- Melbourne Law School - Research Publications
Melbourne Law School - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
14 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 10 of 14
-
ItemOn both sides of the recordPark, M. M. ( 1992)The difficulty of the unity of parties to civil litigation where a party brings suit against himself is considered
-
ItemTales from the colonial pastPark, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1992)Brief historical background linking a prominent member of the New South Wales legal profession to the notorious late nineteenth century criminal case of cannibalism
-
ItemLife and death in the biggest city law firm in thebiggest cityPark, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1996)A description of the traditions of legal practice inside a well-established prestigious New York law firm
-
ItemThe paperless officePark, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1994)Necessary modifications to a new skyscraper to cater for a major law firm as an incoming tenant
-
ItemBrevityPark, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1994)Readers are encouraged to utilise brevity in their written submissions
-
ItemLegal mythology: The House of Lords cannot err, but, thank God, their mistakes can be put rightby Parliament.Park, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1991)The impotence of man-made law to override natural laws is considered.
-
ItemCase law for the tyro advocatePark, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1992)A collection of legal anecdotes involving bold, insouciant, or impudentbehaviour by counsel directed towards the court or the practice of law.
-
ItemFarewell: Legal Beagle (1986 – 1993)Park, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1993)Comment upon the passing of the “Legal Beagle” comic strip from the Law Society of Western Australia’s journal Brief.
-
ItemGrendel’s champion wages battle with Judge BeowulfPark, M. M. (The Victorian Bar, 1995)The fee award litigation involving a successful litigant, its high profile andexpensive attorney, and the factors necessarily considered in awardingcosts against the unsuccessful party in a US Constitutional case. Briefbiographical background to the participants including some parallelsbetween the high profile litigator and one time Supreme Court JusticeLewis Powell.
-
ItemSplitting heirsPark, M. M. (Law Institute of Victoria, 1993-03)This is a letter published in the Law Institute Journal. Discusses the common misconception that both twins must share the same parents. Although it is rare for non-identical twins to have separate fathers, it is possible. It is only in the instance of identical twins resulting from the abnormal division of a single fertilized egg into two identical fertilized eggs that such twins share identical genetic characteristics and the same parents. In the case of fraternal twins resulting from the separate fertilization of separate eggs with such twins sharing some (but not all) genetic characteristics genetic testing of both twins is required to comprehensively determine the paternity of each of the twins. In the case of identical twins the genetic testing of only one twin is sufficient to determine the paternity of both twins. However, the only means to conclusively determine that twins are identical is by genetic testing of both twins.