School of Earth Sciences - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Uncertainties in runoff projections in southwest Western Australia and central Chilean catchments
    Barria Sandoval, Pilar Andrea ( 2017)
    Important runoff reductions have been reported in mid-latitude, Mediterranean-like climate catchments of the Southern Hemisphere (SH), in particular in the southwest of Western Australia (SWA) and in central Chile (CC). These changes have been driven by decreases in rainfall since the mid-1970s. Despite regional rainfall and runoff projections from Global Climate Models (GCMs) indicating that the observed trends are expected to continue during the 21st century, the projections are affected by large uncertainties that limit their utility to decision makers. The main source of uncertainty in runoff projections are the GCMs used to produce future climate projections. However, uncertainties arise from the observations of the climate variables, the statistical methodology to downscale the GCM simulations to the catchment scale and the hydrological model used to simulate runoff. In particular, the short length (<50 years) and poor spatially distributed observed climatological variables in mountainous catchments, characterized by steep topography, hampers a deep analysis of runoff trends and runoff variability, such as the case of CC mountainous catchments. The impact of the GCM uncertainty on runoff projections has mainly been assessed through comparison of multi-model runs of future climate with little exploration of uncertainties inside the models due to different parameterisations. This thesis seeks to investigate the uncertainty response of projected runoff due to both: perturbed physics parameter variations within a GCM using a novel 2500-member ensemble from the HadCM3L model, the climaprediction.net data (CPDN), termed the within-GCM uncertainties, and from a multi-model ensemble of different GCMs collated by the CMIP5 project, termed the between-GCM uncertainties. The impact of GCM uncertainties on runoff modelling for pluvial regimes in southwest Western Australian and Central Chilean catchments was assessed. Both regions share similar trends and climatic features, with major decreases in winter precipitation and runoff since the mid-70s that have been related to a displacement of the Southern Hemisphere storm track. Nonetheless one important difference between SWA and CC catchments, is the presence of nivo-pluvial regimes located at the foothills of the Andes in CC, whose hydrology is poorly understood mainly due to the lack of well distributed and long gauge records that represent its variability. The results presented in this thesis show that the impact of within-GCM uncertainties on runoff projections in SWA catchments is very large; larger than previous estimates of within-GCM uncertainties impact on runoff. The perturbed physics approach indicates that current water management assessments underestimate uncertainties in runoff projections. Regarding the comparison of the impact of between-GCM and within-GCM uncertainties on runoff projections in SWA catchments quantified as the difference between the 5th and the 95th percentile of simulations, the impact of within-GCM uncertainties on runoff projections range between 39% and 65%. Whereas the impact of between-GCM uncertainties on runoff projections range between 44% and 83% for the Representative concentration pathway 4.5 (RCP4.5) scenario and about 38% and 72% under the RCP8.5 for the period between 2050-2080 compared to 1970-2000. Regarding CC catchments, between-GCM uncertainties of about 55% and 51% in runoff projections using the RCP4.5 and the RCP8.5 scenarios were found. The results here reported indicate that the impact of within-GCM and between-GCM uncertainties in SWA catchments runoff projections is very similar. The results also indicate that because some GCMs in the CMIP5 ensemble have multiple runs, using different initial conditions, CMIP5 gives some insight into within-GCM uncertainty as well. For these reasons and because CMIP5 provides runs that represent all regions of the world, it is recommended for use in hydrological assessments of climate change impact and the uncertainties around the projections.