Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRogers, Juliet A
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-24T02:28:43Z
dc.date.available2016-08-24T02:28:43Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/115111
dc.description.abstractIn 1996 the Crimes (Female Genital Mutilation) Act was passed in Victoria, Australia. The consultation with migrant communities, affected by the practices, was almost non-existent. The methods of the consultation, the implementation of the legislation and the use of the term "female genital mutilation" were objected to by the migrant communities. This objection and implementation mirrored similar legislative initiatives and similar methods of implementation in the United States, Canada, Scotland, England and Egypt. This thesis is an analysis of the speech on, and against, female genital mutilation. The analysis explores the texture of this speech, understood as a particular and invested arrangement of fantasy. This fantasy concerns the relation between the liberal subject and the sovereign. The relation is parsed in terms of the economic, the psychoanalytic and the political. These are the three idioms through which fantasies, of female genital mutilation emerge in contemporary times as a fantasy of flesh cut and the possibility of free speech. The thesis has four parts. In the first part it explores fantasies of subjectivity understood as the constitution of a mutilated woman against a fantasy of a non-mutilated liberal subject (as a postcolonial concern). The context for the exploration is firstly the emergence of the above mentioned Crimes (Female Genital Mutilation) Act 1996, and secondly its relations to the formation of the modern liberal subject (Rousseau, Hobbes, Schmitt and Freud). In Part B the thesis explores economies of flesh. First and foremost the economy is staged as a relation between the subject and the sovereign. This relation is figured as a tension between a fantasy of circumcision and a fantasy of mutilation. The psychoanalytic theories of Lacan and the political theories of Agamben are called to aid this exploration. In Part C the thesis discusses the politics of freedom articulated in sovereign democratic politics. Here the thesis moves from its focus on female genital mutilation legislation and places it in the contemporary politics of the `war on terror', evocations of national community and the problematics of a cultural pluralism. These are understood in terms of the differential orientations to loss (of freedom and speech)'; known as melancholia, psychosis and mourning. Mourning is the concern of Part D. In doing so the thesis returns to the speech on and against female genital mutilation and their invocations of human rights. The limits is figured in this part by reference to the protest of an African woman who says `I am not mutilated.' The figure of this woman returns us to the dialectic of flesh and speech that this thesis has argued embodies western fantasies of female genital mutilation. What is lost, but returns to haunt the liberal subject, imagining itself sovereign, is the possibility of freedom and an authorised loss of speech, in a democratic politics worthy of the name.
dc.rightsTerms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in Minerva Access is retained by the copyright owner. You may download, print or save electronic copies of a whole work, or part of a work, for your own research or study or as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. You must obtain permission from the copyright owner to use the work for any other purpose. If you believe this copyrighted work is available on the University of Melbourne network in such a way that constitutes copyright infringement, or a breach of an agreed licence or contract, please notify the Copyright Office at copyright-office@unimelb.edu.au
dc.subjectClitoridectomy
dc.subjectFamily law council (Australia)
dc.subjectFemale circumcision
dc.subjectLaw and legislation
dc.subjectLegislation
dc.subjectSex customs
dc.subjectSex discrimination against women
dc.subjectVictoria
dc.titleFantasies of 'female genital mutilation' : flesh, law and freedom through psychoanalysis
dc.typePhD thesis
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne Law School
melbourne.linkedresource.urlhttp://cat.lib.unimelb.edu.au/record=b3131880
melbourne.contributor.authorRogers, Juliet A
melbourne.accessrightsOnly available to University of Melbourne staff and students, login required


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record