Clinical Pathology - Research Publications

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Colorectal cancer incidences in Lynch syndrome: a comparison of results from the prospective lynch syndrome database and the international mismatch repair consortium
    Moller, P ; Seppala, T ; Dowty, JG ; Haupt, S ; Dominguez-Valentin, M ; Sunde, L ; Bernstein, I ; Engel, C ; Aretz, S ; Nielsen, M ; Capella, G ; Evans, DG ; Burn, J ; Holinski-Feder, E ; Bertario, L ; Bonanni, B ; Lindblom, A ; Levi, Z ; Macrae, F ; Winship, I ; Plazzer, J-P ; Sijmons, R ; Laghi, L ; Della Valle, A ; Heinimann, K ; Half, E ; Lopez-Koestner, F ; Alvarez-Valenzuela, K ; Scott, RJ ; Katz, L ; Laish, I ; Vainer, E ; Vaccaro, CA ; Carraro, DM ; Gluck, N ; Abu-Freha, N ; Stakelum, A ; Kennelly, R ; Winter, D ; Rossi, BM ; Greenblatt, M ; Bohorquez, M ; Sheth, H ; Tibiletti, MG ; Lino-Silva, LS ; Horisberger, K ; Portenkirchner, C ; Nascimento, I ; Rossi, NT ; da Silva, LA ; Thomas, H ; Zarand, A ; Mecklin, J-P ; Pylvanainen, K ; Renkonen-Sinisalo, L ; Lepisto, A ; Peltomaki, P ; Therkildsen, C ; Lindberg, LJ ; Thorlacius-Ussing, O ; von Knebel Doeberitz, M ; Loeffler, M ; Rahner, N ; Steinke-Lange, V ; Schmiegel, W ; Vangala, D ; Perne, C ; Hueneburg, R ; de Vargas, AF ; Latchford, A ; Gerdes, A-M ; Backman, A-S ; Guillen-Ponce, C ; Snyder, C ; Lautrup, CK ; Amor, D ; Palmero, E ; Stoffel, E ; Duijkers, F ; Hall, MJ ; Hampel, H ; Williams, H ; Okkels, H ; Lubinski, J ; Reece, J ; Ngeow, J ; Guillem, JG ; Arnold, J ; Wadt, K ; Monahan, K ; Senter, L ; Rasmussen, LJ ; van Hest, LP ; Ricciardiello, L ; Kohonen-Corish, MRJ ; Ligtenberg, MJL ; Southey, M ; Aronson, M ; Zahary, MN ; Samadder, NJ ; Poplawski, N ; Hoogerbrugge, N ; Morrison, PJ ; James, P ; Lee, G ; Chen-Shtoyerman, R ; Ankathil, R ; Pai, R ; Ward, R ; Parry, S ; Debniak, T ; John, T ; van Overeem Hansen, T ; Caldes, T ; Yamaguchi, T ; Barca-Tierno, V ; Garre, P ; Cavestro, GM ; Weitz, J ; Redler, S ; Buettner, R ; Heuveline, V ; Hopper, JL ; Win, AK ; Lindor, N ; Gallinger, S ; Le Marchand, L ; Newcomb, PA ; Figueiredo, J ; Buchanan, DD ; Thibodeau, SN ; ten Broeke, SW ; Hovig, E ; Nakken, S ; Pineda, M ; Duenas, N ; Brunet, J ; Green, K ; Lalloo, F ; Newton, K ; Crosbie, EJ ; Mints, M ; Tjandra, D ; Neffa, F ; Esperon, P ; Kariv, R ; Rosner, G ; Pavicic, WH ; Kalfayan, P ; Torrezan, GT ; Bassaneze, T ; Martin, C ; Moslein, G ; Ahadova, A ; Kloor, M ; Sampson, JR ; Jenkins, MA (BMC, 2022-10-01)
    OBJECTIVE: To compare colorectal cancer (CRC) incidences in carriers of pathogenic variants of the MMR genes in the PLSD and IMRC cohorts, of which only the former included mandatory colonoscopy surveillance for all participants. METHODS: CRC incidences were calculated in an intervention group comprising a cohort of confirmed carriers of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in mismatch repair genes (path_MMR) followed prospectively by the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database (PLSD). All had colonoscopy surveillance, with polypectomy when polyps were identified. Comparison was made with a retrospective cohort reported by the International Mismatch Repair Consortium (IMRC). This comprised confirmed and inferred path_MMR carriers who were first- or second-degree relatives of Lynch syndrome probands. RESULTS: In the PLSD, 8,153 subjects had follow-up colonoscopy surveillance for a total of 67,604 years and 578 carriers had CRC diagnosed. Average cumulative incidences of CRC in path_MLH1 carriers at 70 years of age were 52% in males and 41% in females; for path_MSH2 50% and 39%; for path_MSH6 13% and 17% and