Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
AuthorHo, L; Lau, L; Churilov, L; Riedel, B; McNicol, L; Hahn, RG; Weinberg, L
PublisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
University of Melbourne Author/sLAU, LAWRENCE; Churilov, Leonid; Weinberg, Laurence; MCNICOL, PETER; Riedel, Bernhard
AffiliationClinical School (Austin Health)
Medicine (Austin & Northern Health)
Surgery (Austin & Northern Health)
Surgery (St Vincent's)
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsHo, L., Lau, L., Churilov, L., Riedel, B., McNicol, L., Hahn, R. G. & Weinberg, L. (2016). Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock. SHOCK, 46 (2), pp.149-157. https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000610.
Access StatusOpen Access
Open Access at PMChttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957966
INTRODUCTION: The most effective rate of fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock is unknown. METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover pilot study in a healthy volunteer model of compensated haemorrhagic shock. Following venesection of 15 mL/kg of blood, participants were randomized to 20 mL/kg of crystalloid over 10 min (FAST treatment) or 30 min (SLOW treatment). The primary end point was oxygen delivery (DO2). Secondary end points included pressure and flow-based haemodynamic variables, blood volume expansion, and clinical biochemistry. RESULTS: Nine normotensive healthy adult volunteers participated. No significant differences were observed in DO2 and biochemical variables between the SLOW and FAST groups. Blood volume was reduced by 16% following venesection, with a corresponding 5% reduction in cardiac index (CI) (P < 0.001). Immediately following resuscitation the increase in blood volume corresponded to 54% of the infused volume under FAST treatment and 69% of the infused volume under SLOW treatment (P = 0.03). This blood volume expansion attenuated with time to 24% and 25% of the infused volume 30 min postinfusion. During fluid resuscitation, blood pressure was higher under FAST treatment. However, CI paradoxically decreased in most participants during the resuscitation phase; a finding not observed under SLOW treatment. CONCLUSION: FAST or SLOW fluid resuscitation had no significant impact on DO2 between treatment groups. In both groups, changes in CI and blood pressure did not reflect the magnitude of intravascular blood volume deficit. Crystalloid resuscitation expanded intravascular blood volume by approximately 25%.
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References