Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDesta, Kinfemicheal Yilma
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-05T11:15:26Z
dc.date.available2019-11-05T11:15:26Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11343/230810
dc.description© 2019 Kinfemicheal Yilma Desta
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines the question of how international law should respond to the challenges of securing digital privacy. Driven mainly by the transnational nature of privacy threats involving private actors as well as States, calls are increasingly made for an ‘international’ privacy framework to meet these challenges. The thesis investigates such recurring calls from the perspective of two global privacy initiatives that posit a progressive vision for the right to privacy in the digital age. Using Internet Bill of Rights (IBRs) and the ongoing United Nations (UN) discourse on the ‘right to privacy in the digital age’ as case studies, it examines the role of emerging initiatives in reimagining current international law of privacy in the digital age. Scholarship investigating IBRs, the (data) privacy literature and the broader field of international law are yet to interrogate the role of, or situate, such initiatives in international law. Nor has international law’s role in addressing the ‘privacy problem’ in the digital environment been considered in the literature. In response to this lacuna, the thesis takes the novel approach of exploring the role of IBRs and the evolving UN privacy discourse in making international privacy law better-equipped in the digital age. The thesis begins by examining whether current international law of privacy is equipped to address the challenges presented by the digital age. It finds that because of historical antecedents, the normative and institutional structures of international privacy law are ill-equipped to address the ‘privacy problem’ in the digital age. The thesis then examines the role of IBRs and the UN Privacy discourse in making the international law of privacy better-equipped in the digital age. It demonstrates that the ‘freestanding’ and ‘contributory’ roles of these initiatives are negligible, but they possess a ‘catalytic’ role which may shape the normative and methodological directions of a more practical reform. Adopting a pragmatic approach, this thesis argues that addressing the privacy problem in the digital age requires reimagining the law along the direction charted in those initiatives but through an approach that is incremental, practical, multifaceted and programmatic. Mapped onto the overarching international human right to privacy framework and drawing upon global privacy initiatives, the thesis then proposes two layers of privacy law reform. It, first, presents the case for a soft law approach towards addressing normative gaps, and secondly, argues for a dialogical approach towards lessening institutional-structural gaps in international privacy law.
dc.rightsTerms and Conditions: Copyright in works deposited in Minerva Access is retained by the copyright owner. The work may not be altered without permission from the copyright owner. Readers may only download, print and save electronic copies of whole works for their own personal non-commercial use. Any use that exceeds these limits requires permission from the copyright owner. Attribution is essential when quoting or paraphrasing from these works.
dc.subjectinternational law of privacy
dc.subjectdigital privacy
dc.subjectthe right to privacy in the digital age
dc.subjectdata privacy
dc.subjectdata protection
dc.subjectinternational privacy law
dc.subjectInternet Bill of Rights
dc.subjectinternational soft law
dc.subjectUnited Nations' data privacy framework
dc.subjecta pragmatic approach to privacy law
dc.subjectinternet rights and freedoms
dc.titleReimagining international law of privacy in the digital age
dc.typePhD thesis
melbourne.affiliation.departmentMelbourne Law School
melbourne.thesis.supervisornameAndrew Kenyon
melbourne.contributor.authorDesta, Kinfemicheal Yilma
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernameMegan Richardson
melbourne.thesis.supervisorothernameJohn Tobin
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch1180116 International Law (excluding International Trade Law)
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch2180114 Human Rights Law
melbourne.tes.fieldofresearch3180199 Law not elsewhere classified
melbourne.tes.confirmedtrue
melbourne.accessrightsThis item is embargoed and will be available on 2021-11-05.


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record