for path_PMS2 11% and 8%. In contrast, in the IMRC cohort, corresponding cumulative incidences were 40% and 27%; 34% and 23%; 16% and 8% and 7% and 6%. Comparing just the European carriers in the two series gave similar findings. Numbers in the PLSD series did not allow comparisons of carriers from other continents separately. Cumulative incidences at 25 years were < 1% in all retrospective groups. CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively observed CRC incidences (PLSD) in path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 carriers undergoing colonoscopy surveillance and polypectomy were higher than in the retrospective (IMRC) series, and were not reduced in path_MSH6 carriers. These findings were the opposite to those expected. CRC point incidence before 50 years of age was reduced in path_PMS2 carriers subjected to colonoscopy, but not significantly so.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Segregation analysis of 17,425 population-based breast cancer families: Evidence for genetic susceptibility and risk prediction
    Li, S ; MacInnis, RJ ; Lee, A ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Dorling, L ; Carvalho, S ; Dite, GS ; Shah, M ; Luccarini, C ; Wang, Q ; Milne, RL ; Jenkins, MA ; Giles, GG ; Dunning, AM ; Pharoah, PDP ; Southey, MC ; Easton, DF ; Hopper, JL ; Antoniou, AC (CELL PRESS, 2022-10-06)
    Rare pathogenic variants in known breast cancer-susceptibility genes and known common susceptibility variants do not fully explain the familial aggregation of breast cancer. To investigate plausible genetic models for the residual familial aggregation, we studied 17,425 families ascertained through population-based probands, 86% of whom were screened for pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, CHEK2, ATM, and TP53 via gene-panel sequencing. We conducted complex segregation analyses and fitted genetic models in which breast cancer incidence depended on the effects of known susceptibility genes and other unidentified major genes and a normally distributed polygenic component. The proportion of familial variance explained by the six genes was 46% at age 20-29 years and decreased steadily with age thereafter. After allowing for these genes, the best fitting model for the residual familial variance included a recessive risk component with a combined genotype frequency of 1.7% (95% CI: 0.3%-5.4%) and a penetrance to age 80 years of 69% (95% CI: 38%-95%) for homozygotes, which may reflect the combined effects of multiple variants acting in a recessive manner, and a polygenic variance of 1.27 (95% CI: 0.94%-1.65), which did not vary with age. The proportion of the residual familial variance explained by the recessive risk component was 40% at age 20-29 years and decreased with age thereafter. The model predicted age-specific familial relative risks consistent with those observed by large epidemiological studies. The findings have implications for strategies to identify new breast cancer-susceptibility genes and improve disease-risk prediction, especially at a young age.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Genetic Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk
    Li, S ; Nguyen, TL ; Tu, N-D ; Dowty, JG ; Dite, GS ; Ye, Z ; Trinh, HN ; Evans, CF ; Tan, M ; Sung, J ; Jenkins, MA ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL ; Southey, MC (MDPI, 2022-06)
