- Faculty of Education - Research Publications
Faculty of Education - Research Publications
Permanent URI for this collection
8 results
Filters
Reset filtersSettings
Statistics
Citations
Search Results
Now showing
1 - 8 of 8
-
ItemMATHEMATICAL ORALITY IN ASIAN AND WESTERN MATHEMATICS CLASSROOMSClarke, D ; Hua, XL ; Figueras, O ; Cortina, JL ; Alatorre, S ; Rojano, T ; Sepulveda, A (INT GRP PSYCHOL MATH EDUC, 2008)
-
ItemKikan-Shido:Through the Lens of Guiding Student ActivityO'KEEFE, C. ; XU, L. ; CLARKE, D. (Charles University in Prague, 2006)
-
ItemExploiting available technologies to align methodology and theory in the study of science classrooms internationallyCLARKE, D. ; XU, L. ; MITCHELL, C. (National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), 2007)
-
ItemEssential Complementarities: Arguing for an Integrative Approach to Research in Mathematics ClassroomsCLARKE, DJ (Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2005)
-
ItemHow Unusual is the Gender Specificity of Mathematical Test Item Types Reported for Dutch Primary School Students?DAVIS, L ; CLARKE, DJ ; HEUVEL-PANHUIZEN, M (MERGA, 2005)
-
ItemAdvancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive PerspectiveSuri, H ; Clarke, D (SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC, 2009-03)The dominant literature on research synthesis methods has positivist and neo-positivist origins. In recent years, the landscape of research synthesis methods has changed rapidly to become inclusive. This article highlights methodologically inclusive advancements in research synthesis methods. Attention is drawn to insights from interpretive, critical, and participatory traditions for enhancing trustworthiness, utility, and/or emancipatory potential for research syntheses. Also noted is a paucity of the literature that builds connections between methodologically diverse segments of the literature on research synthesis methods. Salient features of a methodologically inclusive research synthesis (MIRS) framework are described. The MIRS framework has been conceptualized by distilling and synthesizing ideas, theories, and strategies from the extensive literatures on research synthesis methods and primary research methods. Rather than prescribe how a research synthesis should be conducted or evaluated, this article attempts to open spaces, raise questions, explore possibilities, and contest taken-for-granted practices.
-
ItemOptimising the Use of Available Technology to Support International Collaborative Research in Mathematics ClassroomsCLARKE, D ; MITCHELL, C ; BOWMAN, P ; Janik, T ; Seidel, T (Waxmann Verlag GmbH, 2009)
-
ItemInternational Comparative Research in Mathematics EducationClarke, D ; BISHOP, AJ ; CLEMENTS, MA ; KEITEL, C ; KILPATRICK, J ; LEUNG, FKS (Springer Netherlands, 2003)