOSURES: Age at menarche, first and last live birth, and menopause; number of live births; hormonal contraceptive use; and postmenopausal hormone use. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Self-reported diagnosis of endometrial cancer. RESULTS: Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 133 women (incidence rate per 100 person-years, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.34). Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 11% (n = 70) of women with age at menarche greater than or equal to 13 years compared with 12.6% (n = 57) of women with age at menarche less than 13 years (incidence rate per 100 person-years, 0.27 vs 0.31; rate difference, -0.04 [95% CI, -0.15 to 0.05]; hazard ratio per year, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73 to 0.99]; P = .04). Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 10.8% (n = 88) of parous women compared with 14.4% (n = 40) of nulliparous women (incidence rate per 100 person-years, 0.25 vs 0.43; rate difference, -0.18 [95% CI, -0.32 to -0.04]; hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.10 to 0.42]; P < .001). Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 8.7% (n = 70) of women who used hormonal contraceptives greater than or equal to 1 year compared with 19.2% (n = 57) of women who used contraceptives less than 1 year (incidence rate per 100 person-years, 0.22 vs 0.45; rate difference, -0.23 [95% CI, -0.36 to -0.11]; hazard ratio, 0.39 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.64]; P < .001). There was no statistically significant association between endometrial cancer and age at first and last live birth, age at menopause, and postmenopausal hormone use. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: For women with a mismatch repair gene mutation, some endogenous and exogenous hormonal factors were associated with a lower risk of endometrial cancer. These directions and strengths of associations were similar to those for the general population. If replicated, these findings suggest that women with a mismatch repair gene mutation may be counseled like the general population in regard to hormonal influences on endometrial cancer risk.