    Cumulus, Altocumulus, and Cirrocumulus are measures of mammographic density defined at increasing pixel brightness thresholds, which, when converted to mammogram risk scores (MRSs), predict breast cancer risk. Twin and family studies suggest substantial variance in the MRSs could be explained by genetic factors. For 2559 women aged 30 to 80 years (mean 54 years), we measured the MRSs from digitized film mammograms and estimated the associations of the MRSs with a 313-SNP breast cancer polygenic risk score (PRS) and 202 individual SNPs associated with breast cancer risk. The PRS was weakly positively correlated (correlation coefficients ranged 0.05−0.08; all p < 0.04) with all the MRSs except the Cumulus-white MRS based on the “white but not bright area” (correlation coefficient = 0.04; p = 0.06). After adjusting for its association with the Altocumulus MRS, the PRS was not associated with the Cumulus MRS. There were MRS associations (Bonferroni-adjusted p < 0.04) with one SNP in the ATXN1 gene and nominally with some ESR1 SNPs. Less than 1% of the variance of the MRSs is explained by the genetic markers currently known to be associated with breast cancer risk. Discovering the genetic determinants of the bright, not white, regions of the mammogram could reveal substantial new genetic causes of breast cancer.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Familial Aspects of Mammographic Density Measures Associated with Breast Cancer Risk
    Nguyen, TL ; Li, S ; Dowty, JG ; Dite, GS ; Ye, Z ; Nguyen-Dumont, T ; Trinh, HN ; Evans, CF ; Tan, M ; Sung, J ; Jenkins, MA ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC ; Hopper, JL (MDPI, 2022-03)
    Cumulus, Cumulus-percent, Altocumulus, Cirrocumulus, and Cumulus-white are mammogram risk scores (MRSs) for breast cancer based on mammographic density defined in effect by different levels of pixel brightness and adjusted for age and body mass index. We measured these MRS from digitized film mammograms for 593 monozygotic (MZ) and 326 dizygotic (DZ) female twin pairs and 1592 of their sisters. We estimated the correlations in relatives (r) and the proportion of variance due to genetic factors (heritability) using the software FISHER and predicted the familial risk ratio (FRR) associated with each MRS. The ρ estimates ranged from: 0.41 to 0.60 (standard error [SE] 0.02) for MZ pairs, 0.16 to 0.26 (SE 0.05) for DZ pairs, and 0.19 to 0.29 (SE 0.02) for sister pairs (including pairs of a twin and her non-twin sister), respectively. Heritability estimates were 39% to 69% under the classic twin model and 36% to 56% when allowing for shared non-genetic factors specific to MZ pairs. The FRRs were 1.08 to 1.17. These MRSs are substantially familial, due mostly to genetic factors that explain one-quarter to one-half as much of the familial aggregation of breast cancer that is explained by the current best polygenic risk score.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    DNA Methylation Signatures and the Contribution of Age-Associated Methylomic Drift to Carcinogenesis in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Joo, JE ; Clendenning, M ; Wong, EM ; Rosty, C ; Mahmood, K ; Georgeson, P ; Winship, IM ; Preston, SG ; Win, AK ; Dugue, P-A ; Jayasekara, H ; English, D ; Macrae, FA ; Hopper, JL ; Jenkins, MA ; Milne, RL ; Giles, GG ; Southey, MC ; Buchanan, DD (MDPI, 2021-06)
