Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe
AuthorACKERMAN, ILANA; Dieppe, Paul; March, Lyn; Roos, Ewa; Nilsdotter, Anna; BROWN, GRAEME; Sloan, Karen; OSBORNE, RICHARD
Source TitleArthritis Care & Research
AffiliationMedicine - Royal Melbourne And Western Hospitals
Document TypeJournal Article
CitationsACKERMAN, I., Dieppe, P., March, L., Roos, E., Nilsdotter, A., Brown, G., et al. (2009). Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe. Arthritis Care & Research, 61(2), 166-173.
Access StatusOpen Access
OBJECTIVE. To investigate whether variation exists in the preoperative age, pain, stiffness, and physical function of people undergoing total knee replacement (TKR) and total hip replacement (THR) at several centers in Australia and Europe. METHODS. Individual Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index data (range 0–100, where 0 = best and 100 = worst) collected within 6 weeks prior to primary TKR and THR were extracted from 16 centers (n = 2,835) according to specified eligibility criteria. Analysis of covariance was used to evaluate differences in pain, stiffness, and physical function between centers, with adjustment for age and sex. RESULTS. There was marked variation in the age of people undergoing surgery between the centers (TKR mean age 67–73 years; F[6,1004] = 4.21, P < 0.01, and THR mean age 63–72 years; F[14,1807] = 7.27, P < 0.01). Large differences in preoperative status were observed between centers, most notably for pain (TKR adjusted mean pain 52.5–61.1; F[6,1002] = 4.26, P < 0.01, and THR adjusted mean pain 49.2–65.7; F[14,1802] = 8.44, P < 0.01) and physical function (TKR adjusted mean function 52.7–61.4; F[6,1002] = 5.27, P < 0.01, and THR adjusted mean function 53.3–71.0; F[14,1802] = 6.71, P < 0.01). Large effect sizes (up to 0.98) reflect the magnitude of variation between centers and highlight the clinical relevance of these findings. CONCLUSION. The large variations in age and preoperative status indicate substantial differences in the timing of joint replacement across the centers studied, with potential for compromised surgical outcomes due to premature or delayed surgery. Possible contributing factors include patient preferences, the absence of concrete indications for surgery, and the capacity of the health care systems.
Keywordsrheumatology and arthritis; orthopaedics; health status; indicators of well-being; skeletal system and disorders; arthritis
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format" and choose "open with... Endnote".
- Click on "Export Reference in RIS Format". Login to Refworks, go to References => Import References