- Resource Management and Geography - Research Publications
Resource Management and Geography - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
5 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 5 of 5
-
ItemTHE EFFECT OF AID ON CAPACITY TO ADAPT TO CLIMATE CHANGE: INSIGHTS FROM NIUEBarnett, J (TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2008-06)
-
ItemCold climate in Copenhagen: China and the United States at COP15Christoff, P (ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2010)
-
ItemThe Bali Roadmap: Climate change, COP 13 and beyondCHRISTOFF, P. ( 2008)
-
ItemPeace and development: Towards a new synthesisBarnett, J (SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2008-01)This article develops a theory of peace as freedom that explains some important relationships between peace and development. It does this by critically examining and then synthesizing Johan Galtung's theory of peace as the absence of violence and Amartya Sen's theory of development as freedom. Galtung's theory of peace is clear on the meaning and causes of direct violence, but vague on the details of structural violence. Sen's theory helps overcome many of the problems associated with structural violence, although its focus on agents and the state tends to downplay the importance of larger-scale political and economic processes. In the theory of peace as freedom, peace is defined as, and in praxis is enlarged through, the equitable distribution of economic opportunities, political freedoms, social opportunities, transparency guarantees, protective security and freedom from direct violence. The institutions required for peace as freedom are considered, and it is suggested that the pluralist state is the best model for providing and maintaining peace as freedom. Some implications of this theory for existing and future analyses of the causes of violent conflict are discussed.
-
ItemThe Worst of Friends: OPEC and G-77 in the Climate RegimeBarnett, J (MIT PRESS, 2008-11)In the climate change negotiations the thirteen countries that are members of OPEC obstruct progress towards reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. Although these actions undermine sustainable development in developing countries, the larger Group of 77 (G-77) coalition nevertheless tacitly supports its OPEC members in the climate regime. This article explains the connection between OPEC's interests in oil exports and its inaction on climate change, and the divergence of these interests with those of the G-77. It argues that OPEC's influence within the G-77, and therefore the climate regime, stems from the desire to maintain unity within the G-77. This unity has and is likely to continue to cost the majority of developing countries in the form delayed assistance for adaptation, the possibility of inadequate reduction in emissions under the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol, and continued dependence on increasingly expensive oil imports.