    We investigated aberrant DNA methylation (DNAm) changes and the contribution of ageing-associated methylomic drift and age acceleration to early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) carcinogenesis. Genome-wide DNAm profiling using the Infinium HM450K on 97 EOCRC tumour and 54 normal colonic mucosa samples was compared with: (1) intermediate-onset CRC (IOCRC; diagnosed between 50-70 years; 343 tumour and 35 normal); and (2) late-onset CRC (LOCRC; >70 years; 318 tumour and 40 normal). CpGs associated with age-related methylation drift were identified using a public dataset of 231 normal mucosa samples from people without CRC. DNAm-age was estimated using epiTOC2. Common to all three age-of-onset groups, 88,385 (20% of all CpGs) CpGs were differentially methylated between tumour and normal mucosa. We identified 234 differentially methylated genes that were unique to the EOCRC group; 13 of these DMRs/genes were replicated in EOCRC compared with LOCRCs from TCGA. In normal mucosa from people without CRC, we identified 28,154 CpGs that undergo ageing-related DNAm drift, and of those, 65% were aberrantly methylated in EOCRC tumours. Based on the mitotic-based DNAm clock epiTOC2, we identified age acceleration in normal mucosa of people with EOCRC compared with normal mucosa from the IOCRC, LOCRC groups (p = 3.7 × 10-16) and young people without CRC (p = 5.8 × 10-6). EOCRC acquires unique DNAm alterations at 234 loci. CpGs associated with ageing-associated drift were widely affected in EOCRC without needing the decades-long accrual of DNAm drift as commonly seen in intermediate- and late-onset CRCs. Accelerated ageing in normal mucosa from people with EOCRC potentially underlies the earlier age of diagnosis in CRC carcinogenesis.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure
    Nguyen, TL ; Schmidt, DF ; Makalic, E ; Maskarinec, G ; Li, S ; Dite, GS ; Aung, YK ; Evans, CF ; Trinh, HN ; Baglietto, L ; Stone, J ; Song, Y-M ; Sung, J ; MacInnis, RJ ; Dugue, P-A ; Dowty, JG ; Jenkins, MA ; Milne, RL ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Hopper, JL (WILEY, 2021-05-01)
    Mammograms contain information that predicts breast cancer risk. We developed two novel mammogram-based breast cancer risk measures based on image brightness (Cirrocumulus) and texture (Cirrus). Their risk prediction when fitted together, and with an established measure of conventional mammographic density (Cumulus), is not known. We used three studies consisting of: 168 interval cases and 498 matched controls; 422 screen-detected cases and 1197 matched controls; and 354 younger-diagnosis cases and 944 controls frequency-matched for age at mammogram. We conducted conditional and unconditional logistic regression analyses of individually- and frequency-matched studies, respectively. We estimated measure-specific risk gradients as the change in odds per standard deviation of controls after adjusting for age and body mass index (OPERA) and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). For interval, screen-detected and younger-diagnosis cancer risks, the best fitting models (OPERAs [95% confidence intervals]) involved: Cumulus (1.81 [1.41-2.31]) and Cirrus (1.72 [1.38-2.14]); Cirrus (1.49 [1.32-1.67]) and Cirrocumulus (1.16 [1.03 to 1.31]); and Cirrus (1.70 [1.48 to 1.94]) and Cirrocumulus (1.46 [1.27-1.68]), respectively. The AUCs were: 0.73 [0.68-0.77], 0.63 [0.60-0.66], and 0.72 [0.69-0.75], respectively. Combined, our new mammogram-based measures have twice the risk gradient for screen-detected and younger-diagnosis breast cancer (P ≤ 10-12 ), have at least the same discriminatory power as the current polygenic risk score, and are more correlated with causal factors than conventional mammographic density. Discovering more information about breast cancer risk from mammograms could help enable risk-based personalised breast screening.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Fine-mapping of 150 breast cancer risk regions identifies 191 likely target genes
