Medicine (Austin & Northern Health) - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Duration of platelet storage and outcomes of critically ill patients
    Flint, A ; Aubron, C ; Bailey, M ; Bellomo, R ; Pilcher, D ; Cheng, AC ; Hegarty, C ; Reade, MC ; McQuilten, Z (WILEY, 2017-03)
    BACKGROUND: The storage duration of platelet (PLT) units is limited to 5 to 7 days. This study investigates whether PLT storage duration is associated with patient outcomes in critically ill patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of two hospitals in Australia who received one or more PLT transfusions from 2008 to 2014. Storage duration was approached in several different ways. Outcome variables were hospital mortality and ICU-acquired infection. Associations between PLT storage duration and outcomes were evaluated using multiple logistic regression and also by Cox regression. RESULTS: Among 2250 patients who received one or more PLT transfusions while in the ICU, the storage duration of PLTs was available for 64% of patients (1430). In-hospital mortality was 22.1% and ICU infection rate 7.2%. When comparing patients who received PLTs of a maximum storage duration of not more than 3, 4, or 5 days, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. After confounders were adjusted for, the storage duration of PLTs was not independently associated with mortality (4 days vs. ≤3 days, odds ratio [OR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.30; 5 days vs. ≤3 days, OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.37) or infection (4 days vs. ≤3 days, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39-1.29; 5 days vs. ≤3 days, OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.67-1.83). Similar results were obtained regardless of how storage duration of PLTs was approached. CONCLUSIONS: In this large observational study in a heterogeneous ICU population, storage duration of PLTs was not associated with an increased risk of mortality or infection.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Is platelet transfusion associated with hospital-acquired infections in critically ill patients?
    Aubron, C ; Flint, AW ; Bailey, M ; Pilcher, D ; Cheng, AC ; Hegarty, C ; Martinelli, A ; Reade, MC ; Bellomo, R ; McQuilten, Z (BMC, 2017-01-06)
    BACKGROUND: Platelets are commonly transfused to critically ill patients. Reports suggest an association between platelet transfusion and infection. However, there is no large study to have determined whether platelet transfusion in critically ill patients is associated with hospital-acquired infection. METHODS: We conducted a multi-centre study using prospectively maintained databases of two large academic intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia. Characteristics of patients who received platelets in ICUs between 2008 and 2014 were compared to those of patients who did not receive platelets. Association between platelet administration and infection (bacteraemia and/or bacteriuria) was modelled using multiple logistic regression and Cox regression, with blood components as time-varying covariates. A propensity covariate adjustment was also performed to verify results. RESULTS: Of the 18,965 patients included, 2250 (11.9%) received platelets in ICU with a median number of 1 platelet unit (IQR 1-3) administered. Patients who received platelets were more severely ill at ICU admission (mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score 65 (SD 29) vs 52 (SD 25), p < 0.01) and had more comorbidities (31% vs 19%, p < 0.01) than patients without platelet transfusion. Invasive mechanical ventilation (87% vs 57%, p < 0.01) and renal replacement therapy (20% vs 4%, p < 0.01) were more frequently administered in patients receiving platelets than in patients without platelets. On univariate analysis, platelet transfusion was associated with hospital-acquired infection in the ICU (7.7% vs 1.4%, p < 0.01). After adjusting for confounders, including other blood components administered, patient severity, centre, year, and diagnosis category, platelet transfusions were independently associated with infection (adjusted OR 2.56 95% CI 1.98-3.31, p < 0.001). This association was also found in survival analysis with blood components as time-varying covariates (adjusted HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.41-2.41, p < 0.001) and when only bacteraemia was considered (adjusted OR 3.30, 95% CI 2.30-4.74, p <0.001). Platelet transfusions remained associated with infection after propensity covariate adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for confounders, including patient severity and other blood components, platelet transfusion was independently associated with ICU-acquired infection. Further research aiming to better understand this association and to prevent this complication is warranted.