School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences - Theses

Permanent URI for this collection

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    The economic impact of climate change on perennial crops: the coconut industry in Sri Lanka and the value of adaptation strategies
    Pathiraja, Erandathie ( 2016)
    Coconut is an important food crop in the Sri Lankan economy which utilises nearly 20 percent of its arable lands. This industry is shifting from an export orientation to a domestic industry; mainly due to the population-driven domestic demand and stagnating coconut production. Nearly 65 per cent of annual production is consumed domestically as fresh coconut, while the remaining 35 per cent is utilised by the processing sector for products including coconut oil, desiccated coconut and copra. Coconut production fluctuates with climate. This yield fluctuation has considerable impact on industry stakeholders due to inelastic supply of and demand for fresh coconuts. Government interventions are ad hoc and numerous. Further, the effectiveness of these strategies is questioned in the absence of a consistent analytical framework. This study developed an economic framework; an equilibrium displacement model for the Sri Lankan coconut industry which analyses the impact of different policy interventions. The model was tested for seven hypothetical scenarios of external shocks. The model was subsequently used to analyse the likely impact of climate change in this study. An analytic hierarchy process was used to estimate the biophysical impact of coconut yield under future climatic scenarios. Climate, soil and topography were the main considerations of the model. The outcomes of this model as yield changes were used as a supply shift in the economic model. The total change in economic benefits and distribution of these benefits were estimated to find out the magnitude of the economic shock and impact on different stakeholders. The findings show that the coconut industry in Sri Lanka will face a loss equivalent to 4,795 Rs.Million which is nearly 5 percent of the total value of the industry at equilibrium. The mostly affected stakeholders are wholesalers and domestic coconut consumers. Then the impact of different adaptation options and cost effectiveness were considered to address the impact of climate change. Among these yield increasing adaptation practices, irrigation during dry periods was promising the highest productivity levels. However, the investments were not cost effective for large scale irrigation systems and availability of a water source was a major concern. Fertilizer application and moisture conservation were also identified as cost effective practices that would offset the yield loss and provide extra gain. Development of a heat tolerant cultivar would be a long term sustainable solution with the observed and expected increase in maximum temperature. However, this may take several years and still worthy to invest on. The findings are useful in assessing potential future impacts and directing the industry policies.
  • Item
    Thumbnail Image
    Climate-smart agriculture: a review assessing the merits and future applications of a holistic agricultural paradigm that addresses climate change and development challenges.
    Gardner, Daniel Thomas ( 2015)
    Agriculture is facing significant challenges into the future, especially related to food security when faced with climate change. Climate-Smart Agriculture seeks to address these challenges by providing a holistic framework for agricultural adaptation to, and mitigation of climate change, while also alleviating food security problems in a triple-win context. Climate-Smart Agriculture has origins in other agricultural paradigms, such as the Green Revolution, Conservation Agriculture and Sustainable Intensification. However it has the advantage of amalgamating the best responses from all three. Theoretically, Climate-Smart Agriculture is a universal paradigm able to solve all agricultural issues. In practice, Climate-Smart Agriculture has significant flaws. It has broad principles that cause conflicts and trade-offs even when a triple-win outcome is promised. Climate-Smart Agriculture also suffers from significant funding, insurance and technical issues, while there is little detail as to how the three arms of Climate-Smart Agriculture (adaptation, mitigation and food security) works together in practice. With some perseverance, Climate-Smart Agriculture can be the paradigm to address all these concerns, especially in a developing country context. Climate-Smart Agriculture has the platform for success, through policy formulation, pushing technologies and intervening in local agricultural systems. Even with potential trade-offs, Climate-Smart Agriculture utilises a best-practice approach to increase agricultural resilience through improving ecosystem service by utilising agroforestry and other methods. Climate-Smart Agriculture can still achieve its goals, through a mixture of novel approaches and proven techniques, it can also succeed further with biodiversity and poverty alleviation gains. However for this to occur Climate-Smart Agriculture must improve evidence building, local effectiveness, climate and agricultural policy cohesion and funding. Scientific endeavour must be prioritised with Climate-Smart Agriculture becoming more water, energy and nutrient-smart. Further research needs to occur into potential synergies and trade-offs, with more Climate-Smart Agricultural involvement in food systems, with a push for more integrated food-energy systems. Furthermore barriers to adoption need to be better understood. Funding has been highlighted as the most important issue facing Climate-Smart Agriculture. Overall funding is not well targeted, nor coalesced between adaptation and mitigation strategies. There is a lack of accountability regarding adaptation funding and an overall disjoin between Climate-Smart Agriculture, climate finance and carbon markets that must be rectified. Overall agriculture requires significant transformation. Climate-Smart Agriculture provides the framework to do this. Yet in its current state, Climate-Smart Agriculture provides nothing new, it faces significant problems that must be rectified if it is to become more than just another theoretical agricultural concept.