    Fachal, L ; Aschard, H ; Beesley, J ; Barnes, DR ; Allen, J ; Kar, S ; Pooley, KA ; Dennis, J ; Michailidou, K ; Turman, C ; Soucy, P ; Lemacon, A ; Lush, M ; Tyrer, JP ; Ghoussaini, M ; Marjaneh, MM ; Jiang, X ; Agata, S ; Aittomaki, K ; Rosario Alonso, M ; Andrulis, IL ; Anton-Culver, H ; Antonenkova, NN ; Arason, A ; Arndt, V ; Aronson, KJ ; Arun, BK ; Auber, B ; Auer, PL ; Azzollini, J ; Balmana, J ; Barkardottir, RB ; Barrowdale, D ; Beeghly-Fadiel, A ; Benitez, J ; Bermisheva, M ; Bialkowska, K ; Blanco, AM ; Blomqvist, C ; Blot, W ; Bogdanova, N ; Bojesen, SE ; Bolla, MK ; Bonanni, B ; Borg, A ; Bosse, K ; Brauch, H ; Brenner, H ; Briceno, I ; Brock, IW ; Brooks-Wilson, A ; Bruening, T ; Burwinkel, B ; Buys, SS ; Cai, Q ; Caldes, T ; Caligo, MA ; Camp, NJ ; Campbell, I ; Canzian, F ; Carroll, JS ; Carter, BD ; Castelao, JE ; Chiquette, J ; Christiansen, H ; Chung, WK ; Claes, KBM ; Clarke, CL ; Collee, JM ; Cornelissen, S ; Couch, FJ ; Cox, A ; Cross, SS ; Cybulski, C ; Czene, K ; Daly, MB ; de la Hoya, M ; Devilee, P ; Diez, O ; Ding, YC ; Dite, GS ; Domchek, SM ; Doerk, T ; dos-Santos-Silva, I ; Droit, A ; Dubois, S ; Dumont, M ; Duran, M ; Durcan, L ; Dwek, M ; Eccles, DM ; Engel, C ; Eriksson, M ; Evans, DG ; Fasching, PA ; Fletcher, O ; Floris, G ; Flyger, H ; Foretova, L ; Foulkes, WD ; Friedman, E ; Fritschi, L ; Frost, D ; Gabrielson, M ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Gambino, G ; Ganz, PA ; Gapstur, SM ; Garber, J ; Garcia-Saenz, JA ; Gaudet, MM ; Georgoulias, V ; Giles, GG ; Glendon, G ; Godwin, AK ; Goldberg, MS ; Goldgar, DE ; Gonzalez-Neira, A ; Tibiletti, MG ; Greene, MH ; Grip, M ; Gronwald, J ; Grundy, A ; Guenel, P ; Hahnen, E ; Haiman, CA ; Hakansson, N ; Hall, P ; Hamann, U ; Harrington, PA ; Hartikainen, JM ; Hartman, M ; He, W ; Healey, CS ; Heemskerk-Gerritsen, BAM ; Heyworth, J ; Hillemanns, P ; Hogervorst, FBL ; Hollestelle, A ; Hooning, MJ ; Hopper, JL ; Howell, A ; Huang, G ; Hulick, PJ ; Imyanitov, EN ; Isaacs, C ; Iwasaki, M ; Jager, A ; Jakimovska, M ; Jakubowska, A ; James, PA ; Janavicius, R ; Jankowitz, RC ; John, EM ; Johnson, N ; Jones, ME ; Jukkola-Vuorinen, A ; Jung, A ; Kaaks, R ; Kang, D ; Kapoor, PM ; Karlan, BY ; Keeman, R ; Kerin, MJ ; Khusnutdinova, E ; Kiiski, J ; Kirk, J ; Kitahara, CM ; Ko, Y-D ; Konstantopoulou, I ; Kosma, V-M ; Koutros, S ; Kubelka-Sabit, K ; Kwong, A ; Kyriacou, K ; Laitman, Y ; Lambrechts, D ; Lee, E ; Leslie, G ; Lester, J ; Lesueur, F ; Lindblom, A ; Lo, W-Y ; Long, J ; Lophatananon, A ; Loud, JT ; Lubinski, J ; MacInnis, RJ ; Maishman, T ; Makalic, E ; Mannermaa, A ; Manoochehri, M ; Manoukian, S ; Margolin, S ; Martinez, ME ; Matsuo, K ; Maurer, T ; Mavroudis, D ; Mayes, R ; McGuffog, L ; McLean, C ; Mebirouk, N ; Meindl, A ; Miller, A ; Miller, N ; Montagna, M ; Moreno, F ; Muir, K ; Mulligan, AM ; Munoz-Garzon, VM ; Muranen, TA ; Narod, SA ; Nassir, R ; Nathanson, KL ; Neuhausen, SL ; Nevanlinna, H ; Neven, P ; Nielsen, FC ; Nikitina-Zake, L ; Norman, A ; Offit, K ; Olah, E ; Olopade, O ; Olsson, H ; Orr, N ; Osorio, A ; Pankratz, VS ; Papp, J ; Park, SK ; Park-Simon, T-W ; Parsons, MT ; Paul, J ; Pedersen, IS ; Peissel, B ; Peshkin, B ; Peterlongo, P ; Peto, J ; Plaseska-Karanfilska, D ; Prajzendanc, K ; Prentice, R ; Presneau, N ; Prokofyeva, D ; Angel Pujana, M ; Pylkas, K ; Radice, P ; Ramus, SJ ; Rantala, J ; Rau-Murthy, R ; Rennert, G ; Risch, HA ; Robson, M ; Romero, A ; Rossing, M ; Saloustros, E ; Sanchez-Herrero, E ; Sandler, DP ; Santamarina, M ; Saunders, C ; Sawyer, EJ ; Scheuner, MT ; Schmidt, DF ; Schmutzler, RK ; Schneeweiss, A ; Schoemaker, MJ ; Schoettker, B ; Schuermann, P ; Scott, C ; Scott, RJ ; Senter, L ; Seynaeve, CM ; Shah, M ; Sharma, P ; Shen, C-Y ; Shu, X-O ; Singer, CF ; Slavin, TP ; Smichkoska, S ; Southey, MC ; Spinelli, JJ ; Spurdle, AB ; Stone, J ; Stoppa-Lyonnet, D ; Sutter, C ; Swerdlow, AJ ; Tamimi, RM ; Tan, YY ; Tapper, WJ ; Taylor, JA ; Teixeira, MR ; Tengstroem, M ; Teo, SH ; Terry, MB ; Teul, A ; Thomassen, M ; Thull, DL ; Tischkowitz, M ; Toland, AE ; Tollenaar, RAEM ; Tomlinson, I ; Torres, D ; Torres-Mejia, G ; Troester, MA ; Truong, T ; Tung, N ; Tzardi, M ; Ulmer, H-U ; Vachon, CM ; van Asperen, CJ ; van der Kolk, LE ; van Rensburg, EJ ; Vega, A ; Viel, A ; Vijai, J ; Vogel, MJ ; Wang, Q ; Wappenschmidt, B ; Weinberg, CR ; Weitzel, JN ; Wendt, C ; Wildiers, H ; Winqvist, R ; Wolk, A ; Wu, AH ; Yannoukakos, D ; Zhang, Y ; Zheng, W ; Hunter, D ; Pharoah, PDP ; Chang-Claude, J ; Garcia-Closas, M ; Schmidt, MK ; Milne, RL ; Kristensen, VN ; French, JD ; Edwards, SL ; Antoniou, AC ; Chenevix-Trench, G ; Simard, J ; Easton, DF ; Kraft, P ; Dunning, AM ; Mari, V ; Berthet, P ; Castera, L ; Vaur, D ; Lallaoui, H ; Bignon, Y-J ; Uhrhammer, N ; Bonadona, V ; Lasset, C ; Revillion, F ; Vennin, P ; Muller, D ; Gomes, DM ; Ingster, O ; Coupier, I ; Pujol, P ; Collonge-Rame, M-A ; Mortemousque, I ; Bera, O ; Rose, M ; Baurand, A ; Bertolone, G ; Faivre, L ; Dreyfus, H ; Leroux, D ; Venat-Bouvet, L ; Bezieau, S ; Delnatte, C ; Chiesa, J ; Gilbert-Dussardier, B ; Gesta, P ; Prieur, FP ; Bronner, M ; Sokolowska, J ; Coulet, F ; Boutry-Kryza, N ; Calender, A ; Giraud, S ; Leone, M ; Fert-Ferrer, S ; Jiao, Y ; Lesueur, FL ; Barouk-Simonet, E ; Bubien, V ; Longy, M ; Sevenet, N ; Gladieff, L ; Toulas, C ; Reimineras, A ; Sobol, H ; Bressac-de Paillerets, B ; Cabaret, O ; Caron, O ; Guillaud-Bataille, M ; Rouleau, E ; Belotti, M ; Buecher, B ; Caputo, S ; Colas, C ; De Pauw, A ; Fourme, E ; Gauthier-Villars, M ; Golmard, L ; Moncoutier, V ; Saule, C ; Donaldson, A ; Murray, A ; Brady, A ; Brewer, C ; Pottinger, C ; Miller, C ; Gallagher, D ; Gregory, H ; Cook, J ; Eason, J ; Adlard, J ; Barwell, J ; Ong, K-R ; Snape, K ; Walker, L ; Izatt, L ; Side, L ; Rogers, MT ; Porteous, ME ; Ahmed, M ; Morrison, PJ ; Brennan, P ; Eeles, R ; Davidson, R ; Sexton, A ; Christian, A ; Trainer, A ; Spigelman, A ; Fellows, A ; Shelling, A ; De Fazio, A ; Blackburn, A ; Crook, A ; Meiser, B ; Patterson, B ; Clarke, C ; Hunt, C ; Scott, C ; Amor, D ; Marsh, D ; Edkins, E ; Salisbury, E ; Haan, E ; Neidermayr, E ; Macrea, F ; Farshid, G ; Lindeman, G ; Trench, G ; Mann, G ; Giles, G ; Gill, G ; Thorne, H ; Hickie, I ; Winship, I ; Flanagan, J ; Kollias, J ; Visvader, J ; Taylor, J ; Burke, J ; Saunus, J ; Forbes, J ; Hopper, J ; French, J ; Tucker, K ; Wu, K ; Phillips, K ; Lipton, L ; Andrews, L ; Lobb, L ; Walker, L ; Kentwell, M ; Spurdle, M ; Cummings, M ; Gleeson, M ; Harris, M ; Jenkins, M ; Young, MA ; Delatycki, M ; Wallis, M ; Burgess, M ; Price, M ; Brown, M ; Southey, M ; Bogwitz, M ; Field, M ; Friedlander, M ; Gattas, M ; Saleh, M ; Hayward, N ; Pachter, N ; Cohen, P ; Duijf, P ; James, P ; Simpson, P ; Fong, P ; Butow, P ; Williams, R ; Kefford, R ; Scott, R ; Milne, R ; Balleine, R ; Dawson, S ; Lok, S ; O'Connell, S ; Greening, S ; Nightingale, S ; Edwards, S ; Fox, S ; Mclachlan, S-A ; Lakhani, S ; Antill, Y ; Aalfs, C ; Meijers-Heijboer, H ; van Engelen, K ; Gille, H ; Boere, I ; Collee, M ; van Deurzen, C ; Hooning, M ; Obdeijn, I-M ; van den Ouweland, A ; Seynaeve, C ; Siesling, S ; Verloop, J ; van Asperen, C ; van Cronenburg, T ; Blok, R ; de Boer, M ; Garcia, EG ; Adank, M ; Hogervorst, F ; Jenner, D ; van Leeuwen, F ; Rookus, M ; Russell, N ; Schmidt, M ; van den Belt-Dusebout, S ; Kets, C ; Mensenkamp, A ; de Bock, T ; van Der Hout, A ; Mourits, M ; Oosterwijk, J ; Ausems, M ; Koudijs, M ; Marsh, D ; Baxter, R ; Yip, D ; Carpenter, J ; Davis, A ; Pathmanathan, N ; Simpson, P ; Graham, D ; Sachchithananthan, M (NATURE RESEARCH, 2020-01-07)
