Zoology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Chemoreception and mating behaviour of a tropical Australian skink
    Scott, ML ; Llewelyn, J ; Higgie, M ; Hoskin, CJ ; Pike, K ; Phillips, BL (SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, 2015-10)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Effects of an invasive anuran [the cane toad (Bufo marinus)] on the invertebrate fauna of a tropical Australian floodplain
    Greenlees, MJ ; Brown, GP ; Webb, JK ; Phillips, BL ; Shine, R (WILEY, 2006-11)
    Abstract The ways in which invasive organisms influence native ecosystems remain poorly understood. For example, feral cane toads Bufo marinus have spread extensively through tropical Australia over the last 70 years, but assessments of their ecological impact remain largely anecdotal. We conducted experimental trials to examine the effect of cane toad presence on invertebrate fauna in relatively small (2.4 × 1.2 m) outdoor enclosures on a floodplain near Darwin in the wet–dry tropics. Toads significantly reduced invertebrate abundance and species richness, but only to about the same degree as did an equivalent biomass of native anurans. Thus, if toads simply replaced native anurans, the offtake of invertebrates might not be substantially different from that due to native anurans before toad invasion. However, our field surveys suggest that toads cause a massive (fourfold) increase in total amphibian biomass. The end result is that cane toads act as a massive nutrient sink in the floodplain ecosystem because they consume vast numbers of invertebrates but (unlike native frogs) are largely invulnerable to predation by frog‐eating predators.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    The biology, control and impact of cane toads: an overview of the University of Sydney's research program
    Shine, R ; Brown, GP ; PHILLIPS, B ; Webb, JK ; Hagman, M ; Molloy, K ; Henderson, W (Invasive animals CRC, 2006)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Toxic tucker: the potential impact of cane toads on Australia's reptiles
    Smith, J ; PHILLIPS, B (CSIRO Publishing, 2006)
    Cane Toads Bufo marinus are a highly successful invasive species, having invaded more than twenty countries in the last 150 years. In Australia, they currently occupy more than 1 million square kilometres. Toads are highly toxic and Australian predators have no evolutionary history with the cardiac toxins in toad skin. As such, toads constitute a novel and extremely toxic prey for Australia's predators. Australia's reptiles are perhaps the largest group likely to be affected by the invasion of the toad. By examining species distributions, we conclude that 59% of agamids, 85% of the varanids and all of Australia's crocodiles and freshwater turtles are potentially at risk from toads. We then assayed eleven species of reptile; one freshwater turtle (Chelidae), two crocodiles (Crocodylidae), two dragons (Agamidae), one python (Pythonidae) and five species of monitor (Varanidae) for resistance to toad toxin. We found a high level of variation between species in resistance to toad toxin but in all cases (except for one species of crocodile) all species were easily capable of eating a toad large enough to kill them. We conclude that toads pose a real and ongoing threat to the majority of Australian reptile species we examined.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The impact of cane toads on native wildlife, and developments in toad control
    PHILLIPS, B ; Jambrecina, M (Supervising Scientist, Darwin, 2010)
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Identifying optimal barriers to halt the invasion of cane toads Rhinella marina in arid Australia
    Tingley, R ; Phillips, BL ; Letnic, M ; Brown, GP ; Shine, R ; Baird, SJE ; Cadotte, M (WILEY, 2013-02)
    Summary Spatial heterogeneity in environmental conditions may restrict the spread of invasive species to narrow corridors between extensive patches of suitable habitat; thus, we may be able to curtail invasions by identifying such corridors, and focusing control efforts in these areas. Invasive cane toads Rhinella marina have spread rapidly through northern Australia, but to invade further into Western Australia, the toads must traverse a narrow arid corridor where artificial waterbodies may serve as critical stepping stones for range expansion. We focus on the cane toads' imminent expansion into north‐western Australia and use stochastic simulation to identify areas in which removal of artificial waterbodies would be most effective at stopping their spread. Our model predicts that toads will spread from the Kimberley to the Pilbara regions of Western Australia through a narrow coastal corridor, but that they will depend upon artificial waterbodies to do so. Importantly, excluding toads from artificial waterbodies is predicted to prevent toads from colonizing c. 268 200 km2 of their potential range in Western Australia. We identified three locations where closure of a relatively small subset of artificial waterbodies is predicted to halt the spread of toads. Synthesis and applications. We present a modelling framework that can be used to focus management activities within invasion corridors. Our analyses suggest that strategic removal of potential invasion hubs along such corridors can halt the spread of an invasive species.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Behavioural responses of reptile predators to invasive cane toads in tropical Australia
    Pearson, DJ ; Webb, JK ; Greenlees, MJ ; Phillips, BL ; Bedford, GS ; Brown, GP ; Thomas, J ; Shine, R (WILEY, 2014-06)
    The ecological impact of an invasive species can depend on the behavioural responses of native fauna to the invader. For example, the greatest risk posed by invasive cane toads (Rhinella marina Bufonidae) in tropical Australia is lethal poisoning of predators that attempt to eat a toad; and thus, a predator's response to a toad determines its vulnerability. We conducted standardized laboratory trials on recently captured (toad‐naïve) predatory snakes and lizards, in advance of the toad invasion front as it progressed through tropical Australia. Responses to a live edible‐sized toad differed strongly among squamate species. We recorded attacks (and hence, predator mortality) in scincid, agamid and varanid lizards, and in elapid, colubrid and pythonid snakes. Larger‐bodied predators were at greater risk, and some groups (elapid snakes and varanid lizards) were especially vulnerable. However, feeding responses differed among species within families and within genera. Some taxa (notably, many scincid and agamid lizards) do not attack toads; and many colubrid snakes either do not consume toads, or are physiologically resistant to the toad's toxins. Intraspecific variation in responses means that even in taxa that apparently are unaffected by toad invasion at the population level, some individual predators nonetheless may be fatally poisoned by invasive cane toads.