- Melbourne Law School - Research Publications
Melbourne Law School - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 10 of 56
-
ItemThe Uncertainties, Baby: Hidden Perils of Australia's Authorisation LawGiblin, R (Thomson Reuters, 2009)As digital copying and online distribution become increasingly prevalent, the issue of when a technology provider can be held liable for its users’ infringements grows commensurately more important. In Australia, such liability is imposed through the tort of authorisation, which provides that a defendant will be liable if it “sanctioned, approved or countenanced” a third party infringement. Despite its significance however, some of the principal elements of the doctrine remain unclear. After tracing the origins and development of authorisation in Australia, the work explores the main uncertainties that plague the law today. With reference to the BitTorrent file sharing software, the work then explicitly highlights the ways in which those uncertainties may affect the provider of a useful technology that has both non-infringing and infringing uses. The underlying theme of the work is that, by failing to unequivocally dismiss the increasingly expansionist arguments that are being raised in this context, courts are inadvertently promulgating a de facto expansion of the Australian authorisation law. It concludes by arguing that, unless courts start concertedly addressing the law’s uncertainties and ambiguities, the law will continue to have a more dampening effect on technological innovation in Australia than courts or the legislature ever intended.
-
ItemChanging work organisation and skill requirementsMartin, B ; Healy, J (National Institute of Labour Studies Incorporated, 2009)This paper brings together all the case studies of work organisation and workplace change in Australian workplaces during the past decade, using these to assess exactly what we do and do not know about such change and its effects on skill requirements.
-
ItemReading Swaraj into Article 15—A New Deal for all MinoritiesKhaitan, T (NUJS, 2009)
-
ItemReview of Ronald Keith, and Zhiqiu Lin 'New crime in China: public order and human rights'Biddulph, S ; Keith, R ; Lin, Z (Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2009-03-01)Review of the book 'New crime in China: public order and human rights'
-
ItemFragmentation or interaction: the WTO, fisheries subsidies, and international lawYoung, MA (CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 2009-10)Abstract Subsidies to the fishing sector have trade and ecological consequences, especially for fisheries that are over-exploited. In response, WTO members are negotiating to clarify and improve the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. Yet significant legal challenges constrain this ongoing effort because fisheries conservation and management matters are often addressed by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, instruments of the Food and Agriculture Organization, and other legal regimes to which some WTO members have not consented. This article analyses modes of learning and information exchange within the WTO regime, and compares the proposed use of standards, benchmarks, and peer review in the draft fisheries subsidies rules with existing arrangements between the WTO and organizations such as the OECD and product standard-setting bodies. It argues that novel deliberative strategies of regime interaction are more important in resolving the challenges posed by international law's fragmentation than adherence to strict mandates or legal hierarchies.
-
ItemTrusts, powers and liens: An exercise in ground-clearingBANT, E ( 2009)
-
ItemNotice and knowledge in private law claimsBRYAN, M ( 2009)
-
Item
-
ItemNot all practices are equal: An exploration of discourses, governmentality and scale-free networksDent, C (Informa UK Limited, 2009-09-01)
-
ItemDo Teams Always Lose to Win? Performance Incentives and the Player Draft in the Australian Football LeagueBorland, J ; Chicu, M ; Macdonald, RD (SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2009-10)This article examines whether the player draft used since 1986 in the Australian Football League has caused clubs to tank; that is, to seek to lose matches to obtain improved draft choices. A comparison of clubs’ performances in regular season matches played before and after introduction of the draft provides no evidence that clubs have engaged in tanking. The main potential explanations for the absence of tanking in the Australian Football League are the relatively low benefits to clubs from tanking and limited opportunities for them to engage in this behavior.