    Genome-wide association studies have identified breast cancer risk variants in over 150 genomic regions, but the mechanisms underlying risk remain largely unknown. These regions were explored by combining association analysis with in silico genomic feature annotations. We defined 205 independent risk-associated signals with the set of credible causal variants in each one. In parallel, we used a Bayesian approach (PAINTOR) that combines genetic association, linkage disequilibrium and enriched genomic features to determine variants with high posterior probabilities of being causal. Potentially causal variants were significantly over-represented in active gene regulatory regions and transcription factor binding sites. We applied our INQUSIT pipeline for prioritizing genes as targets of those potentially causal variants, using gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci), chromatin interaction and functional annotations. Known cancer drivers, transcription factors and genes in the developmental, apoptosis, immune system and DNA integrity checkpoint gene ontology pathways were over-represented among the highest-confidence target genes.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Interval breast cancer risk associations with breast density, family history and breast tissue aging
    Nguyen, TL ; Li, S ; Dite, GS ; Aung, YK ; Evans, CF ; Trinh, HN ; Baglietto, L ; Stone, J ; Song, Y-M ; Sung, J ; English, DR ; Jenkins, MA ; Dugue, P-A ; Milne, RL ; Southey, MC ; Giles, GG ; Pike, MC ; Hopper, JL (WILEY, 2020-07-15)
    Interval breast cancers (those diagnosed between recommended mammography screens) generally have poorer outcomes and are more common among women with dense breasts. We aimed to develop a risk model for interval breast cancer. We conducted a nested case-control study within the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study involving 168 interval breast cancer patients and 498 matched control subjects. We measured breast density using the CUMULUS software. We recorded first-degree family history by questionnaire, measured body mass index (BMI) and calculated age-adjusted breast tissue aging, a novel measure of exposure to estrogen and progesterone based on the Pike model. We fitted conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratio (OR) or odds ratio per adjusted standard deviation (OPERA) and calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The stronger risk associations were for unadjusted percent breast density (OPERA = 1.99; AUC = 0.66), more so after adjusting for age and BMI (OPERA = 2.26; AUC = 0.70), and for family history (OR = 2.70; AUC = 0.56). When the latter two factors and their multiplicative interactions with age-adjusted breast tissue aging (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively) were fitted, the AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.69-0.77), equivalent to a ninefold interquartile risk ratio. In summary, compared with using dense breasts alone, risk discrimination for interval breast cancers could be doubled by instead using breast density, BMI, family history and hormonal exposure. This would also give women with dense breasts, and their physicians, more information about the major consequence of having dense breasts-an increased risk of developing an interval breast cancer.
