University Library
  • Login
A gateway to Melbourne's research publications
Minerva Access is the University's Institutional Repository. It aims to collect, preserve, and showcase the intellectual output of staff and students of the University of Melbourne for a global audience.
View Item 
  • Minerva Access
  • Arts
  • School of Historical and Philosophical Studies
  • School of Historical and Philosophical Studies - Theses
  • View Item
  • Minerva Access
  • Arts
  • School of Historical and Philosophical Studies
  • School of Historical and Philosophical Studies - Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Composing commands: an inferentialist semantics for subsententials and imperatives

    Thumbnail
    Download
    Complete Thesis (829.7Kb)

    Citations
    Altmetric
    Author
    Tanter, Kai
    Date
    2017
    Affiliation
    School of Historical and Philosophical Studies
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Document Type
    Masters Research thesis
    Access Status
    Open Access
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/11343/208761
    Description

      © 2017 Kai Tanter

    Abstract
    Standard theories in philosophy of language tend to endorse three claims: 1. Representationalist notions such as truth and reference are semantic primitives; 2. Sentence level meaning is propositional; 3. The meaning of complex expressions is a function of the meaning of their constituents. This thesis develops a semantics for languages with both imperative and declarative sentences, along with constituent names and predicates, and which rejects 1. and 2. above. The key features of this semantics are: inferentialism, compositionality, and content pluralism. It is inferentialist in the sense that, contra 1., meanings are treated as inferential roles, determined by norms of use in speech acts such as asserting and commanding. This is formalised as a proof-theoretic semantics in a cut-free sequent calculus system. It is compositional in the sense that the inference rules assigned to sentences are a function of those assigned to their constituents, names and predicates. In contrast to 2., it is a kind of content pluralism. This means that declarative and imperatives sentences express different sentence level semantic types, rather than just propositions. Despite this, sameness of word meaning is preserved across these different sentence types.
    Keywords
    philosophy of language; logic; inferentialism; imperatives; semantics; bilateralism; content pluralism; compositionality

    Export Reference in RIS Format     

    Endnote

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".

    Refworks

    • Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References


    Collections
    • School of Historical and Philosophical Studies - Theses [1578]
    Minerva AccessDepositing Your Work (for University of Melbourne Staff and Students)NewsFAQs

    BrowseCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects
    My AccountLoginRegister
    StatisticsMost Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors