- Faculty of Education - Research Publications
Faculty of Education - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
13 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 10 of 13
-
ItemRegenerating curriculum inquiry in Australia: some thoughts on this agendaYates, L (Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018-04-01)
-
ItemMedical teachers conceptualize a distinctive form of clinical knowledgeBarrett, J ; Yates, L ; McColl, G (SPRINGER, 2015-05)For over four decades, there have been efforts to specify the types of knowledge that medical students need, how that knowledge is acquired and how its constituent parts are related. It is one of the areas of continuing concern underlying medical education reform. Despite their importance to medical students' learning and development, the perspectives of medical teachers in hospitals are not always considered in such discourse. This study sought to generate an understanding of these teachers' values, perspectives and approaches by listening to them and seeing them in their everyday teaching work, finding and understanding the meanings they bring to the work of medical teaching in hospitals. In interviews, all of the teachers talked more about the optimal forms of knowledge that are important for students than they talked about the form of the teaching itself. Many revealed to students what knowledge they do and do not value. They had a particular way of thinking about clinical knowledge as existing in the people and the places in which the teaching and the clinical practice happen, and represented this as 'real' knowledge. By implication, there is other knowledge in medical education or in students' heads that is not real and needs to be transformed. Their values, practices and passions add texture and vitality to existing ways of thinking about the characteristics of clinical knowledge, how it is depicted in the discourse and the curriculum and how it is more dynamically related to other knowledge than is suggested in traditional conceptualizations of knowledge relationships.
-
ItemClassifying Curriculum Scholarship in Australia: A Review of Postgraduate Theses 1975-2005O'Connor, K ; Yates, L (SPRINGER, 2010-04)
-
ItemInterpretive claims and methodological warrant in small-number qualitative, longitudinal researchYates, L (Informa UK Limited, 2003-07-01)
-
ItemRevisiting curriculum, the numbers game and the inequality problemYates, L (ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD, 2013-02-01)
-
ItemThe Absence of Knowledge in Australian Curriculum ReformsYates, L ; Collins, C (WILEY, 2010-03)This article draws on a study of Australian curriculum shifts between 1975 and 2005 to take up two themes of this special issue: the question about what conceptions of knowledge are now at work; and the consideration of global influences and national specificities in the reformulations of curriculum. It discusses two important approaches to curriculum in Australia in recent times, the ‘Statements and Profiles’ activity of the early 1990s, and the ‘Essential Learnings’ formulations of the past decade. The global tendencies we see at work in these two major approaches are, first, an increasing emphasis on externally managing and auditing student progress as a key driver of how curriculum policies are being constructed; and, secondly, a growing emphasis on approaching curriculum aims in terms of what students should be able to do rather than what they should know. We argue that in the contexts we discuss here, these approaches offered a way of marrying 1970s progressive views on child development and knowledge‐as‐process (views widely held by influential curriculum professionals in Australia) with late 20th century technologies of micro‐management and instrumental agendas favoured by politicians — but that many questions about knowledge were left off the agenda.
-
ItemIntroductionGogolin, I ; Keiner, E ; Steiner-Khamsi, G ; Ozga, J ; Yates, L (SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2007-09)
-
ItemIs impact a measure of quality? Producing quality research and producing quality indicators of research in AustraliaYATES, L (The Australian Association for Research in Education, 2006)Neither impact nor peer review no ‘addressing national research priorities’ are without problems as appropriate criteria for quality assessment in the field of education, but each is being raised in current debates about quality research, and each is indicative of some competing agendas that thread through quality research re-assessments in Australia. This paper discusses some conflicting agendas and trajectories within recent Australian research policy and funding mechanisms for education, as well as the broader context of the status of education research and how this impacts on debates and strategies with regard to quality. It is argued that the education research community do need to develop appropriate quality indicators in the field of education, but to do this effectively requires attention also to the contextual pragmatics and politics of how such assessments will be enacted. More broadly it is also important that the current focus on measures of quality assessment be re-coupled with more attention to contexts of production of education research and the issue of how quality research can be developed.
-
Item
-
ItemIssues of identity and knowledge in the schooling of VET: A case study of lifelong learningTennant, M ; Yates, L (Taylor & Francis (Routledge), 2005-05-01)This article discusses two school-based case studies of vocational education and training in the areas of information technology and hospitality from the perspective of the agendas of 'lifelong learning'. Lifelong learning can be seen as both a policy goal leading to institutional and programme reforms and as a process which fosters in learners identities that enable them to thrive in the circumstances of contemporary life. These case studies suggest that current approaches to vocational education and training in schools are enacting the first but not the second of these agendas. Institutional barriers are being removed and work placements drawn in to schooling programmes. However, the pedagogy, assessment and curriculum of the programmes emphasizes short-term (and conflicting) knowledge objectives rather than orientations to flexible lifelong learning. We argue that it is teachers rather than the students who are thrust most forcibly into adopting new learner-worker identities consonant with the attributes of 'lifelong learners' and the demands of the contemporary workplace.