  • Item
    No Preview Available
    Cumulative Burden of Colorectal Cancer Associated Genetic Variants Is More Strongly Associated With Early-Onset vs Late-Onset Cancer
    Archambault, AN ; Su, Y-R ; Jeon, J ; Thomas, M ; Lin, Y ; Conti, DV ; Win, AK ; Sakoda, LC ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I ; Peterse, EFP ; Zauber, AG ; Duggan, D ; Holowatyj, AN ; Huyghe, JR ; Brenner, H ; Cotterchio, M ; Bezieau, S ; Schmit, SL ; Edlund, CK ; Southey, MC ; MacInnis, RJ ; Campbell, PT ; Chang-Claude, J ; Slattery, ML ; Chan, AT ; Joshi, AD ; Song, M ; Cao, Y ; Woods, MO ; White, E ; Weinstein, SJ ; Ulrich, CM ; Hoffmeister, M ; Bien, SA ; Harrison, TA ; Hampe, J ; Li, CI ; Schafmayer, C ; Offit, K ; Pharoah, PD ; Moreno, V ; Lindblom, A ; Wolk, A ; Wu, AH ; Li, L ; Gunter, MJ ; Gsur, A ; Keku, TO ; Pearlman, R ; Bishop, DT ; Castellvi-Bel, S ; Moreira, L ; Vodicka, P ; Kampman, E ; Giles, GG ; Albanes, D ; Baron, JA ; Berndt, SI ; Brezina, S ; Buch, S ; Buchanan, DD ; Trichopoulou, A ; Severi, G ; Chirlaque, M-D ; Sanchez, M-J ; Palli, D ; Kuhn, T ; Murphy, N ; Cross, AJ ; Burnett-Hartman, AN ; Chanock, SJ ; de la Chapelle, A ; Easton, DF ; Elliott, F ; English, DR ; Feskens, EJM ; FitzGerald, LM ; Goodman, PJ ; Hopper, JL ; Hudson, TJ ; Hunter, DJ ; Jacobs, EJ ; Joshu, CE ; Kury, S ; Markowitz, SD ; Milne, RL ; Platz, EA ; Rennert, G ; Rennert, HS ; Schumacher, FR ; Sandler, RS ; Seminara, D ; Tangen, CM ; Thibodeau, SN ; Toland, AE ; van Duijnhoven, FJB ; Visvanathan, K ; Vodickova, L ; Potter, JD ; Mannisto, S ; Weigl, K ; Figueiredo, J ; Martin, V ; Larsson, SC ; Parfrey, PS ; Huang, W-Y ; Lenz, H-J ; Castelao, JE ; Gago-Dominguez, M ; Munoz-Garzon, V ; Mancao, C ; Haiman, CA ; Wilkens, LR ; Siegel, E ; Barry, E ; Younghusband, B ; Van Guelpen, B ; Harlid, S ; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, A ; Liang, PS ; Du, M ; Casey, G ; Lindor, NM ; Le Marchand, L ; Gallinger, SJ ; Jenkins, MA ; Newcomb, PA ; Gruber, SB ; Schoen, RE ; Hampel, H ; Corley, DA ; Hsu, L ; Peters, U ; Hayes, RB (W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC, 2020-04)
    BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC, in persons younger than 50 years old) is increasing in incidence; yet, in the absence of a family history of CRC, this population lacks harmonized recommendations for prevention. We aimed to determine whether a polygenic risk score (PRS) developed from 95 CRC-associated common genetic risk variants was associated with risk for early-onset CRC. METHODS: We studied risk for CRC associated with a weighted PRS in 12,197 participants younger than 50 years old vs 95,865 participants 50 years or older. PRS was calculated based on single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with CRC in a large-scale genome-wide association study as of January 2019. Participants were pooled from 3 large consortia that provided clinical and genotyping data: the Colon Cancer Family Registry, the Colorectal Transdisciplinary Study, and the Genetics and Epidemiology of Colorectal Cancer Consortium and were all of genetically defined European descent. Findings were replicated in an independent cohort of 72,573 participants. RESULTS: Overall associations with CRC per standard deviation of PRS were significant for early-onset cancer, and were stronger compared with late-onset cancer (P for interaction = .01); when we compared the highest PRS quartile with the lowest, risk increased 3.7-fold for early-onset CRC (95% CI 3.28-4.24) vs 2.9-fold for late-onset CRC (95% CI 2.80-3.04). This association was strongest for participants without a first-degree family history of CRC (P for interaction = 5.61 × 10-5). When we compared the highest with the lowest quartiles in this group, risk increased 4.3-fold for early-onset CRC (95% CI 3.61-5.01) vs 2.9-fold for late-onset CRC (95% CI 2.70-3.00). Sensitivity analyses were consistent with these findings. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of associations with CRC per standard deviation of PRS, we found the cumulative burden of CRC-associated common genetic variants to associate with early-onset cancer, and to be more strongly associated with early-onset than late-onset cancer, particularly in the absence of CRC family history. Analyses of PRS, along with environmental and lifestyle risk factors, might identify younger individuals who would benefit from preventive measures.